PFD report

Russell Charles ROBB · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 22 Dec 2017•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Limited information sharing between adult safeguarding board members
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable inter-agency information sharing for coordinated carePart of recurring concern: Unreliable interagency sharing of safeguarding risk information
  2. Lack of regular medication reviews
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably conduct clinically required medication reviews
  3. Failure to hold strategic safeguarding meetings at an adequate frequency
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate multi-agency safeguarding coordination
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Redesign the Safeguarding Boards and develop an integrated children-and-adults structure while retaining distinct group focus.

    Stated by Trafford Safeguarding BoardStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 12 February 2018.
  2. Action

    Update TARGet meeting terms of reference to strengthen safeguarding-partner information sharing and multi-agency risk assessment and management planning.

    Stated by Trafford Safeguarding BoardStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 February 2018.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Limited information sharing between adult safeguarding board members

Wider context from the report

“which ultimately led to his death. There was no evidence of regular reviews of his medication. There appeared to be no guidelines in place to reduce the quantity of drugs available to Mr Robb at any one time. (CCG; Secretary of State for Health) 2. There was limited evidence of information sharing between the members of the Trafford Adult Safeguarding Board. This meant that the Local Authority were unaware of volume of interaction between the Police and Mr Robb.(Adult Safeguarding Board).As a result only 1 strategic meeting took place over a 6 year period ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable inter-agency information sharing for coordinated care; Unreliable interagency sharing of safeguarding risk information.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of regular medication reviews

Wider context from the report

“which ultimately led to his death. There was no evidence of regular reviews of his medication. There appeared to be no guidelines in place to reduce the quantity of drugs available to Mr Robb at any one time. (CCG; Secretary of State for Health) 2. There was limited evidence of information sharing between the members of the Trafford Adult Safeguarding Board. This meant that the Local Authority were unaware of volume of interaction between the Police and Mr Robb.(Adult Safeguarding Board).As a result only 1 strategic meeting took place over a 6 year period ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably conduct clinically required medication reviews.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to hold strategic safeguarding meetings at an adequate frequency

Wider context from the report

“which ultimately led to his death. There was no evidence of regular reviews of his medication. There appeared to be no guidelines in place to reduce the quantity of drugs available to Mr Robb at any one time. (CCG; Secretary of State for Health) 2. There was limited evidence of information sharing between the members of the Trafford Adult Safeguarding Board. This meant that the Local Authority were unaware of volume of interaction between the Police and Mr Robb.(Adult Safeguarding Board).As a result only 1 strategic meeting took place over a 6 year period ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate multi-agency safeguarding coordination.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of guidelines to reduce the quantity of drugs available at one time

Wider context from the report

“which ultimately led to his death. There was no evidence of regular reviews of his medication. There appeared to be no guidelines in place to reduce the quantity of drugs available to Mr Robb at any one time. (CCG; Secretary of State for Health) 2. There was limited evidence of information sharing between the members of the Trafford Adult Safeguarding Board. This meant that the Local Authority were unaware of volume of interaction between the Police and Mr Robb.(Adult Safeguarding Board).As a result only 1 strategic meeting took place over a 6 year period ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Redesign the Safeguarding Boards and develop an integrated children-and-adults structure while retaining distinct group focus.

Verbatim wording from the response

“At a strategic level, we are in the process of redesigning our Safeguarding Boards and developing a more effective, integrated children and adults structure, whilst ensuring that a unique focus on each group is retained.”

Source location

2017-0385-Response-by-Trafford-Safeguarding-Board
Page 2 · response
Published 12 February 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update TARGet meeting terms of reference to strengthen safeguarding-partner information sharing and multi-agency risk assessment and management planning.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We have updated the Terms of Reference of our TARGet (Trafford Adults at Risk Group) meeting to facilitate better information sharing between safeguarding partners and improve multi-agency risk assessment and risk management planning with regard to supporting”

Source location

2017-0385-Response-by-Trafford-Safeguarding-Board
Page 1 · response
Published 12 February 2018

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. 1

    Relocate the adult social care Screening Team alongside children’s social care and health safeguarding colleagues to improve information sharing.

    Stated by Trafford Safeguarding BoardStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 February 2018.
  2. 2

    Launch generic multi-agency safeguarding training for partners.

    Stated by Trafford Safeguarding BoardStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 February 2018.
  3. 3

    Deliver specific multi-agency training on self-neglect in response to its recognition under the Care Act.

    Stated by Trafford Safeguarding BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 12 February 2018.
  4. 4

    Establish an integrated health and social care structure for Trafford community services under a Section 75 agreement.

    Stated by Trafford Safeguarding BoardStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 12 February 2018.
  5. 5

    Monitor and regularly review new safeguarding arrangements and processes for improvement in practice.

    Stated by Trafford Safeguarding BoardStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 12 February 2018.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Relocate the adult social care Screening Team alongside children’s social care and health safeguarding colleagues to improve information sharing.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The adult social care Screening Team relocated to Trafford Town Hall in December 2016 to sit alongside its children’s social care equivalent and our health safeguarding colleagues. This has helped us to share information more quickly and provide more effective, all-age responses to safeguarding concerns.”

Source location

2017-0385-Response-by-Trafford-Safeguarding-Board
Page 1 · response
Published 12 February 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Launch generic multi-agency safeguarding training for partners.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Section 42 within the Care Act 2014 formally recognises self-neglect as a category of abuse and neglect. Trafford has responded to the most recent change in legislation by developing specific, relevant multi agency training and the first session is due to commence on 26th March 2018. Trafford had launched more generic multi-agency safeguarding training in early 2017.”

Source location

2017-0385-Response-by-Trafford-Safeguarding-Board
Page 2 · response
Published 12 February 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver specific multi-agency training on self-neglect in response to its recognition under the Care Act.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Section 42 within the Care Act 2014 formally recognises self-neglect as a category of abuse and neglect. Trafford has responded to the most recent change in legislation by developing specific, relevant multi agency training and the first session is due to commence on 26th March 2018. Trafford had launched more generic multi-agency safeguarding training in early 2017.”

Source location

2017-0385-Response-by-Trafford-Safeguarding-Board
Page 2 · response
Published 12 February 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish an integrated health and social care structure for Trafford community services under a Section 75 agreement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We now have an all age integrated health and social care structure to deliver community services in Trafford, facilitated by a Section 75 agreement between Trafford Council and Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust. This has enhanced our ability to look at how we familiy approaches to address needs and concerns and made information sharing between health and social care staff more straightforward.”

Source location

2017-0385-Response-by-Trafford-Safeguarding-Board
Page 2 · response
Published 12 February 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor and regularly review new safeguarding arrangements and processes for improvement in practice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We will monitor and regularly review all new arrangements and processes to ensure that they have led to the desired improvement in practice.”

Source location

2017-0385-Response-by-Trafford-Safeguarding-Board
Page 2 · response
Published 12 February 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026