PFD report

Maxim Karpovich · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 22 Feb 2017•West Yorkshire Eastern

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of competence in intrapartum CTG interpretation
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable intrapartum CTG interpretation and escalation
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Develop and provide the eFM web-based resource to improve electronic fetal monitoring interpretation and subsequent management.

    Stated by Royal College of MidwivesStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 5 March 2017.
  2. Action

    Support the electronic fetal monitoring package in collaboration with the Royal College of Midwives and Health Education England.

    Stated by Royal College of Obstetricians and GynaecologistsStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 5 March 2017.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    A theoretical course for all trainees is considered impractical because trainees struggle to obtain study leave and face extensive mandatory training.

    Stated by Royal College of Obstetricians and GynaecologistsUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of competence in intrapartum CTG interpretation

Wider context from the report

“(1) It was apparent that the Midwives involved with Maxim’s birth and a Junior Obstetrician, appeared not to understand that the cardiotocograph (CTG) trace was abnormal on several occasions. The Obstetric Registrar, at 2357 hours, incorrectly classified the CTG to be normal when it clearly was not. The baby, Maxim, who was delivered by an emergency caesarean section. Expert evidence stated that if the caesarean section had been carried out by midnight, the baby would have survived, although there could have been some neurological deficit. (2) This Inquest and many others previously, have caused me to note that Midwives and Obstetricians lack the core skills to interpret CTG tracings for intrapartum care. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable intrapartum CTG interpretation and escalation.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and provide the eFM web-based resource to improve electronic fetal monitoring interpretation and subsequent management.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The RCM in partnership with the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and Health Education England e-Learning for Healthcare developed a comprehensive web-based resource called eFM: an e-learning resource aimed at improving the interpretation of electronic fetal monitoring and subsequent management. This is a free resource for all employees of the National Health Service and contains knowledge-based interactive tutorials, assessments and case studies.”

Source location

Response-from-Royal-College-of-Midwives
Page 2 · response
Published 5 March 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Support the electronic fetal monitoring package in collaboration with the Royal College of Midwives and Health Education England.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However I should mention here that, as the official host, the RCOG has put a significant amount of resource into supporting the eFM package, working with the Royal College of Midwives and Health Education England.”

Source location

Response-from-Royal-College-of-Obstetricians-and-Gynaecologists-1
Page 1 · response
Published 5 March 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

A theoretical course for all trainees is considered impractical because trainees struggle to obtain study leave and face extensive mandatory training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Thank you for writing to me on 22 February and 8 March 2017 regarding the inquest of the deaths of Maxim Karpovich and Billy Wilson. I responded to ████████ on 17 March 2017 after meeting and discussing with the RCOG Officers and seeking input and advice from the new Vice Presidents of Education and Clinical Quality. I apologised to ████████ for the delay in my response explaining that I needed to consult with the Curriculum Review team in some detail before I could address his concerns appropriately. The consensus from the RCOG Officers and the Curriculum Review team was that a theoretical course in itself – particularly a course taking place over many weeks as has been suggested – was unrealistic for all trainees, many of whom are struggling to obtain study leave from their Trusts and are also complaining bitterly about the mandatory training modules that they are expected to complete.”

Source location

Response-from-Royal-College-of-Obstetricians-and-Gynaecologists-1
Page 1 · response
Published 5 March 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

An additional universal CTG course is not considered to enhance safety because the existing curriculum and team-based training arrangements address the relevant risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In terms of the new curriculum, the pressure of completing modules does not allow us to increase the emphasis on CTG interpretation but it will remain an important that trainees evidence this skill. The RCOG opinion on CTG interpretation is that the problems arise in clinical practice when the whole picture is not considered, and this is why trainees are encouraged to demonstrate clinical competence within teams as part of workplace based assessments. In addition senior trainees who are likely to be in charge of such teams can register for our Advanced Training Skills Module (ATSM) in advanced antenatal practice or advanced labour ward practice, both of which contain curricula that deliver additional training in the teamwork around CTG interpretation which includes the running of team meetings and reviews of decision making.”

Source location

Response-from-Royal-College-of-Obstetricians-and-Gynaecologists-1
Page 2 · response
Published 5 March 2017

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Offer multidisciplinary leadership courses for labour ward coordinators and obstetric clinical leads.

    Stated by Royal College of MidwivesStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 5 March 2017.
  2. 2

    Ensure consistency of the curriculum to strengthen training relevant to maternity safety.

    Stated by Royal College of Obstetricians and GynaecologistsStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 5 March 2017.
  3. 3

    Engage fully with NHS England and the Safer Maternity Care programme, including its focus on teamwork, leadership and multiprofessional training.

    Stated by Royal College of Obstetricians and GynaecologistsStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 5 March 2017.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Evidence does not establish that CTG monitoring or computerised CTG interpretation improves outcomes or prevents fetal loss.

    Stated by Royal College of MidwivesDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Offer multidisciplinary leadership courses for labour ward coordinators and obstetric clinical leads.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The RCM also offers multidisciplinary leadership courses for labour ward coordinators and obstetric clinical leads.”

Source location

Response-from-Royal-College-of-Midwives
Page 2 · response
Published 5 March 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ensure consistency of the curriculum to strengthen training relevant to maternity safety.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Whilst we fully understand the concerns around this case we would like to reassure you that the College is committed to ensure that safety is at the heart of anything we do. We have discussed whether one additional course such as that proposed by Professor Steer for all our trainees would enhance safety. We believe that it would not and that we should therefore concentrate on ensuring consistency of our curriculum and also fully engaging with NHS England and the ‘Safer Maternity Care’ programme, launched by Jeremy Hunt at the RCOG in October 2016. This important national programme has come with a very strong bias towards team work and leadership, supported by a new funding stream for multi-professional training programmes.”

Source location

Response-from-Royal-College-of-Obstetricians-and-Gynaecologists-1
Page 2 · response
Published 5 March 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Engage fully with NHS England and the Safer Maternity Care programme, including its focus on teamwork, leadership and multiprofessional training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Whilst we fully understand the concerns around this case we would like to reassure you that the College is committed to ensure that safety is at the heart of anything we do. We have discussed whether one additional course such as that proposed by Professor Steer for all our trainees would enhance safety. We believe that it would not and that we should therefore concentrate on ensuring consistency of our curriculum and also fully engaging with NHS England and the ‘Safer Maternity Care’ programme, launched by Jeremy Hunt at the RCOG in October 2016. This important national programme has come with a very strong bias towards team work and leadership, supported by a new funding stream for multi-professional training programmes.”

Source location

Response-from-Royal-College-of-Obstetricians-and-Gynaecologists-1
Page 2 · response
Published 5 March 2017

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Evidence does not establish that CTG monitoring or computerised CTG interpretation improves outcomes or prevents fetal loss.

Verbatim wording from the response

“What I have, I hope, demonstrated said up to this point is that there is an awful lot of work going on to improve the ability of midwives to interpret CTGs and to improve CTG interpretation more generally however it is important to also understand that the evidence as to how far this will get us is equivocal for example:”

Source location

Response-from-Royal-College-of-Midwives
Page 2 · response
Published 5 March 2017

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026