PFD report

James David Barrett · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 15 Feb 2016•Portsmouth and South East Hampshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to equip searchers with tracking devices
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable police search coordination and information
  2. Unavailability of a stand-alone mapping system for police search advisers
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable police search coordination and information
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Consider a bid to purchase the recommended software or an equivalent system.

    Stated by Police & Crime CommissionerStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 15 February 2016.
  2. Action

    Submit a business case proposing purchase of the MAPYEX system and explaining its intended use.

    Stated by Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary and Thames Valley PoliceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 15 February 2016.
  3. Action

    Revisit the software purchase matter to ensure the purchase occurs.

    Stated by Police & Crime CommissionerStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 15 February 2016.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to equip searchers with tracking devices

Wider context from the report

“I was also told that the search for Mr Barrett could have been more effective if searchers had been equipped with tracking devices which would allow search organisers to see precisely where searchers had looked for him. I should be grateful if Hampshire Police could consider obtaining there devices for use in missing persons searches. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable police search coordination and information.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of a stand-alone mapping system for police search advisers

Wider context from the report

“If the mapping of the search for Mr Barrett had been completed on one mapping system, I believe the search for him could have been conducted more quickly and effectively. This could be done in future if the police search advisers had available to them a stand-alone mapping system rather than relying on a volunteer organisation to map out searches. I was told that a bid for such a mapping system by the police search team has been turned down by Hampshire Constabulary and I would ask that this decision be reviewed in the light of the circumstances of Mr Barrett's death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable police search coordination and information.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider a bid to purchase the recommended software or an equivalent system.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I am able to report that Hampshire Constabulary is currently considering a bid to purchase the software recommended, or an equivalent, and would like to offer my assurance that I will revisit this matter to ensure that this does occur.”

Source location

James-BARRETT-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 15 February 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Submit a business case proposing purchase of the MAPYEX system and explaining its intended use.

Verbatim wording from the response

“You have stated a duty to respond by the 11th April, 2016. I can confirm that a business case has been submitted by Sergeant Turner proposing the purchase of a MAPYEX system at £51,000 along with detail of how the system will be used to reach maximum benefits. On the 2nd March, 2016 I recommended the purchase for ratification to Assistant Chief Constable Scott Chilton.”

Source location

James-BARRETT-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 15 February 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revisit the software purchase matter to ensure the purchase occurs.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I am able to report that Hampshire Constabulary is currently considering a bid to purchase the software recommended, or an equivalent, and would like to offer my assurance that I will revisit this matter to ensure that this does occur.”

Source location

James-BARRETT-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 15 February 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Recommend purchase of the MAPYEX system for Assistant Chief Constable ratification.

Verbatim wording from the response

“You have stated a duty to respond by the 11th April, 2016. I can confirm that a business case has been submitted by Sergeant Turner proposing the purchase of a MAPYEX system at £51,000 along with detail of how the system will be used to reach maximum benefits. On the 2nd March, 2016 I recommended the purchase for ratification to Assistant Chief Constable Scott Chilton.”

Source location

James-BARRETT-Response
Page 1 · response
Published 15 February 2016

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026