PFD report

Michael Lawrence HACKER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 8 May 2015•Avon

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to maintain ambulance service policy appropriately addressing the Mental Capacity Act
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably apply Mental Capacity Act principles in care decisions
  2. Failure to provide ambulance service training appropriately addressing the Mental Capacity Act
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably apply Mental Capacity Act principles in care decisions
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain ambulance service policy appropriately addressing the Mental Capacity Act

Wider context from the report

“1. ████████ an Advocacy and Locum Consultant IMCA expressed in evidence his concerns in relation to the ambulance service in this particular case. I heard evidence that South West Ambulance Services Trust had attended Mr. Hacker previously to take him to hospital for treatment of his gangrene and had not been successful in persuading Mr. Hacker to go with them. ████████ contacted ████████ from the South West Ambulance Services Trust before and after Mr. Hacker's death to be told that if an ambulance turned up at the property then there was a protocol in place that meant that the crew would not use restraint or apply force if Mr. Hacker did not want to go with them. ████████ expressed concerns as to the Trust's policy around the Mental Capacity Act. If Mr. Hacker had been taken to hospital sooner he may or may not have received treatment depending on a number of factors including his capacity to make decisions. I did not make any criticism around the ambulance service in this case however it did raise a concern with me about prevention of future deaths. I am therefore writing this report to ask that you consider your training and policy around the Mental Capacity Act ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably apply Mental Capacity Act principles in care decisions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide ambulance service training appropriately addressing the Mental Capacity Act

Wider context from the report

“1. ████████ an Advocacy and Locum Consultant IMCA expressed in evidence his concerns in relation to the ambulance service in this particular case. I heard evidence that South West Ambulance Services Trust had attended Mr. Hacker previously to take him to hospital for treatment of his gangrene and had not been successful in persuading Mr. Hacker to go with them. ████████ contacted ████████ from the South West Ambulance Services Trust before and after Mr. Hacker's death to be told that if an ambulance turned up at the property then there was a protocol in place that meant that the crew would not use restraint or apply force if Mr. Hacker did not want to go with them. ████████ expressed concerns as to the Trust's policy around the Mental Capacity Act. If Mr. Hacker had been taken to hospital sooner he may or may not have received treatment depending on a number of factors including his capacity to make decisions. I did not make any criticism around the ambulance service in this case however it did raise a concern with me about prevention of future deaths. I am therefore writing this report to ask that you consider your training and policy around the Mental Capacity Act ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably apply Mental Capacity Act principles in care decisions.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.