PFD report

Anthony John PAINE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 9 Jan 2025•Oxfordshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Potentially excessive 30 mph speed limit on a pedestrian-heavy town-centre road
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate speed control at hazardous road locationsPart of recurring concern: Inadequate traffic-speed controls on residential roads
  2. Obscured visibility of the pedestrian crossing for approaching vehicles
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of pedestrian crossing risksPart of recurring concern: Inadequate road sight distance for drivers to identify hazards safely
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Allocate funding through the 2025/26 Vision Zero road safety programme for proposed speed-limit improvement measures.

    Stated by Oxfordshire County CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 13 January 2025.
  2. Action

    Design and seek approval for a proposed 20mph speed limit at the collision location through the 2025/26 programme.

    Stated by Oxfordshire County CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 13 January 2025.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    The current 30mph speed limit is considered appropriate and sufficient until any approved 20mph scheme is implemented.

    Stated by Oxfordshire County CouncilExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Potentially excessive 30 mph speed limit on a pedestrian-heavy town-centre road

Wider context from the report

“The speed limit on the A361 North Bar Street at the location of the collision is 30 mph. There was a concern expressed at the Inquest that this speed limit may be too high, given the characteristics of the road and the volume of pedestrian traffic in the area. The A361 at this location is a long, straight, single carriageway with one lane in each direction. Travelling southbound, the pedestrian crossing is approached from a gradual rise in the road from Banbury Cross Roundabout, some 150 meters away. There is in the road obscures the view of the pedestrian crossing to approaching vehicles. There are a number of pubs and restaurants on both sides of the road and a number of pedestrians in the area late into the evening. The Forensic Collision Investigator concluded that in the short window of time in which Mr. Paine was likely visible to the driver, they failed to see him. The Investigator’s evidence was that even if the driver had seen Mr. Paine, there would have been insufficient time to react and avoid the collision. However, the Investigator’s evidence also stated that if the vehicle had been traveling at a slower speed, this may have provided the driver with sufficient time to react and either avoid the collision or reduce the severity of the impact. In the opinion of the Forensic Collision Investigator, the speed of the driver’s vehicle was 32.6 mph ± 3.6 mph and was a contributing factor to the severity of the collision and that, as a general point, the slower the vehicle is travelling the less severe the effects of any impact. It was further noted that other nearby town/city centres (eg Oxford) have introduced 20 mph speed limits on roads in the city centre. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate speed control at hazardous road locations; Inadequate traffic-speed controls on residential roads.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Obscured visibility of the pedestrian crossing for approaching vehicles

Wider context from the report

“The speed limit on the A361 North Bar Street at the location of the collision is 30 mph. There was a concern expressed at the Inquest that this speed limit may be too high, given the characteristics of the road and the volume of pedestrian traffic in the area. The A361 at this location is a long, straight, single carriageway with one lane in each direction. Travelling southbound, the pedestrian crossing is approached from a gradual rise in the road from Banbury Cross Roundabout, some 150 meters away. There is in the road obscures the view of the pedestrian crossing to approaching vehicles. There are a number of pubs and restaurants on both sides of the road and a number of pedestrians in the area late into the evening. The Forensic Collision Investigator concluded that in the short window of time in which Mr. Paine was likely visible to the driver, they failed to see him. The Investigator’s evidence was that even if the driver had seen Mr. Paine, there would have been insufficient time to react and avoid the collision. However, the Investigator’s evidence also stated that if the vehicle had been traveling at a slower speed, this may have provided the driver with sufficient time to react and either avoid the collision or reduce the severity of the impact. In the opinion of the Forensic Collision Investigator, the speed of the driver’s vehicle was 32.6 mph ± 3.6 mph and was a contributing factor to the severity of the collision and that, as a general point, the slower the vehicle is travelling the less severe the effects of any impact. It was further noted that other nearby town/city centres (eg Oxford) have introduced 20 mph speed limits on roads in the city centre. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of pedestrian crossing risks; Inadequate road sight distance for drivers to identify hazards safely.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Allocate funding through the 2025/26 Vision Zero road safety programme for proposed speed-limit improvement measures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“That said, it should also be noted that following a community consultation, in line with our 20mph policy, an allocation has been made in the 2025/26 Vision Zero road safety programme for the design and implementation of improvement measures including (subject to consultation and subsequent approval) a 20mph speed limit at the location of the traffic collision resulting in the death of Mr Paine. If approved, the intention is that the scheme will be completed by the end of the 2025/26 financial year. Until this scheme is implemented there is no plan to change to the current and appropriate speed limit of 30mph.”

Source location

Response from Oxfordshire County Council
Page 1 · response
Published 13 January 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Design and seek approval for a proposed 20mph speed limit at the collision location through the 2025/26 programme.

Verbatim wording from the response

“That said, it should also be noted that following a community consultation, in line with our 20mph policy, an allocation has been made in the 2025/26 Vision Zero road safety programme for the design and implementation of improvement measures including (subject to consultation and subsequent approval) a 20mph speed limit at the location of the traffic collision resulting in the death of Mr Paine. If approved, the intention is that the scheme will be completed by the end of the 2025/26 financial year. Until this scheme is implemented there is no plan to change to the current and appropriate speed limit of 30mph.”

Source location

Response from Oxfordshire County Council
Page 1 · response
Published 13 January 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The current 30mph speed limit is considered appropriate and sufficient until any approved 20mph scheme is implemented.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Thank you for your letter of 9 January and Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths. In response to the matters of concern raised, I can confirm that the current speed limit (30mph), is in line with current national guidance and standards.”

Source location

Response from Oxfordshire County Council
Page 1 · response
Published 13 January 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026