PFD report

Joseph Page · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 12 Nov 2018•South Wales Central

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Failure of PODS receiving, utilisation and storage arrangements to prevent future deaths
  2. Failure to ensure all doctors and nurses understand revised PODS policy requirements
  3. Delays and uncertainty in updating and implementing PODS policies
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of PODS receiving, utilisation and storage arrangements to prevent future deaths

Wider context from the report

“(4) Whilst the specific events that unfolded in relation to Mr Page on the morning of 23.3.18 may have been unforeseeable, the current arrangements/policies in place for the receiving, utilising and storing of PODS at UHW, Cardiff, could give rise to a risk of future deaths in a variety of different ways. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure all doctors and nurses understand revised PODS policy requirements

Wider context from the report

“(5) Once completed the exercise of implementing the new Policy & Code needs to be thorough and extensive to ensure that all doctors & nurses throughout the Cardiff & Vale University Health Board (whether full time, part-time or Agency/locum) not only are aware of the revised Policy/Code, but clear on its interpretation/requirements. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Delays and uncertainty in updating and implementing PODS policies

Wider context from the report

“(3) I received evidence that the Patient Property Policy and Medicines Code were in the process of being updated to address (1) & (2), but this exercise not expected to be completed until March 2019. Thereafter, & on the evidence of it was not clear when implementation of the updated policies would take effect. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to secure patients’ PODS while awaiting ward admission

Wider context from the report

“(1) In the Emergency Department, and whilst patients were awaiting admission to a Ward, their PODS remained with them unsecured in a bay (or similar). Exposing the medication to potential further use/mis-use by the patient, another patient or relative, or theft and mis-use. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to secure and control medication.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to follow PODS policies on wards

Wider context from the report

“(2) On ward B5, the policies in place at the time in relation to PODS were not followed, allowing Mr Page’s medication to remain unsecured on the Ward, exposing the medication as in (1) above. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.