PFD report

Mrs Brenda McWilliams · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 29 Nov 2019•Manchester North

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to assess high-risk community patients for VTE prevention
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate thromboprophylaxis for patients at risk of venous thromboembolism
  2. Failure to provide medication to minimise VTE risk for high-risk community patients
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to assess high-risk community patients for VTE prevention

Wider context from the report

“I am concerned that the various medical practitioners who attended upon Mrs McWilliams did not consider continuing prescribing Mrs McWilliams medication to minimise the risk of VTE after her discharge from hospital on 21st December 2018 despite recognising that: (1) Mrs McWilliams remained at high risk of VTE and that the consequence of such an event was likely to be serious, even life threatening; (2) it had been deemed appropriate to administer medication to Mrs McWilliams by means of daily injections whilst in hospital; and (3) there were no other suitable means identified and/or adopted to minimise this risk. I understand that NICE has published the following guidance: • Guideline NG89 “VTE in over 16s: reducing the risk of hospital-acquired deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism” • Quality Standard QS29 “VTE in adults: diagnosis and management” I was told that QS29 does not include recommendations for the prevention of VTE. The evidence that I heard suggested that medical practitioners have interpreted the NICE guidance as saying that it is not necessary/appropriate to prescribe medication to minimise the VTE risk for patients who are living in the community unless they have been discharged from hospital with short term immobility (for example with their leg in a cast following a fracture). Whilst I recognise that the decision to prescribe medication is a multi-factoral clinical decision I am concerned that the evidence I heard suggests that some patients living in the community who are at high risk of VTE (who may not have been admitted to hospital whilst at high risk of VTE) are not being assessed and treated with medication to minimise the risk of VTE, which if it develops can be a life-threatening condition. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate thromboprophylaxis for patients at risk of venous thromboembolism.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide medication to minimise VTE risk for high-risk community patients

Wider context from the report

“I am concerned that the various medical practitioners who attended upon Mrs McWilliams did not consider continuing prescribing Mrs McWilliams medication to minimise the risk of VTE after her discharge from hospital on 21st December 2018 despite recognising that: (1) Mrs McWilliams remained at high risk of VTE and that the consequence of such an event was likely to be serious, even life threatening; (2) it had been deemed appropriate to administer medication to Mrs McWilliams by means of daily injections whilst in hospital; and (3) there were no other suitable means identified and/or adopted to minimise this risk. I understand that NICE has published the following guidance: • Guideline NG89 “VTE in over 16s: reducing the risk of hospital-acquired deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism” • Quality Standard QS29 “VTE in adults: diagnosis and management” I was told that QS29 does not include recommendations for the prevention of VTE. The evidence that I heard suggested that medical practitioners have interpreted the NICE guidance as saying that it is not necessary/appropriate to prescribe medication to minimise the VTE risk for patients who are living in the community unless they have been discharged from hospital with short term immobility (for example with their leg in a cast following a fracture). Whilst I recognise that the decision to prescribe medication is a multi-factoral clinical decision I am concerned that the evidence I heard suggests that some patients living in the community who are at high risk of VTE (who may not have been admitted to hospital whilst at high risk of VTE) are not being assessed and treated with medication to minimise the risk of VTE, which if it develops can be a life-threatening condition. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.