PFD report

Michael Gerard McCrorY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 30 Jan 2015•The Wirral

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to record the whereabouts and authorised location of patients on level 1 observations
  2. Insufficient provision of training, support and professional development for staff to minimise recurrence risk
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to record the whereabouts and authorised location of patients on level 1 observations

Wider context from the report

“b. In addition clear evidence was heard that though the therapeutic observation policy had been amended the amended policy still required the whereabouts of a patient on level 1 observations to be known but the practice was still to just record that the person was O (off the ward) as opposed to (Out with permission from a specific time going to a specific location). ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient provision of training, support and professional development for staff to minimise recurrence risk

Wider context from the report

“c. The inquest was heard in January 2015 and it was unclear from the evidence as to what training, support and professional development had been given to the staff involved and staff generally with regard to minimising the risk of recurrence of this type of tragic eventuality. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.