PFD report

Nicola Norman · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 14 Mar 2023•Inner West London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to routinely notify the patient’s GP and treating mental health services of SPA contacts
  2. Failure to routinely pass mental-health-related SPA calls to a suitably qualified clinician for mental health assessment and risk assessment
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable mental health referral pathways
  3. Failure to routinely discuss SPA contacts with a supervising clinician when mental health symptoms or suicidality are raised
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable supervisory review of mental-health clinical decisions
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to routinely notify the patient’s GP and treating mental health services of SPA contacts

Wider context from the report

“3. That SPA contacts are not routinely notified to the patient’s GP and any mental health services providing care for the patient. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to routinely pass mental-health-related SPA calls to a suitably qualified clinician for mental health assessment and risk assessment

Wider context from the report

“2. That such calls are not routinely passed on to a suitably qualified clinician able to undertake mental health assessment and assess risk for the patient. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable mental health referral pathways.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to routinely discuss SPA contacts with a supervising clinician when mental health symptoms or suicidality are raised

Wider context from the report

“1. That SPA contacts are not routinely discussed with a supervising clinician, ss should have but did not happen in Ms Norman’s case, where mental health symptoms and especially where suicidality is raised by the caller. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable supervisory review of mental-health clinical decisions.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.