PFD report

Mervyn Charles Gladstone Leonard HOLBROOK · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 8 Dec 2022•Birmingham and Solihull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to provide a safe route for mobility scooter users to exit the carriageway at the opposite side of the junction
  2. Failure to maintain the kerb at the junction to prevent it appearing to be an official crossing point
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to maintain roads, pavements and verges in a safe state of repairPart of recurring concern: Inadequate control of pedestrian crossing risksPart of recurring concern: Inadequate safety controls at high-risk road junctions
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Amend the kerb height at the footpath outside 214 Alcester Road South at the Livingstone Road junction.

    Stated by Birmingham City CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 9 December 2022.
  2. Action

    Review network kerb-defect information and intervention criteria to identify similar locations and incorporate necessary maintenance processes.

    Stated by Birmingham City CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 9 December 2022.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide a safe route for mobility scooter users to exit the carriageway at the opposite side of the junction

Wider context from the report

“1. I heard and considered evidence from West Midlands Police's Forensic Collision Unit which confirmed that where the footpath outside 214 Alcester Road South reaches the junction of Livingstone Road, it appears that there is a dropped kerb at the apex. On the opposite side of the junction, the kerbs are raised. West Midlands Police advise that this indicates that the dropped kerbs at this side of the junction are a result of vehicles mounting the kerb as they turn left from Livingstone Road to Alcester Road and therefore causing them to be eroded to be level with the road surface. There is also no tactile paving next to these kerbs, which indicate that this dropped kerb is not an "official" pedestrian crossing point - the same being situated approximately 9m from the end of Livingstone Road. 2. Mr Holbrook was able to leave the carriageway on his mobility scooter at apex/mouth of the junction due to the kerb being worn down to the road surface, and was struck in the carriageway. 3. On 12 September 2022, PC ████████ of West Midlands Police submitted a notification via Birmingham City Council's Highway Department's online portal of the defect, with the Highways responding via email on 20 September 2022 stating that it did not meet the intervention levels that require repair. 4. I am concerned that vulnerable road users - particularly users of mobility scooters or bicycles - may inadvertently consider the worn down and defective kerb to be an "official" crossing point and enter the carriageway when it is unsafe to do so. 5. Furthermore, if a mobility scooter or similar were to enter the carriageway at the mouth of the junction (as Mr Holbrook did), they would then be unable to mount the curb at the opposite side - they would have to travel West down the carriageway of Livingstone road to the official crossing point, or alternatively (and more dangerously) navigate South on the carriageway into oncoming traffic onto Alcester Road. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain the kerb at the junction to prevent it appearing to be an official crossing point

Wider context from the report

“1. I heard and considered evidence from West Midlands Police's Forensic Collision Unit which confirmed that where the footpath outside 214 Alcester Road South reaches the junction of Livingstone Road, it appears that there is a dropped kerb at the apex. On the opposite side of the junction, the kerbs are raised. West Midlands Police advise that this indicates that the dropped kerbs at this side of the junction are a result of vehicles mounting the kerb as they turn left from Livingstone Road to Alcester Road and therefore causing them to be eroded to be level with the road surface. There is also no tactile paving next to these kerbs, which indicate that this dropped kerb is not an "official" pedestrian crossing point - the same being situated approximately 9m from the end of Livingstone Road. 2. Mr Holbrook was able to leave the carriageway on his mobility scooter at apex/mouth of the junction due to the kerb being worn down to the road surface, and was struck in the carriageway. 3. On 12 September 2022, PC ████████ of West Midlands Police submitted a notification via Birmingham City Council's Highway Department's online portal of the defect, with the Highways responding via email on 20 September 2022 stating that it did not meet the intervention levels that require repair. 4. I am concerned that vulnerable road users - particularly users of mobility scooters or bicycles - may inadvertently consider the worn down and defective kerb to be an "official" crossing point and enter the carriageway when it is unsafe to do so. 5. Furthermore, if a mobility scooter or similar were to enter the carriageway at the mouth of the junction (as Mr Holbrook did), they would then be unable to mount the curb at the opposite side - they would have to travel West down the carriageway of Livingstone road to the official crossing point, or alternatively (and more dangerously) navigate South on the carriageway into oncoming traffic onto Alcester Road. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to maintain roads, pavements and verges in a safe state of repair; Inadequate control of pedestrian crossing risks; Inadequate safety controls at high-risk road junctions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Amend the kerb height at the footpath outside 214 Alcester Road South at the Livingstone Road junction.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. I confirm the height of the kerb where the footpath outside 214 Alcester Road South reaches the junction of Livingstone Road was amended by the City Council in early January 2023 as per your recommendations.”

Source location

Response from Birmingham City Council
Page 1 · response
Published 9 December 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review network kerb-defect information and intervention criteria to identify similar locations and incorporate necessary maintenance processes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. We have also commissioned to undertake a review of the available kerb defect information to identify locations similar to the incident site on the network so that the necessary processes are incorporated and similar sites are addressed as part of the Council’s maintenance activities. The scope of the study also includes a review of the intervention criteria and whether these need to be revised in the light of this incident. This study is well underway and is expected to be completed by March 2023. A copy of the report will be shared with you as soon as it is available along with details of further proposed actions.”

Source location

Response from Birmingham City Council
Page 2 · response
Published 9 December 2022

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Review highways processes and procedures to prevent similar notification and escalation failures.

    Stated by Birmingham City CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 9 December 2022.
  2. 2

    Contact West Midlands Police to reiterate adherence to the established protocol for reporting fatal or serious road traffic collisions.

    Stated by Birmingham City CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 9 December 2022.
  3. 3

    Share the completed kerb-defect review report and details of further proposed actions with the Assistant Coroner.

    Stated by Birmingham City CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 9 December 2022.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review highways processes and procedures to prevent similar notification and escalation failures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. An investigation into the PC Glyn Hanks’ submitted notification on 12th September 2022 via Birmingham City Council's Highway Department's online portal reporting the defect and the Highways response, provided on 20 September 2022, has also been undertaken and our findings are as follows;”

Source location

Response from Birmingham City Council
Page 2 · response
Published 9 December 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Contact West Midlands Police to reiterate adherence to the established protocol for reporting fatal or serious road traffic collisions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“c. BCC will also be contacting West Midlands Police, reiterating the need to adhere to the already established protocol when reporting fatal or serious road traffic collisions on the City’s highway network.”

Source location

Response from Birmingham City Council
Page 3 · response
Published 9 December 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the completed kerb-defect review report and details of further proposed actions with the Assistant Coroner.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. We have also commissioned to undertake a review of the available kerb defect information to identify locations similar to the incident site on the network so that the necessary processes are incorporated and similar sites are addressed as part of the Council’s maintenance activities. The scope of the study also includes a review of the intervention criteria and whether these need to be revised in the light of this incident. This study is well underway and is expected to be completed by March 2023. A copy of the report will be shared with you as soon as it is available along with details of further proposed actions.”

Source location

Response from Birmingham City Council
Page 2 · response
Published 9 December 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026