PFD report

Patricia Hazell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 19 May 2026•Oxfordshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure of wheelchair access door design and operation to prevent opening from the exterior
  2. Lack of operator ability to mitigate identified residual risks through design or engineering controls
    Part of recurring concern: Vehicle approval failing to control serious safety risks
  3. Dependence on passenger warnings and checks for preventing falls from wheelchair access doors
    Part of recurring concern: Vehicle approval failing to control serious safety risks
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Work with the Department for Transport to support its review of technical standards and regulatory requirements for public service vehicles.

    Stated by Driver and Vehicle Standards AgencyStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 17 July 2026.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of wheelchair access door design and operation to prevent opening from the exterior

Wider context from the report

“• The design and operation of wheelchair access doors on coaches may permit the door to be opened from the exterior • That risks of falling was dependant solely on giving warnings to passengers inside and checking whether a person is leaning against the door. Such warnings may not always be effective. • Where operators have identified residual risk, they may have no ability to mitigate that risk through design or engineering controls, as responsibility for such matters lies with the vehicle approval and safety regime overseen by the DVSA. • In those circumstances, there is a concern that similar incidents could recur involving disabled access doors on coaches, with the potential for serious injury or death. For these reasons, I consider it appropriate to report this matter to the DVSA so that the safety aspects of disabled access doors on coaches may be reviewed in light of the circumstances of this death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of operator ability to mitigate identified residual risks through design or engineering controls

Wider context from the report

“• The design and operation of wheelchair access doors on coaches may permit the door to be opened from the exterior • That risks of falling was dependant solely on giving warnings to passengers inside and checking whether a person is leaning against the door. Such warnings may not always be effective. • Where operators have identified residual risk, they may have no ability to mitigate that risk through design or engineering controls, as responsibility for such matters lies with the vehicle approval and safety regime overseen by the DVSA. • In those circumstances, there is a concern that similar incidents could recur involving disabled access doors on coaches, with the potential for serious injury or death. For these reasons, I consider it appropriate to report this matter to the DVSA so that the safety aspects of disabled access doors on coaches may be reviewed in light of the circumstances of this death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Vehicle approval failing to control serious safety risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Dependence on passenger warnings and checks for preventing falls from wheelchair access doors

Wider context from the report

“• The design and operation of wheelchair access doors on coaches may permit the door to be opened from the exterior • That risks of falling was dependant solely on giving warnings to passengers inside and checking whether a person is leaning against the door. Such warnings may not always be effective. • Where operators have identified residual risk, they may have no ability to mitigate that risk through design or engineering controls, as responsibility for such matters lies with the vehicle approval and safety regime overseen by the DVSA. • In those circumstances, there is a concern that similar incidents could recur involving disabled access doors on coaches, with the potential for serious injury or death. For these reasons, I consider it appropriate to report this matter to the DVSA so that the safety aspects of disabled access doors on coaches may be reviewed in light of the circumstances of this death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Vehicle approval failing to control serious safety risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with the Department for Transport to support its review of technical standards and regulatory requirements for public service vehicles.

Verbatim wording from the response

“DVSA is working closely with the Department for Transport to support its review of the relevant technical standards and regulatory requirements for PSVs. DVSA will also ensure that the circumstances identified in the regulation 28 report are reflected in best-practice guidance for operators and will explore further opportunities to raise awareness through trade bodies. These actions are intended to help strengthen safety arrangements and reduce the likelihood of similar tragic incidents occurring in future.”

Source location

Response from Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency
Page 1 · response
Published 17 July 2026

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Reflect the report’s circumstances in best-practice guidance for public service vehicle operators.

    Stated by Driver and Vehicle Standards AgencyStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 17 July 2026.
  2. 2

    Explore opportunities to raise safety awareness through trade bodies.

    Stated by Driver and Vehicle Standards AgencyStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 17 July 2026.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reflect the report’s circumstances in best-practice guidance for public service vehicle operators.

Verbatim wording from the response

“DVSA is working closely with the Department for Transport to support its review of the relevant technical standards and regulatory requirements for PSVs. DVSA will also ensure that the circumstances identified in the regulation 28 report are reflected in best-practice guidance for operators and will explore further opportunities to raise awareness through trade bodies. These actions are intended to help strengthen safety arrangements and reduce the likelihood of similar tragic incidents occurring in future.”

Source location

Response from Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency
Page 1 · response
Published 17 July 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Explore opportunities to raise safety awareness through trade bodies.

Verbatim wording from the response

“DVSA is working closely with the Department for Transport to support its review of the relevant technical standards and regulatory requirements for PSVs. DVSA will also ensure that the circumstances identified in the regulation 28 report are reflected in best-practice guidance for operators and will explore further opportunities to raise awareness through trade bodies. These actions are intended to help strengthen safety arrangements and reduce the likelihood of similar tragic incidents occurring in future.”

Source location

Response from Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency
Page 1 · response
Published 17 July 2026

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026