PFD report

Edna Smither · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 30 Jul 2014•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Lack of training for calm leadership during emergencies
    Part of recurring concern: Failure of emergency response leadership and coordination
  2. Failure to designate clear emergency leadership
    Part of recurring concern: Failure of emergency response leadership and coordination
  3. Lack of up-to-date first aid certification and choking-response knowledge among staff
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate staff competence to provide first aidPart of recurring concern: Unsafe implementation of choking-risk prevention measures
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of training for calm leadership during emergencies

Wider context from the report

“3. All the staff in attendance, by their own admission, were in a state of panic. No-one, including the senior staff took a position of calm leadership and there seemed to be no training for this nor a recognition as to who really was in charge. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of emergency response leadership and coordination.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to designate clear emergency leadership

Wider context from the report

“3. All the staff in attendance, by their own admission, were in a state of panic. No-one, including the senior staff took a position of calm leadership and there seemed to be no training for this nor a recognition as to who really was in charge. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of emergency response leadership and coordination.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of up-to-date first aid certification and choking-response knowledge among staff

Wider context from the report

“1. It transpired during the course of the hearing that only one (comparatively junior) member of staff present on the day of the incident and death, had a First Aid certificate which was ‘in date’. Whilst I recognise that there is no legal requirement for this, none the less I feel it would be very helpful for all staff to have up-to-date certification, so that they would know when to, and how to, carry out abdominal thrusts to dislodge food boluses etc. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate staff competence to provide first aid; Unsafe implementation of choking-risk prevention measures.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Locked access door delaying emergency transfer

Wider context from the report

“2. There was a door which Mrs Smither was to be carried through by the ambulance staff, and this door was locked. A delay occurred whilst this was unlocked. Was this door in fact a fire escape door, and if so has the situation now been changed? ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to report reportable incidents promptly under RIDDOR

Wider context from the report

“4. There were two failures to report incidents under RIDDOR. Mrs Smither was involved in an incident concerning the use of a hoist, and she was injured. It apparently took the then owners 11 months to report that incident to the Environmental Health Dept. On the occasion of the choking which led to her death, again it took over a week for this to be reported. The guidance document entitled “RIDDOR Explained” does say where there is a death or major injury, it must be reported without delay (e.g. by telephone) and a completed accident report form must follow within ten days. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.