PFD report

Mike Fell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 5 Mar 2018•Inner North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
5

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Unavailability of clamps to close unused trauma lines
  2. Failure to record checks that unused taps are closed to air
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Include these central venous catheter safety issues when the Safe Vascular Access guideline is updated.

    Stated by Association Of Anaesthetists (Great Britain & Ireland) and Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine and Royal College of Anaesthetists and The Intensive Care SocietyStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 17 June 2018.
  2. Action

    Inform individual trusts and health boards that they should maintain systems preventing air entrainment through central venous access devices.

    Stated by Association Of Anaesthetists (Great Britain & Ireland) and Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine and Royal College of Anaesthetists and The Intensive Care SocietyStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 17 June 2018.
  3. Action

    Discuss with the current supplier changing trauma-line design to allow a clamp to be fitted.

    Stated by Barts Health NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 17 June 2018.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of clamps to close unused trauma lines

Wider context from the report

“(2) The trauma lines used at the Royal London Hospital did not come with a clamp which enabled a line that was not in use to be closed ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to record checks that unused taps are closed to air

Wider context from the report

“(1) Whilst it is a matter of routine care to check that unused taps are “closed to air”, it is not recorded in Mr Fell’s notes that the taps had been checked and were closed. It is unclear how or when the 3-way tap on the trauma line became “open to air” ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Include these central venous catheter safety issues when the Safe Vascular Access guideline is updated.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• When the AAGBI guideline Safe Vascular Access is updated these issues will be included.”

Source location

2018-0100-Response-by-Royal-College-of-Anaesthetists
Page 1 · response
Published 17 June 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inform individual trusts and health boards that they should maintain systems preventing air entrainment through central venous access devices.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• In the meantime, we will inform individual trusts and health boards that they should ensure they have appropriate systems in place to prevent harm from air entrainment through such devices. We recommend that theatre departments, ICUs, HDUs and other clinical areas caring for patients with central venous catheters ensure that they examine local practice in terms of using only”

Source location

2018-0100-Response-by-Royal-College-of-Anaesthetists
Page 1 · response
Published 17 June 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss with the current supplier changing trauma-line design to allow a clamp to be fitted.

Verbatim wording from the response

“These lines have been in use in the Trust for many years and the manufacturer of the line do not supply them with clamps. Currently the anaesthetic department are looking at other companies but it would appear none are made with clamps. We are discussing with our current supplier a change in design to allow a clamp to be fitted; they are interested in working with us as they see this as a problem nationally which has not been raised before in relation to this complication.”

Source location

2018-0100-Response-by-Barts-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 17 June 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Rewrite the policy to prohibit three-way taps on central lines and require self-sealing injection ports.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Although we regard this as routine care we have never recorded this in the notes. It is impossible to find out why this particular three way tap was left open; commonly the tap would be open to this port during injection of a drug or connection to an infusion. The tap should be closed before either the syringe is removed from the port or the infusion is removed. Less commonly the three way tap could be ‘opened’ to air by accident during movement of the patient. As a result of this incident we have re-written our policy on the use of central lines and three way taps which states that three way taps should not be used on central lines but self-sealing injection ports should be used. These are available and are in use across the trust. I enclose our up-to-date policy and a Trust wide safety notice to raise awareness of this complication and the new policy.”

Source location

2018-0100-Response-by-Barts-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 17 June 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use self-sealing injection ports on central lines across the Trust.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Although we regard this as routine care we have never recorded this in the notes. It is impossible to find out why this particular three way tap was left open; commonly the tap would be open to this port during injection of a drug or connection to an infusion. The tap should be closed before either the syringe is removed from the port or the infusion is removed. Less commonly the three way tap could be ‘opened’ to air by accident during movement of the patient. As a result of this incident we have re-written our policy on the use of central lines and three way taps which states that three way taps should not be used on central lines but self-sealing injection ports should be used. These are available and are in use across the trust. I enclose our up-to-date policy and a Trust wide safety notice to raise awareness of this complication and the new policy.”

Source location

2018-0100-Response-by-Barts-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 17 June 2018

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Publish information on central venous catheter air-embolism risks in the quarterly Patient Safety Update for anaesthesia professionals.

    Stated by Association Of Anaesthetists (Great Britain & Ireland) and Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine and Royal College of Anaesthetists and The Intensive Care SocietyStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 17 June 2018.
  2. 2

    Issue a Trust-wide safety notice raising awareness of the complication and new central-line policy.

    Stated by Barts Health NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 17 June 2018.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish information on central venous catheter air-embolism risks in the quarterly Patient Safety Update for anaesthesia professionals.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• We will ensure these issues are brought to the attention of all trainees in anaesthesia and all Fellows and Members of the RCoA and AAGBI by publishing information in the Patient Safety Update, which is published quarterly by the RCoA on behalf of the Safe Anaesthesia Liaison Group (SALG - https://www.rcoa.ac.uk/salg), and is distributed to practising anaesthetists throughout the UK.”

Source location

2018-0100-Response-by-Royal-College-of-Anaesthetists
Page 1 · response
Published 17 June 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue a Trust-wide safety notice raising awareness of the complication and new central-line policy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Although we regard this as routine care we have never recorded this in the notes. It is impossible to find out why this particular three way tap was left open; commonly the tap would be open to this port during injection of a drug or connection to an infusion. The tap should be closed before either the syringe is removed from the port or the infusion is removed. Less commonly the three way tap could be ‘opened’ to air by accident during movement of the patient. As a result of this incident we have re-written our policy on the use of central lines and three way taps which states that three way taps should not be used on central lines but self-sealing injection ports should be used. These are available and are in use across the trust. I enclose our up-to-date policy and a Trust wide safety notice to raise awareness of this complication and the new policy.”

Source location

2018-0100-Response-by-Barts-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 17 June 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
5/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026