PFD report

Pardeep Singh PLAHE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 4 Jan 2021•Birmingham and Solihull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
4

Named on the report

Responses found
4

Of 4 recipients

Stated actions
14

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure of the EMIS consultation-list mitigation to reliably ensure practitioner logout and re-login
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate GP consultation provision for safe patient assessmentPart of recurring concern: Unreliable EMIS clinical information and prescribing functions
  2. Failure of EMIS consultation lists to update reliably
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable EMIS clinical information and prescribing functions
  3. Failure to ensure that all EMIS-using GP surgeries are alerted to the consultation-list error
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable EMIS clinical information and prescribing functions
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.14

  1. Action

    Use manual log-off and log-on refreshing as a workaround to identify newly added appointments and prevent missed appointments.

    Stated by Ashfield SurgeryStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 March 2021.
  2. Action

    Update the induction pack with EMIS appointment-screen guidance and disseminate it to new staff, nursing staff, locums and relevant Primary Care Networks.

    Stated by Ashfield SurgeryStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 March 2021.
  3. Action

    Check that the relevant computer ports are open to address the EMIS appointment-screen refresh problem.

    Stated by Ashfield SurgeryStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 8 March 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    EMIS is expected to provide the system solution for appointment screens not refreshing; the practice has not received one.

    Stated by Ashfield SurgeryRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the EMIS consultation-list mitigation to reliably ensure practitioner logout and re-login

Wider context from the report

“1. On the 10th August at 17:30, hours before he inflicted the fatal wound to his neck, Mr. Plahe had a telephone consultation scheduled with his GP at the Ashfield Surgery. The appointment had been booked by his sister that afternoon. Due to a technical issue with the EMIS system the consultation list of the GP due to speak to Mr. Plahe did not update so he did not realise the appointment had been added to his list and did not call Mr. Plahe. Practitioners at the surgery had realised that the system was intermittently not updating consultation lists on or around the 30th July 2020 and had raised the issue with EMIS on the 4th August 2020. To date a solution to correct this intermittent problem has not been identified. Evidence was given at inquest that it does not just affect the Ashfield Surgery but has occurred at other surgeries across the country. 2. Particularly for telephone consultations (where there will not be a patient physically present in the surgery to query why they have not been seen), the fact that the consultation lists do not always update creates a risk to life as a consultation could be missed for a patient with a medical emergency. 3. It is not known whether all GP Surgeries using EMIS have raised an alert that this error can occur. 4. To mitigate the risk of missing appointments the Ashfield Surgery has identified that if practitioners log out of the EMIS system and then log back on the consultation list will update. Therefore, all practitioners are advised to log out and log back in before completing their consultation lists. However, on one occasion since Mr. Plahe's death a locum GP carrying out a list at the surgery did not know to do this and missed an appointment. 5. The methods of mitigating this risk are vulnerable to human error if the practitioner is unaware of the need to log out of EMIS and log back in or if they forget to do so. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate GP consultation provision for safe patient assessment; Unreliable EMIS clinical information and prescribing functions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of EMIS consultation lists to update reliably

Wider context from the report

“1. On the 10th August at 17:30, hours before he inflicted the fatal wound to his neck, Mr. Plahe had a telephone consultation scheduled with his GP at the Ashfield Surgery. The appointment had been booked by his sister that afternoon. Due to a technical issue with the EMIS system the consultation list of the GP due to speak to Mr. Plahe did not update so he did not realise the appointment had been added to his list and did not call Mr. Plahe. Practitioners at the surgery had realised that the system was intermittently not updating consultation lists on or around the 30th July 2020 and had raised the issue with EMIS on the 4th August 2020. To date a solution to correct this intermittent problem has not been identified. Evidence was given at inquest that it does not just affect the Ashfield Surgery but has occurred at other surgeries across the country. 2. Particularly for telephone consultations (where there will not be a patient physically present in the surgery to query why they have not been seen), the fact that the consultation lists do not always update creates a risk to life as a consultation could be missed for a patient with a medical emergency. 3. It is not known whether all GP Surgeries using EMIS have raised an alert that this error can occur. 4. To mitigate the risk of missing appointments the Ashfield Surgery has identified that if practitioners log out of the EMIS system and then log back on the consultation list will update. Therefore, all practitioners are advised to log out and log back in before completing their consultation lists. However, on one occasion since Mr. Plahe's death a locum GP carrying out a list at the surgery did not know to do this and missed an appointment. 5. The methods of mitigating this risk are vulnerable to human error if the practitioner is unaware of the need to log out of EMIS and log back in or if they forget to do so. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable EMIS clinical information and prescribing functions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure that all EMIS-using GP surgeries are alerted to the consultation-list error

Wider context from the report

“1. On the 10th August at 17:30, hours before he inflicted the fatal wound to his neck, Mr. Plahe had a telephone consultation scheduled with his GP at the Ashfield Surgery. The appointment had been booked by his sister that afternoon. Due to a technical issue with the EMIS system the consultation list of the GP due to speak to Mr. Plahe did not update so he did not realise the appointment had been added to his list and did not call Mr. Plahe. Practitioners at the surgery had realised that the system was intermittently not updating consultation lists on or around the 30th July 2020 and had raised the issue with EMIS on the 4th August 2020. To date a solution to correct this intermittent problem has not been identified. Evidence was given at inquest that it does not just affect the Ashfield Surgery but has occurred at other surgeries across the country. 2. Particularly for telephone consultations (where there will not be a patient physically present in the surgery to query why they have not been seen), the fact that the consultation lists do not always update creates a risk to life as a consultation could be missed for a patient with a medical emergency. 3. It is not known whether all GP Surgeries using EMIS have raised an alert that this error can occur. 4. To mitigate the risk of missing appointments the Ashfield Surgery has identified that if practitioners log out of the EMIS system and then log back on the consultation list will update. Therefore, all practitioners are advised to log out and log back in before completing their consultation lists. However, on one occasion since Mr. Plahe's death a locum GP carrying out a list at the surgery did not know to do this and missed an appointment. 5. The methods of mitigating this risk are vulnerable to human error if the practitioner is unaware of the need to log out of EMIS and log back in or if they forget to do so. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable EMIS clinical information and prescribing functions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use manual log-off and log-on refreshing as a workaround to identify newly added appointments and prevent missed appointments.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Outcome Manually need to log on and off as refresh the screening isn’t reliable to ensure appointments not missed.”

Source location

2021-0061-Response-from-Ashfield-Surgery-Redacted
Page 22 · response
Published 8 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update the induction pack with EMIS appointment-screen guidance and disseminate it to new staff, nursing staff, locums and relevant Primary Care Networks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I have enclosed our Induction Pack, which Page 4 highlights the issues with EMIS and the steps that we take at Ashfield Surgery to address this. This is to ensure that all new members of staff are aware of this. We have also discussed this with our nursing staff and our long-term locums. This information has also been shared with our Primary Care Networks that use EMIS currently, following the Coroners case.”

Source location

2021-0061-Response-from-Ashfield-Surgery-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 8 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Check that the relevant computer ports are open to address the EMIS appointment-screen refresh problem.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Second issue was the problem with EMIS and not refreshing the appointments. █ had highlighted this on 30.7.2020. Even manually refreshing the screen didn’t highlight new patients added and literally had to log on and odd the system and only then did patients appear. There have been other bugs with the IT system. █ pointed out these were escalated to EMIS on 4/8/20 by █. They suggested to check computer ports were open.”

Source location

2021-0061-Response-from-Ashfield-Surgery-Redacted
Page 22 · response
Published 8 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Chase the IT desk and further escalate the EMIS appointment-screen refresh problem.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Second issue was the problem with EMIS and not refreshing the appointments. █ had highlighted this on 30.7.2020. Even manually refreshing the screen didn’t highlight new patients added and literally had to log on and odd the system and only then did patients appear. There have been other bugs with the IT system. █ pointed out these were escalated to EMIS on 4/8/20 by █. They suggested to check computer ports were open.”

Source location

2021-0061-Response-from-Ashfield-Surgery-Redacted
Page 22 · response
Published 8 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue Safety Advisory Notice SAN 2021-005 to GP Practices and Clinical Services about the appointment-refresh risk and required actions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. A Safety Advisory Notice (SAN 2021-005) advising organisation and users of the issue, the actions that need to be completed, and a link to direct them to further information if required was sent out to all GP Practices and Clinical Services on 3 February 2021.”

Source location

2021-0061-Response-from-EMIS-Redacted
Page 5 · response
Published 8 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the underlying appointment-refresh technology.

Verbatim wording from the response

“4. A further review of the underlying appointment refresh technology is planned for 2021.”

Source location

2021-0061-Response-from-EMIS-Redacted
Page 5 · response
Published 8 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop an automated appointment-book refresh solution for current-day appointments and inactive user sessions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. The development of a solution to mitigate the risk to all GP Practices and Clinical Services using the appointment book functionality is underway. This is estimated to be released early Q2 2021, this will:”

Source location

2021-0061-Response-from-EMIS-Redacted
Page 5 · response
Published 8 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue investigating reported appointment-refresh failures and resolve them as far as possible.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Have you investigated other solutions, so this doesn’t happen in future? Given the increase in remote working that has occurred over 2020, we are looking at potential solutions to improve this functionality. Until we can implement a solution we will continue to investigate any instances of Appointment Refresh failure that are reported to us, and resolve those as best we can.”

Source location

2021-0061-Response-from-EMIS-Redacted
Page 10 · response
Published 8 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update and disseminate appointment-refresh self-help guidance through the customer portal and EMIS Web information feed.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• A user-facing article has been posted on the EMIS Customer portal to ensure they know to mitigate the risk and is available for self-help (KB0064144) to all customers: “Why isn’t my Appointment Book refreshing?” The article was originally published before this incident (07/02/2020) and updated further on 22/12/2020.”

Source location

2021-0061-Response-from-EMIS-Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 8 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Roll out the completed appointment-refresh functionality to all users through controlled implementation and effectiveness and performance checks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Once completed, the functionality will be rolled out to all users in a controlled manner, to ensure it meets effectiveness and performance metrics. This approach is in line with usual processes for changes to functionality to ensure clinical safety and system performance is maintained.”

Source location

2021-0061-Response-from-EMIS-Redacted
Page 5 · response
Published 8 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue a Safety Advisory Notice to GP practices and clinical services setting out required actions and further information.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• A Safety Advisory Notice (SAN) was sent out to all GP Practices and Clinical Services on 3 February 2021, advising organisations and users of the issue, the actions that need to be completed, and a link to direct them to further information if required.”

Source location

2021-0061-Response-from-NHS-England-and-NHS-Improvement-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 8 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Send all GP practices information about appointment-refresh risks, resolution steps and IT support contacts.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The most recent position has been checked by the CCG’s IT Team in light of your report, and I am advised that with the upgrade to Windows 10 there have been a number of reports to EMIS of this problem reoccurring. In response to this information, the CCG has sent a communication to all GP practices highlighting potential problems and providing information on how this can be resolved, as well as providing them with contact details for the IT support service so that they can access assistance on resolving any ongoing problems. In addition, EMIS issued a safety advisory notice on 3rd February to alert practices to the need to identify and address this issue.”

Source location

2021-0061-Response-from-CCG-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 8 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue monitoring appointment-refresh problems and work with EMIS and GP practices to identify and address further issues.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The CCG IT Team will continue to monitor the situation and work with both EMIS and the GP practices to identify and address any further problems.”

Source location

2021-0061-Response-from-CCG-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 8 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue guidance to GP practices on preventing and resolving appointment-refresh problems.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I understand that the issue of appointments not refreshing was raised as a concern by a number of GP practices. EMIS investigated and identified that this was due to the page(s) not refreshing if certain firewall ports were not opened or users were working remotely through a VPN (virtual private network) connection. The CCG’s IT Team were made aware of the problem around the time this incident occurred, and worked with EMIS and the GP practices to find a cause for the problem and a solution. Guidance was issued following the cause of the problem being identified.”

Source location

2021-0061-Response-from-CCG-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 8 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

EMIS is expected to provide the system solution for appointment screens not refreshing; the practice has not received one.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Please find enclosed a Significant Event Analysis that was done shortly after the event. The altered induction pack was updated IN January 2021. We have yet to receive a solution from EMIS.”

Source location

2021-0061-Response-from-Ashfield-Surgery-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 8 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Manual Appointment Refresh is currently sufficient; users do not need to log out and back into EMIS while automatic refresh is developed.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• There is no need for users to log out and log into EMIS Web. The current advice is to use the ‘Appointment Refresh’ function whilst an automatic capability is developed and released.”

Source location

2021-0061-Response-from-EMIS-Redacted
Page 4 · response
Published 8 March 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

EMIS actions addressing the appointment-list issue mean no further action is considered necessary from NHSE/I at this time.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Given the action already being taken by EMIS, my Primary Care colleagues consider that there is no further action for NHSE/I to take at this time.”

Source location

2021-0061-Response-from-NHS-England-and-NHS-Improvement-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 8 March 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
4/4

Data last updated 7 September 2026