PFD report

Alonzo Christopher Andrew Wood · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 18 Mar 2025•West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Insufficient guidance on management actions for abnormal antenatal CTG
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable management of abnormal antenatal CTG
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Work with others to assess whether a practice guide can be produced for practitioners.

    Stated by National Institute for Health and Care ExcellenceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 March 2025.
  2. Action

    Consider reviewing evidence on antenatal CTG interpretation and resulting actions.

    Stated by National Institute for Health and Care ExcellenceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 March 2025.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Insufficient high-quality evidence is likely to prevent NICE producing guidance on antenatal CTG interpretation and resulting actions.

    Stated by National Institute for Health and Care ExcellenceUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient guidance on management actions for abnormal antenatal CTG

Wider context from the report

“During the course of the evidence I was informed that the clinicians consider that there is insufficient guidance as to the management actions that should be taken in the event of an abnormal antenatal CTG. In particular, the clinicians indicated that there was no guidance where there has been an abnormal CTG antenatally as to whether delivery should occur and, if so, in what period. As such, the decision making is reliant on individual clinical judgment. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable management of abnormal antenatal CTG.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with others to assess whether a practice guide can be produced for practitioners.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We will consider reviewing the evidence on antenatal CTG interpretation and actions to be taken as a result however, there is unlikely to be sufficient evidence of the required quality for NICE to produce a guideline in this area. Our patient safety leads will also work with others to see if they can produce a practice guide to inform practitioners.”

Source location

Response from NICE
Page 1 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider reviewing evidence on antenatal CTG interpretation and resulting actions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We will consider reviewing the evidence on antenatal CTG interpretation and actions to be taken as a result however, there is unlikely to be sufficient evidence of the required quality for NICE to produce a guideline in this area. Our patient safety leads will also work with others to see if they can produce a practice guide to inform practitioners.”

Source location

Response from NICE
Page 1 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient high-quality evidence is likely to prevent NICE producing guidance on antenatal CTG interpretation and resulting actions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We will consider reviewing the evidence on antenatal CTG interpretation and actions to be taken as a result however, there is unlikely to be sufficient evidence of the required quality for NICE to produce a guideline in this area. Our patient safety leads will also work with others to see if they can produce a practice guide to inform practitioners.”

Source location

Response from NICE
Page 1 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Clinical variability means strict antenatal CTG protocols cannot cover every situation; individualised care and experienced clinicians’ judgment remain necessary.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The variability in clinical scenarios in the antenatal period means that strict protocols or exhaustive guidelines, may not cover every situation, underscoring the importance of individualised care plans developed by experienced clinicians. It cannot be emphasised enough that the complexity and variability inherent in clinical practice necessitate reliance on professional judgment to ensure optimal outcomes for both mother and baby.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
Page 2 · response
Published 26 March 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026