PFD report

Gordon Harry Renfrew · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 6 Jul 2023•Nottinghamshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
9

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to maintain effective communication and working relationships between stroke and neurosurgical teams
  2. Lack of clear Stroke team understanding of NICE guidance on decompression craniectomy
  3. Limited opportunities for joint case discussion and learning between Stroke and Neurosurgical teams
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Implement agreed cross-specialty admission, procedure, post-procedure care and referral responsibilities, with electronic notification of relevant teams.

    Stated by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 7 July 2023.
  2. Action

    Discuss cross-specialty cases at service morbidity and mortality meetings, share minutes and actions, and involve relevant specialties.

    Stated by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 7 July 2023.
  3. Action

    Develop joint learning strategies for Stroke, Neurosurgery and Neuro-Radiology teams.

    Stated by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 7 July 2023.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain effective communication and working relationships between stroke and neurosurgical teams

Wider context from the report

“• There is limited evidence to date of improved communication, and a stronger working relationship, between the stroke team and the neurosurgical team at the Trust ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clear Stroke team understanding of NICE guidance on decompression craniectomy

Wider context from the report

“• There is limited evidence to date of the Stroke team having a clear understanding of the NICE guidance regarding Decompression Craniectomy, specifically the importance of detailed careful monitoring post stroke, with clarity about referral criteria to Neurosurgery. The planned Standard Operating Procedure, which may set out this clarity is not yet finalised. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Limited opportunities for joint case discussion and learning between Stroke and Neurosurgical teams

Wider context from the report

“• There are currently limited opportunities for joint case discussion and learning between the Stroke and Neurosurgical teams. The Interventional Neuroradiologists could of course also usefully participate in such Educational opportunities - I note it was ████████, (Consultant in Interventional Neuroradiology) rather than the Stroke team, who asked that Gordon was reviewed by the Neurosurgical team on the early evening of the 7th June 2022 ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to finalise the Standard Operating Procedure for decompression craniectomy monitoring and referral criteria

Wider context from the report

“• There is limited evidence to date of the Stroke team having a clear understanding of the NICE guidance regarding Decompression Craniectomy, specifically the importance of detailed careful monitoring post stroke, with clarity about referral criteria to Neurosurgery. The planned Standard Operating Procedure, which may set out this clarity is not yet finalised. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable coordination of referrals between healthcare teams.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement agreed cross-specialty admission, procedure, post-procedure care and referral responsibilities, with electronic notification of relevant teams.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust held a Joint PFD response meeting 7.8.23 chaired by ████████”

Source location

Response from Nottingham University Hospital
Page 3 · response
Published 7 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss cross-specialty cases at service morbidity and mortality meetings, share minutes and actions, and involve relevant specialties.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Cases involving both specialities will continue to be discussed at service M & M meetings and relevant colleagues from other specialities involved in the delivery of care will be invited to the meeting. Cross speciality attendance may not always be feasible but regardless, the minutes of individual speciality meetings are to be shared across specialties and actions should be discussed with governance and service leads. This is to be implemented across the Trust.”

Source location

Response from Nottingham University Hospital
Page 4 · response
Published 7 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop joint learning strategies for Stroke, Neurosurgery and Neuro-Radiology teams.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There are currently limited opportunities for joint discussion and learning between the Stroke and Neurosurgical teams. The Interventional Neuro-radiologists could of course also usefully participate in such Educational activities.”

Source location

Response from Nottingham University Hospital
Page 4 · response
Published 7 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Finalise and circulate a cross-department SOP incorporating NICE guidance, monitoring requirements and referral criteria for decompressive hemicraniectomy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There is limited evidence to date of the Stroke team having a clear understanding of the NICE guidance regarding Decompression Craniectomy, specifically the importance of detailed careful monitoring post stroke, with clarity about referral criteria to Neurosurgery. The planned Standard Operating Procedure which may set out this clarity is not yet finalised.”

Source location

Response from Nottingham University Hospital
Page 3 · response
Published 7 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver decompressive surgery education through multidisciplinary teaching, induction training, nursing sessions, registrar teaching and simulation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Stroke Department also held a teaching session on Decompressive Hemicraniectomy for ischaemic stroke on 3.7.2023.”

Source location

Response from Nottingham University Hospital
Page 4 · response
Published 7 July 2023

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Present all decompressive surgery cases at quarterly regional stroke meetings attended by stroke and Mechanical Thrombectomy representatives.

    Stated by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 7 July 2023.
  2. 2

    Present complex Mechanical Thrombectomy cases to the steering group and disseminate identified learning through pathway leads.

    Stated by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 7 July 2023.
  3. 3

    Coordinate governance responses for serious incidents and cross-specialty care pathways, agreeing actions, learning and duty of candour.

    Stated by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 7 July 2023.
  4. 4

    Monitor decompressive hemicraniectomy patients through stroke and neurosurgery governance pathways, reporting to the Mechanical Thrombectomy Steering Group.

    Stated by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 7 July 2023.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Present all decompressive surgery cases at quarterly regional stroke meetings attended by stroke and Mechanical Thrombectomy representatives.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, all cases of decompressive surgery are to be presented and discussed at the quarterly regional stroke meeting with representatives from stroke and MT services throughout the region.”

Source location

Response from Nottingham University Hospital
Page 4 · response
Published 7 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Present complex Mechanical Thrombectomy cases to the steering group and disseminate identified learning through pathway leads.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Complex Mechanical Thrombectomy cases will continue to be presented at and discussed at the Mechanical Thrombectomy steering group with identified learning to be disseminated through Mechanical Thrombectomy pathway leads from radiology, stroke and neuro-interventionists.”

Source location

Response from Nottingham University Hospital
Page 4 · response
Published 7 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Coordinate governance responses for serious incidents and cross-specialty care pathways, agreeing actions, learning and duty of candour.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In cases that trigger a SJCR and pathways of care that cross specialties, services should co-ordinate their response through their governance leads and agree around actions, learning and duty of candour. This is to be implemented across the Trust.”

Source location

Response from Nottingham University Hospital
Page 4 · response
Published 7 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor decompressive hemicraniectomy patients through stroke and neurosurgery governance pathways, reporting to the Mechanical Thrombectomy Steering Group.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The NICE guidance has been re-emphasised with all teams across the pathway and is now incorporated into the SOP. This was discussed during the inter-speciality meeting on 24.7.2023. It was agreed that the NICE guidance is to be incorporated into the cross-department SOP. This has now been finalised and due for circulation and to take effect from 1.9.2023. (Document 2). Patients undergoing Decompressive Hemicraniectomy will be monitored through stroke and neurosurgery governance pathways and will report to the Mechanical Thrombectomy Steering Group.”

Source location

Response from Nottingham University Hospital
Page 3 · response
Published 7 July 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026