Recurring concern

Untimely or incomplete community care assessments

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 30 Aug 2013•Latest report 18 Nov 2025

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes delayed, missing or materially inadequate assessments of a person's community care, support or treatment needs where the assessment is part of community care planning, discharge or referral.

Not included

  • Excludes generic staffing, communication or documentation deficiencies unless they directly constitute failure of the community care assessment.
  • Excludes hospital diagnostic, custody, deprivation-of-liberty and mental-capacity assessments unless the assertion explicitly concerns a community care needs assessment.
  • Excludes failures to provide care packages or placements after an assessment has been completed.
Reports
18

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
20

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2025

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
30

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Bolton Borough Council2
Department of Health and Social Care2
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust2
Norfolk County Council2
Brighton and Hove City Council1
Care Quality Commission1
Chesterfield Royal Hospital1
Daryel Care1
East of England Community Health and Care NHS Trust1
Essex County Council1
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust1
Herries Lodge1
Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust1
Lincolnshire County Council1
LNT Software1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent

    AI-generated summary

    Lynsey Ellen Dearden · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mrs Lynsey Ellen Dearden was found deceased at her home on 11 March 2025. The inquest concluded with a short-form conclusion of suicide; the stated cause of death was asphyxiation, with anxiety and depression recorded in Part II. Concerns included failures to provide allocated Community Psychiatric Nurse appointments and to complete a standard assessment framework, alongside the absence of policies or guidance governing these processes.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete standard community needs and treatment assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Evidence emerged during the inquest that Mrs Dearden was allocated a Community Psychiatric Nurse, on the 31st December 2024, to facilitate a standard assessment framework, to assess what help and treatment Mrs Dearden may need in the community. This did not take place, and there was no answer as to when this should have taken place, or how this should have been carried out as there is no policy, guidance or framework in place to govern this. ”

    Source location

    Lynsey Ellen Dearden · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issue and operationalize a Practice Note requiring SAF waiting-list contact, key-worker appointment dates, transition timescales, and clarification that SAF is not prerequisite to care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Immediate actions taken: In response to the PFD and our internal review, we have implemented the following: A Practice Note issued highlighting the following,”

    Source location

    Response from North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise the Trust Care Management Policy to incorporate the new processes, guidance, and audit assurance arrangements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “These additional processes and clarifications will be added to the Trust Care Management Policy which is currently under review.”

    Source location

    Response from North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 November 2025

    Open published response
  2. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Derrick Frederick Tully · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Derrick Frederick Tully was found deceased at home on 20 March 2024 after suffering a massive traumatic subdural haemorrhage, following months of falls and declining health. Concerns included unsuitable temporary accommodation, the absence of a key safe despite repeated concerns, an inappropriate reablement care package, failures to record or escalate injuries after a fall, and the discharge of Derrick from a community team without adequately factoring in his cognitive, mental health and safety difficulties.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to assess reablement suitability in light of cognitive impairment and unreliable self-reporting

    Wider context from the report

    “On discharge from hospital on 3 February 2024 following a fall, Derrick was provided with a good package of care. On 23 February this changed to a reablement package of care. Derrick was not suitable for reablement because of his declining cognition and progressive dementia. The occupational therapist raised concerns that he was not suitable for reablement for these reasons and because there were no rehabilitation goals. There was an over-reliance on Derrick’s self-reporting which was inaccurate given his memory problems, and a focus on him doing more for himself. He began losing weight because he was not eating, and he was not able to cope with self-care. ”

    Source location

    Derrick Frederick Tully · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to account for cognitive, mental health and home-safety barriers when assessing engagement

    Wider context from the report

    “Following MDT meetings due to concerns over Derrick’s increasing deterioration and ability to cope with his own care needs, the Integrated Community Aging Team reviewed him on 6 March. They discharged him from the service on 12 March because he did not want to engage with their home assessment of him. Derrick was suffering from cognitive impairment as a result of previous strokes and newly diagnosed dementia. He also had a mental health history and was paranoid. This was compounded by problems he’d experienced with neighbours and cuckooing concerns meaning that at times, he didn’t feel safe at home. It does not appear that these were factored into his inability to engage with the team. ”

    Source location

    Derrick Frederick Tully · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add assessment-proforma requirements to consult patients’ families where appropriate and document mental-capacity decisions when patients do not consent.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In terms of how such incidents will be addressed in future, the learning from this case will be taken to the governance, Clinical and Quality Lead and team meetings. In addition, details will be added to the assessment proforma around engagement with the next of kin to get collateral history and discuss concerns, if the patient consents to this. If the patient does not give consent, a mental capacity assessment will be conducted and documented around this decision and discussed at MDT with the lead clinician.”

    Source location

    Response from Whittington Health NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct mental-capacity assessments for patients who do not engage with services and involve families where appropriate.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Mental capacity assessment will be conducted for all patients when they are not engaging with services as well as family involvement where appropriate.”

    Source location

    Response from Whittington Health NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revisit training on identifying cognitive abilities, capacity, risk, and risk management under the Mental Capacity Act.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response to the coroner’s findings, Islington does support its workforce through training, audit and the support of the principal social worker with the skills to identify issues relating to residents’ cognitive abilities, their capability to identify risk and the management of that risk in line with the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and its principles. Islington Council will revisit this training in the light of the coroner’s findings.”

    Source location

    Response from Islington Council
    Page 4 · response
    Published 31 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct an independent structured judgement review and discuss its findings at ICAT governance and safeguarding meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Lead Consultant for the Integrated Community Aging team (ICAT) has confirmed that families are usually involved as much as possible in assessments with the consent of patients in ICAT service. Where a patient does not have capacity to decline speaking with their next of kin, attempts are made to do so in their best interests. It is unclear why this did not happen in this case, and this will be explored in detail following an independent structured judgement review at the next ICAT governance meeting on May 21st, 2025. The minutes for those unable to attend will be disseminated by email and one to one discussions. This case will also be discussed at weekly Safeguarding drop ins on 6th May 2025.”

    Source location

    Response from Whittington Health NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The decision to provide Reablement was considered appropriate, lawful and consistent with practice because the resident could communicate his wishes and was previously independent.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The PFD Notice states that the Coroners Court has determined that Derrick was not suitable for reablement because of his declining cognition and progressive dementia.”

    Source location

    Response from Islington Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The team had received and considered information about the patient’s unsafe home circumstances, neighbours and self-care difficulties.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “DT also had a mental health history and was paranoid. This was compounded by problems he’d experienced with neighbours and cuckooing concerns meaning that at times, he didn’t feel safe at home. It does not appear that these were factored into his inability to engage with the team.”

    Source location

    Response from Whittington Health NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    ICAT discharged the patient because other community services addressed all identified problems and provided a safety net for ongoing follow-up.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In terms of the decision making around discharge, although Derrick’s refusal for ongoing assessment was a factor, the primary reason for discharge was that all the identified problems were being addressed by existing teams and ICAT could not add anything further to Derrick’s care. In addition, as he remained under Integrated Networks Coordinators (INC) and several other community services there was a safety net in place in terms of ongoing follow up.”

    Source location

    Response from Whittington Health NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 March 2025

    Open published response
  3. Inner South London

    AI-generated summary

    Naomi SULEYMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Naomi Suleyman developed and later died from pneumonia and complications of an unstageable sacral pressure sore after discharge from hospital, during a period when she was deconditioned and bedbound while her long-term needs were assessed. Concerns included inaccurate discharge information, missed welfare and therapy visits, an incorrect district nursing referral, poor communication between services, and missed opportunities to recognise and address that her discharge was unsafe.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide social work and/or occupational therapy assessment within 24 hours of discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) Due to lack of capacity, Ms Suleyman’s interim care needs pending assessment were brokered to a care provider. As a result, she did not receive a visit from a social worker and/or occupational therapist within 24 hours of discharge as she would have done if her care needs had been provided by the in-house Enablement team. ”

    Source location

    Naomi SULEYMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. Cheshire

    AI-generated summary

    Charles Henry DANIELS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Charles Henry Daniels was admitted to Stepping Hill Hospital in January 2024 after a fall and was later discharged home in March despite being described as clearly unwell. He returned to hospital with an acute on chronic subdural bleed and died on 21 March 2024. Concerns included inadequate nursing record-keeping, failure to alert a doctor to his deterioration before discharge, and the distress caused by his condition and discharge arrangements at home.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to establish whether care at home could be safely provided

    Wider context from the report

    “3) He arrived home by ambulance to his family in physically poor condition and clearly very unwell, on a stretcher in a hospital gown and incontinent, causing considerable distress to the family, particularly after a nurse, the paramedics and his carer questioned how they would cope with his care at home. ”

    Source location

    Charles Henry DANIELS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Mark Anthony McKessy · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mark Anthony McKessy had learning disabilities and care needs and developed alcoholic liver disease following regular and prolonged alcohol use. He deteriorated after admission to Stepping Hill Hospital and died there on 18 February 2023. The principal concerns were poor communication and information sharing between agencies, lack of coordinated care, and insufficient recognition of how his health, social care and learning disability needs interacted, including the extent of his capacity.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Limited Care Act assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “The inquest heard evidence that he had significant leaning difficulties and his capacity was limited. He was known to agencies. Despite this the inquest heard evidence that steps to reduce the risks were not taken due to: 1. Poor communication/information sharing between agencies which meant that there was no coordination of care and no clear overview of his needs; and 2. A lack of recognition by agencies involved with him of his health issues and their inter relationship with his social care and learning disability needs including the extent to which he had capacity. This was compounded by limited Care Act assessments ”

    Source location

    Mark Anthony McKessy · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Improve frontline knowledge and confidence in completing holistic social-care assessments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We recognise there were missed opportunities at this time to fully understand his situation and the impact of drinking on his health and social care needs.”

    Source location

    Response from Stockport Integrated Care Partnership
    Page 3 · response
    Published 30 October 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce peer discussions so managers oversee individual social-care assessments and reviews and strengthen social-work practice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We continue to improve front line practice to ensure our frontline teams increase their knowledge and confidence in completing holistic assessments. To ensure management oversee individual assessments and reviews we are introducing peer discussions to strengthen social work practice. The social care and specialist learning disability health team are co-located to support a joined-up approach to interventions. This is further supported by managers across social care and health meeting on a weekly basis, using the forum to refer individuals for a multi-disciplinary and multi-agency approach.”

    Source location

    Response from Stockport Integrated Care Partnership
    Page 3 · response
    Published 30 October 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the health and social-care offer, including assessment, advice, signposting, substance-misuse support, information and staff training needs, through standing quality-meeting consideration.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following Mr McKessy’s passing, analysis of our current offer, from both social care and health is being considered, including how we carry out assessments, provide advice, our signposting for individuals and our support provided people who experience any element of substance mis-use. This will be a standing agenda at the PCFT Quality Meetings; this will support consideration to further information or training for staff is required, whether we have appropriate information and resources to share with individuals and/or their carers.”

    Source location

    Response from Stockport Integrated Care Partnership
    Page 3 · response
    Published 30 October 2023

    Open published response
  6. Lincolnshire

    AI-generated summary

    Colin Robert GUMM · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Colin Robert GUMM, a vulnerable adult receiving a care package, was found collapsed by his carers and died at Lincoln County Hospital on 27 November 2021 despite treatment. The concerns include gaps in Adult Social Care monitoring and safeguarding, the identification of apparent underweight and clinical dehydration only shortly before his death, conflicting evidence about alcohol provision, and the reported premature closure of a safeguarding enquiry before toxicology results were received.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete Adult Social Care assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Adult Social Care were first involved in 2017 due to the deceased self neglecting. It is recorded assessments were not able to be completed. ”

    Source location

    Colin Robert GUMM · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Capacity to refuse services meant the authority could not compel assessment or acceptance of care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The coroner had evidence within the safeguarding statement that the recorded assessments were not able to be completed due to the individual's lack of engagement with the authority. Where an individual has capacity to refuse to engage with a service, they are entitled to do so. LCC are not able to force an individual to accept services or an assessment.”

    Source location

    Response from Lincolnshire County Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 May 2023

    Open published response
  7. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Molly Ann Sergeant · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Molly Ann Sergeant, aged 17, was found deceased on 16 October 2020 after hanging, having left a note. The report identifies concerns about delayed autism diagnosis, insufficient assessment and discharge planning, failures in social-care assessments and coordination, and a lack of understanding of her aftercare rights and chronic suicide risk.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of assessment of section 117 needs for discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “(6) A lack of understanding of section 117 Mental Health Act rights and potential for consideration for entitlements to meet Molly’s needs related to her mental health disorder, by Essex County Council: a. compelling Molly to choose between family members as part of her discharge planning and then as a consequence changing Molly’s status during her detention from homeless. b. Lack of assessment for any s117 needs to facilitate discharge c. Lack of appreciation of the impact of Molly’s autism diagnosis in a background of chronic suicide risk on decision-making and Molly’s potential to understand the decisions being made. ”

    Source location

    Molly Ann Sergeant · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require Child and Family Assessments and continued Social Care involvement for every young person admitted to a Tier 4 inpatient bed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There is now agreement that there will be a Child and Family Assessment for every young person admitted to an in-patient Tier 4 bed. This has been in place since January 2022 but has been re-emphasised to the Children and Families Hub and all operational social work teams since the Inquest. The initial communication stated that any young person admitted to a psychiatric in-patient unit is a child in need (by definition) and will receive a Child and Family Assessment. There is a specific audit being undertaken this Spring 2023 by our Professional Standards Unit to ensure that these are always taking place. The expectation is that the Young Person will have an allocated social worker throughout their stay as an in-patient.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex County Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 10 March 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain the pan-Essex Section 117 protocol setting out multi-agency care planning processes, including accommodation responsibilities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There is a pan-Essex SET Section 117 Protocol which was published in April 2022. This highlights the primary purposes of Section 117 and is intended to articulate a clear process by which multi-agency care planning in the context of Section 117 should be undertaken. It makes clear reference to the provision of accommodation issues within the Section 117 arrangements. It is currently a 26-page document.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex County Council
    Page 4 · response
    Published 10 March 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and publish internal Section 117 guidance covering duties, processes and the Section 117 Panel.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There is also an internal Section 117 guidance working group which has been developed by the Leads for Mental Health within ECC. This is due to be published in Spring 2023. This will cover Section 117 duties and responsibilities, the Section 117 process, the Section 117 Panel.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex County Council
    Page 4 · response
    Published 10 March 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete the draft Section 117 practice guidance and produce a Thinking Practice Tool to support Section 117 planning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The draft Section 117 practice guidance will be completed in the Spring 2023, and a “Thinking Practice Tool “will be produced to assist staff in relation to the issues involved in Section 117 planning.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex County Council
    Page 4 · response
    Published 10 March 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The acknowledged shortcomings were not causation or contributory factors in Molly’s death.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is not our view that these shortcomings, which we have fully acknowledged and have taken significant steps to ensure do not happen again, were causation factors or contributory factors which led to Molly’s very sad death.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex County Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 10 March 2023

    Open published response
  8. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Rebecca Hayward · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Rebecca Hayward had a history of substance addiction and became homeless after discharge from a care placement on 31 March 2021. She was later provided with hostel accommodation, relapsed into alcohol and substance misuse, and was found deceased on 13 August 2021. Concerns included assessments of people with severe and multiple disadvantage being undertaken by staff with little or no specialist homelessness or substance-misuse experience, and limitations in how changing care needs were assessed when accommodation changed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to extend Care Act assessments to changed care needs when people move accommodation

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Where a person is about to move to a different type of accommodation, Care Act assessments are only extended to include consideration of the individual’s changed care needs in their new environment if the early assessment work identifies eligible care needs in their current circumstances, with the social care provision subsequently being dependant on a re-referral and where such re-referrals are resisted; ”

    Source location

    Rebecca Hayward · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Cumbria

    AI-generated summary

    Darrell Lee DEVLIN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Darrell Lee Devlin died at home on 23 February 2021 after being unwell with a chest infection and while receiving methadone treatment. The inquest record reported active bronchopneumonia and an extremely high level of Flubromazolin in his bloodstream. Concerns focused on reliance on telephone contacts, the absence of in-person assessment and drug testing, and the resulting difficulty in assessing and supporting him while receiving treatment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide in-person assessment and support for drug and alcohol service clients

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Darrell first came into contact with Unity (the drug and alcohol service that your trust was contracted to provide for Cumbria) in 2015. and his final episode of care began on 30th January 2020 when he self referred to ask for treatment for daily heroin use. At the time of his death he was receiving a daily dose of ████████ Methadone supplied every week. Evidence heard at the inquest covered the final 7 months of this treatment episode, during this period I heard of 6 telephone contacts, the last just 18 days before Darrell died, however he was never seen in person and never tested for drug use. (2) Apart from admitting to a single bag of heroin on 1 occasion Darrell consistently told his drug workers that he was abstinent from illicit drugs or alcohol and was well maintained on his daily dose of methadone. The forensic toxicology report (of which I attach a copy for your information) however indicates he was almost certainly not truthful. I am concerned that reliance on remote contacts and lack of testing make it very difficult for drug workers to accurately assess and support their clients, and put the clients at risk of harm or death due to excessive dosage or polydrug exposure on top of their regular medication, as in this case. I am aware that face to face appointments were avoided where possible due to the Covid pandemic but feel this case highlights a need for more effective supervision than that given to Darrell. ”

    Source location

    Darrell Lee DEVLIN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Established action plans to reintroduce face-to-face appointments for service users who were not categorised as high risk.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “GMMH Community Addiction Services recognise that face to face contact is the preferred method of communication and, from mid-2021, services began planning for the re-introduction of these in response to the easing of Covid-19 restrictions.”

    Source location

    2021-0397-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Mental-Health_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 November 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issued staff guidance requiring first appointments to be face to face and ensuring each service user receives a drug test within 12 months.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “For high-risk service users face to face reviews were always maintained, however, for the remaining service users, action plans were put in place to re-introduce face-to-face appointments for all other service users. The service issued guidance to all staff advising all first appointments should be face to face and specific guidance in ensuring everybody had been drug tested within a 12-month period. Service User contact information is closely monitored by the Senior Leadership Team monthly and by local managers on a weekly basis.”

    Source location

    2021-0397-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Mental-Health_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 November 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review all service users through face-to-face appointments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As noted in your findings, it was highlighted that Mr Develin had not been seen face to face nor was a drug screen provided in his last treatment episode with Unity. Humankind’s mobilisation strategy for Cumbria, which reflects the national Humankind approach, concentrates on the following:”

    Source location

    2021-0397-Response-from-Humankinds_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 November 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain at least 12-weekly drug testing and face-to-face reviews for service users.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Humankind follows best practice as stated in NICE guidelines and The Drug Misuse and Dependence guidelines on clinical management (Orange Book), in respect of ensuring that the following takes place every 12 weeks as a minimum:”

    Source location

    2021-0397-Response-from-Humankinds_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 November 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Risk-based telephone reviews and face-to-face appointments when indicated were considered sufficient under national and local COVID-19 guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Unity services allocated service users to pathways, based on risk, and presenting need. Mr Devlin was allocated to the pathway known as “Recovery Journey” which provided contact every 4-6 weeks and, during the Covid-19 restriction this was via a telephone review. In the year prior to his death, Mr Devlin is described in each telephone contact as stable on his prescription and reporting no illicit use (except for 21st October 2020 where he reported he shared one bag of heroin with his partner). There were no telephone contacts during which Mr Devlin sounded drowsy, intoxicated, incoherent or exhibited any behaviour indicative of illicit drug use.”

    Source location

    2021-0397-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Mental-Health_Published
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 November 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Humankind, the current Cumbria service provider, was developing its own response and would take forward the reported issues.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. I note that since Darrell's death the contract to provide drug and alcohol services in Cumbria has transferred to Humankind, and thus I am addressing the report to them as well while acknowledging that they played no part in Darrell's care.”

    Source location

    2021-0397-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Mental-Health_Published
    Page 4 · response
    Published 29 November 2021

    Open published response
  10. Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    KEVIN JOHN FITTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kevin Fitton suffered a catastrophic stroke in 2010 and died after a cardiac arrest following fluid overload during his final hospital admission on 12 July 2019. The report identified longstanding concerns about inadequate assessment and support for his acquired brain injury, poor coordination and communication, ineffective implementation of care assessments, and failures to recognise and respond to his substance use, self-neglect and deteriorating health. The inquest concluded that a failure to obtain an urgent echocardiogram represented a missed opportunity to diagnose and treat his cardiac condition, and that the outcome may have been different with a correct diagnosis and more controlled fluid administration.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Poor or inadequate implementation of Care Act assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “(9) There was a reasonable Care Act Assessment in 2017 however it was poorly/inadequately implemented. It should have been repeated annually – it was not. ”

    Source location

    KEVIN JOHN FITTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review Care Act training and adjust it to refresh multi-agency coordination and consideration of review.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• We will review our Care Act training on offer and make any adjustments necessary to ensure that the key aspect of co-ordination in multi-agency work, and consideration of review, are refreshed features.”

    Source location

    2021-0169-Responses-from-Sussex-NHS-Commissioners-and-Brighton-and-Hove-City-Council_Published
    Page 4 · response
    Published 27 May 2021

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026