Recurring concern

Insufficient care-home staffing capacity for residents’ required care

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 6 Nov 2013•Latest report 5 Dec 2025

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of care-home staffing capacity, deployment or cover that leave residents without required care or assistance, including insufficient staff for two-carer care, assisted mobilisation, feeding, medication distribution, personal care and other essential resident needs.

Not included

  • Excludes nursing staffing shortages outside care-home resident care.
  • Excludes generic management, training, competence or documentation deficiencies unless they directly result in insufficient care-home staffing capacity.
  • Excludes failures limited to one resident’s care plan or one isolated staff omission where inadequate staffing capacity is not identified.
  • Excludes staffing deficiencies in hospitals, prisons, transport services or other non-care-home settings.
Reports
19

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
20

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2025

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
12

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Care Quality Commission4
Department of Health and Social Care4
Acer Mews1
Ambassador House1
Care First Class (UK) Limited1
Glenholme Holdingham Grange1
Gwern Alyn Care Home1
Hc-One Limited1
Ideal Carehomes (Number One) Limited1
Isle of Wight Adult Safeguarding Team1
Isle of Wight NHS Trust1
Moundsley Hall Nursing Home Limited1
MyMil Limited1
NHS England1
Priory Group1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Alan Paul Peet · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Alan Paul Peet, who was quadriplegic following an accidental fall, was admitted to hospital after his condition deteriorated at Acer Mews Care Home on 26 July 2025. He was found to be septic, possibly due to bronchopneumonia, and died at Tameside General Hospital on 28 July 2025. Concerns included inadequate observation and record-keeping, lack of clear management oversight of tracheostomy-trained nursing cover, and agency staff lacking access to electronic systems.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure tracheostomy-trained nursing cover for residents requiring tracheostomy support

    Wider context from the report

    “Mr Peet according to the evidence heard at the inquest was placed at Acer Mews Care Home. His care according to information from his family was provided at a cost of approximately £10,000 a week. This was because he required 24/7 one to one care in a nursing home setting because of the extent of his needs including management of his tracheostomy tube. The inquest heard that at the home there were 2 units, with one registered nurse allocated to each unit. The remainder of the staff were Health Care Assistants. On the day of his admission to hospital the nurse trained in tracheostomy management decided not to cover the unit Mr Peet was in even though there were 3 patients requiring support with tracheostomies on that unit. Instead, they chose to work on the other unit. This left a nurse untrained in tracheostomies on that unit. It was unclear why there was no management oversight of this decision and what steps were in place at the time to avoid such a situation arising. The inquest was also told that the agency nurse used on the day did not have log in rights to the electronic systems in place at the home including the medication system. It was indicated that the manager at the time was aware of this and that it was likely that the nurse could as a consequence only make entries under the details of the other nurse. During the course of the inquest, it was difficult to unpick who had made certain entries. Even though Mr Peet was on one-to-one care and those involved could have no other residents to write up during the time they were caring for him the overall quality of the notes was extremely poor. Entries were limited and it was impossible to fully understand from the notes what had been observed and what had happened and at what point. ”

    Source location

    Alan Paul Peet · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. Norfolk

    AI-generated summary

    Edith Jane ALDEN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Edith Jane Alden, a resident assessed at very high risk of falls, left a communal area unnoticed and unsupervised on 13 September 2021, fell in the garden and suffered severe head injuries. She died on 25 September 2021. Concerns included unclear and inconsistent care plans and risk assessments, insufficient supervision and staffing, and the use of unlocked communal-area access for residents at very high risk of falls.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient staffing capacity for the number of residents

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Staffing levels may be insufficient for the number of residents. Evidence was heard that “staff can’t be everywhere at once”. ”

    Source location

    Edith Jane ALDEN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use the dependency tool to review resident needs and calculate staffing hours, maintaining staffing above required levels where possible.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Dependency tool in place and used to calculate staffing hours – occupancy has fluctuated over time, staffing hours has mainly been maintained at our highest dependency score to support continuity across the staff team.”

    Source location

    2024-0196 Response from The Limes Care Home
    Page 8 · response
    Published 29 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Internal auditing evidence assures that staff allocation effectively meets individual needs and supports the CQC report’s accuracy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I’d respectfully draw Coroner’s attention to the fact that this is a report of the regulator and as such only the regulator can defend their report. We do happen to agree with CQC’s independent assessment dated 5th October 2022. The inspection is a ‘snapshot’ of our service. Our internal auditing processes provide evidence of our staff being allocated to areas throughout the service to effectively meet individual’s needs, which gives us the assurance that the remarks in the CQC report were accurate.”

    Source location

    2024-0196 Response from The Limes Care Home
    Page 10 · response
    Published 29 April 2024

    Open published response
  3. Leicester City and South Leicestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Janet SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Janet Smith, an 81-year-old woman with advanced dementia and ischaemic heart disease, sustained spinal fractures after an unwitnessed fall at her care home on 15 March 2022 and died on 22 March 2022 after deterioration and placement on palliative care. The principal concern was that insufficient staffing meant no carer was monitoring the lounge, allowing her to leave unattended, and that the provider had not done everything possible to mitigate the risk of harm or death from residents being left unmonitored.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient staffing capacity to meet competing resident care and monitoring needs

    Wider context from the report

    “At the time of Mrs. Smith's fall, there were 17 residents and 2 carers. One carer was attending a resident upstairs and the other carer was outside the care home accompanying another resident who wished to have a cigarette. This meant that no carer was in the lounge area monitoring the residents. Accordingly, when Mrs. Smith left the lounge area she was not monitored as required. If she had been monitored, it is understood that she would have been offered assistance and, on a balance of probabilities, the fall that led to her death would not have occurred. It was understood that at the care home there were, and still is, a number of residents with challenging behaviour and care needs, and that for some activities of daily living 2 carers may be required. With only 2 carers on a shift, it is foreseeable that residents can and will be left unattended. It is also foreseeable that competing needs of the residents will mean that residents will be left unmonitored, and an unsafe environment created as occurred with Mrs. Smith. Accordingly, there remains a concern that the provider has not done everything possible to mitigate the risk of actual or potential harm including death. ”

    Source location

    Janet SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update and implement policies covering staffing hours, slips, trips and falls, observations, and general risk assessments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have reviewed our policies and procedures and, for the benefit of the Coroner, we attach the following updated polices and a staffing hours analysis:”

    Source location

    Response from Pine View Care Homes LTD
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 May 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continuously assess residents’ dependency and care needs to determine required staffing hours and mitigate risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Each of our residents require different levels of support and care. Accordingly, their dependency levels (i.e. the amount of time staff should spend with each client) can differ at different times. We continuously review and monitor our residents’ support and care needs and these needs are then graded using our dependency level formula to establish the number of hours staff are required to spend with each resident.”

    Source location

    Response from Pine View Care Homes LTD
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 May 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Employ a third daytime staff member to maintain lounge supervision and assist residents across the home.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We now employ a third member of staff during the day from 9a.m. to 7.00p.m. Sometimes 2 staff members are required to assist residents located in different areas of the care home and to bring residents to different parts of the home for various reasons. A third member of staff remains in the lounge area at all times to monitor and assist residents. Therefore, a member of staff will be present in the lounge room to care for and monitor residents and ensure that residents are not left unattended. This will hopefully assist in trying to mitigate the risk of residents falling in the future as someone will always be present to monitor, assist and tend to residents at all times.”

    Source location

    Response from Pine View Care Homes LTD
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 May 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing staffing, monitoring, policies, training and environmental controls are considered sufficient to keep residents safe and mitigate falling risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “These above policies will hopefully ensure that residents are not left unattended or unmonitored and the risks of residents slipping, tripping and falling is minimised in the future. We believe that residents are safe, they live in a safe environment and they are supported by dedicated staff who are appropriately trained and are capable of assisting residents in the event of a fall.”

    Source location

    Response from Pine View Care Homes LTD
    Page 4 · response
    Published 3 May 2023

    Open published response
  4. Norfolk

    AI-generated summary

    Peter Gary SEABY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Peter Gary Seaby was a resident of The Oaks and Woodcroft Care Home who died in hospital on 22 May 2018 after choking-related symptoms and subsequent aspiration pneumonia. His lunchtime food was not prepared in accordance with his SALT Care Plan, and he did not receive the required one-to-one supervision; the inquest found these possibly contributed to his death. The report also identified concerns about informal care arrangements, staffing levels, and the absence of an internal review after his death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient staffing levels for resident care and supervision

    Wider context from the report

    “2. It was not clear from the evidence that the staffing levels at Oaks and Woodcroft Care Home are sufficient to provide care for residents, including those requiring one to one supervision and supervision out of the Home and to cover individual activities ”

    Source location

    Peter Gary SEABY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review staffing numbers against colleague feedback, resident support plans and resident needs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our operational management team, together with the home management team, regularly review staffing levels at each of our homes, for example prior to the admission of a new resident and in response to the deterioration of a resident’s health. The operational management team have taken this opportunity to review staffing numbers again in response to your report, by consulting with the home management team, seeking feedback from colleagues at the home and reviewing resident support plans and considering resident needs. We are satisfied that staffing levels at The Oaks and Woodcroft Care Home are satisfactory, that staff are being effectively allocated to care for residents and that staffing numbers are sufficient to ensure that residents are safe and well looked after.”

    Source location

    Response from Priory
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 March 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Staffing levels and allocation are considered sufficient to keep residents safe, supported by contingency staffing and on-call management arrangements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our operational management team, together with the home management team, regularly review staffing levels at each of our homes, for example prior to the admission of a new resident and in response to the deterioration of a resident’s health. The operational management team have taken this opportunity to review staffing numbers again in response to your report, by consulting with the home management team, seeking feedback from colleagues at the home and reviewing resident support plans and considering resident needs. We are satisfied that staffing levels at The Oaks and Woodcroft Care Home are satisfactory, that staff are being effectively allocated to care for residents and that staffing numbers are sufficient to ensure that residents are safe and well looked after.”

    Source location

    Response from Priory
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 March 2023

    Open published response
  5. Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

    AI-generated summary

    David John Morganti and 3 others · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    The report concerns several deaths involving delays in ambulance attendance and/or admission to Royal Cornwall Hospital, including deaths after falls, head injuries and a stroke. The principal concerns are the ongoing delays caused by ambulances being held at the hospital, limited intermediate and social care capacity, and the risk that unsafe or inadequately staffed discharge arrangements may worsen patients’ health and lead to readmission.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate staffing levels in residential homes receiving hospital patients

    Wider context from the report

    “Similarly, it will not benefit patient health to discharge a patient from hospital to a residential home that does not have an appropriate level of staffing. All that will happen is that the patient will inevitably become de-conditioned, their illnesses will worsen and the result will be that they are likely to require re-admission. ”

    Source location

    David John Morganti and 3 others · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop accommodation-with-care-and-support specifications, including dementia provision.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A joint commissioner’s day was held in November 2022 and agreed to reset the discharge to assess way of working in Cornwall, with a clear policy position which provides clarity around roles and responsibilities, addressed the high numbers of discharges on pathway 3 with an aim to support more people to return home from hospital as opposed to making long term care decision in an acute environment. There has been significant work completed on pathway 1, utilising voluntary sector support and this has seen a reduction of people waiting for services. There is also ongoing work to develop our specification for accommodation with care and support-which will include dementia.”

    Source location

    Response from Cornwall and Isles of Scilly NHS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 November 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop additional primary-care resources to create more time for care-home support.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We continue to commission successful schemes with community pharmacists to offer additional services such as minor ailments and walk-in consultations. We will be looking to develop additional schemes over the winter period based on feedback from practices – for example we are currently working on additional resources for practices to be able to provide more time for care homes.”

    Source location

    Response from Cornwall and Isles of Scilly NHS
    Page 6 · response
    Published 21 November 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Adopt national recruitment and retention programmes and develop new roles and flexible working arrangements to support safer staffing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are actively engaged in the adoption of all national recruitment and retention programmes to recruit and keep our nurses and have developed new roles and flexible ways of working to support safer staffing.”

    Source location

    Response from Cornwall and Isles of Scilly NHS
    Page 7 · response
    Published 21 November 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Make funding available to support adult social care, hospital discharge and timely transfer into community care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We recognise that discharging people once they no longer need acute care improves their outcomes and reduces the risk of medical complications. To improve rates of safe hospital discharge and increase patient flow, the government is making available up to £2.8 billion this year and £4.7 billion in 2024-25 to support adult social care and discharge. This is alongside £700 million invested this winter, on top of £1.6 billion over the next two years, to support timely and safe discharge from hospital into the community.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 November 2022

    Open published response
  6. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Shirley Alice Moloney · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Shirley Alice Moloney, who had longstanding paranoid schizophrenia and severe frailty, was found unresponsive at her care home on 10 December 2020 after suffering three vomits the previous day. The report states that it was likely she died from aspiration pneumonia and that the death was from natural causes. Concerns included the deterioration of her mental health and the lack of community mental health team care in the last nine months of her life, alongside wider concerns about access to older adult psychiatry for care-home residents.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient availability of mental health nurses in care homes and nursing homes

    Wider context from the report

    “(iv) The inquest heard that mental health concerns can often be overlooked towards the end of life. Structures for accessing care for physical symptoms towards the end of life are well developed. Accessing care and support for psychological distress is not so well defined. Care homes and nursing homes tend to have mainly general nurses, as opposed to mental health nurses. They also have easy access to GPs and geriatricians. There is a perceived lack of easy access to older age psychiatry teams, by care homes and nursing homes. ”

    Source location

    Shirley Alice Moloney · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  7. North Wales (East and Central)

    AI-generated summary

    Albert Rowlands · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Albert Rowlands suffered serious injuries in an unwitnessed accidental fall at the residential care home where he lived and died in hospital on 25 November 2020. The principal concerns were inconsistent implementation of falls-prevention measures, possible staffing pressures affecting care, and the risks associated with the distance and obstacles between his room and the nearest toilet.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate staffing capacity for vulnerable-resident care and alarm response

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The indication that care staff felt pressured should be reflected upon, in the context of whether they are able to devote as much time to vulnerable residents as might be required. By inference, the errors made in respect of the mis-locating of the pressure mat and the incorrect position of the bed are likely to have occurred because the carer involved was rushing. The care home should consider whether its staffing levels are appropriate, both in this context and in terms of how quickly a member of staff might ordinarily be able to respond to a pressure mat alarm sounding. ”

    Source location

    Albert Rowlands · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The staff member’s reported pressure was attributed to wanting to attend scheduled activities, rather than insufficient staffing levels.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2 The member of staff feeling pressured perhaps needs clarifying, from our conversation with her, we believe that it was an internalised pressure, as she wanted to move onto some scheduled activities with other residents, it was not a matter of insufficient staffing levels.”

    Source location

    2021-0253-Response-from-Pendine-Park_Published
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 August 2021

    Open published response
  8. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Ruth Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ruth Jones, a resident of The Beeches Care Home who was at risk of falls, fell while unobserved after being isolated because Covid-19 was suspected. She was admitted to hospital with a fractured neck of femur and bronchopneumonia and later died there. Concerns included the lack of guidance and staffing arrangements for safely observing residents at risk of falls during required isolation, and the difficulties caused when frail patients attended hospital without family support.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient staffing capacity for continuous observation of residents at risk of falls during self-isolation

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The inquest heard that Mrs Jones was frail and at risk of falls. The home had a falls risk plan in place that was based around her being observed during the day in communal areas. The home was not staffed to provide one to one observations for residents required to self-isolate. As a result when Covid 19 was suspected by the GP, and the home were directed to isolate her she could not be observed by staff as would generally be the case in the day. The home took some steps with sensors to ensure they were aware if she stood up whilst in her room but could not provide continuous observation. It was unclear how homes were being advised to safely manage residents at risk of falls where isolation was required. The home were unaware of any guidance that they should follow to manage the risk. ”

    Source location

    Ruth Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The provider and registered manager, not CQC, are responsible for deciding how to address identified care risks and implement improvements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In accordance with CQC’s regulatory remit, we highlight breaches of the Regulations to a provider and where appropriate ask them what they are going to do to make improvements. We do not tell them what they should do. That is for the provider and/or registered manager (both being registered persons for CQC purposes) to decide.”

    Source location

    2021-0038-Response-from-CQC-Redacted
    Page 4 · response
    Published 15 February 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing individualised care plans and additional welfare checks were considered sufficient to mitigate Mrs Jones’s fall risk while unwell.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have reviewed Mrs Jones’ care records, and in this case, we believe that the service had taken all reasonable steps to mitigate the risk of falls for Mrs Jones. There were care plans in place to manage the risk of falls for Mrs Jones and these were relevant whether she was in communal areas or in her bedroom. Reference to times when Mrs. Jones was unwell were made and indicated that staff should make additional checks of Mrs Jones’ welfare at those times. In our view, the registered manager had assessed Mrs Jones on an individual basis and despite her not being funded for one to one care had assessed risk and put measures in place to support Mrs Jones whilst she was unwell.”

    Source location

    2021-0038-Response-from-CQC-Redacted
    Page 5 · response
    Published 15 February 2021

    Open published response
  9. Lincolnshire

    AI-generated summary

    Donald George ELLIOTT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Donald George ELLIOTT was cared for at Glenholme Holdingham Grange and died on 22 February 2019 after a witnessed fall on 31 January 2019, after which he was taken to hospital and later returned to the home. The report raised concerns about staffing levels, staff competence and training, contradictory evidence provided to the inquest, late notification to the coronial service, and the failure of two care-home witnesses to attend under summons.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to deploy enough suitably qualified, competent and experienced staff

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Is the Care Home able to evidence and demonstrate on both dates they complied with Regulation 18 Health and Social Care Act 2008 as to: a) Deploying enough suitably qualified competent and experienced staff and, b) That those staff received the support, training, professional development, supervision and appraisals that are necessary for them to carry out their role and responsibilities. ”

    Source location

    Donald George ELLIOTT · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing staffing levels were considered sufficient and suitably qualified to meet residents’ needs on the relevant dates.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The investigation has demonstrated that there were sufficient, suitably qualified, staff on duty on 24.01.19 and 31.01.19 to meet the needs of the residents occupying the home at the time.”

    Source location

    2020-0109-Response-from-Holdingham-Grange-Nursing-Home_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 June 2020

    Open published response
  10. Manchester West

    AI-generated summary

    Robert Charles Rostron · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Robert Charles Rostron, who had Type 1 diabetes and Alzheimer’s disease, became unconscious after an agency nurse administered insulin despite recording a low blood sugar reading of 2.2. He did not recover to his previous baseline and later died in hospital; the inquest found that the insulin administration exacerbated his natural illness. Concerns included the use of agency nurses without formal induction, insufficient knowledge of records and care plans, and an agency nurse being the only qualified nurse in charge of the unit.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Absence of another qualified nurse when an agency nurse is on duty

    Wider context from the report

    “I am concerned by the use of Agency Nurses in the homes under the management of HC One. In particular, I am concerned by the lack of formal induction and orientation to the unit on this occasion. I am concerned that reliance is placed upon the nursing qualification itself and the agency providing the nurse. I am concerned that an Agency Nurse was used as the senior member of staff in charge of the shift. I am concerned that the Agency Nurse was giving out medication when he had never worked at the Unit before and. I am concerned that there were no other qualified nurses on the Spring Unit at the time. ”

    Source location

    Robert Charles Rostron · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026