Recurring concern

Inadequate telephone mental health assessment

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 18 Aug 2014•Latest report 17 Oct 2024

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of telephone-based mental health assessment, including inadequate questioning, insufficient exploration of symptoms, inappropriate reliance on telephone review or failure to identify the assessor's role or qualifications when these impair the safety of the assessment.

Not included

  • Excludes general telephone triage or call-handling failures that are not specifically concerned with mental health assessment.
  • Excludes failures of face-to-face mental health assessment where telephone assessment is not the identified control.
  • Excludes generic training, communication or staffing deficiencies unless they directly make a telephone mental health assessment inadequate.
  • Excludes failures limited to subsequent referral, treatment, admission or follow-up when the telephone assessment itself was adequate.
Reports
5

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
5

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2024

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
17

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care3
Care Quality Commission1
Farnham Park Health Group1
General Medical Council1
Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership1
gtd healthcare1
NHS England1
NHS Frimley Integrated Care Board1
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust1
Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust1
Turning Point1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Leslie Andrew Swindells · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Leslie Andrew Swindells had a complex mental health background and, after his mental health deteriorated, was found unresponsive at home with self-inflicted puncture wounds to the neck. The concerns included assessment by a practitioner with limited mental-health training, lack of appropriate triage and escalation, failure to recognise and mitigate risk, telephone-based assessment, inadequate documentation, and unclear supervision arrangements.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Greater difficulty assessing mental health by telephone than face to face

    Wider context from the report

    “6. The assessment was carried out by telephone. The inquest was told that approximately 80% of the practitioner’s mental health reviews took place in this way although it was accepted in evidence that it was far more challenging to assess an individual’s mental health via telephone than face to face. During the conversation the practitioner did not identify their role or their qualifications to Mr Swindells. ”

    Source location

    Leslie Andrew Swindells · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Emphasise face-to-face assessment opportunities for new mental health presentations in shared case learning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of the learning to be shared following this case, we will emphasise the need for clinical staff to ensure they have explored all opportunities to see new presentations of mental health conditions as a face-to-face consultation rather than via telephone.”

    Source location

    Response from GTD Healthcare
    Page 7 · response
    Published 17 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Routine two-week mental health reviews may be conducted by telephone because face-to-face consultation is not considered necessary for that limited purpose.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Telephone reviews are an accepted practice for routine two-week mental health reviews as the purpose is to ensure that the patient has collected, is compliant with taking their medication, and that there are no side effects. A face-to-face consultation is not deemed necessary for this type of review, but a referral to GP/ACP would be initiated if any concerns were identified and face to face appointment booked in.”

    Source location

    Response from GTD Healthcare
    Page 7 · response
    Published 17 October 2024

    Open published response
  2. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Keith Andrew NOTTLE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Keith Andrew Nottle died on 5 July 2021 after taking an overdose of two prescribed medications, which the inquest concluded was an accident. Concerns included telephone triage practices that could bypass specialist mental health assessment, the apparent lack of care coordination, and unclear decision-making around his discharge and repeated re-referrals to mental health services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure specialist mental health assessment of patients triaged by telephone workers

    Wider context from the report

    “Evidence was heard regarding the operation of a triage for patients who may be experiencing a mental health crisis. A practice had developed of bypassing specialist mental health assessment by means of telephone workers making their own judgments about the level of risk a person presents to themselves and others, and a judgment about whether or not they require urgent mental health assessment and / or treatment, based on a very limited criteria. This had the result of only a very small proportion of potentially unwell patients being considered by a person with qualifications to assess and treat mental health. This was a culture and practice which stood in conflict with the procedure the Trust had in writing for the role of the telephone workers. ”

    Source location

    Keith Andrew NOTTLE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and refresh helpline workers’ roles, referral escalation, training, supervision, monitoring and audit arrangements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have reviewed and refreshed the key factors in the role of the helpline (telephone) workers with colleagues in Nottinghamshire Healthcare Trust, including when and how referrals are escalated to the Crisis Team, training, supervision, monitoring and audit.”

    Source location

    Response from Turning Point
    Page 1 · response
    Published 22 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Agree a standard operating procedure governing helpline referrals to the Crisis Team.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have met with our colleagues from Nottinghamshire Healthcare Trust on a number of occasions and agreed a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the flow of referrals from the helpline workers to the Crisis Team. This SOP is in line with the service specification and national guidance regarding access to mental health services.”

    Source location

    Response from Turning Point
    Page 1 · response
    Published 22 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ensure helpline workers and their team leader understand the referral standard operating procedure.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have met with the team of helpline workers and their team leader and ensured that they are familiar with the detail of the SOP.”

    Source location

    Response from Turning Point
    Page 1 · response
    Published 22 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce additional monitoring and audits to check compliance with the referral procedure and address variance promptly.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have introduced additional monitoring and audits to ensure that all helpline workers are following the SOP and any variance is addressed in a timely way.”

    Source location

    Response from Turning Point
    Page 1 · response
    Published 22 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Agree a competency framework covering staff confidence in handling calls and escalating risk.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have also agreed a competency framework to provide assurance that our staff are confident in their ability to handle calls and the escalation process regarding risk, amongst other areas.”

    Source location

    Response from Turning Point
    Page 1 · response
    Published 22 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the Recovery Worker competency assessment to strengthen competence in call management, systems use, and risk and safety escalation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Recovery Workers also undertake a competency assessment to ensure they have a high level of competence in managing calls, using correct systems and utilising appropriate escalation protocols in relation to risk and safety management. The competency assessment has been updated in light of this inquest. The updated competency assessment is attached (Appendix 2).”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Nottinghamshire Healthcare
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review local UK Mental Health Triage Scale guidance and establish a more robust process for escalating call-transfer difficulties.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have been assured by Turning Point that in her evidence regarding transfers to CRHT the staff member was referring to June 2021 when the Urgent Access line was first set up, where there were some initial issues with the transfer of calls. The local guidance for the UK Mental Health Triage Scale has been reviewed with a more robust escalation process should there be any difficulty encountered in transfer of a call.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Nottinghamshire Healthcare
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and disseminate the Urgent Access line Standard Operating Procedure to relevant staff through email, supervision, and team meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) (Appendix 3) for the Urgent Access line has been reviewed and shared with all relevant staff via email and also during supervision and team meetings.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Nottinghamshire Healthcare
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce a digital telephony system that records calls and enables regular audit of call activity.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A new digital telephony system is being introduced into the Trust which will provide greater insight into call activity. All calls will be recorded which will enable the roll out of regular audit. It is anticipated that the telephony system will be operational by Mid-August 2022.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Nottinghamshire Healthcare
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce monthly sampling and auditing of telephone recordings to assess SOP compliance and provide training or remedial action where needed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “An audit system is being introduced whereby telephone recordings of a sample of telephone calls will be listened to monthly and utilised for audit and training purposes. This will include monitoring if the calls are being handled in accordance with the SOP and taking remedial action if needed.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Nottinghamshire Healthcare
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 September 2022

    Open published response
  3. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Matthew John Evans · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Matthew John Evans was a 47-year-old man who developed insomnia, anxiety and depression during the third COVID-19 lockdown and died on 16 June 2021 after ending his life. The principal concerns related to the GP’s lack of mental-health assessment, suicide-risk assessment, follow-up and consideration of referral; the general practice’s prescribing, communication and clinical-governance arrangements; and TalkPlus’s lack of clear guidance on referral to secondary mental-health services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to undertake mental health assessment and identify need for further or secondary mental health support

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The actions of the General Practitioner The GP was not sufficiently proactive with multiple lost opportunities to provide better care and support for Matthew. The GP did not undertake a mental health assessment to assess the severity of Matthew’s difficulties and to ascertain whether further support or referral to secondary mental health care were indicated in any of the four telephone consultations. He did not ask or document at any time if Matthew had any suicidal ideation or acts of self-harm. The GP did not offer a face-to-face consultation or arrange a follow up appointment. The GP declined to prescribe Zopiclone and whilst he referred Matthew to the benefits of Melatonin he did not offer a prescription. He prescribed Mirtazepine having not done so before for someone in Matthew’s position on a background of having no post graduate qualifications in mental health. Furthermore, he did not document any warning of the possible side-effects of this drug including the possible increased risk of suicidal ideation with commencing the drug. It is unclear whether the GP had read the letters from TalkPlus. He did not ask permission as to whether it was possible to inform or involve Matthew’s partner and family in his on-going care. ”

    Source location

    Matthew John Evans · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share suicide and self-harm documentation and assessment learning with all Frimley GP practices through bulletins, meetings, clinical leads and prescribing updates.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The NHS Frimley ICB will be carrying out a number of actions following the inquest. These include sharing the concerns raised with all GP practices in the Frimley area. The learning will focus particularly on the importance of good documentation in recording risk of suicide or self-harm following a consultation when someone has been assessed as having suicidal ideation or is at risk of acts of self-harm.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Firmley
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver a recorded virtual training session on mental health assessment and documentation, then distribute the recording to all practices.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The practices across the ICS will also be reminded of the importance of a good mental health assessment using recognised mental health tools. There are already templates for PHQ9 and GAD on the GP systems for them to use. The learning will be shared with practices in July 2022 in the GP bulletin. In September 2022, there will be a virtual training session, which will be recorded, on mental health assessment, which will also include documentation. The recording will be sent to all practices following the event.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Firmley
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Send PHQ9 and GAD7 questionnaires before consultations and record their scores directly in EMIS Web.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “18. PHQ9/GAD7 questionnaire will now be sent to patients to complete ahead of their consultations. Scores will be written directly into EMIS Web so available during the consultation with the patient.”

    Source location

    Response from Farnham Practice
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Create and circulate an Accurix template directing clinicians to GAD and PHQ9 resources for detecting anxiety and symptoms.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “20. Accurix Template created and circulated to all clinicians on where to find GAD & PHQ-9 to detect patient’s anxiety and symptoms.”

    Source location

    Response from Farnham Practice
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The circumstances were a specific case, not widespread poor care, and the care provided was not unsafe.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are satisfied, at this point, that the circumstances surrounding Mr Evans’ death were a specific case and not indicative of widespread poor care on the part of the provider. Whilst we have concluded that improvements could have been made in the care and treatment provided to Mr Evans, this was not unsafe. We are pleased to see the provider has identified areas of improvement in its care and treatment, and we are assured that the actions taken will protect others using the service from harm. At this stage we have decided not to instigate any further action. However, we will continue to regularly monitor the provider and, where”

    Source location

    Response from Care Quality Commisson
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    No further action is currently considered necessary because the provider’s actions are expected to protect service users from harm.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are satisfied, at this point, that the circumstances surrounding Mr Evans’ death were a specific case and not indicative of widespread poor care on the part of the provider. Whilst we have concluded that improvements could have been made in the care and treatment provided to Mr Evans, this was not unsafe. We are pleased to see the provider has identified areas of improvement in its care and treatment, and we are assured that the actions taken will protect others using the service from harm. At this stage we have decided not to instigate any further action. However, we will continue to regularly monitor the provider and, where”

    Source location

    Response from Care Quality Commisson
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Regulatory action can target registered managers or providers, but not failings attributed solely to individuals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As you may be aware, CQC can only take regulatory action against a registered manager or a registered provider, but not when failings of an individual have been identified.”

    Source location

    Response from Care Quality Commisson
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing clinical guidance, professional standards, revalidation and training arrangements are considered sufficient to support appropriate prescribing and diagnosis.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As noted by NHS England, there are several educational resources and guidance documents relating to the assessment and treatment of depression that are regularly reviewed and accessible to clinicians. These include National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance, which details possible adverse effects of prescribing mirtazapine, Clinical Knowledge Summaries and the British National Formulary.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The concerns do not indicate that the doctor poses a patient risk or undermines public confidence in doctors.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The AR is assured that the matters contained in your complaint do not raise concerns that ████████ poses either a risk to patients or undermines the public’s confidence in doctors. Although we do not need to investigate further, we will share your concerns with the doctor’s responsible officer and ask the doctor to discuss it with their appraiser as part of their revalidation.”

    Source location

    Response from General Medical Council(2)
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    No further investigation is considered necessary, although the concerns will be shared for discussion during revalidation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The AR is assured that the matters contained in your complaint do not raise concerns that ████████ poses either a risk to patients or undermines the public’s confidence in doctors. Although we do not need to investigate further, we will share your concerns with the doctor’s responsible officer and ask the doctor to discuss it with their appraiser as part of their revalidation.”

    Source location

    Response from General Medical Council(2)
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The response disputes that secondary mental health referral was indicated, stating that the patient did not meet referral criteria and remained low risk.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “10. The Deceased did not come close to a referral to the urgent assessment unit.”

    Source location

    Response from Farnham Practice
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 May 2022

    Open published response
  4. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Fadhia SEGULEH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Fadhia Seguleh was receiving treatment for anxiety and depression when she was found unresponsive, attached to a ligature at her home on 24 February 2021. The concerns included fragmented care and inadequate information sharing between NHS mental health services, her GP and private therapy provider, telephone-only mental health assessments during Covid, and her attending A&E alone during a previous mental health crisis without family input.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Telephone-only GP assessments of mental health risk and need

    Wider context from the report

    “2. As a consequence of Covid all of the assessments of her by her GP in relation to her mental health were done via telephone. Prior to Covid it was likely that they would have been done face to face. It was accepted that assessments of mental health risk and understanding of need was far easier to assess face to face. ”

    Source location

    Fadhia SEGULEH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. County Durham and Darlington

    AI-generated summary

    Jeffrey Gash · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jeffrey Gash died after hanging himself on 30 September 2013, following contacts with his GP and the Crisis Team while reporting that he was feeling worse and hearing voices. The concerns included insufficient telephone assessment and exploration of his symptoms, failure to arrange or escalate to a face-to-face assessment, unclear policies and recording regarding home visits, and inadequate risk assessment and management.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of training and understanding for appropriate telephone assessment

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The Crisis Team nurse accepted in evidence that she had not been as forceful as she could and should have been to explore with the deceased his new symptoms, auditory hallucinations, hearing voices. This evidences a lack of training and understanding of the nature of and importance of an appropriate level of telephone assessment ”

    Source location

    Jeffrey Gash · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete supervised observation, evaluation and competency development for telephone assessment practice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As you have described, the individual nurse involved in the care of Mr Gash recognised in the inquest that she should have been more detailed in her questioning of him in relation to specific symptoms. This individual has, since the inquest, spent some time reflecting on this with her clinical supervisor. In addition, from September 2013 to January 2014 the individual nurse went through a period of informal capability management. During this time she did not undertake the shift co-ordinator role responsibilities and worked all shifts alongside a more senior and experienced member of the team. She observed best practice assessments and her assessment practice was observed and”

    Source location

    2014-0377-Response-by-Tees-Esk-and-Wear-Valleys-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 August 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct periodic quality checks of crisis-team assessments and provide targeted staff feedback.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since that time, periodic checks of her assessments (and assessments done by the rest of the team) have been undertaken by the Consultant Psychiatrist to provide assurance that they are of appropriate quality. This has also enabled us to provide specific feedback to staff as needed to help them develop and improve. We are now assured that the individual nurse has increased her competence and knowledge in telephone assessment skills together with an overall improvement in team performance.”

    Source location

    2014-0377-Response-by-Tees-Esk-and-Wear-Valleys-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 August 2014

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026