Unreliable access to regional neonatology specialist support
First to latest report 25 Apr 2022 — 30 Aug 2024
Reports that mention this concern
2
Times this concern has been raised
2
Stated actions linked to this concern
4
What this concern includes
Includes failures of the regional neonatology support arrangement, including absent routes for cross-regional specialist advice and unreliable or delayed on-call consultant availability across covered hospitals.
What is not included
Excludes generic regional coordination or mutual-aid deficiencies not explicitly tied to neonatology specialist support.
Excludes failures involving other clinical specialties, ambulance transfers, radiology sharing or general referral capacity.
Excludes isolated staffing, training, communication or equipment deficiencies unless they directly impair access to the regional neonatology support arrangement.
Trends
Reports over time
Reports mentioning this concern, over time
Reports about this concern issued each year.
* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.
Most frequent recipients
Most frequent recipients
Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.
British Association of Perinatal Medicine1
NHS England1
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust1
NHS trust2
Executive non-departmental public body1
Health professional body1
Reports and published responses 2 reports
See individual reports that have raised this concern, and the actions taken in response
West Sussex, Brighton and Hove
Concerns raised1
Variability in on-call Neonatology Consultant attendance times
Linked responses
British Association of Perinatal Medicine
NHS England
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.4
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust
Explore options for establishing a separate Neonatal Consultant on-call rota for the Princess Royal Hospital Special Care Baby Unit.
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust
Approach the Integrated Care Board about externally reviewing current arrangements and options to strengthen Neonatal Consultant on-call provision for the Princess Royal Hospital service.
British Association of Perinatal Medicine
Recommend against simultaneous out-of-hours cover of geographically separate neonatal sites and concurrent Tier 2 and Tier 3 cover by one consultant.
British Association of Perinatal Medicine
Publish recommendations requiring immediate consultant availability, attendance within 30 minutes, and robustly job-planned and risk-assessed local coverage arrangements.
Respondent positions A position is what a respondent says about the concern when they do not describe a specific action.7
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust
Outcome reviews found no evidence that the current Neonatal Consultant on-call arrangements at Princess Royal Hospital are unsafe or contribute to neonatal deaths.
Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust
The Trust cannot currently provide a separate Princess Royal Hospital rota because Consultant, workforce and financial resources are unavailable.
Unable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust
The Trust is asking the Integrated Care Board to externally review current arrangements and options for strengthening Neonatal Consultant on-call provision.
Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
NHS England
NHS Trusts determine their own out-of-hours neonatal consultant response-time policies under consultants’ terms and conditions.
Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
British Association of Perinatal Medicine
BAPM guidance contains no recommendation specifying the time consultants must be on site.
Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.
British Association of Perinatal Medicine
BAPM is advisory rather than executive and therefore cannot direct trusts' local implementation processes.
Outside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.
British Association of Perinatal Medicine
Individual trusts are responsible for implementing local processes in line with national guidelines.
Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
South Yorkshire (Western)
Concerns raised1
Lack of access to support from regional neonatology colleagues
This report raised 3 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
No linked response statements
No respondent-stated action or position is linked to these concerns in the published data.
Actions and positions describe what organisations say in published responses. Implementation is not independently verified.