Recurring concern

Unreliable communication of patient-care information between clinical staff

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 21 Aug 2013•Latest report 27 Feb 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures to communicate relevant patient care, treatment or risk information between clinical staff responsible for the same patient's care.

Not included

  • Formal handover processes where handover itself is the more specific unsafe control
  • Communication between separate organisations or agencies governed by a named information-sharing process
  • Documentation failures where relevant information was otherwise reliably communicated
  • Failure to act after information was reliably communicated
Reports
124

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
133

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
193

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care17
NHS England13
Care Quality Commission7
Barts Health NHS Trust4
Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust4
University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust4
Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust3
Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust3
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust3
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust3
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence3
Royal London Hospital3
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust3
Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust2
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB2

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    David James FENN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    David James FENN was admitted to hospital with suspected sepsis and septic left knee arthritis, after attending several days earlier with similar symptoms and being discharged home. He subsequently developed severe sepsis and multiorgan failure and died on 12 February 2025. The principal concerns were that sepsis was not appropriately recognised on 28 January, the Sepsis 6 pathway was not followed, timely consultant review was not obtained, and relevant clinical discussions and escalation did not occur adequately.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to fully impart and understand crucial clinical information

    Wider context from the report

    “3) The later attempt to seek the Consultant's views was hampered by the use of a mobile phone which had poor signal in the operating theatre and crucial information was not fully imparted/understood. ”

    Source location

    David James FENN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement Epic as a unified electronic patient record providing real-time access to clinical information and an integrated communication and escalation platform.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since October 2025, the Trust has implemented a new electronic patient record system, Epic. The Trust has consolidated a vast number of separate systems into one sole system that encompasses all the patient notes. This provides unified, one record per patient for all clinical and administrative data. The impact for patients is as follows:”

    Source location

    Response from East Sussex and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing escalation and communication pathways are considered appropriate, including consultant review, alternative escalation, and waiting where patients remain stable.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A clinical governance presentation took place on 13 January 2026, wherein this matter was discussed at length. The Trust is satisfied that the methods of escalation and communications in place are appropriate and that patient safety remains a priority.”

    Source location

    Response from East Sussex and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 18 March 2026

    Open published response
  2. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    His Honour Bruce Caulfield · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    His Honour Bruce Caulfield died at Trafford General Hospital on 19 August 2025 from complications arising from coronary artery disease, against a background including an acute on chronic subdural haematoma requiring surgery, hypertension and frailty. Concerns included the delay between a family member requesting medical review and the review taking place, whether nursing practices ensured vulnerable patients received adequate hydration and nutrition, and whether measures relating to communication about sitting-out recommendations were in place across the Trust.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure communication of agreed sitting-out recommendations between physiotherapy and nursing professionals across the Trust

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Whilst the Ward Manager’s local investigation in relation to the circumstances of a fall His Honour sustained on Doyle Ward, Wythenshawe hospital on 30th July 2025 has resulted in an important change in practice as regards to communication between physiotherapy and nursing professionals as to agreed sitting-out recommendations and prominent documentation of these, I am concerned that comparable measures may not be in place across the Trust as a whole. ”

    Source location

    His Honour Bruce Caulfield · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain consistent Trust-wide use of seating charts and documentation of allied health professional recommendations in HIVE for communication and care planning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I would like to offer our sincere apologies if the evidence presented at the inquest gave the impression that the improvements implemented on Doyle Ward were isolated to that ward alone; this is not the case. Across all inpatient areas a seating chart is used consistently, whether as laminated bedside signage or integrated into therapy timetables. AHP recommendations are documented within HIVE, which is accessible to all clinical professionals across the Trust, ensuring a unified approach to communication and care planning.”

    Source location

    Response from Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 9 · response
    Published 10 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Extend the Wythenshawe audit of physiotherapy assessments and nursing review processes across the Trust and report findings through hospital quality and safety groups.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “For patients sitting out for the first time, or where fatigue risk is identified, AHP staff undertake structured assessments including medical history, baseline function, muscle strength, sitting balance and cognition. Recommendations regarding transfer method and seating are documented in HIVE and verbally handed over to nursing colleagues. Nursing staff implement these recommendations in conjunction with moving and handling risk assessments and ongoing observation.”

    Source location

    Response from Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 9 · response
    Published 10 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Trust disputes that communication and documentation measures for sitting-out recommendations were isolated to Doyle Ward, stating they apply consistently across all inpatient areas.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I would like to offer our sincere apologies if the evidence presented at the inquest gave the impression that the improvements implemented on Doyle Ward were isolated to that ward alone; this is not the case. Across all inpatient areas a seating chart is used consistently, whether as laminated bedside signage or integrated into therapy timetables. AHP recommendations are documented within HIVE, which is accessible to all clinical professionals across the Trust, ensuring a unified approach to communication and care planning.”

    Source location

    Response from Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 9 · response
    Published 10 February 2026

    Open published response
  3. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Urielle Mayila Kuyenga · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Urielle Mayila Kuyenga, a four-year-old girl with sickle-cell disease, died in hospital on 4 December 2023 from sepsis resulting from bacterial pneumonia. The report identifies failures to ensure administration of prescribed prophylactic penicillin and failures by doctors to identify her sickle-cell diagnosis during three presentations for respiratory infection as contributory factors.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Breakdown of communication about responsibility for penicillin prescription and dispensation

    Wider context from the report

    “1. As a patient with Sickle Cell Disease, Urielle was prescribed prophylactic penicillin to mitigate the risk of her developing fatal symptoms arising from typical respiratory infections. Urielle’s mother chose not to collect those prescriptions and administer penicillin to Urielle. While specialist doctors believed that her GP was monitoring the prescription and dispensation of the penicillin, whilst Urielle’s GP was misled by Urielle’s mother that the hospital were dispensing the medication directly. The breakdown of communication means that Urielle was left unprotected from opportunistic infection which caused this avoidable death. ”

    Source location

    Urielle Mayila Kuyenga · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Proactively contact patients with sickle cell disease annually for medication reviews, including Penicillin V prescribing and compliance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Having identified these patients from the Audit, all patients with Sickle Cell Disease are proactively contacted by the practice for a medication review. This includes reviewing Penicillin V prescribing and compliance as a key factor. Completed and Continuing on an annual basis.”

    Source location

    Response from Maylands Healthcare Surgery
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Liaise directly with secondary or tertiary specialists when responsibility for Penicillin V prescribing or dispensing requires clarification.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• If there are any concerns regarding who is taking responsibility for prescribing and dispensing Penicillin V prophylaxis, the practice will directly liaise with the patient’s secondary or”

    Source location

    Response from Maylands Healthcare Surgery
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Move all patients with sickle cell disease to electronic repeat dispensing for Penicillin antibiotics.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• All patients with Sickle Cell Disease have had their medications changed to electronic repeat dispensing. This ensures patients can access regular, ongoing supplies of their Penicillin antibiotics from their pharmacy without needing a new prescription from their GP each time. We have also liaised with our on-site pharmacist to ensure that any uncollected prescriptions for Sickle Cell Disease patients are actively communicated back to us at the practice to identify concerns early. Completed and Continuing.”

    Source location

    Response from Maylands Healthcare Surgery
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require the on-site pharmacist to communicate uncollected sickle cell disease prescriptions to the practice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• All patients with Sickle Cell Disease have had their medications changed to electronic repeat dispensing. This ensures patients can access regular, ongoing supplies of their Penicillin antibiotics from their pharmacy without needing a new prescription from their GP each time. We have also liaised with our on-site pharmacist to ensure that any uncollected prescriptions for Sickle Cell Disease patients are actively communicated back to us at the practice to identify concerns early. Completed and Continuing.”

    Source location

    Response from Maylands Healthcare Surgery
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Increase access to shared care records to improve communication between primary and secondary care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the absence of an SCP, clear lines of communication should have been established between Urielle’s specialist in the hospital and GP. The overall responsibility for her care, including monitoring and issuing the prescription, should have remained with the hospital. The government is committed to improving this communication between primary and secondary care as outlined in the 10 Year Health Plan in the section on the ‘Red Tape Challenge’ recommendations. These include work to improve information technology through initiatives such as increasing access to shared care records and developing greater interoperability of electronic patient records (EPRs), starting with the sharing of structured medication information.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop greater interoperability of electronic patient records, starting with structured medication information sharing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the absence of an SCP, clear lines of communication should have been established between Urielle’s specialist in the hospital and GP. The overall responsibility for her care, including monitoring and issuing the prescription, should have remained with the hospital. The government is committed to improving this communication between primary and secondary care as outlined in the 10 Year Health Plan in the section on the ‘Red Tape Challenge’ recommendations. These include work to improve information technology through initiatives such as increasing access to shared care records and developing greater interoperability of electronic patient records (EPRs), starting with the sharing of structured medication information.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Responsibility for addressing the prophylactic penicillin communication concern lies with other bodies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. As a patient with Sickle Cell Disease, Urielle was prescribed prophylactic penicillin to mitigate the risk of her developing fatal symptoms arising from typical respiratory infections. Urielle’s mother chose not to collect those prescriptions and administer penicillin to Urielle. Urielle’s specialist doctors believed that her GP was monitoring the prescription and dispensation of the penicillin, whilst Urielle’s GP was misled by Urielle’s mother that the hospital were dispensing the medication directly. The breakdown of communication means that Urielle was left unprotected from opportunist infection which caused this avoidable death.”

    Source location

    Response from Partnership of East London Co-operatives Ltd
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Without a shared care protocol, the hospital should retain responsibility for care, monitoring and issuing the prescription.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the absence of an SCP, clear lines of communication should have been established between Urielle’s specialist in the hospital and GP. The overall responsibility for her care, including monitoring and issuing the prescription, should have remained with the hospital. The government is committed to improving this communication between primary and secondary care as outlined in the 10 Year Health Plan in the section on the ‘Red Tape Challenge’ recommendations. These include work to improve information technology through initiatives such as increasing access to shared care records and developing greater interoperability of electronic patient records (EPRs), starting with the sharing of structured medication information.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response
  4. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Paolino AMICO · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Paolino Amico, who had metastatic bladder cancer and advanced clinical frailty, was admitted with severe bilateral pneumonia and died in hospital on 12 June 2024. He received multiple overdoses of slow-release morphine following a prescription error, with concerns also raised about medication administration, delayed emergency escalation, oxygen provision after discharge, and the management of morphine reversal and pain relief.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate overnight deterioration and family medication concerns to the on-call doctor

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) The on-call doctor was called approximately one hour after Mr Amico’s NEWS score was found to be 10 and arrived at 07:50, this was not an emergency call. The on-call doctor had not been informed of: a. the deterioration in Mr Amico’s presentation during the night b. that the family had informed nursing staff of their concerns Mr Amico had been given the wrong medication when he was noted to be unresponsive at approximately 03:00 hours, that should have immediately raised concerns about an overdose of MST. ”

    Source location

    Paolino AMICO · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide restorative clinical supervision and professional nurse advocate learning on controlled drugs, communication, challenge and escalation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Restorative clinical supervision took place in June 2024, which was a reflective discussion with special emphasis on how to manage challenging prescribers and how to have an effective professional discussion when in doubt of management plan, and how to escalate higher if still in doubt.”

    Source location

    Response from Princess Alexandra Hospital
    Page 5 · response
    Published 19 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The hospital trust is responsible for providing the response and addressing the reported concerns through its governance arrangements and actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust will be providing their own response to this Report, however, the Hertfordshire & West Essex ICB have advised NHS England of the Trust’s governance arrangements and actions being taken to address the concerns raised. It is understood that the Trust’s Patient Safety Group (PSG) has active oversight of several of the areas highlighted in the Report, particularly medicines safety, recognition of deterioration, and incident learning.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 4 · response
    Published 19 November 2025

    Open published response
  5. Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin

    AI-generated summary

    Lynn SILCOCK · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lynn Silcock was admitted to hospital in September 2022 with symptoms including breathlessness and fatigue, and was diagnosed with aortic stenosis among other conditions. She was discharged without a cardiology referral, appointment or plan, and a gastroscopy report was not followed by a cardiology referral. She died at home on 10 July 2025; the postmortem identified aortic stenosis on a background of bicuspid aortic valve, with myocardial fibrosis. The report raised concerns about communication and document exchange between teams, the absence of an appropriate referral, and the lack of an investigation into what went wrong.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of document exchange and communication between gastroenterology and cardiology teams

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) There was no document exchange or communication between the gastroenterology team and the cardiology team meaning that Ms Silcock was then forgotten about. ”

    Source location

    Lynn SILCOCK · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct a Patient Safety Incident Investigation into inpatient-to-outpatient referral risks and identify the safest referral system.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The case of Mrs Silcock has been raised as a Patient Safety Investigation (PSII) under the Patient Safety Incident Response framework and some of the initial work of that investigation has been used to inform the response outlined in this letter.”

    Source location

    Response from Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require each inpatient specialty to document and share a standard operating procedure defining referral processes, responsibilities and safety-netting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the short to medium term the Trust’s Medical Director and Deputy Medical Director are tasking the leadership teams of our clinical divisions to ensure each inpatient specialty has a clear standard operating procedure (SOP) for inpatient to outpatient referrals. This will be documented and shared across the team with clear direction on process, roles, and responsibilities in ensuring referrals are made and a system of safety netting is in place to ensure decisions to refer to other specialties are followed through and actioned.”

    Source location

    Response from Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish a single outpatient-referral email for each specialty, with referrals managed through standard triage and follow-up processes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There will be a single referral email for each specialty for referral for outpatient follow-up, the referrals within the team will then be managed in the standard way all referrals are with appropriate triage. This process will be developed over the next 3 months with SOPs developed and appropriate communications cascaded.”

    Source location

    Response from Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Raise a project feasibility request to assess a digital referral-management solution for scoping and potential inclusion on the Trust’s digital roadmap.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A project feasibility request has already been raised to assess the need for a digital solution to support referral management. This is the route whereby needs are reviewed and scoped to develop proposals and business cases to place the need on the Trusts ‘digital roadmap’ (the overall programme of work to mature the Trusts digital systems).”

    Source location

    Response from Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital
    Page 4 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and roll out the national Frontline Digitisation Programme, including electronic-record deployment guidance and support for safe implementation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England has long recognised that omissions in information-sharing within or between healthcare organisations can contribute to poor continuity of care and lead to poor health outcomes. In 2021, NHS England developed and rolled out a national ‘Frontline Digitisation’ (FD) Programme, which aimed to support NHS Trusts in England with the procurement and deployment of Electronic Patient Record (EPR) systems. The aim of this was to support increased digital maturity of organisations and improve information sharing within and between organisations. Beyond facilitating the procurement of EPR systems, the FD Programme also provided guidance and support to ensure safe and effective deployments.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The concerns fall outside NHS England’s role and remit as a commissioner of certain healthcare services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The concerns raised in your Report will be dealt with by SATH, to whom your Report has also been addressed, and there is no action for NHS England to take in regard to this matter as the issues fall outside of NHS England’s role and remit as a commissioner of certain healthcare services. However, the following information may be useful to the Coroner as background.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust is responsible for addressing the concerns raised in the report.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The concerns raised in your Report will be dealt with by SATH, to whom your Report has also been addressed, and there is no action for NHS England to take in regard to this matter as the issues fall outside of NHS England’s role and remit as a commissioner of certain healthcare services. However, the following information may be useful to the Coroner as background.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response
  6. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Jillian Anne Steedman · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jillian Anne Steedman died at Pitsea Station on 12 May 2023 after intentionally going into the path of an oncoming train, following a deterioration in her mental health. The report identifies concerns including failures in information sharing, risk assessment, care planning, escalation, crisis response, and review of her placement and support arrangements.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of information sharing between professionals involved in care and treatment

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) There was a lack of information sharing between professionals involved in the care and treatment of Jillian Steedman who was a complex mental health patient with a long history of treatment resistant mental disorder. ”

    Source location

    Jillian Anne Steedman · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hold a post-Inquest debrief with Community and Crisis Response teams to share learning about information sharing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Response: The Trust appreciates the need to ensure information sharing between professionals is carried out in a robust and timely manner. To share the learning on this point, a post-Inquest debrief was held with the Community and the Crisis Response Team teams to discuss the Inquest and the concerns raised with regards to information sharing.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review information-sharing protocols for collaboration with professionals in other organisations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have strengthened our governance by reviewing our information-sharing protocols with specific reference to how we work with professionals in other organisations. We have introduced structured communication methods for handovers and shared care plans which we have made accessible to all involved professionals including care home and social care staff. We are working in a more collaborative culture through regular multidisciplinary team meetings which is supporting our patient’s safety and planning. The Trust has relooked at its named”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce structured handovers and shared care plans accessible to involved health, care-home and social-care professionals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have strengthened our governance by reviewing our information-sharing protocols with specific reference to how we work with professionals in other organisations. We have introduced structured communication methods for handovers and shared care plans which we have made accessible to all involved professionals including care home and social care staff. We are working in a more collaborative culture through regular multidisciplinary team meetings which is supporting our patient’s safety and planning. The Trust has relooked at its named”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Undertake a full review of community mental health social work arrangements, including joint-working arrangements, to clarify roles and responsibilities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response to this PFD, we will undertake a full review of our community mental health social work arrangements, including the existing arrangements supporting joint working, to ensure roles and responsibilities are clear. We expect this work to take place over the next year and we are committed to ensuring that the outcome of this work is safer with better coordinated support for those using the service.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex County Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 October 2025

    Open published response
  7. West Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    Kore Elizabeth Padgett · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kore Elizabeth Padgett was admitted to hospital after an accidental fall down the stairs, sustaining an unstable neck fracture requiring immobilisation in a hard collar. The collar affected her swallowing, contributed to pressure sores, and limited chest physiotherapy; she later developed recurrent aspiration pneumonia and died on 23 October 2024. The concerns included inadequate staff training in fitting the collar, insufficient communication and multidisciplinary consideration of treatment options, and a lack of opportunity for Kore to make an informed decision about the risks and benefits of continued collar use.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of ward care professionals to communicate concerns about the health impact of collar use

    Wider context from the report

    “iv)      The lack of communication between professionals providing care on the ward and the concerns they were raising as to the impact of the collar upon Kore's health and the absence of any consideration of those concerns by those in charge of Kore’s care with no multi-disciplinary approach as to the available treatment options or further assessments which could have been undertaken. ”

    Source location

    Kore Elizabeth Padgett · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of treating clinicians to communicate with the neurosurgical team about treatment options

    Wider context from the report

    “ii)       The absence of communication by the treating clinicians with the neurosurgical team at Leeds in respect of treatment options for Kore given the significant impact that the wearing of the collar was having on Kore with the development of pressure sores, difficulties with her swallow and increasing risks of aspiration. ”

    Source location

    Kore Elizabeth Padgett · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise clinical guidance and protocols to establish escalation processes for advice, complications and neurosurgical liaison in cervical spine injury care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To support this pathway, CHFT guidance and protocols are being revised to provide clear escalation processes for clinical advice, complications and neurosurgical liaison and involvement relating to cervical spine injury. These revisions are being led by Dr ████████, Consultant in Care of the Elderly, and will ensure that patients are managed consistently in line with updated standards. This work is also scheduled for completion by November 2025 and is progressing as planned.”

    Source location

    Response from Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 September 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and implement a collar initiation and management procedure covering consent, risk-benefit decisions, neurosurgical input and escalation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for collar initiation and management is also being developed. This SOP will include guidance on consent, risk versus benefit, informed decision-making, collaborative input from the neurosurgical team, and clear escalation protocols. Led by Dr ████████, Matron for Surgery and Anaesthetics, the SOP will be embedded within the competency framework and is scheduled for implementation by the end of January 2026.”

    Source location

    Response from Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 September 2025

    Open published response
  8. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Lila Airelle Marsland · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lila Marsland became unwell with headache, fever, lethargy and neck pain and was discharged from hospital with a diagnosis of viral tonsillitis. She was found to have died at home around six and a half hours after discharge; the inquest recorded that she died as a consequence of undiagnosed and untreated pneumococcal meningitis. Concerns included the embedding of the Child Sepsis Screening Tool, implementation of relevant NICE guidance, the adequacy and recording of clinical assessments, and fragmented storage and sharing of clinical information.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Fragmented and disjointed storage and sharing of clinical information between professionals

    Wider context from the report

    “The court heard evidence that, over the course of almost 10 hours in hospital, Lila’s history and details of examinations and assessments undertaken were recorded on a mixture of various analogue and digital systems in operation in different parts of the Trust, leading to a risk of vital clinical information being lost in the system. I am concerned that this, and other hospitals elsewhere in the country, continue to operate with information being stored and shared between professionals in a fragmented and disjointed way. ”

    Source location

    Lila Airelle Marsland · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue rolling out and optimising electronic patient records across NHS trusts to improve access to shared patient information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “delivering the best care possible. The Department of Health and Social Care, and NHS England have programmes of work underway which should assist in preventing future deaths connected to this issue.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide support to improve secondary-care organisations’ digital maturity and reduce barriers to sharing clinical information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England is also providing support to bring trusts up to an optimum level of digital maturity, with all secondary care organisations completing a Digital Maturity Assessment in May 2024, which will be run yearly to track progress and identify areas for improvement, which will further reduce barriers to the sharing of information needed to treat patients.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Run annual digital maturity assessments for secondary-care organisations to track progress and identify improvements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England is also providing support to bring trusts up to an optimum level of digital maturity, with all secondary care organisations completing a Digital Maturity Assessment in May 2024, which will be run yearly to track progress and identify areas for improvement, which will further reduce barriers to the sharing of information needed to treat patients.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver a single patient record bringing patients’ medical records together, beginning rollout in maternity care from 2028.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Going beyond this, the Government’s 10 Year Health Plan commits to delivery of a single patient record (SPR). This will provide a comprehensive patient record, bringing together all of a patient’s medical records into one place. We have been engaging with the public to help shape our plans, including what information they would like to see included in a single patient record and we will continue to talk to the public and to health and care professionals as we design the SPR to ensure their needs are reflected. The SPR will begin to go live from 2028 and be rolled out first in maternity care.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 June 2025

    Open published response
  9. South London

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Paul Timothy Dunne · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Paul Dunne was brought to A&E after a paracetamol overdose and was considered at high risk of suicide, but did not receive continuous 1:1 observation. He absconded several times and was found dead after suspending himself in a nearby children's playground. Concerns included failures in risk assessment, observation, communication, documentation and escalation, as well as separate clinical-record systems used by mental health and A&E staff.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to acknowledge communicated patient risk

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Individual mental health professionals appeared to have gaps in knowledge and judgment. The director who was spokesperson for the Mental Health Trust did not appear to appreciate the seriousness of these deficits. • A mental health liaison nurse, who now is manager of these nurses, did not recognize the patient as high risk, despite his having been persuaded to attend A&E by the police against his will, having just expressed suicidal ideation, made a previous attempt, with alcohol intoxication and absconsion, as at the time he denied suicidality. Even in retrospect in court she did not acknowledge her misjudgement. She also asserted incorrectly that a patient who has mental capacity cannot be assessed under the Mental Health Act. • A mental health nurse of 9 years standing in the Home Treatment Team who acknowledged the risk to the patient’s life could hardly be higher, failed to document his assessment, as he could not find anywhere to write it before going on his break. No staff acknowledged that he had informed them of the risk. He assumed the patient would get 1:1 monitoring, but did not direct anyone to the need. When asked what he would have done if he had known there were no staff to conduct 1:1 monitoring, he said that he could perhaps hang around for a bit longer. ”

    Source location

    Mr Paul Timothy Dunne · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Investigating or acting against individual healthcare professionals falls outside the regulator’s authority.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. We recognise the distress and concern these events have caused and acknowledge the importance of accountability where there are apparent shortfalls in professional conduct or decision-making. However, it is important to clarify that the Care Quality Commission’s regulatory remit, as established under the Health and Social Care Act (2008) and the associated Regulated Activities Regulations (2014), is focused on assessing and holding providers rather than individual staff accountable for meeting fundamental standards of care. While we do not have the authority to investigate or act against individual healthcare professionals, we expect providers to ensure that their staff are competent, appropriately trained, and supported to deliver safe and effective care.”

    Source location

    Response from Care Quality Commission
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 February 2025

    Open published response
  10. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Carl Edmond EASTMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Carl Eastman was admitted to hospital after a fall at home and later suffered an unwitnessed fall on 28 July 2024 while in hospital. He sustained an irreversible brain bleed and died in hospital that evening as a direct result of the injury. Concerns included delays in CT scans after falls, widespread communication and record-keeping issues, failure to follow post-fall procedures, and possible wider skills or knowledge deficits among staff.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate accurate clinical information between ward and medical staff

    Wider context from the report

    “2. There was evidence of what I considered to be ‘widespread communication issues’ in the care provided to Mr Eastman. These included: • When the on-call doctor attended to review Mr Eastman at approximately 02:45 on 28 July 2024, ward staff (incorrectly) told the doctor that nobody had fallen on the ward, which lead to the doctor leaving the ward without Mr Eastman having been reviewed. As the consultant geriatrician said in his evidence, communication between the ward staff and medical staff was not good. • The evidence revealed that there were deficiencies in basic record keeping. ”

    Source location

    Carl Edmond EASTMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement and embed SBAR communication education in ward inductions, junior-doctor induction, safety huddles, board rounds and medical discussions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is acknowledged that discussions concerning the patient’s condition could have been more thorough and this failure to communicate effectively has been taken extremely seriously by the teams involved. Communication amongst the nursing and medical teams is of the highest priority to the Trust, and immediate actions have been taken following this safety event to improve key elements of the ward-based and wider hospital communication. It has been identified that the implementation and education of the Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation (SBAR) method of communication, will enable the multi-disciplinary teams to ensure effective and precise information sharing in critical safety events such as Mr. Eastman’s.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce and operate an additional mid-shift safety huddle reviewing high-fall-risk patients and changes in condition.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Introduction of an additional mid-shift ward safety huddle on the ward to include a review of patients at high risk of falling, and any changes in a patient’s condition at all”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 February 2025

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026