Recurring concern

Incomplete medication safety guidance for prescribers

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 29 Apr 2014•Latest report 20 Nov 2023

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of national formularies, prescribing guidelines or clinical decision-support guidance to include, maintain or clearly communicate material medication safety risks, interactions, contraindications or monitoring requirements to prescribers.

Not included

  • Excludes patient-facing product packaging, consumer warnings and general medication information where the deficient recipient is not a prescriber.
  • Excludes unsafe prescribing decisions where applicable medication safety guidance was available and the problem was failure to follow it.
  • Excludes medication administration, dispensing, supply, monitoring or reconciliation failures unless the asserted deficiency is the omission of prescriber-facing medication safety guidance.
  • Excludes guidance for a separately named medication-specific system or hazard where that narrower concern provides the more faithful boundary.
Reports
14

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
15

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2023

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
25

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence6
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency4
NHS England4
Advanced Health And Care Limited1
Amgen Limited1
Association of Ambulance Chief Executives1
Bausch & Lomb U.K. Limited1
BNF Publications1
Claypath and University Medical Group1
Department of Health and Social Care1
Informa Healthcare1
King's College Hospital1
King'S College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust1
Lincolnshire Community Health Services NHS Trust1
London Ambulance Service NHS Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Hertfordshire

    AI-generated summary

    Susan Ann GLADSTONE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Susan Ann Gladstone was admitted to Lister Hospital with pyelonephritis and an extremely elevated INR after taking warfarin and recently prescribed tramadol. She died on 8 January 2021; the principal concern was a potentially fatal interaction between tramadol and warfarin that caused exceptional thinning of her blood and brain bleeding.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of warnings to prescribing doctors about tramadol-warfarin interactions

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) A comment from the Anticoagulation Service in relation to tramadol reads "Known interactor although this is not listed in the BNF, from experience we have seen that this can increase the INR." There was nothing to warn the prescribing doctor of any possible interaction.(4) I found on the balance of probabilities that an interaction between tramadol and warfarin had caused this dangerous, and in the event fatal, INR level to develop. ”

    Source location

    Susan Ann GLADSTONE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. West Yorkshire Eastern

    AI-generated summary

    Dumile Daniel Thompson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Dumile Daniel Thompson developed Ramipril-induced angioedema, deteriorated after an apparent initial improvement, suffered respiratory collapse causing catastrophic brain injury, and died several days later after life support was withdrawn. The principal concerns included inadequate recognition of the risks and trajectory of ACE inhibitor-induced angioedema, insufficient specialist airway reassessment and monitoring, lack of relevant guidance and training, and limited access to previous medical records affecting medication decisions.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to highlight the preferred ARB recommendation for patients of Black African or African Caribbean origin in the BNF

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence, including that of Independent experts in Immunology and Adult Critical Care and Anaesthetics, highlighted that: • National Guidance and training for front line/emergency staff did not, and still does not include specifics about the various types of angioedema (histamine/bradykinin mediated), the risk factors, and the diverging treatment pathways, including the need for specialty medicine input with certain types of angioedema. • NICE does not currently publish guidance or a clinical knowledge summary on emergency management of angioedema. • Those treating Mr Thompson on 23 October 2020 in the A&E department were therefore not aware of the complexity and fickle nature of ACE Induced angioedema, including the potential speed of deterioration in symptoms, even after what appeared to be initial improvement. • ACE Inhibitor angioedema is more common, up to four to five times more, in individuals of Black African or African Caribbean origin. This increased risk factor is not published in the BNF. • The NICE recommendation about using ARB as the preferred choice of medication in patients of Black African or African Caribbean origin is not highlighted in BNF, notwithstanding the BNF is the go-to source for medication management, contraindications, and cautions. It also came to light that Mr Thompson had transferred geographical areas such that clinicians were unable to access his previous medical records to determine why ARB’s, an alternative to ACE Inhibitors, had been preferred by clinicians on a previous occasion. His now treating clinicians were unable to access this information because such records are not readily available to, or shared with, clinicians in a different area/Trust. The reason for this is not entirely clear and was thought to be related to data protection though there is nothing to suggest Mr Thompson withheld his consent, or would have done so. ”

    Source location

    Dumile Daniel Thompson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to publish the increased ACE inhibitor angioedema risk for people of Black African or African Caribbean origin in the BNF

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence, including that of Independent experts in Immunology and Adult Critical Care and Anaesthetics, highlighted that: • National Guidance and training for front line/emergency staff did not, and still does not include specifics about the various types of angioedema (histamine/bradykinin mediated), the risk factors, and the diverging treatment pathways, including the need for specialty medicine input with certain types of angioedema. • NICE does not currently publish guidance or a clinical knowledge summary on emergency management of angioedema. • Those treating Mr Thompson on 23 October 2020 in the A&E department were therefore not aware of the complexity and fickle nature of ACE Induced angioedema, including the potential speed of deterioration in symptoms, even after what appeared to be initial improvement. • ACE Inhibitor angioedema is more common, up to four to five times more, in individuals of Black African or African Caribbean origin. This increased risk factor is not published in the BNF. • The NICE recommendation about using ARB as the preferred choice of medication in patients of Black African or African Caribbean origin is not highlighted in BNF, notwithstanding the BNF is the go-to source for medication management, contraindications, and cautions. It also came to light that Mr Thompson had transferred geographical areas such that clinicians were unable to access his previous medical records to determine why ARB’s, an alternative to ACE Inhibitors, had been preferred by clinicians on a previous occasion. His now treating clinicians were unable to access this information because such records are not readily available to, or shared with, clinicians in a different area/Trust. The reason for this is not entirely clear and was thought to be related to data protection though there is nothing to suggest Mr Thompson withheld his consent, or would have done so. ”

    Source location

    Dumile Daniel Thompson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  3. Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

    AI-generated summary

    JOHN ALFRED ROBERTS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John Alfred Roberts, aged 78, was admitted with vomiting and retching and was found to have an inoperable perforated sigmoid colon. He was discharged home for palliative care and died there on 26 June 2021. The substantive concerns related to an inadvertent reduction in his prednisolone dosage at Royal Cornwall Hospital and the adequacy of medication-error arrangements, as well as omissions in NICE’s BNF guidance about the risk of bowel perforation associated with corticosteroids in people with diverticular disease.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of prednisolone guidance to reflect bowel perforation risk in diverticular disease

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Royal Cornwall Hospital (RCHT) • The concern is the inadvertent reduction of steroid dosage and the arrangements made in relation to the administration of medication dosages and the policies regarding dosage errors, and the application of those policies. • The Court heard that the dosage of 100mg prednisolone was inadvertently reduced to 25mg from 7 to 13 June. The full dose of 100mg was given either side of that period, on 5 and 15 June 2021. No explanation was offered for this reduction other than it being an inadvertent mistake. • RCHT Consultants accepted that the dosage error was a serious mistake. Furthermore, this mistake was not drawn to the patient John’s attention or to the attention of the GP via the discharge summary, which made no reference to the dosage error. It was unclear whether treating physicians or discharging physicians were aware of the dosage error. (2) The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) • The concern is regarding the accuracy and rigour of the British National Formulary (BNF) guidance on Prednisolone, published by NICE, The National Institute for Clinical Excellence • BNF provides Key information on the selection, prescribing, dispensing and administration of medicines. The BNF aims to provide prescribers, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals with sound up-to-date information about the use of medicines. • Evidence was taken at Inquest from a consultant neurologist that recent literature suggests an association between steroids (such as prednisolone) and the risk of bowel perforation in those with diverticular disease. This is not reflected in the BNF guidance regarding prednisolone. • In relation to a number of sections in the Prednisolone guidance it was found as follows • The ‘Important safety information’ section does not refer to the risk of perforation from using corticosteroids for those with diverticular disease • The ‘Contra-indications For all corticosteroids (systemic)’ section does not refer to need for caution in using corticosteroids for those with diverticular disease, albeit it does refer to caution in using with patients with diabetes mellitus and diverticulitis • The ‘Side effects’ section makes no reference to bowel perforation as a risk, albeit it does make reference to peptic ulceration. ”

    Source location

    JOHN ALFRED ROBERTS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Assess BNF information and review literature on bowel perforation risk in patients with diverticular disease.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In light of the findings from your report, we have carried out an assessment of the information currently contained in the BNF relating to prednisolone and the corticosteroids drug class, and reviewed relevant literature regarding the risk of bowel perforation in patients with diverticular disease. The result of that research is that, within the “Cautions” section of all corticosteroid monographs in the BNF, we will add “diverticular disease (increased risk of diverticular perforation)”. This will be actioned for the August online monthly update. The “Cautions” section of BNF content is used to highlight specific clinical situations in which the use of a drug for a given patient is known to present a risk of harm that is greater than usual and therefore a healthcare professional should be aware so that they can weigh the risks and benefits for their individual patient.”

    Source location

    Response from BNF Publications
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 May 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add diverticular disease and increased risk of diverticular perforation to the Cautions section of all corticosteroid monographs in the August online update.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In light of the findings from your report, we have carried out an assessment of the information currently contained in the BNF relating to prednisolone and the corticosteroids drug class, and reviewed relevant literature regarding the risk of bowel perforation in patients with diverticular disease. The result of that research is that, within the “Cautions” section of all corticosteroid monographs in the BNF, we will add “diverticular disease (increased risk of diverticular perforation)”. This will be actioned for the August online monthly update. The “Cautions” section of BNF content is used to highlight specific clinical situations in which the use of a drug for a given patient is known to present a risk of harm that is greater than usual and therefore a healthcare professional should be aware so that they can weigh the risks and benefits for their individual patient.”

    Source location

    Response from BNF Publications
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 May 2023

    Open published response
  4. County Durham and Darlington

    AI-generated summary

    Jane Elizabeth ALLISON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jane Elizabeth ALLISON died in hospital on 20 November 2021 after being admitted with severe type 1 respiratory failure. She had received a 10-day course of nitrofurantoin for a urinary tract infection, and the inquest concluded that she died from the effects of prescribed medication. The principal concern was that BNF guidance did not sufficiently alert clinicians to the risk of sudden pulmonary deterioration or provide adequate monitoring advice in this circumstance.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of nitrofurantoin prescribing guidance to provide advice on monitoring for sudden pulmonary deterioration during short-term treatment in elderly patients

    Wider context from the report

    “In effect, my concern is that the BNF content had not advised to be alerted to the danger of sudden pulmonary deterioration in an elderly patient, and certainly not one who was fit and active, and not in the context of the duration of a prescribing, dispensing and administration period of only 10 days. Effectively, the BNF content did not cover the eventuality of this case in that it was deficient in providing advice as to monitoring and being alert for pulmonary failure. ”

    Source location

    Jane Elizabeth ALLISON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review evidence on nitrofurantoin pulmonary adverse reactions and obtain expert advice on whether product information should be amended.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As you have noted, the product information for nitrofurantoin does list pulmonary and respiratory issues as possible side effects. We have conducted a review of the available evidence concerning nitrofurantoin and pulmonary adverse drug reactions and sought expert advice from the Pharmacovigilance Expert Advisory Group (PEAG) of the Commission on Human Medicines on the”

    Source location

    Response from MHRA
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 March 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Request marketing authorisation holders to strengthen and prominently emphasise respiratory warnings in nitrofurantoin product information for healthcare professionals and patients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In summary, we have considered the available evidence on nitrofurantoin and acute pulmonary reactions and, based on expert advice from the PEAG, will request that Marketing Authorisation Holders (MAHs) strengthen the wording in the UK Summary of Product Information (SmPC) and Patient Information Leaflet (PIL).”

    Source location

    Response from MHRA
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 March 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Communicate nitrofurantoin product-information updates to the BNF so its monograph can be revised as needed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are aware that the BNF, which is not the responsibility of the MHRA, has recently updated the nitrofurantoin monograph. These updates, adding additional information on acute pulmonary reactions, are in line with the current UK SmPC and PIL. The MHRA will communicate any SmPC and PIL updates, to the BNF, so that they can further revise their monograph as needed.”

    Source location

    Response from MHRA
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 March 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish an MHRA Drug Safety Update article informing UK healthcare professionals about nitrofurantoin pulmonary risks, respiratory symptoms, investigation and prompt reporting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The PEAG also agreed that it would be appropriate to communicate to UK healthcare professionals to inform them of these updates and remind them of the potential for pulmonary and chronic adverse drug reactions in association with nitrofurantoin, and that any such symptoms should be investigated and reported promptly. The PEAG considered that an article in the MHRA’s monthly ‘Drug Safety Update’ bulletin may be an appropriate method to communicate these messages, and we will be taking this forward.”

    Source location

    Response from MHRA
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 March 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Alert prescribing clinicians to nitrofurantoin’s serious breathlessness side effects and the need for prompt patient reporting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. An email has been sent to all prescribing clinicians alerting them to the rare but significant and potentially life-threatening side effects of nitrofurantoin causing acute breathlessness and the need to advise patients to promptly report such symptoms.”

    Source location

    Response from Claypath and University Medical Group
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 March 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Write to the Local Medicine Management Team highlighting nitrofurantoin’s life-threatening side effect.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. One of our partners has agreed to write to the Local Medicine Management Team highlighting this life-threatening side effect and expecting possible changes to the local guidelines.”

    Source location

    Response from Claypath and University Medical Group
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 March 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the nitrofurantoin monograph with highlighted information on acute pulmonary reactions, including patient counselling and prompt symptom reporting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have reviewed the BNF content for nitrofurantoin in response to your report and can confirm that we will add additional information regarding acute pulmonary reactions to the nitrofurantoin monograph in the BNF. To increase awareness of this side-effect, we will highlight it specifically in an additional section of the side-effects information. We will also add information on the importance of counselling patients on the possible symptoms of acute pulmonary reactions and the necessity of promptly reporting such symptoms. This will mean that the risk of acute pulmonary reactions will be highlighted in the nitrofurantoin monograph in future.”

    Source location

    2022-0071-Response-from-Royal-Pharmaceutical-Society_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 March 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The BNF is outside the MHRA’s responsibility, so the MHRA will not directly amend its monograph.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are aware that the BNF, which is not the responsibility of the MHRA, has recently updated the nitrofurantoin monograph. These updates, adding additional information on acute pulmonary reactions, are in line with the current UK SmPC and PIL. The MHRA will communicate any SmPC and PIL updates, to the BNF, so that they can further revise their monograph as needed.”

    Source location

    Response from MHRA
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 March 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The BNF is expected to further revise its nitrofurantoin monograph as needed after receiving updated product information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are aware that the BNF, which is not the responsibility of the MHRA, has recently updated the nitrofurantoin monograph. These updates, adding additional information on acute pulmonary reactions, are in line with the current UK SmPC and PIL. The MHRA will communicate any SmPC and PIL updates, to the BNF, so that they can further revise their monograph as needed.”

    Source location

    Response from MHRA
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 March 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Responsibility for BNF content remains with its publishers, so the matter is outside NICE’s authority to comment on or amend.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The BNF is a joint publication of BMJ Group and Pharmaceutical Press, the publishing division of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society. While we make the BNF available on the NICE website, responsibility for the content remains with the publishers and therefore NICE cannot comment on the concerns you have raised.”

    Source location

    2022-0071-Response-from-NICE_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 March 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Royal Pharmaceutical Society is better placed to respond to concerns about the BNF entry for nitrofurantoin.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am aware that your report has also been sent to the chief executive of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society who will be better placed to respond to your concerns.”

    Source location

    2022-0071-Response-from-NICE_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 March 2022

    Open published response
  5. County Durham and Darlington

    AI-generated summary

    Viktor John Anthony Scott-Brown · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Viktor John Anthony Scott-Brown, aged 23, was found hanging at his home overnight on 14/15 December 2018 and pronounced dead at the scene; the inquest concluded that his death was suicide. He had been prescribed Lamotrigine without being warned about its potential association with thoughts of self-harm or suicide, and concerns were raised that reputable prescribing resources were inconsistent or silent about this potential side effect.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Omission of Lamotrigine self-harm or suicide risk from pharmacological information resources

    Wider context from the report

    “Mr Scott-Brown was prescribed Lamotrigine by an NHS Foundation Trust Consultant Psychiatrist. The prescribing consultant did not give Mr Scott-Brown a Trust information sheet about Lamotrigine and a Patient Information Leaflet about Lamotrigine from the drug manufacturer, GlaxoSmithKline. It was common ground that the consultant should have done so. Both documents record as a side effect of using Lamotrigine a risk that the patient may begin to experience thoughts of self-harm or suicide. Mr Scott-Brown was never given that information. The consultant gave evidence that he was not aware of that particular side effect of Lamotrigine, and that his prescribing practice was informed by the British National Formulary and The Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines. Neither the online BNF viewable via the NICE website nor the 10th Edition of The Maudsley Guidelines (to which the court was referred) refer to that side effect in their respective entries for Lamotrigine. Subsequent to the conclusion of the Inquest, I have learned from the Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust that when Mr Scott-Brown was prescribed Lamotrigine, then the current edition of the Maudsley Guidelines was the 13th Edition. The Inquest heard no evidence about the 13th Edition of the Maudsley Guidelines and information therein concerning Lamotrigine. Quite apart from any issue regarding the consultant’s knowledge about Lamotrigine (and the existence of the 13th Edition of the Maudsley Guidelines) and his not having given Mr Scott-Brown the Trust’s prepared information about the drug and its side effects, I am concerned that two obviously reputable sources of pharmacological information are apparently silent, or have been silent, on a potentially significant side effect of this particular drug. From a lay perspective, there is apparent potential for harm to patients depending upon which resources a prescriber consults before prescribing Lamotrigine. That potential for harm might be ameliorated were the advice about Lamotrigine consistent across all such resources. ”

    Source location

    Viktor John Anthony Scott-Brown · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add suicidal ideation as a side effect to the lamotrigine monograph.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have reviewed the BNF content for lamotrigine in response to your letter and can confirm that we will add a side-effect of suicidal ideation to the lamotrigine monograph in the BNF. We will also add information on this side-effect to the important safety section of the lamotrigine monograph. This will mean that the risk of suicidal thoughts and behaviour will be highlighted in the lamotrigine monograph in future.”

    Source location

    2020-0163-Response-from-BNF-Publications_Redacted.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 October 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add information about suicidal ideation to the lamotrigine monograph’s important safety section.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have reviewed the BNF content for lamotrigine in response to your letter and can confirm that we will add a side-effect of suicidal ideation to the lamotrigine monograph in the BNF. We will also add information on this side-effect to the important safety section of the lamotrigine monograph. This will mean that the risk of suicidal thoughts and behaviour will be highlighted in the lamotrigine monograph in future.”

    Source location

    2020-0163-Response-from-BNF-Publications_Redacted.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 October 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the epilepsy guideline and consider incorporating the coroner’s concerns, including moving the suicidal-thoughts footnote into the recommendation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The guideline is currently in the process of being updated.”

    Source location

    2020-0163-Response-from-NICE_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 October 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and obtain approval for a Medication Safety Series document on prescribing resources and patient information sources.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I would like to reassure you that as an organisation we have taken your concerns seriously. As a consequence we have committed to develop a Medication Safety Series document regarding prescribing resources and sources of patient information. This will be made available to all prescribers. We are aiming to have a draft ready for approval at our Drugs and Therapeutics Committee on 24th September 2020. The final document will then be provided to all prescribers and other relevant staff within the Trust. This is expected to be completed by 2nd October 2020. In addition further communication on this will be provided widely through our Trust Ebulletin. It will also be available on the Trust intranet.”

    Source location

    2020-0163-Response-from-Tees-Esk-and-Wear-Valleys-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Redacted-1.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 October 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    No longer involved in the Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines and therefore cannot influence their future content.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust no longer has any involvement in the authorship or editing of the Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines. Our last involvement was in April 2015, when the 12th edition was published.”

    Source location

    Response from Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 October 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reviewing the content of the British National Formulary is outside NICE’s role and authority.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Although accessible from the NICE website, the BNF is a joint publication of the British Medical Association and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society. NICE manages the contract for the production of the BNF and BNF for Children (BNFC), but has no role in reviewing their content.”

    Source location

    2020-0163-Response-from-NICE_Redacted.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 October 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Responsibility for considering and acting on the BNF content concerns rests with its publishers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Your concerns have therefore been passed to the BNF publishers, in confidence, for their consideration and action, as appropriate. They have confirmed they will respond to the Regulation 28: Report directly to you, copying NICE into their response.”

    Source location

    2020-0163-Response-from-NICE_Redacted.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 October 2020

    Open published response
  6. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Shanté Andrée Marie TURAY-THOMAS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Shanté Andrée Marie Turay-Thomas ate hazelnuts on 18 September 2018 and died soon afterwards from acute anaphylaxis. The report identifies concerns about inadequate allergy care, advice and training concerning adrenaline auto-injectors, prescribing and clinical communication, and errors in the NHS 111 response and ambulance categorisation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to advise prescribers to reconsider adrenaline auto injector dose after a device switch

    Wider context from the report

    “8. The CCG failed to draw prescribers’ attention to the need, following scriptswitch from EpiPen to Emerade, to reconsider the dose and to prescribe the higher dose of 500mcgs for patients at higher risk (which would have included Shanté). ”

    Source location

    Shanté Andrée Marie TURAY-THOMAS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Disseminate prescribing, dosing, device-change and training guidance for adrenaline auto-injectors through safety bulletins, newsletters, intranet updates, scriptswitch messages and practice events.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. The narrative verdict was discussed at the NCL Medication Safety Officer (MSO) Local Network on 17th January 2020. The network agreed that a Medicines Safety Bulletin on Adrenaline Auto Injectors (AAIs) would be distributed to GPs and other primary care healthcare professionals. The NCL Medicines Safety Bulletin on Adrenaline Auto Injectors (AAI) dated 24th January 2020 is attached as appendix 1. The bulletin was approved virtually by one NCL Medication Safety Officer (MSO) Local Network following the meeting on 17th January 2020 and distributed to Enfield GP practices on 30th January 2020.”

    Source location

    2020-0124-Response-from-Enfield-CCG.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require senior pharmacist approval of scriptswitch messages and GP Clinical Lead approval of newsletters before distribution.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “An analysis of CCG actions that may have been contributory to this incident were lack of governance around scriptswitch messaging and newsletters sent to practices from the CCG Medicines Management team. Following the review of this case, it was identified that a more robust governance and decision making process was needed. Current measures to stop any recurrence include:”

    Source location

    2020-0124-Response-from-Enfield-CCG.pdf
    Page 4 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish an NCL primary care group to review local formulary and scriptswitch messaging and standardize messages across CCGs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NCL primary care group has been set up to review the local formulary and scriptswitch messaging to standardize messages across NCL CCGs.”

    Source location

    2020-0124-Response-from-Enfield-CCG.pdf
    Page 4 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a post-incident review, produce a report, and submit it to the Quality and Safety Committee to oversee recommendations and implementation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The CCG will now implement a post incident review and a report will be completed to ensure that all actions identified are implemented to prevent a recurrence of this nature. This will include a review of governance processes and decision-making points. This report will go to the Quality and Safety Committee, which will oversee any recommendations and ensure implementation of all actions.”

    Source location

    2020-0124-Response-from-Enfield-CCG.pdf
    Page 4 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share learning with the CCG medicines management team to support safer AAI prescribing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “11. The Practice has shared learning with the CCG medicine management team and the message on scriptswitch has been amended as follows:”

    Source location

    2020-0124-Response-from-Radcliffes-Le-Brasseur_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Amend the ScriptSwitch message with AAI availability, prescribing, dose-checking, counselling, training and allergy-action-plan requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “11. The Practice has shared learning with the CCG medicine management team and the message on scriptswitch has been amended as follows:”

    Source location

    2020-0124-Response-from-Radcliffes-Le-Brasseur_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Have commissioning teams liaise with relevant organisations to facilitate uptake of new guidance and resources supporting management of severe allergies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• I will ensure your report is sent to HEE and the Royal College of General Practitioners. Our commissioning teams will liaise directly with all relevant organisations to facilitate uptake of any new guidance and resource that would support better management of people with severe allergies.”

    Source location

    2020-0124-Response-from-NHS-England_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Consider whether communication routes or commissioning levers can support uptake and embedding of new allergy guidance and resources.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are deeply saddened by Shante’s death. We are grateful to have had the opportunity to respond to your concerns relevant to NHSEI. We will continue to work with HEE, the professional Royal Colleges and the other organisations addressed in your report to keep abreast of any new guidance or resources that they produce that would support better management of people with severe allergies. We will consider whether any of our communication routes or commissioning levers can help with their uptake and embedding.”

    Source location

    2020-0124-Response-from-NHS-England_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Matters of concern 1–14 and 20 do not concern NHS Pathways and fall outside its remit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “HM Coroner raised matters of concern numbered 1 - 20 in the PFD report. Matters of concern 1 – 14 and 20 are not applicable to NHS Pathways. We set out below our response to matters of concern 15 to 19.”

    Source location

    2020-0124-Response-from-NHS-Digital_Redacted-1.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Information about specific adrenaline auto-injector doses is a prescriber’s responsibility, not the call handler’s.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Information about the specific dose required in respect of each AAI has not been included. This is because the appropriate dose is a matter for the prescriber, not the call handler issuing system-generated instructions on how to administer the medication.”

    Source location

    2020-0124-Response-from-NHS-Digital_Redacted-1.pdf
    Page 5 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response
  7. West Sussex

    AI-generated summary

    Katharine Eva Stamp · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Katharine Eva Stamp died while detained under the Mental Health Act from sudden cardiac arrhythmia due to hypoxia, with the hypoxia described as involving aspiration pneumonia, probable sleep apnoea, obesity, smoking and clozapine effects. The report raised concerns that clozapine side effects, particularly in relation to smoking and pneumonia, were under-appreciated and that the BNF did not provide sufficient clarity to prescribers; it also stated that the lack of an effective national weight-gain monitoring programme for mental health inpatients was causally linked to her obesity and probable sleep apnoea.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient BNF clarity about clozapine side effects

    Wider context from the report

    “The side effects of clozapine, with specific reference to smoking and pneumonia, are under-appreciated Professor ████████ gave expert evidence to the Court These side effects may be rare, but they are still important The BNF does not provide sufficient clarity to prescribers about these side-effects ”

    Source location

    Katharine Eva Stamp · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. Bedfordshire and Luton

    AI-generated summary

    Graham Martin SAFFERY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Graham Martin SAFFERY was found deceased at home on 19 June 2018 after taking prescribed oxycodone and amitriptyline. The inquest conclusion stated that the combination carried a risk of sudden death and that his prescription remained unchanged despite signs of over-sedation. A substantive concern was that the BNF did not appear to provide the caution and monitoring advice given by other pharmacological guidance for simultaneous prescribing of these medicines.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of the BNF to provide caution and monitoring guidance for simultaneous amitriptyline and oxycodone prescribing

    Wider context from the report

    “Although other pharmacological guidance such as Medscape Drug Interaction Checker and Stockley’s Interaction Checker recommend the need for both caution and monitoring when prescribing amitriptyline and oxycodone simultaneously, such advice does not appear to be provided by the BNF which is regularly consulted and relied upon by GPs. ”

    Source location

    Graham Martin SAFFERY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Not all opioid–tricyclic combinations should be stopped because low-dose combinations may be clinically appropriate; risks should be reviewed individually.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are not expecting that all patients identified on a combination of an opioid and tricyclic antidepressant will have their medication stopped, but the risk associated with the level of sedation will be reviewed and action can then be taken as appropriate. The use of low dose opioids with low dose amitriptyline may be clinically appropriate.”

    Source location

    2019-0301-Response-by-Bedfordshire-CCG
    Page 3 · response
    Published 5 November 2019

    Open published response
  9. Inner South London

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Edward Hearn · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Edward Hearn died in hospital after a cardiac arrest, with the medical cause of death including sepsis, bronchopneumonia and multiple myeloma treated with chemotherapy. The report identified concerns that a high globulin result was not followed up, that he was discharged without a safe care plan to minimise fall risk during chemotherapy, and that cardiac monitoring requirements for Carfilzomib may not have been sufficiently definitive.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of definitive cardiac-monitoring requirements in Carfilzomib prescribing information

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The expert pharmaceutical physician gave a recommendation that the need for cardiac monitoring was made more definitive in the drug prescribing information for Carfilzomib (and possibly others), which was prescribed in the Cardamon Trial. ”

    Source location

    Mr Edward Hearn · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the statutory safety information for carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone and seek pharmacovigilance expert advice on cardiac-arrest risk controls.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Further to the information provided on this tragic case, and in accordance with your request, we have considered whether the statutory information currently provided by the marketing authorisation holder for prescribers (and patients) on the safe use of carfilzomib, is adequate, and whether any other regulatory measures could be taken to minimise the risk of cardiac arrest in subjects exposed to this drug. The statutory product information for cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone, used in combination with carfilzomib to treat Mr Hearn, was also considered. To this end, we have sought the advice of the Pharmacovigilance Expert Advisory Group (PEAG), an independent advisory group to the Commission on Human Medicines on matters of drug safety.”

    Source location

    Response from MHRA
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 May 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish a Drug Safety Update article reminding prescribers and cardiologists to monitor patients for cardiac disorders before and during carfilzomib treatment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “However, as we have reports of a total of 10 cases (including the case of Mr Hearn) of cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction or cardiac failure with carfilzomib, the PEAG has recommended that doctors prescribing the drug and cardiologists should be reminded of the requirements to monitor patients for cardiac disorders before and during treatment with carfilzomib. This information will be provided via an article in the MHRA’s electronic bulletin for healthcare professionals, Drug Safety Update, in the next 2–3 months. We will keep you informed.”

    Source location

    Response from MHRA
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 May 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue evaluating SmPC guidance on cardiac monitoring for Kyprolis.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We therefore consider that cardiac monitoring guidance is already definitively outlined in the prescribing information for Kyprolis. As the guidance provided in the current SmPC has been approved by PRAC and EMA, we believe that no further revisions to the SmPC are required. We will however, continue to conduct ongoing pharmacovigilance for Kyprolis and to evaluate our SmPC guidance on cardiac monitoring, in accordance with all pharmacovigilance requirements.”

    Source location

    Response from AMGEN
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 May 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing statutory product information adequately highlights serious cardiac disorder risks for the medicines concerned.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Therefore, on review of the available information, and in relation to actions within the remit of the MHRA, we are satisfied that the statutory SmPC and PIL for the medicines concerned in the case of Mr. Hearn currently provide relevant information to highlight the risk of serious cardiac disorders.”

    Source location

    Response from MHRA
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 May 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing prescribing information definitively outlines cardiac monitoring guidance, so no further SmPC revisions are required.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We therefore consider that cardiac monitoring guidance is already definitively outlined in the prescribing information for Kyprolis. As the guidance provided in the current SmPC has been approved by PRAC and EMA, we believe that no further revisions to the SmPC are required. We will however, continue to conduct ongoing pharmacovigilance for Kyprolis and to evaluate our SmPC guidance on cardiac monitoring, in accordance with all pharmacovigilance requirements.”

    Source location

    Response from AMGEN
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 May 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    A unilateral SmPC update based on one case is not possible because extensive medical evidence and stakeholder examination are required.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We take all adverse event (“AE”) reporting very seriously at Amgen. Governance processes, both internally at Amgen and at European Medicines Agency (“EMA”) and Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (“PRAC”) level, mandate that AE data, such as in this case, is evaluated on a regular basis to establish the benefit risk profile of authorised medicinal products and determine whether adjustments are needed in the Summary of Product Characteristics (“SmPC”) and Patient Information Leaflet (“PIL”). The labeling process in the EU is a collaboration between the agency (EMA/PRAC) and the MAH. A unilateral update to the SmPC based on one case alone, would not therefore be possible as examination of extensive medical evidence by all stakeholders would be required prior to any SmPC change being implemented.”

    Source location

    Response from AMGEN
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 May 2019

    Open published response
  10. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Sufia Begum · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sufia Begum was admitted to Queen Elizabeth Hospital with vomiting, confusion and generalised weakness after being prescribed clarithromycin while taking verapamil. She died on 24 April 2018 from multiorgan failure and calcium channel blocker toxicity, with the inquest concluding that she died from an unrecognised adverse drug interaction. The principal concern was that not all doctors were aware of the BNF mobile device app, identified as a useful tool for detecting potential drug interactions.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of doctors’ awareness of the BNF mobile device app for identifying potential drug interactions

    Wider context from the report

    “1. I heard evidence at the inquest that the most useful tool to identify potential drug interactions was the BNF mobile device APP. The author of the RCA confirmed that not all doctors were aware of the APP. An alert to all NHS Trusts and GPs would provide this valuable information which may prevent a future death from an unknown drug interaction. ”

    Source location

    Sufia Begum · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish and circulate a Medicines Newsletter alert promoting use of the BNF App to check drug interactions when clinical-system checking is unavailable.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “On 14th November the CCG included the following alert in its monthly Medicines Newsletter:”

    Source location

    Sufia-Begum-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 September 2018

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026