Recurring concern
Inadequate surveillance of swimmers and water users
- Reports that mention this concern
- 4
- Times this concern has been raised
- 4
- Stated actions linked to this concern
- 1
What this concern includes
Includes dedicated beach or waterside surveillance arrangements for swimmers and other water users, including patrol positioning, observation coverage, watching systems and comparable controls intended to detect incidents or people in difficulty promptly.
What is not included
- Excludes general lifeguard staffing or beach-cover shortages where surveillance coverage or detection is not the identified unsafe condition.
- Excludes CCTV, lighting or rescue-equipment deficiencies where the assertion does not concern surveillance or detection of swimmers and water users.
- Excludes the underlying presence of dangerous currents, rough water or other beach hazards where no surveillance deficiency is identified.
- Excludes emergency rescue or treatment failures occurring after an incident has been reliably detected.
Trends
Reports over time
Reports mentioning this concern, over time
Reports about this concern issued each year.
* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.
Most frequent recipients
Most frequent recipients
Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.
Reports and published responses 4 reports
See individual reports that have raised this concern, and the actions taken in response
-
Concerns raised1
Insufficient surveillance of lake areas and visitor hazards
This report raised 3 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked response
- Forest of Marston Vale Trust
Respondent positions A position is what a respondent says about the concern when they do not describe a specific action.2
-
Forest of Marston Vale Trust
The Trust considers its existing risk assessment and safety arrangements suitable and sufficient to address drowning risks.
-
Forest of Marston Vale Trust
The lake’s size, topography and restricted sight lines make routine visual checks impracticable and ineffective.
-
Concerns raised1
Inadequate beach patrol surveillance coverage
This report raised 6 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
No linked response statementsNo respondent-stated action or position is linked to these concerns in the published data.
-
Concerns raised1
Inadequate watching system for swimmers and sea-craft
This report raised 3 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
No linked response statementsNo respondent-stated action or position is linked to these concerns in the published data.
-
Concerns raised1
CCTV failing to provide visibility of the pool underwater and in blind spots
This report raised 13 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked response
- Bannatyne Fitness Limited
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.1
-
Bannatyne Fitness Limited
Reposition Maida Vale pool CCTV cameras and add cameras to remove the identified blind spot.
Actions and positions describe what organisations say in published responses. Implementation is not independently verified.
Data last updated 7 September 2026