Recurring concern
Failure to ensure exercise commanders are competent in JSP539 safety requirements
First reported 20 Jul 2015•Latest report 1 Nov 2019
What this concern includes
Includes failures of the JSP539 commander-competence process, including dissemination of JSP539 requirements, training, knowledge checks, competency verification and assurance that commanders understand and can apply the requirements for the exercises they command.
Not included
- Excludes generic military training, leadership or staffing deficiencies not specifically tied to JSP539 competence or the safety of the relevant exercises.
- Excludes failures in the substantive design or content of JSP539 where commander competence or implementation is not the identified unsafe condition.
- Excludes operational exercise failures occurring after commanders have been reliably trained and verified, unless they also demonstrate a deficiency in the JSP539 competence-assurance process.
- Excludes competence concerns involving personnel who do not command the JSP539-governed type of exercise.
- Reports
- 2
- Individual concerns
- 5
- Date range
- 2015–2019
- Stated actions
- 6
Distinct published reports
A report can raise multiple concerns
First to latest report issue date
Described in published responses
Reports over time
Reports over time
Reports about this concern issued each year.
* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.
Most frequent recipients
Most frequent recipients
Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.
Concerns and responses across reports
Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.
-
Concerns raised2
Inadequate commander training and understanding of JSP539
Lack of a system to disseminate JSP539 information and verify commanders’ knowledge
This report raised 20 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Responses linked to these concernsEach statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
Actions described in response An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.3
-
Action
Brief commanding officers on JSP 539 through training, conferences and written communications, while inspecting units’ use of current policy.
Stated by Ministry of Defence -
Action
Review the Unit Fitness Training Officer course to include relevant publications and provide required training.
Stated by Ministry of Defence -
Action
Review the Unit Fitness Training Officer course and Physical Development Audit to increase focus on JSP 539 and WBGT readings.
Stated by Ministry of Defence
-
Concerns raised3
Failure to verify requisite knowledge and training of exercise commanders
Failure to instruct commanders to adhere to JSP539 during specialist exercises
Lack of JSP539 training for senior commanders
This report raised 16 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Responses linked to these concernsEach statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
Actions described in response An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.3
-
Action
Issue urgent safety advice reminding Armed Forces personnel about climatic-illness information, risk assessment, prevention, and treatment.
Stated by Ministry of Defence -
Action
Provide JSP 539, heat-illness, and treatment training to commanders and specialist units, with Directing Staff training and student procedural declarations.
Stated by Ministry of Defence -
Action
Require formal Director-level waivers and documented mitigation when exercises operate outside JSP 539 parameters.
Stated by Ministry of Defence
Data last updated 7 September 2026