Recurring concern

Failure to make relevant mental health assessment information available across care settings

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 18 Apr 2017•Latest report 8 Jul 2025

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures to transfer, display, print, retrieve or otherwise make relevant mental health screening, assessment findings, conclusions and associated clinical notes available across institutions, Trusts or shared care settings when the information is needed for subsequent mental health assessment, prioritisation or onward referral.

Not included

  • Excludes generic electronic-record, IT, printing or information-sharing failures where mental health assessment information is not the material object.
  • Excludes failures in the quality of mental health assessment or referral decisions after the relevant information was reliably available.
  • Excludes failures limited to communicating with patients, families or carers unless the missing information is also needed by services conducting mental health assessment.
  • Excludes unrelated clinical information transfers and general medical-record availability concerns without a specific mental health assessment context.
Reports
5

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
6

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2017–2025

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
18

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care2
Care Quality Commission1
Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Local Health Board1
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust1
NHS England1
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust1
Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust1
Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust1
West Sussex County Council1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. East Riding and Hull

    AI-generated summary

    John Michael Kirkman · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John Michael Kirkman, who had a long history of paranoid schizophrenia and previous detentions and admissions under the Mental Health Act, died after ingesting ████████ between 26 and 27 December 2023. The principal concern was that mental health screening information from one part of the country might not be promptly available in another because of different IT systems, potentially affecting subsequent assessments and referral prioritisation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of different IT systems to make preceding mental health screening assessment data immediately available for subsequent assessments and onward referral

    Wider context from the report

    “Evidence was heard that if a mental health screening assessment is carried out in one part of the country, the results and conclusions reach may not necessarily be immediately available in another part of the country, when a further assessment is carried out. Evidence suggested that such assessments capture important clinical information and the lack of availability of preceding data may adversely influence subsequent assessments. Screening may form the basis for onward referral for formal mental health assessments. Absence of vital background information could result in an incorrect prioritisation for onward referral as it did in this case. The situation is not ubiquitous but does occur due to the use of different I.T. systems in various institutions. ”

    Source location

    John Michael Kirkman · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Support broader clinical record sharing across organisational boundaries.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Beyond these national services, NHS England is committed to supporting broader clinical record sharing across organisational boundaries. Since 2021, all primary and secondary care organisations have been able to share a subset of patient information within Integrated Care Board footprints via their local Shared Care Record. The Core Information Standard defines the typical content of these records and provides a consistent framework for data sharing.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and implement the national initiative connecting Shared Care Records across England.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Recognising the clinical need for greater interoperability, NHS England has launched a national initiative to connect Shared Care Records across England. This investment aims to ensure that authorised professionals can access safe, reliable, and accurate records, regardless of where care is delivered. Local organisations, including participating NHS Trusts, determine what additional information beyond the core standard is shared, and individual Trusts are responsible for negotiating data-sharing protocols to support enhanced local collaboration.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue developing solutions to address fragmented IT systems and improve access to clinical information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We acknowledge the ongoing challenges posed by disparate IT systems, particularly in mental health services, where timely access to information can significantly affect assessment and referral decisions. This is a recognised patient safety and clinical quality issue. NHS England continues to develop solutions to address these challenges, including the proposed creation of a Single Patient Record as part of the NHS 10 Year Health Plan. It is intended that this record will bring a patient’s medical records into once place and will build on existing foundations to support clinicians and patients in accessing the information needed to aid clinical decision-making, subject to appropriate permissions and privacy safeguards.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a personalised-care framework specifying information availability across mental health services and geographical areas.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England is also developing a specific framework for delivering personalised care and support to adults and older adults with severe mental health problems. The framework will set out the core aspects of care for people who require help from secondary or integrated primary, voluntary, community and social enterprise (VCSE) and secondary care mental health services. The framework outlines that all required information relating to a person’s mental health assessment and their care and support plan should be available to all staff who need it. This includes where people move between different services across different geographical areas.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 16 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NHS England cannot currently mandate suppliers to implement the technical work needed for mental health data sharing via the National Record Locator.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The NRL functionality allows any previous health assessment to be both located and seen, however only 17 out of 54 mental health trusts can currently share data via the NRL, mainly due to the need for system suppliers to implement technical pointers, but also as there is currently limited funding for this development work. Some suppliers have not participated in using the NRL due to their preferences for structured data formats.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Individual NHS Trusts are responsible for negotiating data-sharing protocols supporting information beyond the core standard.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Recognising the clinical need for greater interoperability, NHS England has launched a national initiative to connect Shared Care Records across England. This investment aims to ensure that authorised professionals can access safe, reliable, and accurate records, regardless of where care is delivered. Local organisations, including participating NHS Trusts, determine what additional information beyond the core standard is shared, and individual Trusts are responsible for negotiating data-sharing protocols to support enhanced local collaboration.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 July 2025

    Open published response
  2. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Paige Jeannette ALLEN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Paige Jeannette Allen died after falling from Southerndown Cliffs in the early hours of 21 April 2021, following an emergency services rescue attempt. The concern was that mental health practitioners assessing patients in crisis across different Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board localities might not have immediate access to relevant medical records, potentially increasing the risk of incomplete or insufficient assessments.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide assessing practitioners with immediate and comprehensive access to relevant mental health records across localities

    Wider context from the report

    “Whilst I did not find that the matter of concern outlined below was directly causative of, nor contributory to, Miss Allen’s death, my concern broadly is that those patients who contact mental health services in Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board (CTMUHB), especially at the time of crisis may be assessed without the assessing practitioner having immediate & comprehensive access to relevant and proximate medical records, notes & plans (such as WARRN assessments, & Care & Treatment Plans). More particularly, the evidence indicated that should a patient present to mental health services in the Bridgend locality, but have their secondary mental health care managed in either the Merthyr/Cynon locality or the Rhondda/Taff/Ely locality or vice versa, the assessing practitioner will not immediately i.e. at the time of assessment, have access to that patient’s FACE records. My concern is that this has the potential to deprive the assessing practitioner of pertinent and proximate material which may increase the risk of an incomplete or insufficient assessment. That being potentially significant in informing the assessing practitioner of his/her action/planning for that individual in crisis. Whilst I received evidence that CTMUHB has pledged to adopt a system, which it is believed will ameliorate the current situation, I am concerned that until such time as the same is available and immediately accessible across the three localities, the risk identified persists. Interim measures may wish to be considered to mitigate the risk identified. ”

    Source location

    Paige Jeannette ALLEN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Standardise management of required paper records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Chaired by the Clinical Service Group manager for Merthyr and Cynon Locality, with a multidisciplinary group from across CTM, the HQCR has aligned this work with the recommendations and learning from recent external reviews most particularly the May 2022 Healthcare Inspectorate of Wales (HIW) Review of Discharge Arrangements for Adults from Inpatient Mental Health Services within CTMUHB. A programme of work is underway to:”

    Source location

    Response from Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Scope phasing out paper notes and maximise existing digital systems before implementing the single electronic record.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Chaired by the Clinical Service Group manager for Merthyr and Cynon Locality, with a multidisciplinary group from across CTM, the HQCR has aligned this work with the recommendations and learning from recent external reviews most particularly the May 2022 Healthcare Inspectorate of Wales (HIW) Review of Discharge Arrangements for Adults from Inpatient Mental Health Services within CTMUHB. A programme of work is underway to:”

    Source location

    Response from Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review paper and electronic archives and systems and standardise approved inpatient and outpatient care-planning documentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The immediate mitigating actions of the HQCR included the review of all paper and electronic archives and systems to ensure that there was a congruence of all care planning documentation for inpatients and outpatients. This ensures, through the use of only approved Inpatient Management Plan and Care and Treatment Plan (CTP), that all staff are clear on what documents should be available to them when seeking them out. In addition, governance measures were introduced to limit access to any patient information held on the W and T electronic drives, with senior level authorisation required in order to gain access,”

    Source location

    Response from Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Map information transfer between community and inpatient teams and share admission and discharge flow diagrams across the Care Group.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The HQCR group has undertaken process mapping regarding passing patient information between Community Mental Health Team (CMHT) and Inpatient for admission and discharge developing flow diagrams that have been shared across the Care Group. They have also developed a number of user guides on how to access and use FACE/w-drive when accessing RTE and M&C records. At present the Mental Health teams will continue to use email to share information between RGH and Bridgend but now a secure email inbox is used at all times to ensure confidentiality but also simplifying access and gathering of information.”

    Source location

    Response from Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 2 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and distribute user guides for accessing and using FACE and shared-drive records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The HQCR group has undertaken process mapping regarding passing patient information between Community Mental Health Team (CMHT) and Inpatient for admission and discharge developing flow diagrams that have been shared across the Care Group. They have also developed a number of user guides on how to access and use FACE/w-drive when accessing RTE and M&C records. At present the Mental Health teams will continue to use email to share information between RGH and Bridgend but now a secure email inbox is used at all times to ensure confidentiality but also simplifying access and gathering of information.”

    Source location

    Response from Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 2 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use secure email inboxes for information sharing between RGH and Bridgend mental health teams.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The HQCR group has undertaken process mapping regarding passing patient information between Community Mental Health Team (CMHT) and Inpatient for admission and discharge developing flow diagrams that have been shared across the Care Group. They have also developed a number of user guides on how to access and use FACE/w-drive when accessing RTE and M&C records. At present the Mental Health teams will continue to use email to share information between RGH and Bridgend but now a secure email inbox is used at all times to ensure confidentiality but also simplifying access and gathering of information.”

    Source location

    Response from Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 2 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and distribute the Clinical Information Access and Recording Matrix and accompanying standard operating procedure across mental health clinical teams.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As a mitigation for the multiple record system that are still in place across the CTM Mental Health service the HQCR Workstream has developed a Clinical Information Access and Recording matrix (CIARM) for clinical team /staff access (“who accesses what system for what purpose”) for all systems across the mental health service. This informs all clinical staff of how to access patient clinical risk and discharge planning information both in and out of hours and is the primary tool by which the care Group will mitigate the potential risks inherent with our present multiple systems.”

    Source location

    Response from Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 2 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and endorse a business case for a unified electronic record system.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In relation to the longer term work to develop safe systems for sharing information, I would like to provide assurance that the Executive and Board are committed to the implementation of a unified electronic record system for the Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Care Group, which includes Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services.”

    Source location

    Response from Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 2 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the national Welsh Community Care Information System strategic programme with Digital Health and Care Wales and other health boards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A business case has been developed and endorsed by the Executive. There are however challenges with the preferred national system. The Health Board is working closely with Digital Health and Care Wales and other Health Boards as part of the review of the national strategic programme for the Welsh Community Care Information System. The outcome of this review will influence timescales for WCCIS implementation for the Health Board.”

    Source location

    Response from Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 2 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Plan the pre-implementation phase for transferring existing community mental health users to a Health Board Welsh Community Care Information System.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Currently, planning is underway for a pre implementation phase to bring all existing users, mainly within the CMHT’s who currently use WCCIS via the local authorities, over to a Health Board WCCIS system. The timescale for this is approx. 6 months, however CTM will be meeting with Aneurin Bevan University Health Board on 27 July 2023 to capture lessons learnt from their implementation”

    Source location

    Response from Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board
    Page 4 · response
    Published 2 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the unified-record business case using implementation lessons to determine required resources and approach.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The business case is in the process of review, with the lessons from Aneurin Bevan seen as key to fully understanding the resources and approach required to best move forward with minimal delay. In addition the Health Board is working in partnership with Health Education Improvement Wales to develop digital champion roles to influence and lead digital workforce transformation.”

    Source location

    Response from Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board
    Page 4 · response
    Published 2 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implementation of the integrated electronic record was delayed by infrastructure and resource issues, while national programme review affected implementation timescales.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A business case has been developed and endorsed by the Executive. There are however challenges with the preferred national system. The Health Board is working closely with Digital Health and Care Wales and other Health Boards as part of the review of the national strategic programme for the Welsh Community Care Information System. The outcome of this review will influence timescales for WCCIS implementation for the Health Board.”

    Source location

    Response from Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 2 July 2026

    Open published response
  3. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Kate Hedges · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kate Hedges died at Gatley Station on 27 November 2020 as a consequence of injuries sustained in an event that is redacted in the supplied text. The concerns included separate computerised record-keeping systems that could mean staff lacked relevant information for risk assessments and care plans, and an alleged failure to follow safeguarding policy. The report also raised concerns that mental health services were not consistently trauma-informed and that the ward environment could be distressing and difficult for people who had experienced trauma.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure staff undertaking risk assessments and formulating care plans have access to all relevant information

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The court heard evidence that the Trust’s Psychological Therapy serviced used (and continues to use) a different computerised record-keeping system from that used by staff providing acute mental health services, which the latter staff group do not necessarily have access to. It is a matter of concern that this approach means staff undertaking risk assessments and formulating care plans may on occasion be doing so without access to all relevant information. This was certainly true in Ms Hedges’ case. ”

    Source location

    Kate Hedges · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issue a Trust-wide safety alert instructing staff to check other services and access relevant information for risk assessments and care plans.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To make this process more robust the Trust has issued a Safety Alert to all GMMH staff to ensure they are aware to check whether a patient is open to another service within the Trust and that they know how to gain access to information to inform risk assessment and the formulation of care plans. I have attached the alert for your information.”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Mental Health
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Run a quality improvement project to develop and improve cross-service clinical risk assessment, recording, information sharing, training and supervision.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “GMMH has commenced a Quality Improvement Project in relation Clinical Risk Assessment that will include how clinical risks are assessed and recorded across different services to improve information sharing. Senior clinical staff from across the Trust are involved in this project and are being supported by ████████, Professor of Psychiatry and Population Health at the University of Manchester. The Trust anticipates that a revised risk assessment process will be piloted in services within six months to enable adjustments before being implemented across the Trust. This process will also include the training and supervision given to staff to support them in assessing risks and formulating care plans.”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Mental Health
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing systems and information-sharing arrangements are considered sufficient; there are no plans to adopt one clinical record system across primary and secondary care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In GMMH Secondary Care Services the patient information system used is PARIS and all staff are trained in the use of PARIS at induction and have access to PARIS. This means that staff from IAPT can see if a patient is under any other GMMH S services.”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Mental Health
    Page 1 · response
    Published 5 May 2022

    Open published response
  4. County Durham and Darlington

    AI-generated summary

    Mina TOPLEY-BIRD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mina TOPLEY-BIRD, who had a severe and enduring mental illness and a history of suicide and self-harm attempts, was admitted to West Park Hospital after attempting to run into traffic and stab herself. On 8 May 2019, after being told that no bed was available for her in London, she said words to the effect of “I may as well kill myself”; she was later found hanging in her room and pronounced dead. Concerns included incomplete access to historic medical records, inability to print and share documents across NHS Trust systems, uncertainty about ligature-point assessments, limited bed-management coverage, and incomplete risk-assessment and safety-summary processes.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to print medical notes and other documents from the Trust IT system in shared premises

    Wider context from the report

    “2. It became apparent on the evidence that whilst Trust staff were working in premises operated by another Trust (in this case, County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust - CDDFT) they could not print medical notes and other documents from the TEWV IT system onto printers in 'shared' premises such as the A&E Department of the CDDFT. This again meant important documents can be unable to be shared with staff undertaking such tasks as Mental Health Assessments. ”

    Source location

    Mina TOPLEY-BIRD · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 5 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Increase Liaison Team overnight staffing to two staff members.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has also since taken action and increased the staffing establishment of the Liaison Team, increasing the number of staff on duty overnight night to two. This means that if a document does need to be printed urgently, one member of staff can go to our nearby Trust premises to do this.”

    Source location

    2021-0100-Response-from-West-Park-Hospital-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 April 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operational processes for locally commissioned mental health services are the responsibility of local NHS providers and their commissioning partners.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Mental health services provided by TEWV are locally commissioned and therefore operational processes, such as those described, are the responsibility of local NHS providers and their clinical commissioning group (CCG) system partners, which commission the services.”

    Source location

    2021-0100-Response-from-Dept.-of-Health-and-Social-Care-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 April 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Enforcement action was not required because the regulator concluded there was no ongoing risk to service users.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “My officials also approached the Care Quality Commission (CQC). The CQC has sought assurances from the Trust in relation to its investigation and has concluded that there is no ongoing risk to service users and that enforcement action was not required.”

    Source location

    2021-0100-Response-from-Dept.-of-Health-and-Social-Care-Redacted
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 April 2021

    Open published response
  5. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Daniel Maher · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Daniel Maher was found hanging at his home on 26 May 2016, and efforts to resuscitate him were unsuccessful. The report raised concerns that significant information about vulnerable individuals may not be readily accessible when mental health services in West Sussex and Surrey are involved, including because of limited access to records and reliance on verbal referrals without routinely shared paperwork.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to routinely share clinical assessment records with receiving community mental health services outside the county

    Wider context from the report

    “During the course of the inquest the court heard evidence from mental health professionals working on behalf of both West Sussex County Council and SABP. The court was told that it was not an uncommon occurrence for patients who are detained in Surrey under s.136 MHA to be taken to Langley Green Hospital in West Sussex for assessment and then, at some point thereafter, to be released back into the care of the community health services in Surrey. Given that this is not an uncommon occurrence I have concerns regarding the sharing of information as between the respective mental health services in West Sussex and Surrey. - The court was told that mental health professionals cannot access patient information which is held on the computerised systems of mental health services outside their own county. As a result, they are dependent on seeking that information directly from their colleagues in other counties, which the court was told was a time consuming process and also impracticable in relation to mental health assessments carried out during anti-social hours. - The court was also told that it is common practice, after a mental health assessment has been completed at the s.136 suite at Langley Green Hospital, for a verbal referral to be made by telephone in respect of patients being referred to community mental health services outside of the county. The court was told that key paperwork, such as the clinical record of the s.136 assessment, is not routinely shared on the making of such referrals. In fact that the Approved Mental Health Professional employed by West Sussex County Council indicated that she was not allowed to fax such paperwork to other agencies for reasons of data protection. - As a result of the above I am concerned that significant information relating to the clinical history, presentation and risk of vulnerable individuals is not easily accessible by the relevant healthcare professionals, in circumstances in which an individual is assessed at the s.136 suite in West Sussex, and has either previously been under the care of, or is referred back into the care of, mental health services in Surrey. Consideration should be given to whether any steps can be taken to address the above concerns. ”

    Source location

    Daniel Maher · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide timely access to patient information held by mental health services in other counties

    Wider context from the report

    “During the course of the inquest the court heard evidence from mental health professionals working on behalf of both West Sussex County Council and SABP. The court was told that it was not an uncommon occurrence for patients who are detained in Surrey under s.136 MHA to be taken to Langley Green Hospital in West Sussex for assessment and then, at some point thereafter, to be released back into the care of the community health services in Surrey. Given that this is not an uncommon occurrence I have concerns regarding the sharing of information as between the respective mental health services in West Sussex and Surrey. - The court was told that mental health professionals cannot access patient information which is held on the computerised systems of mental health services outside their own county. As a result, they are dependent on seeking that information directly from their colleagues in other counties, which the court was told was a time consuming process and also impracticable in relation to mental health assessments carried out during anti-social hours. - The court was also told that it is common practice, after a mental health assessment has been completed at the s.136 suite at Langley Green Hospital, for a verbal referral to be made by telephone in respect of patients being referred to community mental health services outside of the county. The court was told that key paperwork, such as the clinical record of the s.136 assessment, is not routinely shared on the making of such referrals. In fact that the Approved Mental Health Professional employed by West Sussex County Council indicated that she was not allowed to fax such paperwork to other agencies for reasons of data protection. - As a result of the above I am concerned that significant information relating to the clinical history, presentation and risk of vulnerable individuals is not easily accessible by the relevant healthcare professionals, in circumstances in which an individual is assessed at the s.136 suite in West Sussex, and has either previously been under the care of, or is referred back into the care of, mental health services in Surrey. Consideration should be given to whether any steps can be taken to address the above concerns. ”

    Source location

    Daniel Maher · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026