Recurring concern

Unsafe management of methadone treatment and intoxication risks

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 1 Nov 2013•Latest report 4 Mar 2024

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of controls specifically dedicated to the safe use and management of methadone, including staff knowledge and training, recognition of intoxication and respiratory-depression risks, assessment of drug and alcohol interactions, initial-treatment medical review, monitoring, prescribing and escalation.

Not included

  • Excludes generic staff competence or training deficiencies that are not specifically tied to methadone treatment or methadone-related intoxication risks.
  • Excludes management of other medicines or substance-use risks unless methadone is the material shared safety concern.
  • Excludes general medication prescribing, administration or review failures where methadone-specific safety is not identified.
  • Excludes respiratory-depression hazards unrelated to methadone treatment or methadone-related intoxication.
Reports
9

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
15

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2024

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
23

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care2
Belmarsh Prison1
Bromley Drug and Alcohol Service1
Dinnington Group Practice1
G4S1
General Medical Council1
General Pharmaceutical Council1
Haverhill Pharmacy1
National Police Chiefs’ Council1
Nestor Primecare Services Limited1
NHS England1
Nursing and Midwifery Council1
Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust1
Priory Group1
Public Health England1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Inner West London

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Lee Martin Hughes, also known as Martin Lee Hughes · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lee Martin Hughes was found deceased in his cell at HMP Wandsworth on 25 December 2021 while remanded in custody. The medical cause of death was methadone and benzodiazepine intoxication, and the jury concluded that drug-related misadventure was contributed to by neglect. Concerns included the assessment and prescribing of methadone, failure to respond appropriately to signs of sedation and impaired consciousness, and inadequate communication and escalation between healthcare disciplines.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to withhold or reduce methadone when patients show signs of sedation

    Wider context from the report

    “5. That methadone should be withheld and or reduced if the patient/inmate is showing signs of sedation. ”

    Source location

    Mr Lee Martin Hughes, also known as Martin Lee Hughes · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Overreliance on subjective withdrawal symptoms rather than objective signs when assessing methadone need

    Wider context from the report

    “1. That clinicians, wishing to believe their patients, are relying too heavily on what patients tell them (symptoms) rather than looking for evidence (physical signs) of withdrawal, As such, given the particular difficulties of prescribing to prisoners, that objective signs of withdrawal assessments (OWS) should be used to determine whether methadone should be prescribed rather than the COWS score which contains many subjective factors and may be more easily manipulated by an inmate to appear as if that inmate is experiencing withdrawal from drugs necessitating an increase in methadone. ”

    Source location

    Mr Lee Martin Hughes, also known as Martin Lee Hughes · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to account for reduced opiate tolerance and synergistic agents when prescribing methadone

    Wider context from the report

    “4. That practitioners when prescribing consider whether time spent in custody prior to remand may have reduced an individual's tolerance to opiates, especially when methadone is to be prescribed with a synergistic agent such as a benzodiazepine. ”

    Source location

    Mr Lee Martin Hughes, also known as Martin Lee Hughes · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the national service specification using learning from the case to strengthen prescribing and supply of sedating medicines.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am pleased to see from your Report that processes and procedures have been changed within HMP Wandsworth to address learning identified in this case and meet expectations in terms of prescribing and supplying sedating medicines safely.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 6 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise and disseminate the withdrawal-treatment policy, including sedation safeguards, tolerance assessment, urine screening and clinical review requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. The policy for the pharmacological treatment of drugs and alcohol withdrawal within the early days in custody has been reviewed, substantially revised and disseminated by the medicines management committee, with input from specialist substance misuse practitioners. It is a requirement that all prescribers of acute withdrawal medications at HMP Wandsworth have completed the RCGP drugs and alcohol management certificates to at least the part one level. This is the most recognised specialist substance misuse qualification in the UK. In addition, it should be noted that since Mr Hughes’ passing, HMP Wandsworth has employed a very experienced full time substance misuse practitioner, who oversees all of the five day review. This is the critical juncture to adjust the dosage and combination of sedating medications safely and consistently.”

    Source location

    Response from Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 6 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss the case in a prescriber reflective-practice forum, focusing on individual history, clinical signs, investigations and cautious methadone dosing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. This case has provoked a great deal of reflection on the balance of risks and benefits of methadone, especially in the first days of drug accumulation, and when prescribed alongside benzodiazepines or other sedatives. The findings and recommendations of Mr Hughes’ inquest have been shared with all prescribers. His case has already been discussed within a reflective practice forum for prescribers, focussing on the judicious interpretation of the individual patient’s history, clinical signs and investigations (such as urine drug screens), to prioritise safety with a ‘start low and go slow’ approach, even when this is unpopular with the patient.”

    Source location

    Response from Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 6 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Follow national guidance on any revised opiate withdrawal scale and support implementing an approved change.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. The replacement of COWS with an Opiate Withdrawal Scale which excludes subjective reported symptoms would provide a more objective measure of opiate withdrawal and has great merit. Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust would require any deviation from current standards to be ratified at a national level and across the entire prison estate before it could be recommended as standard care. This has been raised with commissioners and we will follow up the direction from NHSE in relation to the use of a new withdrawal scale, and will fully support implementation of any revision to national guidance. In the interim I do recognise and recommend that clinicians should focus more on objective signs of withdrawal than subjective ones.”

    Source location

    Response from Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 6 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver case-based learning for prescribers on prioritising objective withdrawal signs over reported symptoms.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As a result, HMP Wandsworth healthcare has already delivered a case-based learning event for all its prescribers, focussing on the risks of over relying on reported symptoms over verifiable clinical signs.”

    Source location

    Response from Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 6 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    National guidance already addresses reduced opioid tolerance and reducing or withholding methadone when sedation is present.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. That practitioners, when prescribing consider whether time spent in custody before remand, may have reduced an individual’s tolerance to opiates; this is especially when methadone is to be prescribed with a synergistic agent such as benzodiazepines.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 6 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    National standards and case-by-case clinical judgement are considered sufficient; NHS England will not mandate a particular withdrawal assessment tool.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England commissioned services use national clinical guidelines and the tools described in these to assess patients for opioid, or other withdrawal from dependence forming medicines. For opioid and benzodiazepines withdrawal this guidance is Drug misuse and dependence: UK guidelines on clinical management - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) along with guidance issued by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) which is found at Recommendations | Drug misuse in over 16s: opioid detoxification | Guidance | NICE.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 6 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Adopting an Opiate Withdrawal Scale requires national ratification and NHS England direction before it can become standard care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. The replacement of COWS with an Opiate Withdrawal Scale which excludes subjective reported symptoms would provide a more objective measure of opiate withdrawal and has great merit. Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust would require any deviation from current standards to be ratified at a national level and across the entire prison estate before it could be recommended as standard care. This has been raised with commissioners and we will follow up the direction from NHSE in relation to the use of a new withdrawal scale, and will fully support implementation of any revision to national guidance. In the interim I do recognise and recommend that clinicians should focus more on objective signs of withdrawal than subjective ones.”

    Source location

    Response from Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 6 March 2024

    Open published response
  2. Suffolk

    AI-generated summary

    Matthew Colin FITTEN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Matthew Fitten was found deceased at home on 17 April 2020, and toxicology identified a toxic quantity of methadone in his blood. During the COVID-19 pandemic, his methadone collection was changed from three times per week to fortnightly, but he received three large bottles without a measuring jug or instructions for accurately measuring his prescribed daily dose. The report identifies concerns that this increased access to methadone and the lack of suitable dosing arrangements contributed to his death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide measuring equipment and instructions for accurate daily methadone dosing

    Wider context from the report

    “During the evidence it was heard that at the start of the Covid19 pandemic PHE guidance was issued to Turning Point (the Suffolk Recovery Network) that individuals on opiate replacement treatment (Methadone) should be moved off short term (daily or tri-weekly) prescription collections to longer term ones. In Matthew’s case his collection was changed from 3 times per week to fortnightly. The doctor who made the changes to the prescription stipulated that Matthew’s dose must be in single daily dosage bottles. Matthew had a secure store in his home and was used to taking his Methadone from single daily dosage bottles. In addition the Turning Point doctor had sent a letter to all of the pharmacy’s that supplied opiate replacement therapies to his patients, explaining that only daily usage bottles should be prescribed. On the 15th April 2020 Matthew collected his 14-day methadone supply from the Haverhill Pharmacy in Haverhill, Suffolk. Evidence produced by Matthews father during the inquest itself, clearly showed that Matthew had been issued three bottles of Methadone to cover the 14-day period. These bottles contained 100ml, 156ml and 500ml of Methadone respectively. In addition, because Matthew’s prescription had been for single dose bottles a separate ‘measuring jug’ had not been prescribed by the Turning Point doctor. Matthew’s prescribed dose of Methadone was 54ml daily. As such, when Matthew was given the 100ml, 156ml and 500ml Methadone bottles on the 15th April 2020, he was not given anything to accurately measure his daily dose from them. It is therefore probable, that due to a lack of a measuring jug, Matthew guessed his first dose from the larger Methadone bottles with tragic consequences. Had Matthew been given daily dose bottles of Methadone as prescribed, or a measuring jug and instructions on how to use it had been provided, on a balance of probability basis his death would not have occurred. ”

    Source location

    Matthew Colin FITTEN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to dispense prescribed methadone in single daily dosage bottles

    Wider context from the report

    “During the evidence it was heard that at the start of the Covid19 pandemic PHE guidance was issued to Turning Point (the Suffolk Recovery Network) that individuals on opiate replacement treatment (Methadone) should be moved off short term (daily or tri-weekly) prescription collections to longer term ones. In Matthew’s case his collection was changed from 3 times per week to fortnightly. The doctor who made the changes to the prescription stipulated that Matthew’s dose must be in single daily dosage bottles. Matthew had a secure store in his home and was used to taking his Methadone from single daily dosage bottles. In addition the Turning Point doctor had sent a letter to all of the pharmacy’s that supplied opiate replacement therapies to his patients, explaining that only daily usage bottles should be prescribed. On the 15th April 2020 Matthew collected his 14-day methadone supply from the Haverhill Pharmacy in Haverhill, Suffolk. Evidence produced by Matthews father during the inquest itself, clearly showed that Matthew had been issued three bottles of Methadone to cover the 14-day period. These bottles contained 100ml, 156ml and 500ml of Methadone respectively. In addition, because Matthew’s prescription had been for single dose bottles a separate ‘measuring jug’ had not been prescribed by the Turning Point doctor. Matthew’s prescribed dose of Methadone was 54ml daily. As such, when Matthew was given the 100ml, 156ml and 500ml Methadone bottles on the 15th April 2020, he was not given anything to accurately measure his daily dose from them. It is therefore probable, that due to a lack of a measuring jug, Matthew guessed his first dose from the larger Methadone bottles with tragic consequences. Had Matthew been given daily dose bottles of Methadone as prescribed, or a measuring jug and instructions on how to use it had been provided, on a balance of probability basis his death would not have occurred. ”

    Source location

    Matthew Colin FITTEN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and publish COVID-19 guidance for drug and alcohol treatment providers addressing infection risks and medication dispensing arrangements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Public Health England’s (PHE's) COVID-19 guidance to the drug and alcohol treatment sector (COVID-19: guidance for commissioners and providers of services for people who use drugs or alcohol) was developed with senior medical, pharmacy and other representatives from the sector, including from Turning Point. The process started from calls with treatment providers on 17 and 18 March 2020 and the guidance was developed until the first iteration was published on 15 April 2020.”

    Source location

    2020-0275-Response-from-Public-Health-England-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 5 January 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen individualised risk-assessment requirements in subsequent iterations of published guidance before changing medication dispensing arrangements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To prevent future deaths, PHE has often reiterated to drug and alcohol treatment providers the need for individualised risk assessments before changing medication dispensing arrangements and strengthened these lines in subsequent iterations of its published guidance this year. PHE has also worked closely with the Care Quality Commission (CQC), whose inspectors are actively monitoring registered drug treatment services. The CQC has investigated the changes in practice that the pandemic has required, to make sure that there is no blanket application of these changes.”

    Source location

    2020-0275-Response-from-Public-Health-England-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 January 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reiterate to drug and alcohol treatment providers the need for individualised risk assessments before changing medication dispensing arrangements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To prevent future deaths, PHE has often reiterated to drug and alcohol treatment providers the need for individualised risk assessments before changing medication dispensing arrangements and strengthened these lines in subsequent iterations of its published guidance this year. PHE has also worked closely with the Care Quality Commission (CQC), whose inspectors are actively monitoring registered drug treatment services. The CQC has investigated the changes in practice that the pandemic has required, to make sure that there is no blanket application of these changes.”

    Source location

    2020-0275-Response-from-Public-Health-England-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 January 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue supplying methadone in individual dose containers as the pharmacy’s standard procedure.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As explained above that pharmacy may have made supply in bigger bottles than individual dose bottles. This is not the normal practice of the pharmacy. Haverhill pharmacy always ensure safety and wellbeing of patients. April 2020 was an unprecedented time and all pharmacies were dealing with staff issues, supply issues and abuse from patients towards the NHS staff. All these factors may have made the pharmacy supply the methadone not in individual bottles.”

    Source location

    2020-0275-Response-from-Haverhill-Pharmacy-Redacted
    Page 10 · response
    Published 5 January 2021

    Open published response
  3. Avon

    AI-generated summary

    Abdeslam BENELGHAZI · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Abdeslam BENELGHAZI was detained under Section 2 of the Mental Health Act and was prescribed methadone alongside several other medications, including clonazepam. He died on 9 December 2017; the inquest identified concerns about inappropriate combined prescribing, inadequate monitoring and failure to escalate concerns, including after signs of over-sedation or reduced consciousness.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unsafe co-prescribing of clonazepam with methadone

    Wider context from the report

    “He expressed a particular concern in relation to the prescribing of clonazepam with methadone. The reasons he gave were that clonazepam has a long half life; side effects include respiratory depression; that one supplier of clonazepam states “concomitant use of clonazepam with opioids may result in sedation, respiratory depression, coma and death”; that clonazepam is a means of delivering a high equivalent dose benzodiazepine without exceeding BNF limits. He said that in this case clonazepam may have been the drug that tipped the balance. ”

    Source location

    Abdeslam BENELGHAZI · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Request marketing authorisation holders to update clonazepam and methadone product information, including warnings about respiratory depression and delayed methadone effects.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The MHRA has reviewed all licences for clonazepam and methadone and noted that not all marketing authorisation holders (MAH) have applied the appropriate amendments. The MHRA is therefore contacting the MAH holders to request updates to the product information and the outstanding changes are expected to be implemented within three to six months.”

    Source location

    2019-0337-Response-by-Department-of-Health-and-Social-Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 10 November 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind healthcare professionals through a Drug Safety Update article about respiratory-depression risks when benzodiazepines and opioids are co-prescribed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, the MHRA will remind healthcare professionals of the risks of respiratory depression when benzodiazepines and opioids are co-prescribed via an article in its Drug Safety Update early this year.”

    Source location

    2019-0337-Response-by-Department-of-Health-and-Social-Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 10 November 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ensure development of a mental-health early-warning-score case study covering opioid use and over-sedation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response to changes to the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) parameters¹¹, Health Education England (HEE) is working in partnership with NHS England and NHS Improvement and others, to support learning needs for the health and care workforce. Learning resources have either been developed, are in development or are being planned for staff working in secondary care, primary care, ambulance settings and mental health settings. The resources consist of a number of case studies covering presentations common to particular care settings. In response to your report, HEE advises that it will ensure the development of a specific case study to cover opioid use and over sedation when it develops the early warning score learning resource for mental health settings.”

    Source location

    2019-0337-Response-by-Department-of-Health-and-Social-Care
    Page 4 · response
    Published 10 November 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop prescribing guidance for mental health, endorsed by the Royal Pharmaceutical Society, with additional support, resources and learning materials.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am further advised that HEE is providing education and training opportunities for mental health practitioners through the development of related competency frameworks and teaching initiatives. HEE is working with health system stakeholders, subject matter experts and people with lived experience, to develop guidance, endorsed by the Royal Pharmaceutical Society, that sets out additional guidance, support, resources and learning materials specifically related to prescribing in mental health.”

    Source location

    2019-0337-Response-by-Department-of-Health-and-Social-Care
    Page 4 · response
    Published 10 November 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Clinicians are responsible for prescribing decisions, including medication dosages and combinations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Prescribing decisions are made by clinicians who are responsible for taking into consideration the dosage of medication prescribed and the combination of medicines administered.”

    Source location

    2019-0337-Response-by-Department-of-Health-and-Social-Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 10 November 2019

    Open published response
  4. South Yorkshire (Eastern)

    AI-generated summary

    Lyndsey Holt · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lyndsey Holt, who was 37 weeks pregnant, collapsed after a gastric ulcer perforated and caused catastrophic bleeding. She died the following morning after emergency surgery and resuscitation; concerns included the telephone prescribing of methadone without sufficient information, assessment, or early medical review, and the provision of a seven-day supply to a methadone-naïve patient.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of medical review during the initial phase of methadone treatment

    Wider context from the report

    “The circumstances in which the methadone was prescribed namely: (1) Doing so over the telephone with no face to face consultation. (2) Consequent lack of detail regarding: 2.1 the drugs being taken by Miss Holt 2.2 the frequency with which they were being taken 2.3 the degree if any, of her dependence 2.4 absence of assessment of any psychological issues (3) Providing a methadone naïve patient with a 7 day supply. (4) Lack of medical review during the initial phase. ”

    Source location

    Lyndsey Holt · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provision of a 7-day methadone supply to a methadone-naive patient

    Wider context from the report

    “The circumstances in which the methadone was prescribed namely: (1) Doing so over the telephone with no face to face consultation. (2) Consequent lack of detail regarding: 2.1 the drugs being taken by Miss Holt 2.2 the frequency with which they were being taken 2.3 the degree if any, of her dependence 2.4 absence of assessment of any psychological issues (3) Providing a methadone naïve patient with a 7 day supply. (4) Lack of medical review during the initial phase. ”

    Source location

    Lyndsey Holt · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to conduct a face-to-face consultation before prescribing methadone

    Wider context from the report

    “The circumstances in which the methadone was prescribed namely: (1) Doing so over the telephone with no face to face consultation. (2) Consequent lack of detail regarding: 2.1 the drugs being taken by Miss Holt 2.2 the frequency with which they were being taken 2.3 the degree if any, of her dependence 2.4 absence of assessment of any psychological issues (3) Providing a methadone naïve patient with a 7 day supply. (4) Lack of medical review during the initial phase. ”

    Source location

    Lyndsey Holt · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Stoke-on-Trent and North Staffordshire

    AI-generated summary

    Name not published · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    The deceased was arrested on 2 October 2011 and held in custody, where he received prescribed methadone and medication for alcohol withdrawal. He was found unresponsive in his cell shortly before 9.00pm on 3 October 2011; the recorded medical cause of death was methadone intoxication, with alcohol withdrawal in a chronic alcoholic also identified. Concerns included communication between medical practitioners and custody staff, inconsistent observation levels, joint training, and training on drug and alcohol-related risks.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient targeted training on drug and alcohol-related risks in custody

    Wider context from the report

    “5. That training should include targeted training on the risks and dangers of drug and alcohol abuse, including methadone intoxication and alcohol withdrawal, particularly if the detainee is likely to be in custody for upwards of 24 hours. ”

    Source location

    Name not published · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Secure force training on drug and alcohol risks, including methadone intoxication and alcohol withdrawal.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. Training will be secured by the Force regarding the risks and dangers of drug and alcohol abuse, including Methadone intoxication and alcohol withdrawal. This will be built into the aforementioned training programme.”

    Source location

    2015-0138-Response-by-Staffordshire-Police
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 April 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide mandatory first-aid induction training, including defibrillator, advanced airway, drug and alcohol risk training, with annual refresher training for detention officers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. As per response three above, G4S have and continue to provide mandatory first aid training to each of its custody officers as part of an initial induction training programme. The first aid training is taught over three days and includes (but is not limited to); Defibrillator and Advanced Airway training; training on Alcohol and Drugs (including associated risks). In addition, each of the custody detention officers is required to undertake a refresher first aid training course annually. Again training on the risks and dangers of drug and alcohol abuse will be taught during that refresher course. G4S will also examine opportunities to provide additional guidance via an ‘on line’ Learning Management System.”

    Source location

    2015-0138-Response-by-G4S1
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 April 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Examine opportunities to provide additional drug and alcohol risk guidance through an online learning management system.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. As per response three above, G4S have and continue to provide mandatory first aid training to each of its custody officers as part of an initial induction training programme. The first aid training is taught over three days and includes (but is not limited to); Defibrillator and Advanced Airway training; training on Alcohol and Drugs (including associated risks). In addition, each of the custody detention officers is required to undertake a refresher first aid training course annually. Again training on the risks and dangers of drug and alcohol abuse will be taught during that refresher course. G4S will also examine opportunities to provide additional guidance via an ‘on line’ Learning Management System.”

    Source location

    2015-0138-Response-by-G4S1
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 April 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing guidance and training already address drug and alcohol risks, withdrawal, and referral for medical assessment where concerns arise.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. That training should include targeted training on the risks and dangers of drug and alcohol abuse, including methadone intoxication and alcohol withdrawal, particularly if the detainee is likely to be in custody for upwards of 24 hours.”

    Source location

    2015-0138-Response-by-College-of-Policing
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 April 2015

    Open published response
  6. Inner South London

    AI-generated summary

    Laurence Boyens · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Laurence Boyens died in prison on 15 November 2012 from Methadone, Tramadol and Diazepam intoxication. The jury identified concerns about the combination and interaction of prescribed drugs, failures to monitor intoxication symptoms and blood pressure, and failures to suspend or withhold Methadone and Tramadol when signs of toxicity were present.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to stop medicines when Methadone toxicity is considered

    Wider context from the report

    “4. ████████ ████████ was represented at the inquest and the following evidence gave rise to concerns: • He prescribed Citalopram, Tramadol, Methadone, Diazepam and Sodium Valproate on 10th to a new patient without seeing him, although probably in possession of old medical records from previous stay in prison, but not those from his GP related to the period before detention in prison. • When he saw the patient on 13th he failed to consider the interactions between Citalopram and Tramadol and between Citalopram and Methadone, both of which the prison expert ████████ said were contraindicated, nor the summative effects of combining Methadone, Tramadol and Diazepam. • He said that he was not aware whether withdrawal can cause low BP and thought the BP was measured to see if the patient was withdrawing. • He said that he did not know whether he should stop Methadone if the BP was low. • Mr Boyens was seen by the doctor on 13th, the day after another witness found him drowsy with “pinned eyes” and a few hours before another witness found him unsteady and drowsy. He made no record of the state of the pupils, but did record him as unusually drowsy. • At that examination, according to his 2013 statement he considered the patient was drowsy due to lack of sleep; in a 2015 statement he considered use of illicit drugs and was aware of the possibility of Methadone toxicity. But he failed to stop these drugs from continuing to be administered. • At this assessment on 13th he recorded an intention to stop the Citalopram on the request of the patient, but did not take the simple steps to cancel the prescription on the computerised record and if he told a nurse about this instruction it was not recalled or noted by them, and continued to be administered. • He gave evidence that he would not administer Naloxone to a patient unless the patient was blue and unconscious and known to have taken opiates and did not know any disadvantages of doing so. ████████ gave evidence that this was not correct and that Naloxone properly administered had the potential to save lives. ”

    Source location

    Laurence Boyens · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of defined criteria and recording requirements for lowering blood pressure

    Wider context from the report

    “1. There appeared to be a general misunderstanding how health care professionals should comply with DH Clinical Management of Drug Dependence in Adult Prison Settings Guidelines 12.3 and 12.4. In particular this relates to the requirement to ensure that patients who are undergoing Methadone or Buprenorphine stabilization have not experienced a lowering of blood pressure or drowsiness before administration of the controlled drug. • Health care assistants routinely took the blood pressure before administration but did not inform the nurse of the reading and may not have had instruction when to report the reading • The evidence of six nurses and a health care assistant showed that previous blood pressure recordings were not sought or examined to determine if there had been a lowering of BP • The record of blood pressure was often written on paper and not usually entered in the medical records at the time and sometimes not at all • A health care assistant who did record a BP of 93/68 was asked by a nurse to repeat it and reported back to the medication hatch that it was still low. No apparent action was taken by nurses to suspend the medication or escalate the concern to a doctor on 11th. • One nurse, who did not see the BP of 93/58 recorded in the records and administered Methadone, did not know what she would do if he had discovered a previous higher BP. • One nurse was surprised that a BP of 105/60 having a reading of 128/68 and 93/68 the previous day and 121/81 the day before that, should trigger withholding Methadone and escalating to the doctor. • The expert GP, who had been clinical director in the health care team provided to the prison, identified a sequence of seven BP recordings over 4 days, six of which (the second was considered rogue) should have triggered suspension of administration of drugs and escalation to the doctor, but in no case did this occur. • The head of health care at the time, who was an inexperienced nurse, did not accept that advice and asserted it would be impractical to implement it, as it would lead to significant delays. • In a local policy on Buprenorphine a threshold triggering suspension of drug and escalation was defined as 90/60 without reference to the trend. None was found in a section on Methadone and no definition of lowering of blood pressure or how to record it was found in any local policies. • No nurse saw the entry in the medical records by a doctor at 18.56 on 13th November which read: “Unusually drowsy. Eyelids close when not engaged. communicative alert. no sadness or dsh. Plan stop Citalopram and monitor for signs of overdose.. may req further urine test before further Methadone testing...”. • At 17.57 on 13th, one hour from the doctor’s assessment, when he must have been unusually drowsy, no nurse found him drowsy when he presented at the hatch for medication, and he was given Methadone and Tramadol. • On the morning of 14th he was given further Methadone and Tramadol, without measuring the blood pressure, or testing, as the previous day was last day of his Methadone titration regime and his 5 day review. ”

    Source location

    Laurence Boyens · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  7. County Durham and Darlington

    AI-generated summary

    David Peter Greenfield · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    David Peter Greenfield, aged 29, was admitted to hospital for alcohol detoxification and was found unresponsive in his bedroom less than 24 hours later. The report states that his death involved pre-existing heart disease, respiratory depression linked to obesity and the effects of drugs. Concerns included staff experience and understanding of risks associated with methadone and respiratory depression, and the absence of drug screening for patients admitted for alcohol detoxification, which impeded meaningful risk assessment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of staff competence and risk appreciation for patients with drug and alcohol problems receiving methadone

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Not everyone involved in his care was experienced in dealing with patients who had both drug and alcohol problems and the risks of respiratory depression in patients such as the deceased were not fully appreciated. The internal enquiry undertaken by The Priory following the deceased’s death took into account experience and opinions of people within the organisation but did not draw upon research undertaken outside the organisation on the question of sudden and unexpected deaths of people taking prescribed methadone. A re-training programme had been introduced by The Priory following this death but it would seem that there remains a lack of a detailed appreciation of the risks involved of death of patients in receipt of methadone and of patients with the particular characteristics of the deceased and therefore until that understanding and appreciation of risk has been determined training which has already being investigated cannot properly deal with issues which have yet to be identified. It is therefore believed that a further review of such risk and risk management policies needs to be considered with suitable re-training introduced thereafter. ”

    Source location

    David Peter Greenfield · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete an audit of medical staff competencies in specialist detoxification wards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I hope that you will be reassured to learn that we have, in response to Mr Greenfield’s death and your Regulation 28 Report completed an audit of the competencies of the medical staff working in our specialist wards such as those which provide a detoxification service. The audit has been led by the Priory Group Medical Director ████████. Where necessary staff have been transferred to other wards or provided with additional training in the very small number of cases where we have identified individuals who do not have the full suite of competencies that we would expect.”

    Source location

    2014-0518-Response-by-Priory-Group
    Page 1 · response
    Published 27 November 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Transfer staff or provide additional training where competency gaps are identified.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I hope that you will be reassured to learn that we have, in response to Mr Greenfield’s death and your Regulation 28 Report completed an audit of the competencies of the medical staff working in our specialist wards such as those which provide a detoxification service. The audit has been led by the Priory Group Medical Director ████████. Where necessary staff have been transferred to other wards or provided with additional training in the very small number of cases where we have identified individuals who do not have the full suite of competencies that we would expect.”

    Source location

    2014-0518-Response-by-Priory-Group
    Page 1 · response
    Published 27 November 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ensure full baseline physical health assessments at admission and increase physical-health complications in ongoing risk assessments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are taking increasing account of the risks to physical health where there is a co-morbid substance misuse and mental health problems. For example we are ensuring that a full baseline physical health assessment is in place at the point of admission and that potential physical health complications feature more prominently as part of the on-going risk assessment process.”

    Source location

    2014-0518-Response-by-Priory-Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 November 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce a comprehensive training programme for Aspen Ward staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “With regard to the staff at Aspen Ward, Priory Hospital Middleton St George I hope that you will be reassured to learn that we have introduced a comprehensive training programme for them. The training provided to date has largely consisted of refresher training. We are in the process of sourcing and arranging more advanced level training as a means of ensuring high levels of expertise among the staff team.”

    Source location

    2014-0518-Response-by-Priory-Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 November 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Source and arrange advanced-level training for Aspen Ward staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “With regard to the staff at Aspen Ward, Priory Hospital Middleton St George I hope that you will be reassured to learn that we have introduced a comprehensive training programme for them. The training provided to date has largely consisted of refresher training. We are in the process of sourcing and arranging more advanced level training as a means of ensuring high levels of expertise among the staff team.”

    Source location

    2014-0518-Response-by-Priory-Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 November 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Integrate investigation lessons into Priory online training modules.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I hope that you will be reassured to learn that the lessons learnt in respect of your investigation into the death of Mr Greenfield will be shared at the forthcoming Priory Group Consultant Psychiatrist Conference which is to be held on Monday 19 January 2014. We will also take the opportunity to integrate the lessons learnt from this tragic incident into our on-line training modules (this is an on-going piece of work however the relevant training modules are all due for review in spring 2015). We will also take the opportunity to raise the matters as part of future safety bulletins and at our internal meetings and conferences for example the lessons learnt from this case were presented at our Medical Directors Meeting which took place on Monday 19 January 2015.”

    Source location

    2014-0518-Response-by-Priory-Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 November 2014

    Open published response
  8. South London

    AI-generated summary

    Deanne Naomi Smith · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Deanne Smith, who was dependent on drugs and had recently relapsed to using heroin, died on 8 January 2013 after methadone bottles were found at her home. The coroner was concerned that several days’ supply of methadone was dispensed at once over public holidays when the usual pharmacy arrangements were suspended, particularly for drug-dependent individuals who also acquired opiates illegally.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unsafe provision of several days’ methadone supply at one time during public holidays

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence I heard at the inquest concerns me in that at times of public holidays, such as Christmas and New Year, when the usual pharmacy is closed for some of the days, an appreciable quantity of methadone is dispensed and provided for the individual to use on days over the holiday period. When the individual is dependent on opiates and is known to acquire opiates both legally and illegally, it seems appropriate to question to wisdom of providing several days’ supply at one time. I invite the Drug and Alcohol Service and the Pharmacy to reconsider their policies and procedures for the provision of methadone to drug-dependent individuals at times of public holiday when the usual methods of provision are suspended. If drug-dependent individuals are permitted to take away several days’ supply in one visit, there must remain a risk of future deaths. Part of a coroner’s duty at an inquest is to make a report such as this, intended to assist in the prevention of future deaths. ”

    Source location

    Deanne Naomi Smith · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Encourage services to use pharmacies open at weekends and bank holidays as medication collection bases for patients who have relapsed or miss doses.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. For patients who have relapsed or not taking their medication on regular basis, we will encourage the services to use pharmacies that are open at weekends and bank Holidays as a base for picking up their medication on those specific days to reduce the amount of medication taken home.”

    Source location

    2014-0141-Response-by-United-Pharmacy
    Page 1 · response
    Published 31 March 2014

    Open published response
  9. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Joanne Manning · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Joanne Manning had a history of poly-substance abuse and methadone treatment, developed asthma and increasing breathlessness, and died from respiratory failure. The inquest conclusion attributed the respiratory failure to the combination of her respiratory disease, methadone, mirtazapine, cocaine and morphine. Concerns included a failure to provide the methadone-prescribing psychiatrist with information about her diagnosis and treatment, and the absence of a procedure ensuring clear communication between general practice and secondary care methadone providers.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure methadone prescribers are fully informed of patients’ diagnosis, medication and treatment

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Methadone is to be used with caution in a patient suffering from asthma. In order for the prescriber of methadone to exercise all due caution, they would have to be fully informed of the patient’s diagnosis and treatment by other healthcare professionals involved in the patient’s care. (2) Evidence was heard that methadone should be used with caution in a patient who is also receiving mirtazapine. (3) The psychiatrist prescribing the methadone requested further information about the patient’s medication and treatment from The Practice, Loxford. The letter from the psychiatrist was in general practice file. It was not however responded to. (4) The general practitioner who gave evidence at the Inquest agreed that the psychiatrist should have been fully informed, but she felt that the patient could tell the psychiatrist about her diagnosis and treatment. (4) The general practitioner was unable to comment on whether it would be appropriate for a patient who often attended appointments intoxicated, to inform the psychiatrist of key clinical information. It is my view that this would not be appropriate. (5) Evidence was given at the Inquest that there was no procedure or policy in place to ensure clear lines of communication between general practitioners to secondary care providers of methadone. It was agreed by the general practitioner and psychiatrist that such a policy/procedure would be desirable to protect patients in the future. ”

    Source location

    Joanne Manning · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026