Recurring concern

Unreliable management of medication doses not taken

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 29 Apr 2015•Latest report 11 Mar 2025

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes dedicated processes for identifying, recording, monitoring and escalating prescribed medication doses that patients do not take, including self-administered medication not taken at dispensing and medication refusal or omission procedures where the failure can leave treatment interruption or associated risk unmanaged.

Not included

  • Excludes general medication prescribing, dispensing, administration or supply failures where an omitted or refused dose is not the material concern.
  • Excludes medication-adherence problems that are not linked to a failure to detect, monitor or respond to doses not taken.
  • Excludes failures to manage medication effects, toxicity or treatment response after medication has been taken reliably.
  • Excludes generic staffing, communication, documentation or training deficiencies unless they directly impair management of medication doses not taken.
Reports
12

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
12

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2015–2025

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
22

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

NHS England4
HM Prison and Probation Service2
Barts Health NHS Trust1
Care Quality Commission1
Care UK1
Crystal Care1
Department of Health and Social Care1
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust1
Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership1
Guys Marsh Prison1
Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1
Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust1
Practice Plus Group1
Royal Stoke University Hospital1
Sapphire House1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Christopher Granville Bradbury · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Christopher Granville Bradbury fell at home, sustained a cut to his right foot, and was admitted to hospital several days later with diarrhoea, vomiting, collapse, and swelling of the right leg. He was diagnosed with a severe invasive soft tissue infection and underwent a below-the-knee amputation, but died the following day. Concerns included a lack of national knowledge and guidelines for these infections, ineffective training and learning measures, and the absence of an audit trail when medication was omitted because it was unavailable or for another reason.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain an audit trail for omitted medication doses

    Wider context from the report

    “iii) When signing medication out, at the hospital, if the medication is not available, no signature is required when choosing option 5 “omitted dose”. This means that there is no audit train, if a patient is not given their medication, because it is unavailable, or omitted for some other reason. ”

    Source location

    Mr Christopher Granville Bradbury · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement electronic prescribing and medicines administration across both Trust sites to record medication omissions, reasons and decision-makers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. With regard to the concern raised about medication omissions and the lack of an auditable trail when a dose is not administered, I can confirm that currently we do not have an Electronic Prescribing and Medicines Administration (EPMA) system in place at our Trust.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Stoke University Hospital
    Page 3 · response
    Published 11 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require staff to document reasons for drug omissions in patient records through a circulated Patient Safety Learning Alert.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the interim, we have developed a Patient Safety Learning Alert requiring staff to document reasons for drug omissions. These omissions are to be documented within the relevant patient record. This alert has been circulated to all staff and is enclosed for your review.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Stoke University Hospital
    Page 3 · response
    Published 11 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Electronic prescribing systems and existing nursing record requirements address accountability and escalation risks for omitted medication doses.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Electronic Prescribing and Medicines Administration (EPMA) systems eliminate the lack of signature and accountability issue raised by the Coroner because a person would need to be logged into the system to record a missed dose and there would therefore be the requirement of a digital signature. Within EPMAs there is also the facility to include alerts that would prompt the person recording a missed dose if this were a critical drug that shouldn’t usually be omitted.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Further NHS England comment on the reported concerns is not possible based on the information provided.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is not possible for NHS England to provide further comment based on the information provided in your Report.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 March 2025

    Open published response
  2. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    DAVID WAYNE BENNETT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    David Wayne Bennett died by hanging on 13 June 2023 after being found suspended by a ligature, with cocaine and alcohol ingestion. He had a history of drug-induced psychosis and had sought help for deteriorating mental health, psychosis and lack of sleep before his death. Concerns included inadequate sharing and recording of mental-health and primary-care information, unclear urgent-care pathways, failures to escalate requests for urgent medication review, and insufficient mental-health assessment and liaison at hospital.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to identify and escalate unrequested antipsychotic medication

    Wider context from the report

    “(5) Mr Bennett had an open prescription for antipsychotic medication on his GP record that was not being requested and the primary care mental health nurse did not ask about this and the nurse did not inform the GP or seek any advice from her line manager who was a nurse prescriber. ”

    Source location

    DAVID WAYNE BENNETT · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train Mental Health Practitioners to locate current and historical prescriptions in SystmOne.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Response: Current and historic prescriptions can be viewed on SystmOne by practitioners based within a GP practice, hence prescriptions / history are available to view as required by attending practitioners. Planned training for Basildon and Brentwood MHP’s will ensure all MHP’s are aware of where to allocate current and historical prescriptions in SystmOne. In addition the team is working with the local private provider on exploring if there are additional modules available on Systmone which will further support care delivery pathways.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Concerns about care before 6 June 2023 do not relate to the respondent, so it has identified no action concerning them.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I understand from my colleagues in attendance at the Inquest hearing, that these matters of concern; points 1 – 5, do not relate to Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust (MSEFT), and we have not identified any action to be taken in respect of these.”

    Source location

    Response from Mid & South Essex NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Line Manager would not have prescribed medication because prescribing for this case was outside the manager’s remit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As set out in evidence, the MHP ought to have discussed this case with a Nurse Prescriber or the Line Manager, the request for medication could have been looked into further. Whilst this would provide insight into medication history, the Line Manager has confirmed that he would not have prescribed any medication for Mr Bennett in light of the fact this is out of his remit. Mr Bennett’s case would have been presented at the First Response Team’s (FRT)”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 February 2025

    Open published response
  3. East Sussex

    AI-generated summary

    Trevor Alan MONERVILLE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Trevor Alan Monerville, who had been detained at HMP Lewes, was found unresponsive in his cell on 18 April 2021 and died after suffering from epilepsy and non-epileptic attack disorder. The principal concerns were inadequate monitoring and management of his epilepsy after the ACCT closed, poor communication and information-sharing between healthcare, prison staff and family, and insufficient staff training in managing epilepsy and seizures.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a mechanism to report medication non-compliance to Security

    Wider context from the report

    “b. Communication between healthcare and prison staff especially when Trevor was returned to the wing, between the prison staff and family, briefing by prison managers to officers on the wing about Trevor’s condition were all inadequate. Evidence was heard about the lack of integration of various IT systems which contributed to poor communication. In spite of the evidence from PPG regarding the sensitivity of medical records which should not be disclosed to the prison staff, I remain concerned that there was no effective monitoring and management of Trevor on the wing once the ACCT was closed. There was no mechanism in place for prison and healthcare staff to report their concerns about Trevor’s non compliance with taking his medication to Security, thus preventing the cell from being searched for retained medication. ”

    Source location

    Trevor Alan MONERVILLE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use confidential intelligence reports to notify Security when patients may be stockpiling medication.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Pharmacy technicians manage medication compliance. They have now been given wings to lead on so that they have full oversight of patients on their own wing. SystmOne assists with supporting the identity of patients who have missed doses. In addition, the IR process is in place if it is believed or suspected that a patient might be stockpiling. An IR is an intelligence report that will be received confidentially by the security department.”

    Source location

    Response from Practice Plus Group
    Page 4 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing information-sharing protocols and weekly meetings are considered appropriate for communication and management of complex safety concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There are Information Sharing protocols in place, as directed by national policy, which underpin the exchange of information between healthcare and prison staff. There are several regular meetings involving healthcare and prison staff where individual issues are raised and addressed, including the Safety Intervention Meeting and Multi-Disciplinary Complex Case Clinic, both of which are held weekly.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response
  4. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Rhys Lennon Hill · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Rhys Lennon Hill underwent spinal surgery and was discharged from Royal Preston Hospital on 30 January 2023. He collapsed at home on 9 February 2023 and attempts to resuscitate him were unsuccessful; a post-mortem examination found that he died from a pulmonary embolus due to a deep vein thrombosis. The principal concerns included failure to escalate his refusal of Dalteparin or assess the associated risk, failure to provide required VTE information at discharge, and wider problems with communication, documentation, medication reconciliation, and discharge processes.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a clear escalation process for omitted critical medicines

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Despite a critical medicine being not given to Rhys there appeared to be no clear policy on how that would be escalated to a senior nurse/ treating clinician and how that escalation would be captured in the notes; ”

    Source location

    Rhys Lennon Hill · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust is the appropriate organisation to respond to concerns one to seven.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This response focuses on the issues raised in your Report within the remit of NHS England national policy and programmes. Concern numbers one to seven in your Report fall under the remit of Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. I note that you have also addressed your Report to the Trust, who are the appropriate organisation to respond. NHS England has requested to be sighted on this and will carefully consider their response to the coroner. My regional Quality colleagues within the North West have been engaging with Lancashire and South Cumbria Integrated Care Board (ICB) to seek assurance for the local concerns raised.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response
  5. Cheshire

    AI-generated summary

    John Joseph SINGLETON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John Joseph Singleton, who was serving a prison sentence at HMP Risley, was found hanging in his locked cell on 1 September 2019 and later died in hospital on 10 September 2019. The report identifies concerns about sporadic medication compliance and the difficulty of detecting non-collection of medication, including the lack of an automated warning flag in the SymStone system. These issues were stated not to have caused or contributed to his death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of the electronic patient system to flag uncollected or undispensed medication for early identification of non-compliance

    Wider context from the report

    “During the inquest it came to light that John was prescribed medications for depression and epilepsy whilst incarcerated. His compliance with medications was found to be sporadic and as a result he failed to collect a number of prescriptions to enable continuity of his medication. Some of the reasons around this were anxiety in attending to collect his medications and also periods of self-isolation. Whilst Healthcare at the prison were aware of some of the periods of non-compliance and in fact a GP referral and action was taken to enable John to have weekly in-possession medication to support his compliance, other periods were not flagged or identified and it became clear that monitoring those prisoners who are not medication compliant, particularly if receiving weekly or monthly medication was challenging due to the SymStone electronic patient system not being able to flag a warning for non-compliant prisoners for early identification and referral. John subsequently suffered a decline in his mental health and whilst the lack of medication compliance was not deemed to cause or contribute to his death, the importance of consistent medication for medical conditions and early identification of prisoners who do not comply was an issue which was raised and explored within the inquest. The action taken by the prison after John's suicide was to put a cross check system in place by which pharmacy technicians cross reference the medication by way of a weekly stock check to identify the prisoners who have not collected medications or had the same dispensed, so that referrals can be made to the Healthcare team and or GP to task. Such a system is less than ideal as it is both resource heavy, carries real risks of not being accurate and in the Coroners view, for prisoners in possession of medication, there is likely to be a much longer period before non-compliance is identified which carries real risks of fatalities. The inquest touched upon the SymStone electronic record used across the Prison estates by Healthcare. From the evidence it appears that the system has a facility to flag concerns and tasks to action and in fact, certain flags are generated automatically to alert healthcare staff to live issues around a prisoner, however, something as simple and the system generating a warning flag to identify when medication is not dispensed or collected was neither possible nor available on the current operating system. An automated flag alert via the system upon the failure to dispense or collect medication by a prisoner would be a far more efficient and effective way in which prisoners failing to comply with medications could be identified and actioned quickly and in which future deaths could be prevented. ”

    Source location

    John Joseph SINGLETON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Investigate HJIS reporting functions to identify a mechanism for detecting non-collection of in-possession medicines.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I can advise that work is underway now to investigate the reporting functions in HJIS to establish whether there is a suitable mechanism that can be used by provider services, to identify non-collections of in-possession medication. This would be used to prioritise medicines supply room checks and follow up. Once an effective way forward is identified and agreed, the national NHS England Health and Justice team will work to facilitate roll out across the estate.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Write to Health and Justice regional teams and request commissioners remind prison healthcare staff to monitor uncollected in-possession medicines using available HJIS and local processes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the interim, in response to the concerns noted, NHS England's National Director of Health & Justice, Armed Forces and Sexual Assault Services Commissioning, will write to Health and Justice regional teams sharing these concerns, and asking commissioners to work with prison healthcare provider organisations, to remind all staff of the requirement to monitor uncollected in-possession medicines and the current options available within HJIS and in local processes to support this.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    An automated medication non-compliance flag would not improve safety because it would be seen only when a clinician opens the patient record.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is our view that a flag in a record is not a solution that would improve safety, as the flag would not be seen until a clinician opens that patient record, whereas a HJIS generated report will detail every individual who missed doses, or supplies, in the timeframe reported on.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 March 2024

    Open published response
  6. West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Alison Mary ROSS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Alison Mary Ross died on 11 November 2022 from an intraabdominal haemorrhage following an ascitic drain procedure performed on 10 November 2022. The report raises concern that there was no guidance for monitoring medicines self-administered by patients who did not take them when dispensed, relevant to the administration of apixaban before the procedure.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of guidance for monitoring self-administered medications not taken at dispensing

    Wider context from the report

    “It was brought to my attention that the competencies for those involved in medicine administration stated that medications should not be left at the bedside, but no guidance for the monitoring of medication for those patients who self administer prescriptions dispensed to them who do not take their medication at the time of dispensing it. ”

    Source location

    Alison Mary ROSS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Trust considers there is no ongoing patient-safety risk concerning medication administration.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our new Divisional Director of Nursing for the Medicine Division has reviewed your concerns in relation to medication administration in conjunction with the safety, quality and governance team in her Division, and is confident that there is not an ongoing risk to patient safety in this respect. We have made significant improvements to the systems and processes in place following Mrs Ross’ sad death, and I will summarise these below.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 September 2023

    Open published response
  7. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Jane Elizabeth Wadsworth · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jane Elizabeth Wadsworth became seriously unwell after elective hip surgery, developing a deep vein thrombosis, cellulitis, sepsis, acute kidney injury and liver failure, and died on 31 December 2022 despite intensive care treatment. Concerns included missed antibiotic doses, limited consultant input, unclear escalation and doctor-to-doctor discussion about intensive care, unavailable Critical Care Outreach support, and no evidence that specialist liver advice was obtained.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure administration and escalation of missed antibiotic doses

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Mrs Wadsworth missed three doses of antibiotics prescribed to treat her infection according to the evidence given to the inquest. This did not appear to have been escalated and there was no clear explanation regarding this occurring other than that her cannula may not have been in place and there was a delay in a doctor being available to reinsert one; ”

    Source location

    Jane Elizabeth Wadsworth · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit omitted medication doses through pharmacy, ward quality-assurance and accreditation processes, reporting results and sharing learning for improvement.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust continue to focus on improvement in relation to missed doses of medication. There is an established program of medication audits which are reported to the Trust’s Medication Safety Group. The Medication Group meet bi-monthly and has a multidisciplinary membership. At present the Pharmacy Department perform an annual snapshot retrospective audit which focuses on omitted/unsigned doses. The audit covers inpatient areas and looks at any medication doses which are not administered as prescribed and the documented reasons for this. The most recent audit was presented to Trust Medicines Safety Group on 28/04/23.”

    Source location

    Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issue a staff poster explaining how to prevent medication omissions and obtain unavailable medicines.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust recognise that there is an overall percentage of medication doses which are omitted for a ‘non-valid clinical reason’. This means that unsigned doses would be recorded under this category (along with any medication doses omitted due to lack of availability). In the last completed audit the percentage of medication doses omitted for a ‘non-valid clinical reason’ averaged 4% of all prescribed doses. This audit is part of the Trust’s standard audit cycle and the results are fed back to the multidisciplinary Medicines Safety Group. One of the actions from the last audit was to issue a new poster which highlights to all staff how to avoid omissions in medication- this includes information of how to access medication if unavailable within the clinical area.”

    Source location

    Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Redesign the medication kardex to highlight time-critical medicines and streamline ward medication-ordering and emergency supply arrangements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust medication kardex has been redesigned to place greater emphasis on time critical medications. Pharmacy systems for ordering medications to the ward have been streamlined and the Trust also has an emergency medication cupboard and an on-call pharmacy for obtaining medications out of hours. I attach a copy of the template of the updated medicines kardex and the PowerPoint slides to support the new medicine chart for your consideration and information.”

    Source location

    Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide each ward with an allocated pharmacist and pharmacy technician to review treatment sheets daily and support timely medication ordering.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To provide further support for inpatient areas each ward has a Ward based Pharmacy Team. Each ward area has an allocated ward pharmacist and pharmacy technician who evaluate individual treatment sheets on a daily basis. They form a key element of the multidisciplinary team caring for our patients. Pharmacy presence on the wards supports the accurate prescribing and administration of medication. They also ensure timely ordering of medications which do not form part of the routine medication stocked within the ward area.”

    Source location

    Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide medication-omission induction and refresher training, with medication-management assessment for nurses new to the Trust.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The issue of omitted doses is covered in the nursing induction training that the Pharmacist delivers. Every nurse receives this training at the point of joining the Trust. This training can also be accessed as a refresher course. Every nurse new to the Trust also receives a medication management assessment undertaken by the Ward Manager which evidences safer practice in keeping with Trust policy. This is recorded in the individual’s personnel file and a copy sent to the learning and development department.”

    Source location

    Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The concerns fall under the Trust’s remit rather than NHS England’s functions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The matters of concern raised in your Report come under the remit of Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust (hereafter “the Trust”), who are therefore the appropriate organisation to respond to the concerns raised. I am however grateful to you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention. The concerns have been shared with my relevant regional Quality colleagues in the North West, who are engaging with Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board (the responsible commissioning body for Greater Manchester) about the issues raised.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Trust is the appropriate organisation to respond, with the Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board responsible for commissioning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The matters of concern raised in your Report come under the remit of Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust (hereafter “the Trust”), who are therefore the appropriate organisation to respond to the concerns raised. I am however grateful to you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention. The concerns have been shared with my relevant regional Quality colleagues in the North West, who are engaging with Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board (the responsible commissioning body for Greater Manchester) about the issues raised.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response
  8. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Mr John Michael James · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr John Michael James was admitted to hospital with malnutrition and a bowel obstruction caused by an adenocarcinoma, and later underwent surgery and intensive care. He died from a pulmonary embolism after three missed doses of prescribed anticoagulation medication; the report raised concern that the refusals were not escalated and that there was no electronic alert to notify medical staff when doses were not administered.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of electronic alerts escalating non-administration of prescribed anticoagulation medication to the medical team

    Wider context from the report

    “The refusal of anti-coagulation medication was not brought to the attention of medical staff. The administration of anti-coagulation medication to patients like Mr James, is vital for reducing the risk of a venous thrombo-embolism, a potentially life-threatening condition. There is no electronic prompt/alert to highlight to the medical team when prescribed anticoagulation medication is not administered. The Trust’s internal investigator recognised that a fail-safe should be put in place within the electronic records, to ensure escalation to the medical team where doses of prescribed anti-coagulation are not administered. Such a measure could prevent similar deaths from occurring. It was considered that this measure could assist in preventing future deaths not just locally, but at a wider level. ”

    Source location

    Mr John Michael James · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update Millennium training so multidisciplinary teams understand and use visual flags to prevent omission of critical medications.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our response: The electronic prescribing and medicines administration system (ePMA) currently has functionality (all of which is accessible via Millennium®) to reduce harm associated with missed or late medication administration. This includes visual aids in the form of a red tile if a dose is delayed by more than 2 hours. This visual flag is available to all users. Millennium training will be updated to reflect learning from this case to ensure that multi-professional teams know how to use the flag system to ensure critical medications are not omitted.”

    Source location

    Response from Bart Health NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 July 2023

    Open published response
  9. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Alan Massam · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Alan Massam, a resident with dementia, had repeated falls after moving to a dementia residential home and was twice admitted to hospital. After a traumatic brain bleed and rib fractures were identified, he deteriorated and died in hospital on 24 October 2019. Concerns included inadequate information-sharing between agencies, discharge without effective communication or confirmation that the care home could meet his needs, and the absence of a clear escalation process when he refused medication and fluids.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a defined escalation process for refusal of medication and fluids

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The staff at the home were aware of the prescribing of medication including antibiotics. However when he refused them and fluids there was no defined escalation process which would ensure that the risk this presented was recognised and acted on. ”

    Source location

    Alan Massam · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Undertake an unannounced targeted inspection of Lisburne Court covering the concerns raised in the prevention of future death report.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Upon receipt of the concerns raised within the Regulation 28 report issued to CQC by the Coroner on 26 April 2021 a decision was made to undertake an unannounced targeted inspection of Lisburne Court. The findings of this inspection will be shared with the Coroner. This will be completed to ensure that the circumstances of Mr Massam’s death do not reflect any ongoing risk to people currently living at the home.”

    Source location

    2021-0120-Response-from-CQC-Redacted
    Page 5 · response
    Published 29 April 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing arrangements requiring contact with the GP provide the escalation route when care-home patients refuse medication or fluids.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Future actions will include the implementation of Trusted Assessment training for all staff. Point 3 – escalation process in care homes for patients refusing medication. In any situation where a patient is not accepting prescribed medication and is declining fluid intake then contact should be made to the patient’s GP so that a decision can be”

    Source location

    2021-0120-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 April 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    When patients refuse prescribed medication or fluids, their GP should decide the appropriate next steps.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I understand that the Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership recommends that where a patient is not accepting prescribed medication or fluids, then contact should be made to the patient’s GP so that a decision can be made in relation to next steps.”

    Source location

    2021-0120-Response-from-Dept-of-Health-Social-Care-Redacted
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 April 2021

    Open published response
  10. Norfolk

    AI-generated summary

    James Owen DELANEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    James Owen DELANEY was a resident at Sapphire House Care Home and had insulin-controlled diabetes. He refused insulin on 25 and 26 July 2018 and was unwell on 27 July; he was found unresponsive and pronounced dead on 28 July 2018. Concerns included insufficient regular refresher training on policies and inconsistent procedures for contacting a GP when medication was refused.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain a consistent and accessible medication-refusal procedure across Homes

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The Medication Policy covering all medication, all service users at all Homes within the Crystal Care umbrella organisation, provides a GP should be called if medication is not taken for 24 hours. At Sapphire House staff have been sent an email requiring them to call a GP should a service user refuse one dose of medication. This is not a standard procedure across all Homes and could lead to confusion, particularly should staff transfer between Homes and on new staff joining who may not have access to the email. ”

    Source location

    James Owen DELANEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Amend the company-wide medication policy to require condition-specific escalation after the first refusal and define emergency responses and generic-medication escalation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “On hearing the evidence of ████████ during the inquest, she suggested that for specific conditions, such as diabetes, she would expect to be informed within a 24 hour period. The Company has subsequently amended the company wide medication policy to reflect the evidence of ████████”

    Source location

    2019-0208-Response-by-Crystal-Care-Norfok-Limited
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 August 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce medication-refusal quick-reference reminders attached to medication administration records across all homes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Company has also introduced quick reference reminders which are attached to the MAR sheet for specific service users. Examples of the quick reference sheets are attached herein for the Coroner's consideration. These quick reference sheets direct the support worker to the medication policy in the event of refusal of medication. These reference sheets are used across the Company within all homes.”

    Source location

    2019-0208-Response-by-Crystal-Care-Norfok-Limited
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 August 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Create a transfer and unfamiliar-staff checklist requiring policy familiarisation, signatures, allocated reading time and a named mentor.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Company have now created a checklist for staff who are either transferring between homes or are otherwise unfamiliar with the home that they would be working with, e.g. agency staff or staff covering a shift.”

    Source location

    2019-0208-Response-by-Crystal-Care-Norfok-Limited
    Page 4 · response
    Published 23 August 2019

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026