Recurring concern

Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 13 Dec 2008•Latest report 26 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures affecting the completeness, accuracy, consistency, availability, legibility or contemporaneous maintenance of patient, resident and clinical care records.

Not included

  • Information-transfer failures where the underlying records are reliable
  • Documentation dedicated to a separately named safety system when that system supplies the more faithful parent boundary
  • Non-care administrative records
Reports
474

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
568

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2008–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
780

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care64
NHS England38
Care Quality Commission30
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board12
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust11
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust10
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust10
Stockport NHS Foundation Trust10
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust10
Office of the Chief Coroner9
Recipient name withheld9
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust9
Barts Health NHS Trust8
East London NHS Foundation Trust8
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust8

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Mrs Surekha Pandharinath Shivalkar · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mrs Surekha Pandharinath Shivalkar, aged 78, underwent revision total hip replacement surgery and subsequently developed profound hypotension, multiorgan failure and cardiac arrest, dying despite intensive treatment. Concerns included the absence of a formal preoperative risk assessment tool, poor communication between the surgical and anaesthetic teams, and inadequate systems concerning the senior surgeon’s departure before the operation concluded.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record a surgeon's early departure in the surgical notes

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The Senior Consultant surgeon left the surgery prior to its conclusion, lengthening the procedure. The Consultant did not effectively communicate his reasons for leaving the surgery to the other members of the surgical team, neither did the surgical notes refer to his early departure. The Consultants statement to the court did not indicate that he had left the surgery before its conclusion. No system was in place to; assess whether a decision to leave surgery was appropriate, or to effectively monitor when a surgeon leaves theatre. ”

    Source location

    Mrs Surekha Pandharinath Shivalkar · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. Greater Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Jos Tarse-Joy · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jos Tarse-Joy was born by emergency caesarean section at 41 weeks after his high-risk pregnancy was not explicitly identified to his parents or care team, no induction had been arranged, and CTG monitoring was not used on admission. He was born in very poor condition, sustained severe brain damage following hypoxia, and died at Royal Oldham Hospital on 15 December 2020. The principal concerns included communication and documentation failures, lack of appropriate monitoring and induction planning, unclear escalation processes, and wider issues concerning maternity-service layout and national guidance.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of explicit flagging of high-risk pregnancies in notes and communication

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The inquest heard evidence that the pregnancy was considered to be a high risk pregnancy .However the inquest heard that there was no nationally recognised way of flagging this within the notes. The trust have taken steps to be more explicit regarding this following Jos's death. The inquest heard that the consequence of it not being explicit in communication or the notes meant that his parents, the community midwife and the GP were unaware that the pregnancy was considered to be high risk. ”

    Source location

    Jos Tarse-Joy · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish a uniform, interoperable format for maternity records across clinical systems.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To improve women's access to maternity records, in June 2021 an additional £52 million was announced to fast track the provision of online maternity records. This backs the long-term plan commitment to ensure everyone has access to their maternity notes and information electronically by 2023/24. An initial component of this was to create an agreed uniform format for the notes both in terms of layout and content. This then has been taken to ensure “interoperability” – that is that the notes will be shared irrespective of clinical system.”

    Source location

    Response from DHSC
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 January 2022

    Open published response
  3. West Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    Dilys Greta Etchells · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Dilys Greta Etchells was found after an unwitnessed fall at her nursing home, later diagnosed with fractures of the left tibia and fibula, and subsequently developed pressure ulcers before dying in hospital on 2 July 2021. The report identified concerns about the absence or documentation of fall-prevention measures, delayed medical referral, inadequate care documentation, handover communications, and wound-management procedures.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate note taking

    Wider context from the report

    “• To review existing practices with regard to the adequacy of note taking and to consider protocols to ensure compliance with care plans. ”

    Source location

    Dilys Greta Etchells · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate documentation of visual checks on residents in their rooms

    Wider context from the report

    “• Consider the adequacy of the supporting documentation with regard to visual checks on residents in their rooms. ”

    Source location

    Dilys Greta Etchells · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Carry out hourly checks of residents in their rooms and document the outcomes in contemporaneous notes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As outlined above, handover sheets have been developed to ensure thorough handover of information (including the outcome of visual checks) as part of the twice daily handover process.”

    Source location

    2021-0428-Response-from-HIll-Care-Group_Published
    Page 6 · response
    Published 29 December 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit handover sheets and processes regularly to verify completion and consistency with care plans.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Registered General Nurses and Shift Leaders have been informed of the new handover process by the Home Manager during weekly team meetings. To ensure that this change becomes embedded in day to day practice, the Home Manager carries out audits of the handover sheets as part of the weekly quality programme to ensure that the documented information accords with the detailed care plan and that the handover sheet has been fully completed. In my role as Regional Manager, I also undertake monthly audits of the handover sheet and process for further organisational assurance that the correct process is being followed by members of staff.”

    Source location

    2021-0428-Response-from-HIll-Care-Group_Published
    Page 6 · response
    Published 29 December 2021

    Open published response
  4. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Nichola Jane Lomax · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Nichola Jane Lomax had a long history of an eating disorder and attended hospital several times in 2020 with severe malnutrition and electrolyte imbalance. She died on 3 August 2020 after delays and failings involving hospital treatment, specialist referral, communication, monitoring, nutritional care and access to appropriate services. The report identified concerns about inadequate eating-dis disorder training, access to specialist advice, referral criteria, critical services, community monitoring, nursing care and investigation of deaths.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Poor and inaccurate compilation of clinical documentation

    Wider context from the report

    “6) Nursing Input and Recording For NCA Notwithstanding that the NCA made admissions in relation to the clinical care provided to Nichola, the Serious Incident Review did not consider the nursing input. Evidence during the course of the Inquest showed the nursing input to be poor and lacking in basic care. There were no nutrition / fluid charts on her first admission in June. There was a lack of close monitoring of her food and purging behaviours which would have been essential information to provide to the Doctors involved in setting her treatment plan. There was a poor documentation and incorrect compilation of documentation which highlighted her malnutrition but then recorded conflicting information. ”

    Source location

    Nichola Jane Lomax · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Manchester West

    AI-generated summary

    JOAN WRIGHT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Joan Wright, aged 91, fell at home, sustained a fractured left femur, and underwent surgery during which a guide wire penetrated her pelvis. She later developed a severe infection in the hip and died at a nursing home on 16 June 2021. The report raised concerns that insufficient workable and accessible IT facilities caused crucial clinical information to go unrecorded, creating a risk to other patients.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient availability, workability and accessibility of IT facilities for timely electronic record-keeping

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Both the Divisional Review Report produced by the Trust and oral evidence at the inquest disclosed problems with insufficient workable IT facilities at the hospital to allow for timely record-keeping in patients' electronic notes. I was advised that all clinical staff are supposed to make records in the electronic notes and that no handwritten records are now kept. I heard evidence that staff therefore have to rely on memory, or notes written on scraps of paper, until such time as they can access the electronic records on a computer. This case provided several instances in the care of a single patient where either no notes were made at all of clinical discussions or management plans, or crucial information was omitted. I am concerned that the issues of availability, workability and accessibility of IT equipment for such recording (in the context of a reliance on paperless working) creates a risk of future deaths to other patients where crucial information may go unrecorded. ”

    Source location

    JOAN WRIGHT · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deploy the electronic patient record system and associated devices across inpatient areas.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Electronic Patient Record (EPR) system was deployed to inpatient areas in October 2019. The devices were allocated based on learning from other organisations, workflows, number of beds, ward layout, EPR functionality and existing equipment. The devices included; mobile computer carts, fixed desktop computers, drug trolley laptops, tablets and ‘Patient Status at a Glance’ electronic ‘tracking boards’. This technology was approved by each of our Divisional Leadership Teams and through the governance of the Transformation Board prior to going live with the system.”

    Source location

    2021-0420-Response-from-Royal-Bolton-Hospital_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 December 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Trial additional computers on wheels to assess their effect on timely and accurate clinical documentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following feedback from clinical staff, around their challenges in accessing the EPR system and associated devices, a working group was established to understand this further. This led to a test trial, which ran throughout May and June 2021, and aimed to consider the impact of supplying two additional two computers on wheels to inpatient wards. Findings, clearly demonstrated the positive impact these additional devices had in supporting staff with inputting timely, and maintaining accurate clinical records.”

    Source location

    2021-0420-Response-from-Royal-Bolton-Hospital_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 December 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Procure and deploy additional computers on wheels across all wards to improve access to electronic patient records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The results were presented to the Senior Nurse Management Team in July 2021 and the Divisional Nurse Directors confirmed the device requirements. In August 2021, Executive approval of the recommendations for additional computers was provided. Following this, in October 2021, a business case, outlining the plan for finance provision and information technology deployment, was approved by the Trusts Capital Revenue Investment Group.”

    Source location

    2021-0420-Response-from-Royal-Bolton-Hospital_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 December 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct ward visits, educate clinical staff on equipment housekeeping, and audit equipment care, charging and fault reporting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, following the scoping of existing devices on wards, the Technical Team found that poor care of the equipment and the delay in reporting damaged equipment to the Information Technology Department resulted in avoidable equipment unavailability.”

    Source location

    2021-0420-Response-from-Royal-Bolton-Hospital_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 December 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review ward-round processes and competing demands for computers on wheels, then develop and implement relevant action plans.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We acknowledge there have been pressures on IT equipment and the computers on wheels, in particular across the surgical wards, where there have been competing demands from the surgical teams and nursing staff. In addition to the extra equipment ordered, a Steering Group has been established to review ward round processes and the competing demands on the equipment by various clinical staff. The work being undertaken by the Steering Group is expected to be completed by May 2022 with relevant action plans developed and in place.”

    Source location

    2021-0420-Response-from-Royal-Bolton-Hospital_Published
    Page 3 · response
    Published 22 December 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Equipment deployment was delayed by the global data-chip shortage affecting manufacturing and distribution.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “An order was placed with suppliers on the 11th November 2021 and since then there has been regular liaison with suppliers in order to secure the earliest available delivery of equipment. Due to the current global shortage of data silicon chips, which is severely affecting the manufacturing of technical equipment, this has delayed delivery of the order. The suppliers have provided a provisional delivery date of June 2022, however this is reliant upon no further delays within the manufacturing and distribution chain. Once the equipment has been delivered the Technical Team will prioritise resources to build and deploy the equipment across all wards, within seven to ten days.”

    Source location

    2021-0420-Response-from-Royal-Bolton-Hospital_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 December 2021

    Open published response
  6. Newcastle upon Tyne and North Tyneside

    AI-generated summary

    David Michael O’Brien · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    David Michael O’Brien died at North Tyneside General Hospital after falling from his wheelchair, sustaining a hip fracture, and developing bronchopneumonia. Concerns included excessive wheelchair use despite advice that it was for mobility only, inadequate communication and record keeping between care providers, failure to undertake a risk assessment, and advice about the wheelchair not being followed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Poor record keeping of safety-relevant care information

    Wider context from the report

    “7. The evidence that I heard suggests that Springfield Health Care have poor record keeping and poor communication between staff. It also suggests that as an agency, it is not aware of which agencies are responsible for providing assistance to its clients. Advice given by other agencies appears not to have been documented or followed. ”

    Source location

    David Michael O’Brien · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    There were no reasonable grounds to suspect an offence under Regulations 12 and 22, so formal criminal investigation was not undertaken.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The second took place after the inquest and took account of the evidence gathered during the coronial investigation and specifically the concerns raised at points 1-8 of your Regulation 28 report. In both cases the CQC concluded there were no reasonable grounds to suspect an offence under Regulations 12 and 22 RAR 2014 and no formal criminal investigation was undertaken.”

    Source location

    2022-0068-Response-from-CQC_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 March 2022

    Open published response
  7. Warwickshire

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Robert Hammond · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Robert Hammond was found at his home address on 30 January 2021 after receiving treatment from the Trust from 20 December 2020. During the inquest, it was identified that Working with Risk documentation was not completed on approximately the first nine contacts, and the resulting care plan was described as unsatisfactory.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete initial assessment and care plan documentation

    Wider context from the report

    “During the inquest there was evidence that Working with Risk (WWR) documentation was not completed on approximately the first nine contacts with Mr Hammond. The 1st contact was on 23rd December 2020 where 2 hours had been allocated for this task as well as the initial assessment and care plan – none of the written documents were completed. The WWR documents were also not completed (on subsequent contacts) on 31/12/20, 3/01/21, 4/01/21,5/01/21, 6/01/21, 7/01/21, 8/01/21, 10/01/21 and 11/01/21. The Trust was unable to give an explanation for these failures. As a result, the care plan for Mr Hammond was unsatisfactory. ”

    Source location

    Mr Robert Hammond · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Robert Wright · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Robert Wright, aged 80, died at Prince Charles Hospital on 26 July 2019 after his condition deteriorated; post-mortem examination identified necrotising cholecystitis caused by gallstones. The principal concern was that a hospital referral for consideration of cholecystectomy was not available to the consultant surgeon because paper referrals were routinely added to patient notes only shortly before clinic appointments, creating a risk that clinicians may not have all relevant information.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in placing paper referrals in patient notes

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) While outpatient referrals from a GP would have been available to the surgeon via an IT system, his evidence was that referrals within the Hospital were made on paper (2) Those paper referrals were routinely not placed on the patient’s notes until 2-3 days prior to the clinic, in this case many weeks after being made. (3) In these circumstances there is clearly a risk that a clinician will not have available to them all of the relevant evidence regarding a patient’s referrals and condition (4) A busy consultant clinician should not in any event be placed in the position of having to look back through paper records to find a referral for a related condition which he had no reason to expect had been made. ”

    Source location

    Robert Wright · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Plan and develop online presentation, triage and vetting of hospital referrals for Consultant review.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “With regards to the first matter, referrals from General Practice are available on an IT system, however, these referrals are presented to the Consultant body for review on paper. The paper referrals are then triaged and patients are assigned to the appropriate clinics on an appropriate pathway.”

    Source location

    2021-0374-Response-from-Cwm-Taf-University-Health-Board_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 November 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue transitioning patient records to electronic access, reducing reliance on paper records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The clinic letters, with the triage outcome, are placed in the patient’s notes and are available for the Consultant team prior to the patient’s appointment in clinic. However, if the referral letter were not actually present in the patient’s physical notes, the medical team would refer to the Welsh Clinical Portal where the referrals are evident. We wish to note that we have moved towards the electronic patient record and a large number of patient’s records are no longer available in clinics in a paper format as we recognise that relying on paper is a risk. These notes are available to medical staff online and our staff have received training onto how to access information as required.”

    Source location

    2021-0374-Response-from-Cwm-Taf-University-Health-Board_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 November 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The missing referral information probably would not have changed the patient’s outcome.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This is true and in this patient’s case, he was already on a waiting list for a cholecystectomy. Had this information been available, this would have probably not changed the outcome.”

    Source location

    2021-0374-Response-from-Cwm-Taf-University-Health-Board_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 November 2021

    Open published response
  9. Worcestershire

    AI-generated summary

    RHIAN EMMA KATE ROSE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Rhian Rose became unwell during a hospital admission for the second phase of medical termination of pregnancy following feticide for trisomy 21. Her condition deteriorated, leading to emergency caesarean section, hysterectomy and cardiac arrest; she died from multi-organ failure and sepsis on 25 November 2019. The principal concerns were insufficient consideration of informed consent and maternal choice regarding mode of delivery, and inadequate guidance on infection risks and delivery options following feticide.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record discussions about mode of delivery, maternal wishes and management-plan risks and benefits

    Wider context from the report

    “1) Informed consent and material choice regarding mode of delivery – I am concerned that enough emphasis is not being given to maternal wishes regarding mode of delivery. This issue appears to be a recurring theme in obstetric practice, and I am concerned that the culture in this area appears to still not fully accepting of the principles of informed consent set down in case law of the appeal courts (Montgomery) and in NICE guidance (Caesarean Section) and of facilitating the wishes of pregnant women and holding full and frank discussions about the risks and benefits and the pros and cons of the different options. I am concerned that situations might arise, like it appeared happened in Rhian’s case, where maternal requests are being made for re-consideration of the mode of delivery owing to feelings of physical weakness, pain or developing ill health. Evidence heard at Rhian’s inquest demonstrated that there was very little, if indeed any, recorded (in medical records) discussions held between midwives/obstetricians and Rhian regarding mode of delivery, maternal wishes and risk/benefits of differing management plans. ”

    Source location

    RHIAN EMMA KATE ROSE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Adopt the IDECIDE tool in the maternity information system to support and document informed mode-of-delivery decisions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The IDECIDE tool has already been built into the BadgerNet maternity information system, however NHSX has asked that CleverMed to hold off on making this available to sites in the live BadgerNet mode. NHSX want to ensure other vendors have the opportunity to create a version, and are working on taking the design CleverMed have created into a more generic specification. CleverMed have asked NHSX for a timescale of when they could start a pilot or involve BadgerNet sites however this has yet to be agreed.”

    Source location

    2021-0371-Response-from-Worcestershire-Acute-Hospitals-Trust_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 November 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce personalised care plans in the BadgerNotes app for discussion, review and professional authorisation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “C) Personalised care plans are being introduced at WHAT in January 2022, this will give women the ability to complete a birth plan within their BadgerNotes app, the plan must be discussed, reviewed and authorised by a Healthcare professional.”

    Source location

    2021-0371-Response-from-Worcestershire-Acute-Hospitals-Trust_Published
    Page 3 · response
    Published 4 November 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide monthly multidisciplinary maternity training covering human factors, informed consent, Montgomery, balanced counselling and documentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “D) Training at WAHT in maternity is multi professional and this takes place on a monthly basis. Included within this a section is dedicated to human factors, Informed consent and reference is made to the Montgomery ruling and balanced counselling and documentation. This case highlighted the importance of contemporaneous documentation regarding mode of delivery discussions and decisions.”

    Source location

    2021-0371-Response-from-Worcestershire-Acute-Hospitals-Trust_Published
    Page 3 · response
    Published 4 November 2021

    Open published response
  10. West Yorkshire Eastern

    AI-generated summary

    Neil Peter Bastock · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Neil Peter Bastock, who had a history of paranoid schizophrenia and previous suicide attempts and self-harm, died by suicide on 20 September 2021. The report raises concerns about rescinding his detention without family involvement or a formal capacity assessment, inadequate care planning and continuity, failures to respond to warning signs after he became a voluntary patient, and failure to notify police when he left the ward.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Incomplete nursing records

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Mr Bastock’s treatment in the Newsam Centre lacked continuity. The responsible clinician was a locum who had recently taken over from another locum psychiatrist. There was no ward manager on the ward to provide leadership for the care being provided. There was no psychologist on the ward to contribute to care planning. The nursing records were incomplete, possibly due to teething problems associated with the recently introduced electronic recording system. ”

    Source location

    Neil Peter Bastock · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026