Recurring concern

Unreliable recognition and response to illness in care-home residents

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 10 Jan 2014•Latest report 13 Jan 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in care-home arrangements for recognising, assessing, acting directly on or escalating residents’ illness, including staff inability to recognise physical or subtle illness signs, failure to act on basic observations, and inappropriate routing of residents’ medical problems instead of timely direct action.

Not included

  • Excludes generic staff training, staffing or workload concerns where no failure in recognising or responding to a care-home resident’s illness is identified.
  • Excludes failures limited to obtaining or recording observations when the illness-recognition or response process is otherwise reliable.
  • Excludes hospital, emergency-service or community clinical response failures that do not concern care-home residents or care-home staff.
  • Excludes failures in treatment or escalation after an illness has been reliably recognised and appropriately acted upon.
  • Excludes unrelated emergency situations where no resident illness or care-home illness-response control is identified.
Reports
11

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
13

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
6

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Care Quality Commission4
Abbotsbury Residential Home1
Bank Close House1
Beech Cliffe Grange1
Beech Cliffe Limited1
Community Disability Nurse1
Department of Health and Social Care1
GP1
Independent Futures1
Leeds City Council1
Leeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust1
Maple York Care Group Limited1
Moorfield House Surgery1
My The Orchards Ltd1
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Derby and Derbyshire

    AI-generated summary

    Peter William THOMPSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Peter William Thompson, who had Type 2 Diabetes and had moved into residential care after worsening mobility, became ill with a urinary tract infection, reduced food and fluid intake, swallowing difficulties and refusal of medication. His blood sugar levels were not tested until paramedics attended on 5 March 2025, by which time he had developed Hyperglycaemic Hyperosmolar State and severe kidney damage; he died in hospital on 9 March 2025. The principal concerns were the absence of blood sugar testing by care home staff and the lack of formal handovers between shifts, which could delay escalation of a resident’s deteriorating condition.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of care home staff to perform blood sugar pin prick testing for ill residents with Type 2 Diabetes

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Worsening blood sugar levels in a resident with Type 2 Diabetes can be fatal. Illnesses including infection can cause the progressive condition of Hyperglycaemic Hyperosmolar State. This is what happened with Peter Thompson. No one tested his blood sugar levels until the paramedics attended on 5 March 2025. By this time his condition was so severe his prognosis was poor and he did not recover despite treatment. I heard evidence that the earlier treatment is started the better the prognosis. I heard evidence from members of the Ageing Well Team and the Community Nurse that there was an expectation that Care Home staff were carrying out the blood sugar pin prick test. The former manager of the home said that Care Home staff do not do this and do not have the equipment to do this. This test is not complex. It is a test that a resident or a carer would do in their own home. It would form part of a baseline observation for a Type 2 Diabetic patinet who was ill and assist with decision on need to escalate. The continued absence of this test being done by care home staff gives cause for concern that there is a risk that a future death could occur. ”

    Source location

    Peter William THOMPSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Instruct staff to request immediate blood glucose testing from external professionals when diabetic residents show illness or other concerning health changes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As an interim measure, staff have been instructed that any concerns about a diabetic resident’s health must include a request for a blood glucose test from external healthcare professionals until training and competencies are completed by care staff.”

    Source location

    Response from Bank Close House Residential Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue monitoring and reviewing arrangements until the blood glucose testing training pathway and responsibilities are formally confirmed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Further monitoring and review will continue until the training pathway and responsibilities are formally confirmed.”

    Source location

    Response from Bank Close House Residential Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The home disputes that care staff should undertake blood glucose testing, relying on consistent contrary guidance from external healthcare professionals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The coroner’s report states that Bank Close House should be carrying out blood glucose testing for diabetic residents. Historically, the home has been advised by both the Ageing Well Team and the GP Practice Advanced Nurse Practitioner that care home staff should not undertake blood glucose testing. This guidance has been consistent and shaped our practice, please see attached care plans with entries added in with instructions from ageing well team.”

    Source location

    Response from Bank Close House Residential Care Home
    Page 1 · response
    Published 20 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Until care staff are trained and assessed as competent, external healthcare professionals will undertake blood glucose testing for diabetic residents.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Until staff are trained and signed off as competent, all concerns regarding a diabetic resident’s health will continue to be escalated to external professionals, who will carry out blood glucose testing as needed.”

    Source location

    Response from Bank Close House Residential Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The home cannot implement staff blood glucose testing until external professionals confirm training, competency requirements and clinical governance arrangements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• They remain uncertain about who will be responsible for delivering the required training and competency assessments for care home staff.”

    Source location

    Response from Bank Close House Residential Care Home
    Page 1 · response
    Published 20 January 2026

    Open published response
  2. Liverpool and the Wirral

    AI-generated summary

    Gloria SIMON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Gloria Simon moved into a care home for respite care and died there from natural causes on 20 September 2025 after her health deteriorated. Concerns included missed opportunities for timely clinical assistance, a GP misunderstanding the care home setting and oxygen saturation reading, and possible insufficient training of non-clinical staff in seeking help and taking and responding to basic observations.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to act appropriately on basic observation results

    Wider context from the report

    “3. It was not clear from the evidence that the staff at the care home have been trained so that they have a sufficient understanding of when basic observations should be taken, how and where the results should be recorded or how they should be acted upon. There was no evidence that observations has been carried out prior to 19 January, despite Gloria Simon having been judged sufficiently unwell on 17 January that a GP should be called. The court was not made aware of when the observation results contained in the Request for Care form had been taken, nor whether further observations were taken at all in the period of more than 24 hours between then and her death. The court is concerned that the training received by care home staff did not enable them to understand the potential value and importance of basic observations, nor to understand how they should act upon them, thereby denying them (and clinicians who might be involved later) information which might assist in determining the seriousness and evolving nature of the condition of an elderly and vulnerable resident. The court would like to know what measures are being taken to address this. ”

    Source location

    Gloria SIMON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Supervise senior care assistants on obtaining clinical support, including contacting 111 or 999 when residents are unwell and a GP is unavailable.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Supervision of all senior care assistants has been completed by the Registered Manager which includes instruction that when a resident is unwell and a GP cannot be accessed every attempt to obtain clinical support will be made. This would include contacting 111 or in fact 999 following observations.”

    Source location

    Response from Riversdale Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train all Senior Care Assistants to use digitally generated follow-up prompts for spiked observations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “When observations are entered into our digital care planning system, a follow up is auto generated based on spiked observations being entered. This will support the Senior Care Assistants who are not clinically trained to interpret these results. This function has been trained for all Senior Care Assistants as part of the revised competency assessment.”

    Source location

    Response from Riversdale Care Home
    Page 3 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Configure the digital care planning system to generate follow-up actions when spiked observations are entered.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “When observations are entered into our digital care planning system, a follow up is auto generated based on spiked observations being entered. This will support the Senior Care Assistants who are not clinically trained to interpret these results. This function has been trained for all Senior Care Assistants as part of the revised competency assessment.”

    Source location

    Response from Riversdale Care Home
    Page 3 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response
  3. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Joyce May DENNIS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Joyce May Dennis, a resident of Roseacre Care Home, became unwell on 9 September 2019 and deteriorated over the following days before being admitted to hospital with sepsis and the onset of a heart attack. She died at 15.30 on 13 September 2019. The principal concerns were inadequate monitoring and record-keeping, failure to investigate or escalate worsening symptoms, insufficient staff training about illness and sepsis in older people, poor liaison, and failure to record family concerns.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient training and understanding of subtle signs of illness in elderly people

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Although the staff were aware of their duties if someone was ill they did not appear to have sufficient training or understanding of the signs of illness in the elderly which can be more subtle. ”

    Source location

    Joyce May DENNIS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 7 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Trivialization of symptoms by staff without appropriate medical qualification

    Wider context from the report

    “3. There was evidence of failure to ask Joyce simple questions to elicit whether concern was needed; trivialization of her symptoms by people who were not medically qualified to say that those symptoms were trivial; and a general lack of liaison with each other and overview such that in snapshot form it was possible to miss or to minimise the symptoms Joyce had over the course of a week and to make assumptions which then put Joyce at risk. ”

    Source location

    Joyce May DENNIS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 7 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Murray Hyslop · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Murray Hyslop developed Covid-19, reduced fluid intake and appetite, and became dehydrated, malnourished and affected by acute kidney injury. He was admitted to hospital on 24 December 2020 but did not recover and died from natural disease on 16 January 2021. Concerns included inadequate prevention of pressure damage, failure to identify when he needed medical attention, and a lack of openness about learning from adverse events.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of expectation for staff to take a broader view when identifying residents in need of medical attention

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Identifying a resident in need of medical attention – some of the difficulties in Mr Hyslop’s care were exacerbated by the outbreak of Covid-19, but there was no evidence of any expectation upon any members of staff to consider a broader view of Mr Hyslop’s presentation than how he was on a particular day. The witnesses did not seek to suggest that they usually did this but were unable to during the outbreak and so I consider that it is likely that this was an issue was existed both before and after the outbreak. I was more reassured in this area by “Restore 2” materials and training which provide very clear and helpful guidance to carers. It is not clear to me how this training, which has been completed by the registered manager, has been effectively cascaded to frontline care staff and their evidence to me suggested that this has not happened to date; ”

    Source location

    Mr Murray Hyslop · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Philip Taylor · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Philip Taylor, who had Lewy Body Dementia and lived in a residential care home, became severely dehydrated during a chest infection and died in hospital on 6 January 2020 after developing an acute kidney injury. Concerns included failure to recognise and respond to dehydration, delayed ambulance transfer and hospital assessment, inadequate monitoring, and limited national guidance for care home staff and paramedics.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Limited care-home staff ability to recognise and respond to escalating dehydration risk

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The staff in the care home were not medically qualified. The inquest heard that their ability to recognise and respond to an escalating risk of dehydration was limited. There was no national guidance to assist care home staff in understanding how to recognise; respond and escalate the risk of dehydration. ”

    Source location

    Philip Taylor · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing website information and links to authoritative guidance provide providers with the information needed to support service users’ hydration needs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Information on the CQC website to signpost providers on meeting Regulation 14 is available. This includes links to a variety of best practice guidance including Diet, nutrition and obesity (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) which is deemed relevant to all service providers. Other specific guidance to adult social care service included links to BAPEN (British Association for Parenteral & Enteral Nutrition): BAPEN: Malnutrition universal screening tool; Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) explanatory booklet; Nutrition for specific groups (Royal College of Nursing); Nutrition support in adults (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence); Nutrition support in adults (NICE); Nutritional care and older people (Social Care Institute for Excellence, March 2009).”

    Source location

    2020-0289-Response-from-CQC-Redacted
    Page 3 · response
    Published 7 January 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The review found insufficient evidence of regulatory breaches, with appropriate nutrition and hydration care plans, monitoring records and assessments in place.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The death of Mr Taylor was reviewed as part of our regulatory duties, to assess whether there was any evidence of failings by a Registered Person that amounted to a breach of the Regulations. The conclusion of the initial review found that there was insufficient evidence of a breach of the Regulations. Mr Taylor had a nutrition and hydration care plan in place, along with a variety of other appropriate and relevant care plans. These were being reviewed on a monthly basis. An assessment of Mr Taylor’s nutrition needs had also been recently reviewed in December 2019. Daily records were being completed and included food and fluid charts. The latter records both food offered and fluid taken by Mr Taylor, which would have assisted with auditing to ensure appropriate fluid levels were maintained. The meal chart is a similar mechanism for ensuring appropriate food intake.”

    Source location

    2020-0289-Response-from-CQC-Redacted
    Page 4 · response
    Published 7 January 2021

    Open published response
  6. Staffordshire South

    AI-generated summary

    John Keith Edwards · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John Keith Edwards, aged 64, was admitted to a care home for respite and subsequently suffered falls, seizures, reduced mobility, pressure sores and a rapid decline before dying in a nursing home on 19 December 2016. Concerns included inadequate care-home policies and care, failures to seek medical assistance and recognise deterioration, poor record-keeping, and inappropriate placement for his complex needs.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to recognise residents’ deteriorating condition

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Southwinds Care home did not appear to be able to cope with Mr Edwards complex care needs. Consequently the original placement appeared to be inappropriate (2) The Care Home had an inadequate policy to deal with falls and no policy for pressure sore prevention and care (3) Care Home staff applied a seizure policy which was not specific to the resident. (4) Care Home staff failed to seek medical assistance following seizures. (5) Care Home staff failed to deal with significant bruising which developed 8 days after admission to the Care Home. (6) Care records were retrospectively filled in. (7) Staff and management failed to recognise and seek help for the residents deteriorating condition other than by way of an out of hours attendance when the GP was given minimal information and the urgent follow up request was not done. (8) Staff were unaware that medication brought in by the family was available to Mr Edwards, therefore it was not given. None was sought from the GP. (9) Non patient specific dressings were used on pressure sores. (10) A non-patient specific mattress was used on his bed. (11) Visits by the placement officer and disability nurse failed to identify Mr Edward’s deteriorating condition. ”

    Source location

    John Keith Edwards · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  7. South Yorkshire (Eastern)

    AI-generated summary

    Steven Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Steven Jones, aged 27, was a non-verbal resident of a care home who became ill with sickness, diarrhoea, loss of appetite and sleep disturbance before dying on 10 December 2013. He was diagnosed with a perforated colon, leading to multi-organ failure and hypoxic brain injury. Concerns included failures to escalate carers’ concerns, insufficient incident reporting, delayed medical referral, and delays in calling emergency services and transferring him to hospital.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of staff to act directly on residents' illness

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) In practice staff did not act directly in dealing with illness of a resident, rather channelling medical issues through the registered managers. ”

    Source location

    Steven Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use the Anticipatory HealthCare Calendar to assess health symptoms, direct staff responses, record significant communications, train staff, and audit use weekly.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In June 2014 the Anticipatory HealthCare Calendar (AHCC) was introduced. ████████ raised the introduction of this system in her evidence to the Inquest on 9 November 2017. This is a NHS proforma that acts as a criteria-referenced monitoring system for health-related issues in those with learning disabilities. Specific symptoms are listed and given a risk level of Green, Amber or Red; amber and red directly link to required specific staff actions and responses, which are described within the tool and recorded on a Significant Communication Sheet, part of the tool. These range from continued monitoring, through administering pain relief or attending a GP surgery when possible, to contacting emergency services immediately. AHCC is a career-level tool that is directive in terms of response to specific symptoms.”

    Source location

    2017-0357-Response-by-Beech-Cliffe-Limited
    Page 3 · response
    Published 11 February 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Staff were trained and authorised to contact doctors or emergency services directly, rather than being required to route medical issues through managers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All staff had full first aid training, which includes advising them to call an ambulance in an emergency. Sarah gave evidence to the Inquest on 9 November 2017 that all staff have responsibility to meet the needs of residents and all have authority to contact Doctors etc and all telephone numbers are and were kept in a directory in the staff office; there was no need to go up the ladder for approval before the call could be made.”

    Source location

    2017-0357-Response-by-Beech-Cliffe-Limited
    Page 4 · response
    Published 11 February 2018

    Open published response
  8. Bedfordshire and Luton

    AI-generated summary

    BERYL MARGARET ELIZABETH GOODE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Beryl Margaret Elizabeth Goode fell while trying to use a commode, later became confused, and was subsequently found on the floor with an obvious head injury. She was taken to hospital and died on 2 May 2017. The principal concerns were that staff did not consider head injury as a possible cause of her confusion and lacked training to identify or exclude it, including when a resident denied injury.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of night shift staff to consider and exclude possible head injury in residents with confusion

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) At no point did the night shift staff consider that a head injury could have been the cause of the deceased’s confusion. (2) It is accepted that the night shift are not medically trained. However, that makes it all the more important that they are aware of the possibility of a head injury to the residents, even in circumstances where the resident denies an injury. (3) It is also accepted that the deceased may not actually have had a head injury from the first fall. Nevertheless, without training, the staff were not able to exclude a head injury. (4) It is also accepted that calling the emergency services some 2 hours earlier would not have prevented her death if she had sustained a head injury in the first fall. However, in certain scenarios, residents in the future may have their lives saved if head injury is considered as a possible diagnosis. ”

    Source location

    BERYL MARGARET ELIZABETH GOODE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Gateshead and South Tyneside

    AI-generated summary

    EDWIN THOMPSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Edwin Thompson, a 77-year-old residential care home resident with dementia, was found dead in a bathroom on 8 October 2011. The post-mortem identified a previously undiagnosed cardiovascular disease as the natural cause of death. The report identified concerns about protective measures for a vulnerable resident, delayed medical assistance, loss of contact with a resident prone to wandering, response to a final medical crisis, staff training, and record keeping.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a clear directive for care staff to seek medical advice without delay for residents presenting with pain

    Wider context from the report

    “There is a need to draft and disseminate to all care staff a clear, simple and concise directive to care home staff to seek medical advice or assistance in respect of residents presenting with pain, particularly of a cardiac nature without delay. Staff with no medical qualification must not seek to speculate as to possible causes of symptoms and should not seek to medicate ( unless otherwise previously prescribed by a Medical Practitioner) or prescribe “remedies” of no or no known worth to anyone in their care. ”

    Source location

    EDWIN THOMPSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. West Yorkshire (East)

    AI-generated summary

    Mrs Gladys Smith · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mrs Gladys Smith died while resident at a care home; the supplied text does not provide further circumstances of her death. The concerns included failures in repositioning, bruise and wound monitoring, falls assessment, weight and nutrition monitoring, dementia care, and delays or gaps in district nursing wound documentation and referral. The report also identified a lack of comprehensive national guidance on wounds and ulcers caused by impact injuries.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to proactively seek medical practitioners' care advice for residents with recognised medical conditions

    Wider context from the report

    “(h) Care Home staff do not proactively enquire of medical practitioners as to how to care for residents with certain medical conditions – for example, hiatus hernias, dementia. In the circumstances, Care Home staff should ensure proactive enquiries are made of relevant medical practitioners at the earliest opportunity as to the appropriate care for residents suffering from recognised medical conditions. ”

    Source location

    Mrs Gladys Smith · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026