Recurring concern

Failure to reliably measure and monitor blood glucose levels

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 25 Jul 2014•Latest report 13 Jan 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of controls specifically dedicated to measuring, monitoring, reviewing or following up blood glucose levels, including inaccurate measurement, omitted or untimely testing, inadequate trend review and failure to establish whether testing was completed after refusal, across relevant clinical and care settings.

Not included

  • Excludes broader diabetes-care failures where blood-glucose measurement or monitoring is not the identified unsafe condition.
  • Excludes failures limited to prescribing, administering or supplying insulin or other treatment after reliable glucose monitoring has occurred.
  • Excludes generic equipment, staffing, training, documentation or escalation deficiencies unless they directly impair the blood-glucose measurement or monitoring process.
  • Excludes glucose-tolerance testing and other diagnostic testing where the concern is pregnancy-status identification, test-request information or interpretation rather than monitoring blood glucose levels.
Reports
13

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
18

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
19

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care3
Adbolton Hall1
Bank Close House1
Bilbrook Medical Centre1
Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1
Care Quality Commission1
Four Seasons Health Care Group1
Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust1
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency1
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence1
Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust1
Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust1
Runwood Homes Limited1
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust1
Springfield House Nursing Home1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Derby and Derbyshire

    AI-generated summary

    Peter William THOMPSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Peter William Thompson, who had Type 2 Diabetes and had moved into residential care after worsening mobility, became ill with a urinary tract infection, reduced food and fluid intake, swallowing difficulties and refusal of medication. His blood sugar levels were not tested until paramedics attended on 5 March 2025, by which time he had developed Hyperglycaemic Hyperosmolar State and severe kidney damage; he died in hospital on 9 March 2025. The principal concerns were the absence of blood sugar testing by care home staff and the lack of formal handovers between shifts, which could delay escalation of a resident’s deteriorating condition.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of care home staff to perform blood sugar pin prick testing for ill residents with Type 2 Diabetes

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Worsening blood sugar levels in a resident with Type 2 Diabetes can be fatal. Illnesses including infection can cause the progressive condition of Hyperglycaemic Hyperosmolar State. This is what happened with Peter Thompson. No one tested his blood sugar levels until the paramedics attended on 5 March 2025. By this time his condition was so severe his prognosis was poor and he did not recover despite treatment. I heard evidence that the earlier treatment is started the better the prognosis. I heard evidence from members of the Ageing Well Team and the Community Nurse that there was an expectation that Care Home staff were carrying out the blood sugar pin prick test. The former manager of the home said that Care Home staff do not do this and do not have the equipment to do this. This test is not complex. It is a test that a resident or a carer would do in their own home. It would form part of a baseline observation for a Type 2 Diabetic patinet who was ill and assist with decision on need to escalate. The continued absence of this test being done by care home staff gives cause for concern that there is a risk that a future death could occur. ”

    Source location

    Peter William THOMPSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Instruct staff to request immediate blood glucose testing from external professionals when diabetic residents show illness or other concerning health changes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As an interim measure, staff have been instructed that any concerns about a diabetic resident’s health must include a request for a blood glucose test from external healthcare professionals until training and competencies are completed by care staff.”

    Source location

    Response from Bank Close House Residential Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue monitoring and reviewing arrangements until the blood glucose testing training pathway and responsibilities are formally confirmed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Further monitoring and review will continue until the training pathway and responsibilities are formally confirmed.”

    Source location

    Response from Bank Close House Residential Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The home disputes that care staff should undertake blood glucose testing, relying on consistent contrary guidance from external healthcare professionals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The coroner’s report states that Bank Close House should be carrying out blood glucose testing for diabetic residents. Historically, the home has been advised by both the Ageing Well Team and the GP Practice Advanced Nurse Practitioner that care home staff should not undertake blood glucose testing. This guidance has been consistent and shaped our practice, please see attached care plans with entries added in with instructions from ageing well team.”

    Source location

    Response from Bank Close House Residential Care Home
    Page 1 · response
    Published 20 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Until care staff are trained and assessed as competent, external healthcare professionals will undertake blood glucose testing for diabetic residents.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Until staff are trained and signed off as competent, all concerns regarding a diabetic resident’s health will continue to be escalated to external professionals, who will carry out blood glucose testing as needed.”

    Source location

    Response from Bank Close House Residential Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The home cannot implement staff blood glucose testing until external professionals confirm training, competency requirements and clinical governance arrangements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• They remain uncertain about who will be responsible for delivering the required training and competency assessments for care home staff.”

    Source location

    Response from Bank Close House Residential Care Home
    Page 1 · response
    Published 20 January 2026

    Open published response
  2. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Sybil Morgan-Gray · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sybil Morgan-Gray developed hypoglycaemia in hospital, which was not recognised for several hours and resulted in a consequential brain injury. She later died from an infection arising from earlier abdominal surgery; the principal concern was that blood gas analysers displayed unrecordably low glucose as “- - -”, which could be misinterpreted and delay clinical action.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of blood gas machines to clearly indicate unrecordably low blood glucose levels

    Wider context from the report

    “1. A concern regarding the interpretation of blood gas machine readings. Specifically, when blood glucose levels are unrecordably low, the machines report this as ‘- - -’. This display can be misinterpreted as indicating the sample is unanalysable, rather than accurately reflecting an extremely low glucose level. This misinterpretation could lead to delayed or inappropriate clinical responses, potentially resulting in future deaths. It was unclear why the results are not recorded as ‘Low’ or similar. ”

    Source location

    Sybil Morgan-Gray · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Investigate whether interpretation of glucose and other out-of-range point-of-care analyser results presents a wider safety issue.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is therefore important that device users are familiar with any warnings or symbols displayed on the device and the recommended course of action, particularly when results fall outside of the reporting range. We have investigated whether there is a wider issue across all point of care analysers and can confirm that we have not identified any further safety signals reported through our Yellow Card scheme associated with the interpretation of glucose results, or any other point of care results, outside the reporting range.”

    Source location

    Response from Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
    Page 3 · response
    Published 20 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share applicable report details with the manufacturer for review through its ongoing post-market surveillance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is our intention to share applicable details of this report with the manufacturer so that they can review this case as part of their on-going post market surveillance activities, and to work with the trust to resolve any identified training issues that may have arisen. We will also engage with NHS England colleagues to determine if any additional similar cases have been reported to Learn from Patient Safety Events and if there are, will work with NHSE to ensure appropriate training is in place.”

    Source location

    Response from Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
    Page 3 · response
    Published 20 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with the trust to resolve any identified training issues relating to interpretation of analyser results.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is our intention to share applicable details of this report with the manufacturer so that they can review this case as part of their on-going post market surveillance activities, and to work with the trust to resolve any identified training issues that may have arisen. We will also engage with NHS England colleagues to determine if any additional similar cases have been reported to Learn from Patient Safety Events and if there are, will work with NHSE to ensure appropriate training is in place.”

    Source location

    Response from Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
    Page 3 · response
    Published 20 May 2025

    Open published response
  3. Norfolk

    AI-generated summary

    Janice HOPPER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Janice HOPPER was discharged from hospital to a care home on 31 December 2021, became unwell in January 2022, was admitted to hospital, and died on 12 February 2022. Concerns included inaccurate and inadequately reviewed care plans, failures to monitor blood glucose, food and fluid intake, and the administration of Morphine Sulphate as a matter of course despite instructions that it was to be given only as required. The inquest recorded the medical cause of death as Alzheimer's Dementia, Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, with a conclusion of natural causes.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inconsistent blood-sugar monitoring instructions across documents

    Wider context from the report

    “5. Mrs Hopper was diagnosed with Diabetes. The Care Plan provided for Mrs Hopper's blood sugar levels to be checked twice weekly. This information differed from information contained in other documents. Mrs Hopper's blood sugar levels were not checked until the day she presented as unwell and was admitted to hospital, some fourteen days after admission. ”

    Source location

    Janice HOPPER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to check blood sugar levels twice weekly

    Wider context from the report

    “5. Mrs Hopper was diagnosed with Diabetes. The Care Plan provided for Mrs Hopper's blood sugar levels to be checked twice weekly. This information differed from information contained in other documents. Mrs Hopper's blood sugar levels were not checked until the day she presented as unwell and was admitted to hospital, some fourteen days after admission. ”

    Source location

    Janice HOPPER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain person-centred diabetes care plans covering hypo- and hyperglycaemia responses and residents’ dietary requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Further to the inquest, all residents with a diagnosis of diabetes, whether it be tablet or diet control, are now having their blood sugars monitored via the GP practice and these residents are having their bloods taken every 3-6 months. All care plans are now person centred to the individual with how staff should respond to a resident who may be experiencing hypo/hyperglycaemic episodes, and they better reflect the residents dietary requirements. As part of the process of reviewing care plans for residents with diabetes, advice was obtained from the catering and hospitality lead, who also worked closely with a nutritionist on the menus for the care home, which included advice related to menus for residents with diabetes.”

    Source location

    Response from Runwood Homes
    Page 2 · response
    Published 1 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor blood glucose and obtain blood tests every three to six months for residents with diabetes through the GP practice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Further to the inquest, all residents with a diagnosis of diabetes, whether it be tablet or diet control, are now having their blood sugars monitored via the GP practice and these residents are having their bloods taken every 3-6 months. All care plans are now person centred to the individual with how staff should respond to a resident who may be experiencing hypo/hyperglycaemic episodes, and they better reflect the residents dietary requirements. As part of the process of reviewing care plans for residents with diabetes, advice was obtained from the catering and hospitality lead, who also worked closely with a nutritionist on the menus for the care home, which included advice related to menus for residents with diabetes.”

    Source location

    Response from Runwood Homes
    Page 2 · response
    Published 1 December 2022

    Open published response
  4. Berkshire

    AI-generated summary

    Colm MCCABE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Colm McCabe, aged 79, was admitted to hospital with hyperglycaemia after his blood sugar levels were not monitored and insulin administration was not clarified at the care home. He was transferred to hospital on 22 March 2021 and died there on 24 March 2021; the inquest concluded that natural causes were contributed to by neglect. Concerns included staff recruitment, training and appraisal, ineffective auditing, failures to clarify and monitor diabetes care, and the candour and completeness of investigations by the care home.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to identify and clarify blood sugar monitoring issues

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Whilst I was advised that a new management team is working at this care home, I remain concerned about auditing of the effectiveness of this. We heard evidence that auditing was taking place at the time of this death, but this appears to have missed significant factors, including the fact that a 72 hour review was not carried out, that neither the 72 hour review nor any subsequent management of the patient picked up the blood sugar monitoring issue, nor did they seek clarification of this point with the hospital, the GP or community diabetic nurses. ”

    Source location

    Colm MCCABE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. North West Kent

    AI-generated summary

    Jonathan Richard McCARTHY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jonathan Richard McCarthy was admitted to hospital with confusion, aspiration pneumonia, sepsis, acute kidney injury and swallowing difficulties, and later deteriorated with another aspiration pneumonia and hyperglycaemia. The stated concerns were failures to correctly monitor blood sugar and ketones, administer the correct insulin dose, and provide adequate nursing care and escalation to the medical team.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to correctly monitor blood sugar and ketone testing

    Wider context from the report

    “[BRIEF SUMMARY OF MATTERS OF CONCERN] (1) The Trust failed to correctly monitor the blood sugar and ketone testing of Jonathan Richard McCarthy (2) The Trust failed to administer the correct does of insulin (3) There was inadequate nursing care and a failure to escalate to the medical team when it was clear this should be carried out. ”

    Source location

    Jonathan Richard McCARTHY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the approved blood-glucose monitoring guideline, including traffic-light interpretation, hypoglycaemia management and escalation procedures.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It was identified during the Serious Incident investigation that the staff concerned were unsure of the appropriate procedures relating to the monitoring of blood sugar and ketone testing therefore a Trust Guideline for capillary blood glucose monitoring for inpatients and day cases with Diabetes Mellitus over the age of 16 years has been written and approved by the Medical Specialities Directorate. This guideline is in keeping with the standard set by the National Inpatient Diabetes Audit. The guideline has been out for wide consultation with comments from clinicians across the trust being received. Contained within the Guideline is a coloured “traffic light” risk tool to assist staff on the wards to interpret the results of blood sugar and ketone testing, with recommended actions to undertake and escalation as appropriate.”

    Source location

    2019-0179-Response-by-Maidstone-and-Tunbridge-Wells-NHS-Trust_Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 August 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide monthly induction training for clinical support workers, registered nurses and junior doctors on diabetic monitoring, equipment, escalation and referrals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Ongoing monthly training has been in place for new Clinical Support Workers and Registered Nurses and this is undertaken during their first weeks on induction to the trust where diabetic management is highlighted in bite-sized sessions. This is delivered by the Diabetes Specialist Nurses on both sites. This demonstrates the use of equipment (by the Point of Care Team), the new algorithm for the recognition and management of hyper- and hypo-glycaemia and how to request in-patient referrals to the Diabetes Team and escalate for medical attention. The Blood Glucose Guideline also forms part of the Junior doctors induction programme which is also undertaken by the Diabetes Team.”

    Source location

    2019-0179-Response-by-Maidstone-and-Tunbridge-Wells-NHS-Trust_Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 August 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver additional registered-nurse and clinical-support-worker study days using the case and related serious incidents as teaching scenarios.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition two further specific study days have been booked for Registered Nurses and a half day for Clinical Support Workers where the above will be discussed in more depth and the use of Mr McCarthy’s case and any other related Serious Incidents used as teaching scenarios.”

    Source location

    2019-0179-Response-by-Maidstone-and-Tunbridge-Wells-NHS-Trust_Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 August 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Purchase and deploy blood-ketone testing machines to key locations, with emergency-department nursing training and specialist-nurse support.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has also been out to tender for a blood glucose and ketone testing meter that has the capability of linking into the existing clinical observation monitoring tool (Nervecentre) which would record and escalate results accordingly. In addition blood ketone testing machines have been purchased and assigned to key locations in the trust with the aim to ultimately have them on each ward. The Emergency Departments on both sites have these in place and appropriate training has been rolled out to the nursing staff. In addition the Diabetic Nurse Specialists also carry ketone testing machines to support access and training to the ward staff as and when required.”

    Source location

    2019-0179-Response-by-Maidstone-and-Tunbridge-Wells-NHS-Trust_Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 August 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Include dedicated blood-glucose-guideline training and case learning in junior-doctor induction programmes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Junior doctor induction programmes will now include dedicated training in the Blood Glucose monitoring guideline and the key learning points from Mr McCarthy’s case.”

    Source location

    2019-0179-Response-by-Maidstone-and-Tunbridge-Wells-NHS-Trust_Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 August 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver targeted staff training and share case learning on testing, abnormal-result response and escalation to medical or diabetes teams.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As outlined in response to question (1), this aspect of Mr McCarthy’s care has been addressed directly with the staff concerned on those on the ward with specific training and the learning from Mr McCarthy’s case has been shared. The introduction of the algorithm, the raised awareness of the importance of testing and acting/escalating abnormal results have been outlined and incorporated into the new guidance. This includes the element of how and when to escalate to medical teams or diabetic nurse specialists for assistance and review.”

    Source location

    2019-0179-Response-by-Maidstone-and-Tunbridge-Wells-NHS-Trust_Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 August 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and introduce connected blood-glucose and ketone meters with real-time dashboard escalation, replacing existing meters and training staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has also been out to tender for a blood glucose and ketone testing meter that has the capability of linking into the existing clinical observation monitoring tool (Nervecentre) which would record and escalate results accordingly. In addition blood ketone testing machines have been purchased and assigned to key locations in the trust with the aim to ultimately have them on each ward. The Emergency Departments on both sites have these in place and appropriate training has been rolled out to the nursing staff. In addition the Diabetic Nurse Specialists also carry ketone testing machines to support access and training to the ward staff as and when required.”

    Source location

    2019-0179-Response-by-Maidstone-and-Tunbridge-Wells-NHS-Trust_Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 August 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver ward-based diabetes-monitoring training through specialist nurses and link nurses.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Ongoing adhoc ward training is to be delivered by the Diabetes Specialist Nurses to raise awareness of the new Blood Monitoring guidance on the wards with support from identified link nurses. In addition we have worked with the Directorate and Communications team to develop a strategy to raise awareness throughout the organisation in regard to the process of close diabetic monitoring. Some of this work included the use of the Patient Safety Calendar to focus on the key elements of diabetic management, a launch of the Blood Monitoring Guideline and bespoke Training days for Nurses and Clinical Support Workers.”

    Source location

    2019-0179-Response-by-Maidstone-and-Tunbridge-Wells-NHS-Trust_Redacted
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 August 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement an organisation-wide diabetes-monitoring awareness strategy using the Patient Safety Calendar, guideline launch and bespoke training days.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Ongoing adhoc ward training is to be delivered by the Diabetes Specialist Nurses to raise awareness of the new Blood Monitoring guidance on the wards with support from identified link nurses. In addition we have worked with the Directorate and Communications team to develop a strategy to raise awareness throughout the organisation in regard to the process of close diabetic monitoring. Some of this work included the use of the Patient Safety Calendar to focus on the key elements of diabetic management, a launch of the Blood Monitoring Guideline and bespoke Training days for Nurses and Clinical Support Workers.”

    Source location

    2019-0179-Response-by-Maidstone-and-Tunbridge-Wells-NHS-Trust_Redacted
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 August 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Disseminate the blood-monitoring guidance through presentations at remaining Trust Clinical Governance days.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The new guidance will continue to be disseminated throughout the Trust by way of short presentations at the remaining Trust Clinical Governance days over the coming months delivered by either the Diabetes Specialist Nurses or the lead Diabetic Consultants.”

    Source location

    2019-0179-Response-by-Maidstone-and-Tunbridge-Wells-NHS-Trust_Redacted
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 August 2019

    Open published response
  6. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Joan Osborne · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Joan Osborne, who had diabetes and advanced dementia, died on 25 August 2017 after repeated difficulties obtaining her blood glucose levels and administering her insulin. The concerns included failures by nursing home staff to seek medical assistance or escalate her missed insulin, inadequate records, failure to recognise her deteriorating condition, and inaccurate blood glucose measurement and treatment on 22 August 2017.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to recognise an incorrect blood glucose reading

    Wider context from the report

    “(8) A member of staff at the care home was unable to accurately obtain Mrs Osborne’s blood glucose level on 22.08.2017 when asked by the GP and did not recognise that the reading was incorrect. ”

    Source location

    Joan Osborne · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inability to accurately obtain blood glucose levels

    Wider context from the report

    “(8) A member of staff at the care home was unable to accurately obtain Mrs Osborne’s blood glucose level on 22.08.2017 when asked by the GP and did not recognise that the reading was incorrect. ”

    Source location

    Joan Osborne · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Purchase new blood-glucose monitoring machines and assess staff competency in using them.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition to this, new Blood Glucose Monitoring Machines were purchased for individual residents on the 13 October 2017 to replace previous machines in use within Adbolton Hall. Staff have received training in the use of these new Blood Glucose Monitoring Machines.”

    Source location

    2018-0091-Response-by-Adbolton-Hall-Ltd
    Page 4 · response
    Published 16 June 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The inaccurate blood-glucose reading is considered an isolated incident because the staff member no longer works there and no further incidents occurred.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “(9) New Blood Glucose Monitoring Machines were purchased on 13/10/2017, and staff have had their competency assessed for using these machines. The incident with regards to the incorrect reading of the blood sugar on the 22/08/2017 was isolated to one staff member who has not worked at Adbolton Hall since the 22/08/2017.”

    Source location

    2018-0091-Response-by-Adbolton-Hall-Ltd
    Page 5 · response
    Published 16 June 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Diabetes care is considered adequately assessed and provided because relevant authorities were satisfied the home’s complex-needs admissions were safe.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “their pre-admission assessments were sent to ████████, Management Officer for the Quality and Market Management Team within Nottinghamshire County Council, and ████████, Care Home Quality Lead Nottingham North and East, Nottingham West and Rushcliffe Clinical Commissioning Group, to ensure that they were confident that the home could meet each individual’s needs. On 26 March 2018, ████████ advised the home that they were not required to continue to send these to them, as they were satisfied that all the home’s admissions, including those with individuals with complex needs, were safe. We are confident therefore that diabetes care is adequately assessed and provided for.”

    Source location

    2018-0091-Response-by-Adbolton-Hall-Ltd
    Page 4 · response
    Published 16 June 2018

    Open published response
  7. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Natalie Ann Thornton · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Natalie Thornton, who had longstanding brittle type 1 diabetes and related complications, began insulin pump therapy in December 2014. On 18 January 2015 she became unwell, collapsed, and died; the inquest concluded that the medical cause of death was diabetic ketoacidosis. Concerns were raised about the adequacy of monitoring and review of blood sugar data after the pump was introduced, including that trends were not analysed, and about variable national support for insulin pump users.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate monitoring and review of blood sugar levels and pump-generated data

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Concern was expressed as to the adequacy of the monitoring and review of blood sugar levels/data generated following the initial use of the pump provided by the Salford Royal Trust which provided Natalie’s equipment and had been caring for her over many years. More particularly trends were not analysed. Whilst noting that the introduction of insulin pump therapy was deemed an evolutionary process no formal Pump Agreement was in place at the time although such Agreements have now been implemented ”

    Source location

    Natalie Ann Thornton · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. Blackpool and the Fylde

    AI-generated summary

    Barry THOMPSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Barry Thompson, an insulin-dependent diabetic, died on 27 February 2016 while a patient on the Acute Medical Unit, after being admitted with sepsis from diabetic foot ulcers and hyperglycaemia. The report identified concerns about failure to provide insulin, fluids, adequate monitoring, antibiotics and medical review, as well as inaccurate and incomplete records and ineffective information sharing during transfer between departments.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clear instructions and staff knowledge for monitoring diabetic patients with sepsis

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Managing a diabetic patient. Instructions were not given as to how frequently Mr Thompson’s blood sugar and ketones should be monitored. The evidence was that this should be every hour. After 16.15 hours there was one measurement of blood sugar and a later recording on the acute medical unit (untimed) and no measurement of ketones. It is of concern that staff were not clear how frequently to monitor a diabetic patient, nor are with a concomitant condition i.e. sepsis, or where to locate a Ketone box for testing .Diabetes is a very common medical problem which hospital staff encounter frequently. Another inquest approximately 18 months ago was heard at Blackpool concerning the management of a diabetic patient where, although the facts and personnel differed the same conclusion was recorded. In that case the author of the Serious Incident Review concluded there was a lack of “joined up thinking”. ”

    Source location

    Barry THOMPSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Inner South London

    AI-generated summary

    Michael George · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Michael George died after developing a life-threatening hyperglycaemic condition while receiving long-term Olanzapine treatment. The report identified concerns about inadequate monitoring for diabetes, delays and insufficient urgency in transfer to A&E, incomplete referral information, and gaps in the subsequent oversight and care arrangements for the physical health of mental health inpatients.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide appropriate care plans addressing the risks of refused urine and blood glucose testing

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Although there was now systematic recording of urine and blood glucose of patients on antipsychotics on the wards, the audit conducted and presented in court showed a number of patients who had refused these tests, but not demonstrated whether in subsequent weeks testing was conducted or whether these same patients, like Mr George, never had their glucose measured, noting that urine measurement was non invasive, and had an appropriate care plan to address these risks. ”

    Source location

    Michael George · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to follow up refused glucose and urine testing for patients on antipsychotics

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Although there was now systematic recording of urine and blood glucose of patients on antipsychotics on the wards, the audit conducted and presented in court showed a number of patients who had refused these tests, but not demonstrated whether in subsequent weeks testing was conducted or whether these same patients, like Mr George, never had their glucose measured, noting that urine measurement was non invasive, and had an appropriate care plan to address these risks. ”

    Source location

    Michael George · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Testing patients who refuse blood or urine samples is constrained by the practical difficulty and unpleasantness of restraint.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “10. CQUINs (commissioning for quality and innovation) have optimised the requesting of tests on the wards but the management of patients refusing tests is very difficult. It is possible to take glucose under restraint under the MHA. The MCA may be used but, restraint for bloods is technically difficult and if someone has a treatment responsive illness, in the absence of an acute deterioration, people often wait for their mental health to settle and try again once, they regain capacity. If someone is refusing bloods, it is rare for them to agree to urine testing – urine is usually more difficult to get than blood. However with respect to sugar, a BM Stix under restraint is feasible – though not pleasant.”

    Source location

    2015-0264-Response-by-South-London-and-Maudsley-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 9 July 2015

    Open published response
  10. North London

    AI-generated summary

    Hana Aisha Abd Elhamid · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Hana Aisha Abd Elhamid was being treated with Clozapine for a mental health condition and developed diabetes, which was likely not identified because routine fasting blood tests were not carried out. She later required intubation for a diabetic coma, self-extubated and sustained airway injury, and died after subsequent breathing difficulties and treatment for a narrowed airway. The principal concerns were the failure to perform routine blood sugar testing and the resulting airway injury during treatment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to perform routine blood sugar testing during long-term Clozapine treatment

    Wider context from the report

    “that this patient developed diabetes whilst on long term Clozapine treatment and that routine blood tests for sugar in the blood are likely to have prevented events, the need for intubation during treatment for a diabetic coma with resultant trachea injury following self -extubation, that directly led to the patients death ”

    Source location

    Hana Aisha Abd Elhamid · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share the coroner’s report with NHS England.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Your report has also been shared with NHS England. NHS England is currently working with the Royal College of Psychiatrists and the Prescribing Observatory for Mental Health to investigate patient safety incidents associated with Clozapine. Patient monitoring is included within the scope of this work. Should compelling evidence of system failures be found, then NHS England would support work to improve management and minimise harm.”

    Source location

    2015-0194-Response-by-Department-of-Health
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 May 2015

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026