Recurring concern

Unreliable information sharing for prison-to-community discharge coordination

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 28 Jul 2017•Latest report 6 Feb 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in the dedicated prison-to-community discharge coordination process involving the prison discharge coordinator, MAPPA, prison, probation or receiving community agencies, including unclear role responsibility, failure to define required information, inability to locate or update information, and ineffective transfer or sharing of discharge and risk information.

Not included

  • Excludes generic inter-agency information-sharing failures that are not tied to prison discharge, release or community-supervision coordination.
  • Excludes clinical treatment, accommodation, appointment or care-provision failures where prison-to-community discharge information sharing is not the unsafe condition.
  • Excludes prison or probation risk-management deficiencies that do not involve the transfer, availability or coordination of information during discharge or release.
  • Excludes failures confined to a single organisation's records where no cross-organisation prison-to-community coordination problem is identified.
Reports
7

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
9

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2017–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
36

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Ministry of Justice5
HM Prison and Probation Service4
West Midlands Police2
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust1
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust1
College of Policing1
Department for Education1
G4S1
Government Legal Department1
HM Courts & Tribunals Service1
Home Office1
Lancashire Constabulary1
Learning Together CIC1
Office for Students1
Practice Plus Group1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Suffolk

    AI-generated summary

    Paul Christopher THOMPSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Paul Christopher THOMPSON died on 15 July 2024 after moving onto the railway tracks at Elmswell Railway Station and lying in the path of an oncoming freight train. He had a history of suicidal ideation and had been receiving mental health care in custody. The report identified shortcomings in the internal passage of information at HMP Norwich about the release of prisoners receiving mental health care, and in the timely provision of release information to Probation Services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide Probation Services with timely release information

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence received at Inquest indicated that inadequate arrangements existed at HMP Norwich to provide for the release of prisoners in receipt of mental health care during out of hours periods. In line with procedures in place at HMP Norwich, Mr. Thompson should have been seen by the mental health team treating him so that appropriate arrangements could be put in place for follow up care and treatment in the community. This did not occur. The mental health team treating Mr. Thompson were only made aware of the fact that he had been released when it was mentioned the following day during a general staff briefing. In addition, Mr. Thompson was not given clear information around when to report to Probation Services, nor were Probation Services advised in a timely manner of Mr. Thompson’s release. As a consequence, when Mr. Thompson presented to Durham Probation Office the day after his release (12th July 2024), staff at the Probation Office in Durham had no knowledge of him or the fact of his release. Neither the failure to properly out-process Mr. Thompson from mental health services at HMP Norwich, nor the failure to inform Probation Services in Durham of Mr. Thompson’s release made a material contribution to his death. However, I am concerned that the evidence heard at Mr. Thompson’s Inquest reveals shortcomings in the internal passage of information at HMP Norwich concerning the release of prisoners in receipt of mental health care and treatment, particularly those who have expressed recent suicidal ideation. In addition, I am concerned as to the adequacy of information passage to the Probation Service relating to the release of prisoners from custody. In another case these failures may give rise to a risk of death. ”

    Source location

    Paul Christopher THOMPSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Compile a telephone list of active contact numbers for each Probation Area in England and Wales.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I note for your information that I have tasked my in-house Senior Probation Officer to compile a telephone list of active numbers, one for each Probation Area across England and Wales. This will in future days allow my administrators to supplement any email correspondence with a live call alerting our Probation colleagues to the relevant event. In the case of Mr Paul Thompson a Durham Probation number dialled at or shortly before 5pm was not answered. Clearly the incoming e-mail was not processed through to the Duty Officer before Paul arrived at Framwell House at 10am as directed by his discharge licence from HMP Norwich.”

    Source location

    2026-0066 - Response from HMP Norwich
    Page 3 · response
    Published 10 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The release licence clearly instructed the prisoner when and where to report, and Durham Probation received timely release information at its correct email address.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I attach at Annex B to this correspondence a copy of the licence given to Mr Thompson as part of his discharge procedure from HMP Norwich. It is dated 11th July 2024 and is signed by Paul Thompson.”

    Source location

    2026-0066 - Response from HMP Norwich
    Page 3 · response
    Published 10 February 2026

    Open published response
  2. Liverpool and the Wirral

    AI-generated summary

    WILLIAM CAMPBELL BISSETT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    William Campbell Bissett, aged 88, died by suicide by hanging in his cell at HMP Wymott on 13 October 2023, shortly before his planned release on licence. The report raised concerns about inadequate advance planning for his accommodation, insufficient engagement by prison offender management and probation services, and the failure to notify local authorities that he would be homeless on release.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to inform local authorities of impending prisoner homelessness before release

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) 56 days before release HMP Wymott should have informed the Fylde Coast Local Authorities that Mr Bissett would be homeless upon release so that his name appeared on the agenda for the monthly Prison Release Meeting. This was not done. ”

    Source location

    WILLIAM CAMPBELL BISSETT · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss custodial cases without release addresses at multi-agency Prison Leavers Meetings using system-generated case lists and probation-led coordination.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Locally, anyone managed by the Blackpool Probation Office in custody who is without a release address is discussed at the local Prison Leavers Meetings which are attended by Probation, Prison, and the Local Authority. A list of cases for discussion at these meetings is generated from the Probation case management system – NDel ius, using the “No Fixed Abode” recorded status. The Prison Leavers Meetings are chaired by the Probation Delivery Unit (PDU) Senior Probation Officer which ensures they have insight into the pre-release work required/being undertaken by their teams in a timely manner and have the links with the housing workers to facilitate assessments and discuss need, including duty to refer situations.”

    Source location

    Response from HMPPS and NW Probation Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct a North West resettlement review and consider the consistency of multi-agency pre-release meeting arrangements within it.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the North West Probation Region, I have commissioned a resettlement review and the consistency of arrangements for multi-agency pre-release meetings will be considered as part of this review.”

    Source location

    Response from HMPPS and NW Probation Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide co-located or visiting local-authority housing workers to support probation staff with prison-leaver accommodation needs and referrals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We also have a number of PDU’s where housing workers are co-located at our offices and early indications are that this improves working relationships and the sharing of information.”

    Source location

    Response from HMPPS and NW Probation Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Prison and Probation Service, not healthcare, is responsible for prisoner release and statutory housing referrals; healthcare provides treatment and collaborates.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Prison and Probation Service are responsible for the release and any release conditions relating to prisoners and have a statutory duty to refer to the Local Authority for housing of prisoners where required. The healthcare service works collaboratively with the prison service and Offender Management Teams providing specific healthcare treatment and will attend any multidisciplinary discharge meetings put in place by the teams to enable the correct community healthcare to support release back to the community.”

    Source location

    Greater Manchester Mental Health
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 January 2025

    Open published response
  3. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Jacob Michael Nicholas BILLINGTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jacob Michael Nicholas Billington was unlawfully killed when he was stabbed in the neck during a night out in Birmingham on 6 September 2020. The concerns included inadequate coordination and information-sharing between agencies during the release of a high-risk prisoner with serious mental health difficulties, and a lack of clear cross-agency guidance and understanding of responsibilities.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to establish effective information sharing for prison discharge coordination

    Wider context from the report

    “4. West Midlands MAPPA has a prison discharge coordinator role. It was clear from the evidence at the inquest that this role was not fully understood by other agencies and what information needed to be shared was not clear. The new policy drafted by BSMHT remained confused as to which cases were to fall within the responsibility of the prison discharge coordinator role. There remains a risk of further deaths as the role is not properly understood and information sharing is not effective. ”

    Source location

    Jacob Michael Nicholas BILLINGTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unclear responsibilities and case remit for the prison discharge coordinator role

    Wider context from the report

    “4. West Midlands MAPPA has a prison discharge coordinator role. It was clear from the evidence at the inquest that this role was not fully understood by other agencies and what information needed to be shared was not clear. The new policy drafted by BSMHT remained confused as to which cases were to fall within the responsibility of the prison discharge coordinator role. There remains a risk of further deaths as the role is not properly understood and information sharing is not effective. ”

    Source location

    Jacob Michael Nicholas BILLINGTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to coordinate interagency release management and share critical information

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Management of release and lack of interagency working. The management of the perpetrators release was not coordinated and there was inadequate communication between relevant agencies. In effect agencies worked in silos. Critical information is not being shared and agencies work in different IT systems meaning there is no one place where information is collated and hence a comprehensive account of matters known to each agency is not easily available to those professionals who may need to know a high risk prisoner’s whereabouts on release. This concern was reinforced by evidence heard during the inquest that changes made since Jacob's death did not include the resettlement information being given to Mental Health In reach teams in the prison. The failure to share information leads to a concern of future deaths as high risk seriously unwell prisoners may be released without key agencies knowing where they are meaning any are not traced and treated assertively in the community. ”

    Source location

    Jacob Michael Nicholas BILLINGTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Record travel-warrant destinations and email them to the OMU group for communication to relevant offender managers and agencies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• At HMP & YOI Parc, a member of the cashiers team issues a travel warrant for each prisoner shortly before they are released from custody. The cashier previously recorded on CMS, the prison’s central electronic messaging system, the fact that a travel warrant had been issued. The cashier now records where the travel warrant has been issued to, and, in addition, sends an email to a new OMU email group, which includes healthcare admin and the Heads of Offender Management, to indicate that a travel warrant has been issued with details of where the travel warrant has been issued to. This email is automatically received by all offender managers within OMU. This information is then communicated to the Community Offender Manager and any other individuals/agencies involved with the prisoner.”

    Source location

    Response from G4S Care Justice Services (UK) Ltd
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require offender managers to notify Community Offender Managers about sentence-end releases involving no fixed abode and provide release-destination information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Whilst Community Offender Managers have responsibility for the coordination of release planning, notice was given by email to all offender managers within HMP & YOI Parc that they must notify the relevant Community Offender Manager when a prisoner is being released at sentence end date and will be of no fixed abode. When doing so, they must provide any information relating to a prisoner’s intentions in terms of where they are going on the day of release. This will assist the Community Offender Manager to effectively manage the prisoner’s release, and to coordinate and link in with other external agencies believed by the Community Offender Manager to be relevant to coordinate interagency working.”

    Source location

    Response from G4S Care Justice Services (UK) Ltd
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue streamlining internal data recording so information is shared through the national prisons IT system, DPS.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The HMPPS primary national electronic records system used in all prisons in England and Wales is DPS (formerly PNOMIS). Other agencies involved in OMU and resettlement utilise other records systems, including NDel ius (the Probation Service), SystmOne/other electronic clinical records systems, and other records systems used by third party providers. G4S has no power to implement changes to streamline IT systems used by HMPPS, the NHS and/or other third party providers. Other interested persons may be better able to assist HM Senior Coroner in relation to this issue. G4S will, however, continue to streamline its own data recording, to ensure as much information as possible is shared through the primary national prisons IT system, DPS. G4S has very limited access to NDel ius, but information on this system is regularly accessible to Probation Service”

    Source location

    Response from G4S Care Justice Services (UK) Ltd
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Include the BSMHFT MAPPA Clinical Lead in developing a sustainable MAPPA engagement strategy and identifying alternative arrangements for gaps.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Deputy Medical Director chaired an initial scoping meeting in response to these issues identified by the PFD on 10th April 2024, culminating in agreement on 3 primary areas of focus:”

    Source location

    Response from BSMHFT
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish dedicated cross-organisational, multidisciplinary Task and Finish workstreams to review processes and policies and identify further action.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To ensure effective progress in addressing these areas, we will establish dedicated workstreams that will operate as part of a Task and Finish group. The stakeholders for each workstream will be responsible for reviewing existing processes and relevant policies to determine if further action is required. The initially identified stakeholders have been both cross-organisational and multi-professional including Secure Care Services, the In Reach Team, Community Mental Health Services (BSMHFT and FTB) and HMP Birmingham. As this work progresses, if additional key stakeholders are identified, they will be included.”

    Source location

    Response from BSMHFT
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement an improved referral and discharge procedure through the updated standard operating protocol.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the meantime we can offer you assurances that since the events that culminated in Mr Billington’s death the Trust has improved the structure and supervision surrounding the prison discharge coordinator roles, such that the practitioners have weekly supervision with opportunity to escalate cases of concern, and an improved system of referrals and discharge procedures, reflected in the updated standard operating protocol. This means that in the event of a similar situation occurring again, there would be sufficient structure to ensure and support the flexibility in service provision to prevent such an individual falling between services, even where they had been discharged from active multiagency management by MAPPA.”

    Source location

    Response from BSMHFT
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hold formal admission handovers and pre-release meetings with transferring mental-health teams or prisons and relevant agencies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Formal hand over of care is received from the transferring Community Mental Health Team (CMHT) or previous prison via a formal meeting”

    Source location

    Response from Swansea Bay University Health Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide documented discharge summaries and comprehensive handovers to primary care, general practitioners, patients and, with consent, probation officers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A Formal discharge meeting is also held between the MHIR and Primary Care Teams when patients / prisoners within the prison setting are being discharged from secondary care services (MHIR) back to primary care services within the prison. This meeting includes a full”

    Source location

    Response from Swansea Bay University Health Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use weekly discharge information, prison NOMIS access and a Governor Grade officer at Single Point of Access meetings to verify release dates.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• On a weekly basis the MHIR Team are sent the discharge information of prisoners from the Offender Management Unit (OMU). We don’t request travel warrant information as the travel warrant is only issued on the day of travel. We also now have access to the prison NOMIS system which we didn’t previously (training for use is being rolled out to the whole team with 50% already achieved). This system is updated by the Resettlement Team and OMU regarding release dates. These layered approaches help to avoid the risk of the team not being aware of relevant information”

    Source location

    Response from Swansea Bay University Health Board
    Page 4 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue reviewing and refining MAPPA practices to improve interagency working and risk-information sharing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “MAPPA arrangements are overseen by a Strategic Management Board (SMB) and in the West Midlands this Board will continue to review and refine practices to ensure interagency working is effective and to support the sharing of relevant risk information. The findings in this case have been presented to MAPPA SMB. The SMB is committed to ensuring their part in providing avenues to share information. Furthermore, the SMB has reinforced the statutory requirement for all duty to cooperate agencies in the MAPPA arena.”

    Source location

    Response from HMPPS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce the statutory information-sharing requirement for MAPPA duty-to-cooperate agencies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “MAPPA arrangements are overseen by a Strategic Management Board (SMB) and in the West Midlands this Board will continue to review and refine practices to ensure interagency working is effective and to support the sharing of relevant risk information. The findings in this case have been presented to MAPPA SMB. The SMB is committed to ensuring their part in providing avenues to share information. Furthermore, the SMB has reinforced the statutory requirement for all duty to cooperate agencies in the MAPPA arena.”

    Source location

    Response from HMPPS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with the Health Trust on guidance revisions for the prison discharge coordinator role to clarify responsibilities, information sharing and probation-service implementation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Prison Discharge Coordinator role is a Health Trust bespoke role in Birmingham and Solihull. West Midlands Probation Service welcomes the investment in this role for this area and will work with the Health Trust to support any Guidance revisions undertaken by the Health Trust to ensure that the Guidance is clear and enables effective information sharing and can be embedded within and understood by all in the Probation Service.”

    Source location

    Response from HMPPS
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the Prison Discharge Coordinator job description, role scope and potential additional resource requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. Role of the Prison Discharge Coordinator. The Standard Operating Procedure has been revised. In addition to this there is an intention to review the Job Description of this role and understand in more depth the scope of what this role can achieve currently or will need to achieve in the future including any potential additional resource requirements. This review is aimed at aligning the role’s”

    Source location

    Response from BSMHFT
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with MAPPA partners to ensure the prison discharge coordinator role and policy are understood and cascaded to police MAPPA teams.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The issue will be addressed by the partners who manage the prisoner coordinator role and who amend the new policy. West Midlands Police will work with our MAPPA partners to ensure both the role and policy are both understood and cascaded to all staff within the police MAPPA teams.”

    Source location

    Response from West Midlands Police
    Page 4 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hold monthly strategy meetings monitoring first-night accommodation and whether released prisoners’ whereabouts are known to community services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Monthly strategy meetings at the prison show consistently high (c 90%) levels of prisoners released from custody are housed on the first night of their release, so that their whereabouts immediately post release is known to relevant community services.”

    Source location

    Response from G4S Care Justice Services (UK) Ltd
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the Prison In-reach and CMHT interaction process, complete a gap analysis and develop a plan to strengthen continuity of care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. Interface between Prison In-reach and the CMHT- A comprehensive review of the current interaction process between the Prison In-reach team and the CMHT is planned. This will involve a detailed gap analysis to determine areas needing strengthening. We aim to develop a clear plan to enhance this interface, thereby improving continuity of care and ensuring that individuals receive the necessary support as they transition from prison to community-based services.”

    Source location

    Response from BSMHFT
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Approach SystemOne to discuss the feasibility of adding a local field for community mental health team information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Systemone Whilst this point is an issue which will need to be addressed at a more national level by other Interested Parties, the Trust has also looked at its own Systemone interface in HMP Birmingham to see if this can be amended locally.”

    Source location

    Response from BSMHFT
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct multidisciplinary pre-discharge reviews and formal pre-release planning meetings four to six weeks before known release dates.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Discharge to Community”

    Source location

    Response from Swansea Bay University Health Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue updating ViSOR records for each individual so information can be shared across agencies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Visor is the shared IT system accessible to numerous agencies. West Midlands Police will ensure we continue to update Visor records for each individual to ensure information can be shared across agencies.”

    Source location

    Response from West Midlands Police
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with agencies to clarify key roles and systems, improve information sharing and management, and protect the public.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We will work with all agencies to understand key roles and systems to better share information, manage individuals and protect the public.”

    Source location

    Response from West Midlands Police
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Visit managed offenders after prison release regardless of their MAPPA process status.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Finally, as explained in evidence during the inquest: West Midlands Police’s approach to visiting managed offenders has changed since Mr Billington’s death. The position now is that a West Midlands Police officer will try to visit a managed offender when they are released from prison, regardless of the status of the MAPPA process.”

    Source location

    Response from West Midlands Police
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide policing support to partners concerning high-risk prisoners with mental health difficulties released at sentence end.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This issue will be addressed by HMPPS, however we will ensure we provide support from a policing perspective to partners in relation to high-risk prisoners with mental health difficulties at their sentence end date. From a policing perspective, it is important to note that the IT systems now in place (as described in evidence during the inquest) have changed meaning that there are now better opportunities to identify someone if they have been assessed as being at an increased risk to themselves or others.”

    Source location

    Response from West Midlands Police
    Page 4 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise and reissue the sentence-end-date release practice document, and embed its expectations in staff development sessions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “For a prisoner to still be detained in custody at the point of sentence expiry is usually as a result of them having been recalled to custody. This means they remain the responsibility of the Probation Community Offender Manager (COM) until the point of release at the sentence end date (SED). There is no statutory authority for Probation supervision of a prisoner released into the community at SED. The sharing of information prior to release into the community in an effective manner with relevant agencies is therefore of paramount importance. The Probation Service West Midlands has a practice document which sets out the expectations for Practitioners when cases are being released at SED. This document has been revised and reissued to all staff and embedded in development sessions delivered by the Regional Quality Team.”

    Source location

    Response from HMPPS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Promote the NHS Reconnect Service to probation practitioners to support referrals for through-the-gate transition support.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS-England are commissioned to provide healthcare in Prisons. The sharing of information between health in custody and health in the community is a core feature of the nationally rolled out NHS-England Reconnect Service. West Midlands Probation Service has actively promoted the Reconnect Service with Probation Practitioners in recent months to ensure they are aware of how to refer into this service in Prison for support “through the gate”, the transition period from prison into the community.”

    Source location

    Response from HMPPS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Concerns about SystmOne, cross-agency release guidance and the MAPPA discharge coordinator fall outside G4S’s power to address.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “G4S confines its response to the first concern identified relating to the management of release from prison and interagency working.”

    Source location

    Response from G4S Care Justice Services (UK) Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    G4S cannot influence release management or interagency working at private prisons operated by other providers or HMPPS.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, G4S has no power to influence the management of release of prisoners from, and/or to ensure interagency working at, private prisons operated by other providers or HMPPS operations.”

    Source location

    Response from G4S Care Justice Services (UK) Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Other interested persons addressed by the report are better placed to consider concerns 2, 3 and 4 and determine any response.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “G4S has no power to take action regarding concerns 2, 3 and 4, and, therefore, is not in a position to assist HM Senior Coroner with regard to these concerns. Other interested persons to whom the Regulation 28 report has been addressed are better able to consider the concerns raised, take action and/or explain why no action is proposed.”

    Source location

    Response from G4S Care Justice Services (UK) Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issues concerning information sharing on NDelius should be addressed to HMPPS.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The HMPPS primary national electronic records system used in all prisons in England and Wales is DPS (formerly PNOMIS). Other agencies involved in OMU and resettlement utilise other records systems, including NDel ius (the Probation Service), SystmOne/other electronic clinical records systems, and other records systems used by third party providers. G4S has no power to implement changes to streamline IT systems used by HMPPS, the NHS and/or other third party providers. Other interested persons may be better able to assist HM Senior Coroner in relation to this issue. G4S will, however, continue to streamline its own data recording, to ensure as much information as possible is shared through the primary national prisons IT system, DPS. G4S has very limited access to NDel ius, but information on this system is regularly accessible to Probation Service”

    Source location

    Response from G4S Care Justice Services (UK) Ltd
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Liaison with MAPPA is the Offender Management Unit’s responsibility, while the Responsible Authority must notify Health and arrange relevant meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In respect of MAPPA, Swansea Bay University Health Board undertake the role of a ‘Duty to Cooperate Agency’ with Probation, HMP and the Police as the Responsible Authority – it is the Responsible Authority’s responsibility to inform Health if a MAPPA eligible individual is scheduled for discharge and ensure we are invited to relevant meetings to coordinate release / discharge management. The MHIR Team liaise directly with the prison based Offender Management Unit and not directly with MAPPA. Liaison with MAPPA is the responsibility of the Offender Management Unit.”

    Source location

    Response from Swansea Bay University Health Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Health Trust is responsible for revising guidance for the prison discharge coordinator role; Probation will support that work.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Prison Discharge Coordinator role is a Health Trust bespoke role in Birmingham and Solihull. West Midlands Probation Service welcomes the investment in this role for this area and will work with the Health Trust to support any Guidance revisions undertaken by the Health Trust to ensure that the Guidance is clear and enables effective information sharing and can be embedded within and understood by all in the Probation Service.”

    Source location

    Response from HMPPS
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Health Board lacks power to take action regarding the West Midlands MAPPA prison discharge coordinator concern.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “West Midlands MAPPA has a prison discharge coordinator role. It was clear from the evidence at the inquest that this role was not fully understood by other agencies and what information needed to be shared was not clear. The new policy drafted by BSMHT remained confused as to which cases were to fall within the responsibility of the prison discharge coordinator role. There remains a risk of further deaths as the role is not properly understood and information sharing is not effective.”

    Source location

    Response from Swansea Bay University Health Board
    Page 7 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Partners managing the prison discharge coordinator role will address the role and amend the related policy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The issue will be addressed by the partners who manage the prisoner coordinator role and who amend the new policy. West Midlands Police will work with our MAPPA partners to ensure both the role and policy are both understood and cascaded to all staff within the police MAPPA teams.”

    Source location

    Response from West Midlands Police
    Page 4 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    HMPPS is responsible for providing and operating resettlement services, which are delivered by HMPPS-commissioned external providers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “HMPPS has responsibility for provision and operation of resettlement services. Such resettlement services at HMP & YOI Parc are commissioned by HMPPS from external providers who are based within the prison to facilitate resettlement services for prisoners approaching release from custody. G4S is not party to the procurement or placement of resettlement services within HMP & YOI Parc or the direct delivery of these services. G4S’ focus is on ensuring alignment and integration with third party service providers to ensure effective interagency working.”

    Source location

    Response from G4S Care Justice Services (UK) Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    G4S cannot implement changes to streamline IT systems used by HMPPS, the NHS and third-party providers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The HMPPS primary national electronic records system used in all prisons in England and Wales is DPS (formerly PNOMIS). Other agencies involved in OMU and resettlement utilise other records systems, including NDel ius (the Probation Service), SystmOne/other electronic clinical records systems, and other records systems used by third party providers. G4S has no power to implement changes to streamline IT systems used by HMPPS, the NHS and/or other third party providers. Other interested persons may be better able to assist HM Senior Coroner in relation to this issue. G4S will, however, continue to streamline its own data recording, to ensure as much information as possible is shared through the primary national prisons IT system, DPS. G4S has very limited access to NDel ius, but information on this system is regularly accessible to Probation Service”

    Source location

    Response from G4S Care Justice Services (UK) Ltd
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    National Systemone interface issues must be addressed by other Interested Parties, although the Trust is exploring a local amendment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Systemone Whilst this point is an issue which will need to be addressed at a more national level by other Interested Parties, the Trust has also looked at its own Systemone interface in HMP Birmingham to see if this can be amended locally.”

    Source location

    Response from BSMHFT
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    A unified prison interagency IT system cannot be implemented because the Health Board lacks the necessary power.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Swansea University Health Board recognise that there is not a shared database for interagency working in place across England and Wales prison establishments to enable the transfer and access to key information by agencies coordinating the discharge of high risk individuals.”

    Source location

    Response from Swansea Bay University Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response
  4. South Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    Jamie Lee Bennett · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jamie Lee Bennett, who had been abstinent from drugs and methadone for approximately eight months, was found unresponsive in his room at Norfolk Park Bail Hostel on 2 May 2020 and was pronounced deceased by paramedics. The report identified concerns about incomplete sharing of his substance-misuse and Naloxone information, reduced support after release, unclear responsibilities and inadequate training and auditing for welfare checks, and a delay in calling emergency services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Gaps in communication of crucial substance-misuse and Naloxone information to Approved Premises

    Wider context from the report

    “There were gaps in the information provided by HMP Moorlands to Norfolk Park Bail Hostel, in particular his history of substance misuse and that Jamie had refused Naloxone. The Court heard evidence that information sharing with third parties is in line with national guidelines, but also that there should have been another report by the offender management services that would have been more detailed and would have given this information to Norfolk Park. I do feel that if Norfolk Park Bail Hostel had that information, they would have been in a better position to support Jamie during those first crucial 48 hours and that may have reduced the risk of him using substances and dying It is my view there should be a process by which crucial information about a patient is communicated to the Approved Premise, specifically substance misuse history, any substance misuse work, any detox or re-toxification processes undertaken, and whether the patient has accepted or refused Naloxone and any community drugs services referral. It is my view this will assist the Approved Premise to determine the level of support to be offered to a resident, especially those that are released on a Friday and will have limited support from anywhere other than an Approved Premise during the first 48 hours It is my opinion there is a risk that future deaths may occur unless such a process is developed ”

    Source location

    Jamie Lee Bennett · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Draft a detailed patient-release information template covering substance misuse, Naloxone, mental health and other relevant support needs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following the Inquest, PPG Healthcare reflected on the type of information being requested and determined that more information should be shared. Therefore, Healthcare have drafted a more detailed template (attached for reference), which provides more specific information including, medical conditions, medication, COVID vaccinations, social services input, mental health concerns including history of self-harm, and specific equipment the patient may require, substance misuse involvement including SMS history, any current substance misuse work, any detox or re-toxification processes undertaken, whether the patient has been offered and trained for Naloxone and details of any community drugs service referrals that may have been made.”

    Source location

    Response from Practice Plus Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a tracked, consent-based process for quality-assured Approved Premises information reports, recording requests and completed reports on SystmOne.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A process has been immediately implemented for managing all Approved Premises information requests: – Requests for patient information received are logged onto a spreadsheet for tracking the process. – All information/medical report requests received are scanned onto the patient record on SystmOne. – Consent to share information is signed by the patient and scanned onto the patient record (SystmOne). – The Medical Record template is completed by a manager, quality assured and shared with the requesting provider. – The completed report is scanned onto the patient record (SystmOne) providing an audit trail.”

    Source location

    Response from Practice Plus Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the Naloxone refusal disclaimer and require refusals to be signed, scanned onto SystmOne and recorded in third-party medical reports.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Patients are provided with advice on discharge, where appropriate, about Naloxone. I understand this occurred in the case of Jamie Lee Bennett. However, in order for greater clarity and clinical safety, the disclaimer form for Naloxone has now been updated to make the risks of not accepting Naloxone clearer, please see Appendix B. When a”

    Source location

    Response from Practice Plus Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 May 2022

    Open published response
  5. London City

    AI-generated summary

    Saskia Jones and 2 others · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    On 29 November 2019, Usman Khan carried out a terrorist attack at Fishmongers’ Hall, fatally stabbing Saskia Jones and Jack Merritt before being fatally shot by firearms officers on London Bridge. The report raised concerns about risk assessment and communication for events involving high-risk offenders, and about the assessment, information-sharing, supervision and management of terrorist offenders released into the community.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide MAPPA panels direct input from the preparing forensic psychologist

    Wider context from the report

    “It is a matter for concern that MAPPA panels managing even the most serious offenders may not have the benefit of hearing directly from a forensic psychologist who has prepared an ERG report shortly prior to the offender’s release. ”

    Source location

    Saskia Jones and 2 others · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 20 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update MAPPA statutory guidance to require forensic psychologists to attend meetings and present ERG assessments, including Level 3 and core group meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• We will update the MAPPA statutory guidance by April 2022, to make it a requirement that psychologists attend MAPPA meetings – and, specifically, to require them to be invited to present their ERG assessment to the MAPPA meeting. The updates will form part of a wider revision of the chapter on meetings in the MAPPA Guidance.”

    Source location

    2021-0362-Response-from-MoJ_Published
    Page 4 · response
    Published 3 November 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Other bodies are taking forward substantive work on the concerns, so further College guidance or training would risk duplicating their work.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In developing our response, we are grateful to the other addressees (and national Counter Terrorism policing) who have shared their responses with us. We note from their responses that these addressees have taken forward, or plan to take forward, substantive work to address the seven MCs listed above.”

    Source location

    2021-0362-Response-from-College-of-Policing_Published
    Page 4 · response
    Published 3 November 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    ERG findings need not have a dedicated minutes section because the CTPO presents them to the panel and documents them in the relevant section.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “30. ERG assessments are shared with CT Police NMs, and the ERG is discussed at MAPPA Panel to allow a full understanding of a nominal risk and to ensure CT Police risk management plans reflect this information. There is no specific section in the minutes for the ERG summaries however the Counter Terrorism Probation Officer (CTPO) would talk the panel through the findings once the ERG had completed within prison and therefore documented in their section.”

    Source location

    2021-0362-Response-from-West-Midlands-Police_Published
    Page 9 · response
    Published 3 November 2021

    Open published response
  6. Lancashire and Blackburn with Darwen

    AI-generated summary

    Cherylee Yvette Shennan · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Cherylee Yvette Shennan, a 40-year-old woman, was murdered on 17 March 2014 by a former offender who had subjected her to domestic abuse, including serious violence. The report raised concerns about inadequate inter-agency communication and management of the perpetrator, including the absence of a mandatory process for sharing information when an offender with a known history of domestic abuse was managed at MAPPA Level 1.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of mandated joined-up inter-agency communication at offender release or when new personal relationships develop

    Wider context from the report

    “1) During the course of the inquest statistics regarding the nature of domestic abuse were repeatedly reviewed and accepted by senior member of both probation and police services. In particular domestic abuse features in about half of all cases managed by probation staff and that in the year to the end of 2018 of the 659 homicides 1 in 10 were committed by a partner. Evidence was heard of the MAPPA process, for the managing of risk of offenders to be released on licence, and for the interagency sharing of information regarding those offenders. During the course of the evidence it was made clear that the perpetrator in this instance was a very dangerous individual, who was described as controlling and manipulative, and who, it was accepted by the witnesses involved in his management, was likely to have controlled his meetings by his nature, and by partial disclosures of information. The underlying issue that arose from both the various reviews that took place after the death of Cherylee Shennan, and from the inquest was that there was no substantial interagency communication following the perpetrator's release on licence, which would, the jury found, have allowed the sharing of his licence conditions and action plans to be put in place by local police forces. The jury concluded that such a failing possibly contributed to the death on the 17th March 2014. At the inquest no evidence was heard regarding any changes to MAPPA or the guidance given. Whilst the evidence heard was that the MAPPA level allocated to an individual is fluid, and would be based upon their risks and presentation at that time, my concern centres on the issue that an offender who has served a significant sentence and accordingly has never been fully tested before release on licence, and who has a significant history of domestic abuse and violence, will still be released on MAPPA level 1. On the evidence that was heard there remains no mandated process for joined up inter-agency working or communication at the point of their release, or when they develop new personal relationships. ”

    Source location

    Cherylee Yvette Shennan · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Refresh MASH staff messaging periodically on identifying life-licensed perpetrators as high risk and sharing referral information to prompt safeguarding action.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Lancashire Constabulary are a key stakeholder in the MASH (Multi-Agency Sharing Hub), which has dedicated and co-located National Probation Service staff able to access national databases to ensure quality research can be conducted on criminal matters subject of safeguarding referrals – in particular those with previous convictions and actionable orders – such as licence conditions.”

    Source location

    2019-0244-Response-by-Lancashire-Constabulary_Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 September 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Pan-Lancashire MARAC operating protocol already addresses urgent referrals and high-risk prioritisation for relevant offenders.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Specifically, with regards to perpetrators with homicide convictions and urgent MARAC referral, a Pan-Lancashire MARAC Operating Protocol Document was agreed in April 2016 which referenced specifically the procedure relating to Emergency MARAC, and reflects a response to the DHR in question.”

    Source location

    2019-0244-Response-by-Lancashire-Constabulary_Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 September 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Responsibility for referring relevant life-licensed offenders to MARAC lies with the offender manager.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Specifically, with regards to perpetrators with homicide convictions and urgent MARAC referral, a Pan-Lancashire MARAC Operating Protocol Document was agreed in April 2016 which referenced specifically the procedure relating to Emergency MARAC, and reflects a response to the DHR in question.”

    Source location

    2019-0244-Response-by-Lancashire-Constabulary_Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 September 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing MASH arrangements provide research, information sharing and referral of life-licensed perpetrators to relevant agencies, including Probation and Social Care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Lancashire Constabulary are a key stakeholder in the MASH (Multi-Agency Sharing Hub), which has dedicated and co-located National Probation Service staff able to access national databases to ensure quality research can be conducted on criminal matters subject of safeguarding referrals – in particular those with previous convictions and actionable orders – such as licence conditions.”

    Source location

    2019-0244-Response-by-Lancashire-Constabulary_Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 September 2019

    Open published response
  7. London (City)

    AI-generated summary

    SARAH LYNNE REED · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sarah Lynne Reed took her own life on 11 January 2016 in a single-occupancy cell at HMP Holloway, using a ligature made from bed linen. The report identifies concerns about delays in obtaining fitness-to-plead reports, management of her medication and deteriorating mental health, inappropriate reduction of observations, delays and deficiencies in care planning, and cancelled visits that contributed to her isolation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to notify community care coordinators of prisoner release

    Wider context from the report

    “(19) There was evidence from Sarah’s care coordinator in the community, a social worker with the START Team, that she was never informed by HMP Holloway of the release of any prisoner whom she had previously supported in the community, despite the care coordinator having close links with the prison, for example visiting prisoners she had supported and sometimes taking part in CPA meetings. The care coordinator said that this would be ‘incredibly helpful’. ”

    Source location

    SARAH LYNNE REED · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ratify the new continuity-of-care discharge policy by 1 October 2017.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A new discharge policy – “Continuity of Care on Release/Discharge or Transfer from Prison” has been written by CNWL Offender Care. This has been written in line with the recently published NICE guidance (Physical Healthcare of People in Prison (NG57) 2 November 2016, and will be used across all CNWL Offender Care sites. Once ratified, by 1 October 2017, the below will become standard and expected practice.”

    Source location

    2017-0238-Response-by-CNWL-NHS-Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 1 August 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement pre-release assessments, comprehensive care summaries, post-release plans and liaison with receiving services under the discharge policy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A new discharge policy – “Continuity of Care on Release/Discharge or Transfer from Prison” has been written by CNWL Offender Care. This has been written in line with the recently published NICE guidance (Physical Healthcare of People in Prison (NG57) 2 November 2016, and will be used across all CNWL Offender Care sites. Once ratified, by 1 October 2017, the below will become standard and expected practice.”

    Source location

    2017-0238-Response-by-CNWL-NHS-Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 1 August 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the new custody offender-management model, including dedicated staff and additional resources to support prisoners’ engagement with services before release.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our service specification ‘Manage the Custodial and Post Release Periods’ is clear that all individuals in custody must have a resettlement plan and that the offender manager must ensure that external agencies are notified of a prisoner’s release. All prisons are expected to adhere to this specification, but I know that it is not fully in place across the estate, and we are currently implementing a new model of offender management in custody. This includes making available additional resources to ensure that there are dedicated staff in each establishment who can provide support to prisoners, including by facilitating their engagement with services prior to release. This is scheduled to be in place in all prisons by March 2019.”

    Source location

    2017-0208-Response-by-NOMS
    Page 4 · response
    Published 1 August 2017

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026