Recurring concern

Failure of The Scouts Association to oversee local health and safety execution

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 7 Feb 2020•Latest report 22 Feb 2024

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of The Scouts Association's central oversight and accountability arrangements for health and safety or safeguarding execution by its federated local charities, including inadequate visibility of local practice, unclear allocation of accountability and insufficient central assurance or support.

Not included

  • Excludes generic governance, leadership or accountability deficiencies not specifically tied to The Scouts Association's oversight of local health and safety or safeguarding execution.
  • Excludes failures confined to an individual Scout group or local charity where no deficiency in The Scouts Association's central oversight is identified.
  • Excludes deficiencies in centrally generated training or POR requirements where the reported unsafe condition is not the failure of central oversight of local implementation.
  • Excludes unrelated school, care-home, housing or other organisational oversight processes.
Reports
2

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
3

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2020–2024

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
10

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

The Scout Association2
Children's Commissioner for Wales1
Department for Education1
Health and Safety Executive1
Office of the Children's Commissioner1
The Charity Commission1
Unity Insurance Services1
Welsh Government1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. North Wales (East and Central)

    AI-generated summary

    Benjamin David Leonard · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Benjamin David Leonard, aged 16, died after slipping and falling from a cliff while descending the Great Orme during an Explorer Scout trip in North Wales. The report identifies concerns about inadequate planning, risk assessment, briefing, supervision, training, safeguarding, first-aid provision, oversight and the Scouts Association’s response to the death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of central oversight of local safety execution

    Wider context from the report

    “36. The Scouts Association is distant from its membership through its federated branches of 8000 charities and layers of hierarchy meaning that it cannot know how health and safety is executed at ground level. Training and POR are generated centrally, yet The Scouts Association defer accountability for safeguarding and safety to the individual charities. ”

    Source location

    Benjamin David Leonard · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 12 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient safety-team resources and local reach

    Wider context from the report

    “37. The centralised safeguarding team and safety team are not on par with each other in terms of resources and reach to local level. Safety is not prioritised in the same way as safeguarding has been. Safeguarding is reacted to more quickly than safety by The Scouts Association. ”

    Source location

    Benjamin David Leonard · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 13 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue examining TSA’s safeguarding and governance concerns, including assessing corrective work and requesting supporting information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Commission can also look into past conduct by the trustees and what steps had been, and are being taken, to address all safeguarding and safety concerns set out in the Report and ensure the trustees are meeting their legal duties in governing the TSA and have suitable governance and adequate procedures, including to address your concerns as set out in the Report.”

    Source location

    Response from Charity Commission for England and Wales
    Page 5 · response
    Published 26 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ensure TSA and its affiliated charities understand which safety improvements the Commission considers essential.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “24. TSA has assured us it will respond fully to the Report’s findings and have committed to sharing its response with the Commission. Its response will be relevant to our decisions about any regulatory action we may consider necessary to assist, or ensure, TSA make the changes that need to be implemented to address the concerns set out in the Report. We will ensure TSA and its affiliated charities are clear on the Commission’s view about what improvements are essential and must be made and we will continue to examine the concerns identified.”

    Source location

    Response from Charity Commission for England and Wales
    Page 6 · response
    Published 26 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Build and operate a permanent internal Audit and Assurance team to audit local charities, monitor compliance and report nationally.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. In October 2023, The Scout Association agreed to make a significant investment into a new and permanent internal Audit & Assurance staff team which we are currently building. This new team, working in partnership with volunteer leadership, will look to audit and monitor all of our 8,000 charities at local level and provide reporting nationally to the Board. The new Audit & Assurance team will initially look at training compliance, permitting compliance, the quality and effectiveness of risk assessment against proposed activities, implementation, and management of the Nights Away Permit approval process and wider permitting. Furthermore, it will ensure that robust action plans are built, any issues are addressed, and, if required, stop an activity from happening in partnership with local volunteer leadership. It will also support local Scouts charity Trustees in their responsibilities.”

    Source location

    Response from Scouts
    Page 7 · response
    Published 26 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce a movement-wide assurance framework for local safety compliance monitoring and auditing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “c. A new movement-wide assurance framework to support local leaders, monitor and audit compliance, including in relation to safety (detailed in Section 1, point 5).”

    Source location

    Response from Scouts
    Page 22 · response
    Published 26 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Increase safety, adventurous-activities and training staffing capacity, including recruiting new safety roles and agreeing a permanent structure.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As highlighted during this inquest, we are continuing to build robust approaches to Safeguarding practices and culture. We are committed to doing all that is practical to ensure all young people are always safe, and building a clear and ever-present safety culture. In response to this inquest and the concerns expressed by HM Coroner, we are now making a further investment to increase the size of our safety staff team and building a volunteer pool of experts to respond to and support the issues identified. This will increase capacity and offer additional support to our volunteers, including training support.”

    Source location

    Response from Scouts
    Page 19 · response
    Published 26 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and improve support, training, communication and accountability for County and District leadership and Trustees.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “a. Further reviewing the support we need to provide to County and District leadership, including Trustees, so they have the right tools and support in place to deliver the safest of provision. This is part of our volunteer transformation work.”

    Source location

    Response from Scouts
    Page 29 · response
    Published 26 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue assessing the case and practicalities for further regulation of out-of-school settings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Existing Work on Regulatory Models”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Education
    Page 10 · response
    Published 26 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Commission an external strategic safety partnership to review safety practices and provide third-party assurance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. We are in discussions to commission a new strategic partnership with a nationally recognised organisation that is a leader in safety to review our current safety practices, and they will act as a Third-Party reviewer². We anticipate this partnership will be in place by May 2024 and will initially cover four core areas:”

    Source location

    Response from Scouts
    Page 6 · response
    Published 26 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Department cannot comment on the Scout Association’s internal structure, workings, or implementation of internal policies and procedures.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “6. Finally, we would note that various matters identified in your report concern the internal structure and workings of the Scout Association (for example their internal FAIP process). Where feasible, we have sought to address all matters of concern, but unfortunately we cannot comment on the internal set-up and structure of individual organisations, or charities in the case of the Scout Association. We understand that the Scout Association will provide a response to your report which we expect will address these issues. Similarly, we understand that the Charity Commission will provide a response which we expect will address matters relating to charity trustees’ legal duties and responsibilities in managing their charity.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Education
    Page 4 · response
    Published 26 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Scout Association and the Charity Commission are expected to address matters concerning internal operations and charity trustees’ legal duties, respectively.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “6. Finally, we would note that various matters identified in your report concern the internal structure and workings of the Scout Association (for example their internal FAIP process). Where feasible, we have sought to address all matters of concern, but unfortunately we cannot comment on the internal set-up and structure of individual organisations, or charities in the case of the Scout Association. We understand that the Scout Association will provide a response to your report which we expect will address these issues. Similarly, we understand that the Charity Commission will provide a response which we expect will address matters relating to charity trustees’ legal duties and responsibilities in managing their charity.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Education
    Page 4 · response
    Published 26 February 2024

    Open published response
  2. North Wales (East and Central)

    AI-generated summary

    Benjamin David Leonard · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Benjamin David Leonard, aged 16, died at the scene from a head injury after slipping and falling approximately 200 feet while attempting to descend a cliffside path on the Great Orme during a Scout trip on 26 August 2018. The substantive concerns included failures to follow and implement Scout safety policies, the absence of written and dynamic risk assessments, inadequate trip planning and briefing, ineffective leadership and group supervision, and insufficient organisational oversight and training.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of the Scout Association to oversee health and safety execution at ground level

    Wider context from the report

    “18. The Scout Association is distant from its membership through its federated branches of 8000 charities and layers of hierarchy meaning that it cannot know how health and safety is executed at ground level. ”

    Source location

    Benjamin David Leonard · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce and circulate the Safety Advisor role to support safety-policy implementation and compliance locally.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The role of Safety Coordinators (a volunteer role at County level) was reviewed and a new role description and role title of Safety Advisor was circulated to volunteer line managers in November 2020. The role of the new Safety Advisor is:”

    Source location

    Response from Scouts
    Page 9 · response
    Published 26 February 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Agree six new safety staff posts, including a Head of Safety, National Headquarters Safety Manager and four Compliance Officers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Update on the additional staff with expertise in safety management The financial pressures created by the COVID-19 pandemic has meant that at this stage we are unable to fully recruit the intended 10 to 12 additional staff members as originally stated in this response. Due to the financial implications of the pandemic, TSA has gone through a redundancy programme during 2020 and reduced staff headcount by 29%. However, despite this the number of staff in the Safe Scouting department focussing on safety will increase as detailed below.”

    Source location

    Response from Scouts
    Page 11 · response
    Published 26 February 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The federated structure, central policies, local oversight, training, database and monitoring provide appropriate safety oversight despite organisational distance from local groups.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In particular, the role of TSA is to produce policies, rules and procedures for those volunteers who deliver scouting in the community; to ensure that those policies, rules and procedures are made available to local Scout Groups to assist them in providing Scouting activities to our young people; to provide an organisational framework for volunteers that ensures that there is oversight by volunteer line managers at District, County and country level; to provide resources to enable training for its volunteer leaders; to maintain a national membership database that records their various qualifications and certifications (as outlined above); and to monitor the efficacy and continuing suitability of these rules and processes by analyzing various sources of data - whether data on training compliance, incident reports, or by commissioning external studies - and to take any necessary action as”

    Source location

    Response from Scouts
    Page 18 · response
    Published 26 February 2020

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026