Recurring concern

Failure to provide timely and adequate follow-up after discharge

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 30 Jan 2013•Latest report 23 Oct 2025

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of the post-discharge process, including absent or delayed follow-up care, appointments, referrals, contact, treatment plans, monitoring, or community support where these are needed after discharge.

Not included

  • Excludes failures confined to pre-discharge assessment or the discharge decision unless they directly concern arranging continuing post-discharge care.
  • Excludes missed-appointment follow-up where no discharge or post-discharge care process is involved.
  • Excludes generic staffing, communication, documentation or community-care deficiencies unless they directly cause or form part of inadequate follow-up after discharge.
  • Excludes unrelated care transitions that do not concern follow-up after discharge.
Reports
55

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
66

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2025

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
56

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care8
NHS England5
Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust4
Care Quality Commission3
Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust3
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board3
Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust2
East London NHS Foundation Trust2
Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership2
Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust2
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust2
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust2
Aneurin Bevan University LHB1
Barts Health NHS Trust1
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin

    AI-generated summary

    Lynn SILCOCK · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lynn Silcock was admitted to hospital in September 2022 with symptoms including breathlessness and fatigue, and was diagnosed with aortic stenosis among other conditions. She was discharged without a cardiology referral, appointment or plan, and a gastroscopy report was not followed by a cardiology referral. She died at home on 10 July 2025; the postmortem identified aortic stenosis on a background of bicuspid aortic valve, with myocardial fibrosis. The report raised concerns about communication and document exchange between teams, the absence of an appropriate referral, and the lack of an investigation into what went wrong.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to arrange cardiology follow-up after discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Discharged without a cardiology clinic appointment or plan to be later referred. ”

    Source location

    Lynn SILCOCK · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct a Patient Safety Incident Investigation into inpatient-to-outpatient referral risks and identify the safest referral system.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The case of Mrs Silcock has been raised as a Patient Safety Investigation (PSII) under the Patient Safety Incident Response framework and some of the initial work of that investigation has been used to inform the response outlined in this letter.”

    Source location

    Response from Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require each inpatient specialty to document and share a standard operating procedure defining referral processes, responsibilities and safety-netting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the short to medium term the Trust’s Medical Director and Deputy Medical Director are tasking the leadership teams of our clinical divisions to ensure each inpatient specialty has a clear standard operating procedure (SOP) for inpatient to outpatient referrals. This will be documented and shared across the team with clear direction on process, roles, and responsibilities in ensuring referrals are made and a system of safety netting is in place to ensure decisions to refer to other specialties are followed through and actioned.”

    Source location

    Response from Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish a single outpatient-referral email for each specialty, with referrals managed through standard triage and follow-up processes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There will be a single referral email for each specialty for referral for outpatient follow-up, the referrals within the team will then be managed in the standard way all referrals are with appropriate triage. This process will be developed over the next 3 months with SOPs developed and appropriate communications cascaded.”

    Source location

    Response from Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Raise a project feasibility request to assess a digital referral-management solution for scoping and potential inclusion on the Trust’s digital roadmap.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A project feasibility request has already been raised to assess the need for a digital solution to support referral management. This is the route whereby needs are reviewed and scoped to develop proposals and business cases to place the need on the Trusts ‘digital roadmap’ (the overall programme of work to mature the Trusts digital systems).”

    Source location

    Response from Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital
    Page 4 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Responsibility for making the cardiology referral lay with the medical inpatient team, not gastroenterology, at discharge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The possibility of bleeding or malignancy led to the endoscopy investigations being prioritised with cardiology advising these should be completed first then cardiology would continue the process to investigate the aortic stenosis. On review it is clear there was no expectation that the gastroenterology team would be responsible for following up the referral to cardiology once Ms Silcock’s endoscopy investigations were completed.”

    Source location

    Response from Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The concerns fall outside NHS England’s role and remit as a commissioner of certain healthcare services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The concerns raised in your Report will be dealt with by SATH, to whom your Report has also been addressed, and there is no action for NHS England to take in regard to this matter as the issues fall outside of NHS England’s role and remit as a commissioner of certain healthcare services. However, the following information may be useful to the Coroner as background.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust is responsible for addressing the concerns raised in the report.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The concerns raised in your Report will be dealt with by SATH, to whom your Report has also been addressed, and there is no action for NHS England to take in regard to this matter as the issues fall outside of NHS England’s role and remit as a commissioner of certain healthcare services. However, the following information may be useful to the Coroner as background.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response
  2. County Durham and Darlington

    AI-generated summary

    Esther Jane Lancaster Byrne · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Esther Jane Lancaster Byrne, who had vascular dementia and was extremely frail, died at her care home on 18 December 2024 after deterioration following a fall, a neck of femur fracture, surgery and discharge back to the care home. Concerns included poor communication with the family and power-of-attorney holder, misunderstandings about her baseline and mobility affecting discharge planning, failure to arrange follow-up, and doubts about the quality and accuracy of outsourced radiological reporting.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to arrange follow-up appointments after discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “3. It was accepted that a follow up appointment should have been arranged for the deceased after discharge and there was no explanation for why this was not arranged. ”

    Source location

    Esther Jane Lancaster Byrne · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use a discharge process requiring follow-up appointments when needed and documenting confirmation in patient records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The accountable doctor, ████████ accepts that the lack of a scheduled follow up appointment was an error on his part. A discharge process is in place to include scheduling a follow up appointment for every patient (if required) and confirmation is documented in the patient records. To ensure compliance with this process regular ward audits will be completed to provide assurance.”

    Source location

    Response from County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct regular ward audits to monitor compliance with the follow-up appointment process.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The accountable doctor, ████████ accepts that the lack of a scheduled follow up appointment was an error on his part. A discharge process is in place to include scheduling a follow up appointment for every patient (if required) and confirmation is documented in the patient records. To ensure compliance with this process regular ward audits will be completed to provide assurance.”

    Source location

    Response from County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 June 2025

    Open published response
  3. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Mr David Thompson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr David Thompson had a longstanding affective disorder and a history of alcohol and illicit drug use. After receiving inpatient and outpatient mental health care, he consumed alcohol and inflicted deep cuts to his wrists; he died on 3 March 2024 from hypovolaemic shock caused by the wrist injuries. Concerns included gaps in discharge planning and follow-up at Priory Dorking, incomplete awareness of his care and relapse history at Priory Altrincham, and a lack of communication between NHS and private consultants.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to make a 48-hour post-discharge follow-up call

    Wider context from the report

    “4. There was no 48 hour follow up call to Mr Thompson following his discharge, as per Priory Policy. ”

    Source location

    Mr David Thompson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    A 48-hour follow-up call is not required where a confirmed NHS community appointment exists within 72 hours of discharge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Matter of concern 4 - 48 hour follow up call”

    Source location

    Response from Priory Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 August 2024

    Open published response
  4. Rutland and North Leicestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Christopher Henrik LARSEN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Christopher Henrik Larsen, a 52-year-old man, was found hanging at his home in Leicestershire on 6 January 2023 and died before a planned mental health triage call. Concerns included inadequate documentation and decision-making in multidisciplinary team meetings, inaccurate interpretation of risk information, insufficient risk assessment and discharge planning, and weaknesses in the serious incident investigation and learning process.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of planned post-discharge support

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Discharge Mr Larsen was discharged from the care of LPT on 3 December 2022, there was no planned support for Mr Larsen post-discharge other than some counselling which was due to start three weeks later. The Trust’s SI report states that it is “unclear why it was felt the risks had subsided by the time of discharge on 3.12.2022” and that Mr Larsen had the “presence of ample markers for high risk of completed suicide” yet he was discharged back to the care of his GP and into a lacuna of care with no pre-arranged support other than counselling which would not commence for three weeks. ”

    Source location

    Christopher Henrik LARSEN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discharge to primary care is considered appropriate for many patients when supported by a collaboratively formulated crisis and contingency plan with 24-hour access.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Crisis Resolution Home Treatment Team is a short-term, needs-based intervention service whose primary role is to mitigate the requirement for inpatient admission to an acute mental health hospital setting. Patients are referred into the service for intensive home treatment from a variety of different settings, including both primary and secondary care. For a substantial number of patients who have received care from the team, a referral into secondary care is not clinically appropriate or indicated. Many patients are subsequently discharged back to primary care following the formulation of a clear crisis and contingency plan which is formulated in collaboration with the patient (and carers where applicable).”

    Source location

    Response from Leicestershire Partnership NHS (2)
    Page 4 · response
    Published 14 June 2024

    Open published response
  5. Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

    AI-generated summary

    Sally Poynton · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sally Poynton, aged 44, was fatally stabbed by her son on 22 June 2021. The report raised concerns about failures in mental-health assessment and follow-up, including inadequate discharge information, difficulties obtaining reassessment, referral handling, communication with family, and discharge without clinical consideration despite signs of deteriorating mental health.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Absence of a planned route back to mental health assessment

    Wider context from the report

    “a) In-patient care at Longreach Hospital Approximately one year before Sally’s homicide, ████████ had been detained under s2 of the MHA and spent 10 days at Longreach. At the time, there had been noted changes in his behaviour to include a belief that he could live without food for 10 years (Breatharianism), disinhibited behaviour to include sunbathing naked on a driveway (believing he received energy from the sun) and a stated belief that others could hear his thoughts – thought broadcasting – a potential symptom of schizophrenia. ████████ was selectively mute, fasting and drinking only distilled water. He was assessed on at least three occasions by a consultant psychiatrist, was reviewed by multiple junior medical doctors, seen by mental health nurses and reviewed by the Early Intervention in Psychosis Team. No one saw any evidence of psychosis and it was felt there were no longer grounds in law to detain him. He was discharged without a diagnosis or a plan for future care. At inquest, ████████████ accepted the medical team never completely got to the bottom of the reason for his presentation. His Responsible Clinician, ████████████, referred to a ‘quandary’ in identifying how much of ████████ presentation was due to culture or lifestyle and how much was due to his morbid condition. This uncertainty was not reflected in the discharge summary which described ████████ as a ‘model patient.’ One of the most striking features of the evidence was the difficulty Sally then encountered in having ████████ re-assessed. Indeed, in the year that followed, despite multiple attempts, ████████ was not seen again by a doctor from the mental health team. It is noteworthy that ████████ did not believe himself to be unwell, there appears to have been an assumption he had capacity and as he did not consent to treatment, that appears to have become an insurmountable barrier to further care. I felt there were a number of points of learning: i) An inaccurate or incomplete discharge summary that did not reflect the element of uncertainty in diagnosis both doctors outlined at inquest; ii) A failure to discuss with Sally or the maternal side of ████████ family how he presented, notwithstanding a clear direction following a first ward round to ‘collaborate’ with the family. This seems particularly relevant given Jacob’s mutism which made obtaining a history difficult. It may be of note that there was a difficult family dynamic with an acrimonious separation of ████████ parents. ████████ father was spoken to and there was a reference in the evidence that a member of the in-patient team felt it was Sally’s mental health that needed consideration. It was not explored at inquest whether one side of the family’s views had been accepted at the expense of the other’s. iii) The absence of a plan detailing the route back for ████████ to be seen again if the reason for his bizarre presentation was due to an emerging illness (that worsened) rather than alternative lifestyle choices; iv) A failure to advise Sally, as Nearest Relative, of her statutory right to request ████████ assessment under the MHA. This omission has been noted previously in other PSIF/SIRs. You may wish to reflect whether information in this regard can be included on a website or similar if it is not already and whether there is a need for training of staff in this regard. v) A delay of five months in putting into the RiO records a detailed timeline provided by Sally while ████████ was an in-patient. ████████ accepted that had he seen it at the time, he would have had further questions for Jacob. vi) A lack of understanding or professional curiosity about ████████ drug-taking and the extent to which, if at all, this contributed to ████████ presentation. It was accepted by ████████ that he had been misled by ████████ who had minimised his history in this regard where there was substantial evidence of illicit drug use, including psychotropics. ”

    Source location

    Sally Poynton · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish statutory guidance for discharge from mental health and learning disability and autism inpatient settings, including patient, carer and family involvement in discharge planning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “From a national perspective, we recognise how vital it is that organisations across the health system work together to ensure effective discharge planning and the best outcomes for people who are discharged from hospital, and that people and their chosen carers are fully involved in the process. On 26 January 2024, new statutory guidance for discharge from all mental health and learning disability and autism inpatient settings for children, young people and adults was published. The guidance provides clarity in relation to how health and care systems can work together to support discharge from all mental health inpatient settings and ensure the right support is in place in the community. The guidance also includes best practice on how patients, carers and family members should be involved in discharge planning.”

    Source location

    2024-0267 Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 20 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    No further difficulties need to be overcome in the referral pathway into secondary mental health services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• In terms of its function as a referral pathway I do not believe that there are any difficulties which need to be overcome.”

    Source location

    Response from Cornwall Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Integrated Care Board is expected to respond to concerns about the specific care provided.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I would expect the Cornwall and Isles of Scilly Integrated Care Board to respond in detail to the concerns you have raised about the specifics of the care that Sally’s son received.”

    Source location

    2024-0267 Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 20 May 2024

    Open published response
  6. East Riding and Hull

    AI-generated summary

    Linda Heath · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Linda Heath was discharged from hospital with a sacral sore, but the discharge information did not include a required district nursing referral and no referral was made. Her condition worsened, she was admitted to hospital, and she died on 31 March 2022 from sepsis caused by an infected sacral sore. The substantive concerns included inadequate discharge information, failure to arrange district nursing care, insufficient follow-up after discharge, and over-reliance on private domiciliary carers without sufficient enquiry into their remit.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Absence of GP follow-up triggers for recently discharged patients with worsening conditions and missed routine appointments

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) No trigger appears to exist whereby GPs conduct follow up enquiries or visits to patients who have recently been discharged from hospital and who are complaining of a condition which may worsen and failing to attend routine appointments due to a worsening of their condition. ”

    Source location

    Linda Heath · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to make post-discharge referrals for patients needing district nursing care

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Despite the presence of a difficult sacral sore which would have benefitted from district nursing care, no referral was made post discharge by the GP surgery. ”

    Source location

    Linda Heath · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share the review findings with CQC’s Primary and Community Care operations team for consideration in its regulatory response.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A national professional advisor and senior specialist for Primary and Community Care at CQC have reviewed the coroner’s letter, evidence bundle, the clinical records and practice response to the integrated care board who would cover the oversight of this GP practice. The findings will be shared with the operations team for Primary and Community Care to consider alongside other information held by CQC. This will inform our regulatory response.”

    Source location

    Response from CQC
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Finalize and roll out an electronic nursing discharge pro forma prompting community-nursing referral consideration and recording referral recipients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust confirms that it has developed a pro forma to be utilised by nursing staff in relation to each and every discharge of an in-patient. This pro forma will be used when nurses are planning for a patient’s discharge, and it will identify and highlight a number of matters that need to be considered and addressed at the point of discharge. The pro forma is still being finalised, this work is expected to conclude within the next two weeks – because it is an electronic system, the Trust’s digital team has been involved in updating it. That said a number of words are already using the document in paper form but this will be rolled out across the Trust very shortly.”

    Source location

    Response from HUTH
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss the appropriate level of information about community-nursing referrals for inclusion in medical discharge summaries.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In relation to the immediate discharge summary this is a document completed by medical staff, and is intended to be a summary of the medical care. There are ongoing discussions about the level of information that should be included within the form, as it is important it does not become too lengthy, but the Trust is of the view that in order to prevent the problem that occurred in Linda’s case, the issue to be addressed is ensuring that appropriate referrals are made in the first place, by the Trust at the point of discharge. In Linda’s case if the discharge summary had noted the need for community nursing referral it is true that it is possible the GP could have followed this up, but in fairness it would not be the GP’s responsibility to do that. In Linda’s case she proactively sought input from her GP and their involvement was discussed at the Inquest.”

    Source location

    Response from HUTH
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Explore enabling external SystmOne users to send referrals directly into CHCP’s SystmOne system.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Internally CHCP services can send SystmOne to SystmOne referrals, (SystmOne is CHCP main Electronic Care Record (ECR) system). CHCP is currently exploring options to enable external SystmOne users to also send SystmOne to SystmOne referrals.”

    Source location

    Response from City Healthcare Partnership Hull
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share referral criteria, available services and referral instructions regularly with GPs and other healthcare organisations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• CHCP regularly shares updates in relation to the referral criteria, services offered and how to refer with GPs and other HCP organisations including Secondary Care, and GPs and HCP organisations also have access to the Directory of Services (DoS) via www.directoryofservices.nhs.uk & NHS Service Finder via www.servicefinder.nhs.uk”

    Source location

    Response from City Healthcare Partnership Hull
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement mandatory use of SystmOne task functionality for structured communication, monitored task handling, and patient-record traceability.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To address concerns regarding the lack of referrals to the district nursing team and other issues raised, the following measures have been discussed with the practice team and implemented to prevent future occurrences:”

    Source location

    Response from GP Surgery
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Concerns about points 2 and 3 relate to primary care rather than the Trust’s responsive responsibilities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Matters of concern at paragraph 5 of the Report are noted, and the Trust responds as it did at the Inquest in relation to points 1 and 4. Points 2 and 3 relate to primary care.”

    Source location

    Response from HUTH
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Providers involved in Linda’s care should address the specific care concerns, provide further information, and identify related learning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Your Report raises some concerns that would be more appropriately answered by the providers involved in Linda’s care, who I note you have also addressed your Report to. My response to your focuses on those areas that fall within the remit of NHS England’s national policy and programmes, although my regional colleagues have engaged with the Humber and North Yorkshire Health and Care Partnership on the concerns raised, as this is system in which the providers involved in Linda’s care operate.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Oversight of the GP practice is assigned to the integrated care board, while findings inform CQC’s regulatory response.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A national professional advisor and senior specialist for Primary and Community Care at CQC have reviewed the coroner’s letter, evidence bundle, the clinical records and practice response to the integrated care board who would cover the oversight of this GP practice. The findings will be shared with the operations team for Primary and Community Care to consider alongside other information held by CQC. This will inform our regulatory response.”

    Source location

    Response from CQC
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The material risk arose from missed community nursing referrals at discharge, not insufficient information in the immediate discharge summary.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Matters of concern at paragraph 5 of the Report are noted, and the Trust responds as it did at the Inquest in relation to points 1 and 4. Points 2 and 3 relate to primary care.”

    Source location

    Response from HUTH
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Feedback on the concerns cannot be provided because no referral was made to Community Nursing, and the referral hub manages all CHCP referrals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “City Health Care Partnership (CHCP) is unable to provide any feedback in relation to the above concerns, as there was no referral made to CHCP Community Nursing by Hull University Teaching Hospital (HUTH) or St Andrew’s Surgery Hull. CHCP has a 24-hour Care Co-ordination Hub, which manages all referrals into CHCP.”

    Source location

    Response from City Healthcare Partnership Hull
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Routine monitoring and risk-based inspections are considered sufficient to identify and address further concerns about the services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “During the inspection process we routinely review correspondence, tasks and referrals. We will use the regulation 28 report to remind colleagues of the importance of this process.”

    Source location

    Response from CQC
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 May 2024

    Open published response
  7. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    James Colin Day · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    James Colin Day, who had developed severe post-traumatic stress disorder after serving in Afghanistan, collapsed and died on Malvern Road on 6 May 2023. The report describes concerns that mental health support for service personnel with severe PTSD, both during service and after discharge, was patchy and difficult to access, and that he used alcohol and prescribed medication to cope with his symptoms.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Difficult access to mental health support for service personnel with severe PTSD during service and following discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “The inquest heard evidence that James Day had served his country as a member of the armed services. He had been deployed to Afghanistan as part of his service where he had witnessed traumatic events that had led to him developing post-traumatic stress disorder. He needed support to help him deal with the trauma. However that had not been provided in such a way whilst he was serving to allow him to deal with his PTSD. He had subsequently left the army and had continued to struggle to cope with his PTSD. He used alcohol and prescribed medication to try and cope with the severe symptoms of his PTSD. The inquest heard that support for service personnel with severe PTSD such as Mr Day whilst they were still serving and following discharge was patchy, difficult to access and did not appear to recognise how significant the impact of events they had witnessed whilst serving could be on their mental health. The inquest heard that better mental health support whilst serving and following discharge may have avoided Mr Day having to turn to self-medication to try and have respite from his PTSD symptoms. ”

    Source location

    James Colin Day · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The report may reflect an incomplete understanding of MOD medical history and support because MOD was not an interested person.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the specific case of Mr Day, I am concerned that the Ministry of Defence (MOD) were not considered an Interested Person at the inquest. This means your Regulation 28 Report may be based on an incomplete understanding of Mr Day’s medical history and the support that was provided to him by the MOD. I have asked the Head of the Defence Inquests Unit (DIU) to provide you separately with the details of the support Mr Day did receive.”

    Source location

    Response from Ministry of Defence
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing mental health services mean there is no immediate need to change MOD policies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Considering this, and the suite of mental health services that do exist for the Armed Forces community, I do not feel there is an immediate need to change MOD policies in response to your Regulation 28 Report. However, that is not to assume everything is perfect, and I am committed to improving the overall level of support given to both Service Personnel and Veterans. I can assure you, and Mr Day’s family, that if there are any significant improvements that can be identified, steps will be taken to implement them.”

    Source location

    Response from Ministry of Defence
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 February 2024

    Open published response
  8. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Michael Joseph HINDES · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Michael Hindes died by suicide after calling 999 because he felt suicidal and being taken to St George’s Hospital for a half-hour mental health assessment before discharge. The principal concerns were that he was not referred to the crisis team despite a likely minimum one-week wait for community mental health follow-up, and that the assessing nurse did not try to persuade him to involve his family, who were unaware of his mental ill health until after his death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in community mental health team follow-up

    Wider context from the report

    “He was discharged with a plan for follow up by the community mental health team (CMHT). I was told that the local CMHT meets at the beginning of every week, and then there is sometimes a delay before an appointment is made, so it was likely that Michael would have to wait an absolute minimum of a week to be seen. In the meantime, it was not thought necessary to refer him to the crisis team. Michael’s family knew nothing of his mental ill health. He declined an invitation by the nurse assessing him to contact them. He did not want to worry them. Despite her awareness of the multiple therapeutic benefits of the input of a patient’s loved ones, the assessing nurse did not in any way try to persuade Michael to allow her to do this. The first that Michael’s family heard of Michael’s mental ill health was when they heard of his death. I am sure that, had they been made aware of it while he was still alive, they would have done everything in their power to support him and to engage with the mental health services. Families very often complain to me at inquest that mental health services have not done enough to try to bring them in to a patient’s care. In spite of the frequency of this occurrence, the lesson does not seem to be being learnt. ”

    Source location

    Michael Joseph HINDES · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. North Yorkshire and York

    AI-generated summary

    Carole MCQUINN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Carole MCQUINN underwent pancreatic surgery in February 2022 and subsequently experienced pancreatic leakage, abdominal collections and prolonged hospital treatment. After discharge without a discharge note, medication or follow-up appointment, concerns about infection were not adequately recorded or escalated, and a positive swab result was not reviewed until several days later. She was later admitted with suspected intra-abdominal sepsis and was found unresponsive in hospital; the inquest concluded that she died from a pulmonary embolism likely related to post-operative infection, inflammation and immobility.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to arrange follow-up appointments at discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The deceased was discharged from hospital on the evening of 20th April 2022 with no discharge note, medications or follow-up appointment. I heard evidence that evening discharges are a cause for concern for the Trust itself, and that while consideration is being given to ensuring follow-up appointments are set on discharge, this is not yet currently in place. Trust staff were falsely reassured in this case that the deceased had this safety net in place when she did not. ”

    Source location

    Carole MCQUINN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide AMS CSU patients with discharge notes, booked follow-up appointments, wound-care plans, medication or supplies, and community-support instructions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since this review all staff involved in the discharge process have been informed of the team’s requirements, including providing patients with (a) a paper copy of their discharge note on leaving the ward even if medication has yet to be dispensed, (b) the date and time of outpatient follow-up appointments, (c) wound care plans, (d) supplies of medication, dressings etc. They have been reminded of their responsibility for making appropriate arrangements for community resources such as district nursing and the need for clear instructions about repeat prescriptions in the discharge summary. The document template for the electronic discharge note (EDAN) has also been amended to ensure that all relevant information and advice is included and can be reviewed by patients, their relatives and their GPs.”

    Source location

    Response from Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Amend the electronic discharge-note template to include required discharge information and advice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since this review all staff involved in the discharge process have been informed of the team’s requirements, including providing patients with (a) a paper copy of their discharge note on leaving the ward even if medication has yet to be dispensed, (b) the date and time of outpatient follow-up appointments, (c) wound care plans, (d) supplies of medication, dressings etc. They have been reminded of their responsibility for making appropriate arrangements for community resources such as district nursing and the need for clear instructions about repeat prescriptions in the discharge summary. The document template for the electronic discharge note (EDAN) has also been amended to ensure that all relevant information and advice is included and can be reviewed by patients, their relatives and their GPs.”

    Source location

    Response from Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response
  10. Cumbria

    AI-generated summary

    Brenda SHIELDS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Brenda Shields died at home in Carlisle on 8 December 2022 after taking her life by ligature suspension while under the influence of a very high blood alcohol level. The principal concerns were that she was discharged without planned follow-up, her family was not involved as expected, relevant notifications and referrals were delayed or not made, and insufficient weight was given to her alcohol problems and recent history when assessing risk.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to plan follow-up after discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Brenda was discharged without any planned follow up. Her family were not involved in the discharge process despite assurances that they would be, her GP did not receive discharge notification from the Hadrian unit until 8 days after the event or from the Crisis team until 10 days after Brenda's death. Referrals promised from Hadrian unit to Drug/Alcohol services and Persistent Physical Symptoms Service were not made. ”

    Source location

    Brenda SHIELDS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The discharge included planned follow-up, with ongoing support from the Cumbria East Crisis Team and planned referrals to other services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition to the above, this concern also suggests that Brenda was discharged from the Hadrian Unit and the Crisis Team without any planned follow up. Again, by way of clarification and in accordance with the written evidence provided, immediately following discharge from the Hadrian Unit, Brenda was supported in the community by the Cumbria East Crisis Team, and she continued to be supported by this service until the date of her sad death (on which date she was also discharged from the service). The role of crisis services is to provide people with safe, effective, compassionate, high-quality care whilst they remain in mental health crisis. Where appropriate and as in this case, the crisis service offers home treatment intervention to allow people to be discharged from hospital earlier whilst still experiencing an acute phase of illness.”

    Source location

    Response from Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 June 2023

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026