Recurring concern

Unreliable medication management in care homes

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 28 Feb 2014•Latest report 30 Jan 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes care-home failures in medication governance and management, including medication policies and procedures, prescribing or administration controls, access restrictions, documentation, checking, monitoring and escalation where these directly concern safe medication use for residents.

Not included

  • Excludes medication failures outside care-home resident medication management unless the assertion explicitly concerns the same care-home process.
  • Excludes generic staffing, training, communication or record-keeping deficiencies unless they directly impair safe medication management in a care home.
  • Excludes medication supply, prescribing, dispensing or administration concerns governed by a more specific established medication-safety parent when the narrower concern is the better boundary.
  • Excludes clinical treatment or monitoring failures unrelated to medication management.
Reports
11

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
15

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
13

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Care Quality Commission3
700 Club1
Alexandra Court - Cleveleys1
Cann House Care Home1
Care4u Health Care Limited1
Care UK1
Cherish Home Care Ltd1
Department of Health and Social Care1
Four Seasons Health Care Group1
Hc-One Limited1
Office of the Chief Coroner1
Passmonds House Care Home1
Premiere Health Limited1
Rochdale Borough Council1
South Tyneside Borough Council1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Devon, Plymouth and Torbay

    AI-generated summary

    Pamela George · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Pamela George, aged 70, died at Derriford Hospital on 30 June 2023 after being urgently admitted with suspected sepsis. The report identified missed opportunities to carry out required blood tests, manage a breast infection, document and escalate a fall and medical concerns, assess and record capacity, and maintain relevant care-home policies and records.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of medication policies

    Wider context from the report

    “6. There was little or no evidence of policies in place generally at the home and in particular on medication, escalation and reporting of concerns . ”

    Source location

    Pamela George · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete and consolidate operational policies covering medication, infection control, incidents, escalation, safeguarding, concerns and hospital discharge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A full review and consolidation of all operational policies has been completed.”

    Source location

    Response from Cann House
    Page 4 · response
    Published 3 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Store operational policies centrally in a digital governance system accessible to all staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Policies are now centrally stored within a digital governance system, accessible to all staff.”

    Source location

    Response from Cann House
    Page 4 · response
    Published 3 February 2026

    Open published response
  2. Sunderland

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Thompson Elliott · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Thompson Elliott, a care home resident, was admitted to hospital with chest pains and discharged with changed opioid medication. Because the discharge letter could not be located, both old and new opioids were administered, resulting in an overdose; he later contracted influenza A in hospital and died after respiratory failure. The principal concerns were unclear procedures, inadequate medication recording and administration, and inconsistent staff decisions when discharge information was unavailable.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to clarify medication changes before continued administration

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence has revealed significant concerns with regard to the recording and administration of medication, when patients return to the care home, and a discharge letter cannot be located following a period in hospital. I am concerned that the evidence was that if a patient returned to the care home with new medication prescribed whilst in hospital to replace previously prescribed medication, and the patient’s discharge letter could not be immediately located, there would be uncertainty amongst staff as to the correct procedure to follow in such circumstances. Medication that had been stopped whilst in hospital due to its impact upon the patient’s kidneys continued to be administered on 18th and 19th December 2024, before it could be clarified with either the hospital or GP which was the correct medication. The new medication was not administered on either of those days. The evidence revealed that the new medication was not immediately recorded onto the patient’s electronic medication record (EMAR) and held in a cupboard pending clarification. Despite no clarification and following a 24-hour delay, it was then incorrectly added to the record as new and additional medication - not replacement medication. The medication had been changed to oxycodone due to the impact oramorph was having upon the patient’s kidneys. Due to the administration error in recording oxycodone as new and therefore additional medication, the patient was then given both oramorph and the new oxycodone medication on the morning and afternoon of 20th December 2024 which was 2 days following his discharge. This resulted in an opioid overdose. I am concerned that the evidence was such that it was not possible to determine exactly what efforts, if any, were made by staff to clarify the medication position with the hospital on either 18th, 19th or 20th December 2024 but medication continued to be administered. On 21st December 2024 a team leader was able to speak to the hospital and despite being advised that if there was no discharge letter to take all medications and clarify the position with the GP, a decision was made to only administer the old medication of oramorph and there no attempts to contact the GP. There were no attempts to contact 111 or Recovery at Home for advice. I am concerned that the evidence revealed that there was no policy or guidance document setting out the procedures, which staff must follow in such circumstances, which created confusion and inconsistent decision making resulting in a medication overdose and continued use of a medication that had been stopped in hospital due to the harm it was causing to the patient’s kidneys. The evidence raises a further concern that the procedure still remains unclear despite internal reviews following the death. I shall be glad to be told of any learning arising from this death and timescales and results of your review. ”

    Source location

    Mr Thompson Elliott · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clear procedures for medication management when a discharge letter cannot be located

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence has revealed significant concerns with regard to the recording and administration of medication, when patients return to the care home, and a discharge letter cannot be located following a period in hospital. I am concerned that the evidence was that if a patient returned to the care home with new medication prescribed whilst in hospital to replace previously prescribed medication, and the patient’s discharge letter could not be immediately located, there would be uncertainty amongst staff as to the correct procedure to follow in such circumstances. Medication that had been stopped whilst in hospital due to its impact upon the patient’s kidneys continued to be administered on 18th and 19th December 2024, before it could be clarified with either the hospital or GP which was the correct medication. The new medication was not administered on either of those days. The evidence revealed that the new medication was not immediately recorded onto the patient’s electronic medication record (EMAR) and held in a cupboard pending clarification. Despite no clarification and following a 24-hour delay, it was then incorrectly added to the record as new and additional medication - not replacement medication. The medication had been changed to oxycodone due to the impact oramorph was having upon the patient’s kidneys. Due to the administration error in recording oxycodone as new and therefore additional medication, the patient was then given both oramorph and the new oxycodone medication on the morning and afternoon of 20th December 2024 which was 2 days following his discharge. This resulted in an opioid overdose. I am concerned that the evidence was such that it was not possible to determine exactly what efforts, if any, were made by staff to clarify the medication position with the hospital on either 18th, 19th or 20th December 2024 but medication continued to be administered. On 21st December 2024 a team leader was able to speak to the hospital and despite being advised that if there was no discharge letter to take all medications and clarify the position with the GP, a decision was made to only administer the old medication of oramorph and there no attempts to contact the GP. There were no attempts to contact 111 or Recovery at Home for advice. I am concerned that the evidence revealed that there was no policy or guidance document setting out the procedures, which staff must follow in such circumstances, which created confusion and inconsistent decision making resulting in a medication overdose and continued use of a medication that had been stopped in hospital due to the harm it was causing to the patient’s kidneys. The evidence raises a further concern that the procedure still remains unclear despite internal reviews following the death. I shall be glad to be told of any learning arising from this death and timescales and results of your review. ”

    Source location

    Mr Thompson Elliott · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to escalate medication uncertainty to appropriate clinical advisers

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence has revealed significant concerns with regard to the recording and administration of medication, when patients return to the care home, and a discharge letter cannot be located following a period in hospital. I am concerned that the evidence was that if a patient returned to the care home with new medication prescribed whilst in hospital to replace previously prescribed medication, and the patient’s discharge letter could not be immediately located, there would be uncertainty amongst staff as to the correct procedure to follow in such circumstances. Medication that had been stopped whilst in hospital due to its impact upon the patient’s kidneys continued to be administered on 18th and 19th December 2024, before it could be clarified with either the hospital or GP which was the correct medication. The new medication was not administered on either of those days. The evidence revealed that the new medication was not immediately recorded onto the patient’s electronic medication record (EMAR) and held in a cupboard pending clarification. Despite no clarification and following a 24-hour delay, it was then incorrectly added to the record as new and additional medication - not replacement medication. The medication had been changed to oxycodone due to the impact oramorph was having upon the patient’s kidneys. Due to the administration error in recording oxycodone as new and therefore additional medication, the patient was then given both oramorph and the new oxycodone medication on the morning and afternoon of 20th December 2024 which was 2 days following his discharge. This resulted in an opioid overdose. I am concerned that the evidence was such that it was not possible to determine exactly what efforts, if any, were made by staff to clarify the medication position with the hospital on either 18th, 19th or 20th December 2024 but medication continued to be administered. On 21st December 2024 a team leader was able to speak to the hospital and despite being advised that if there was no discharge letter to take all medications and clarify the position with the GP, a decision was made to only administer the old medication of oramorph and there no attempts to contact the GP. There were no attempts to contact 111 or Recovery at Home for advice. I am concerned that the evidence revealed that there was no policy or guidance document setting out the procedures, which staff must follow in such circumstances, which created confusion and inconsistent decision making resulting in a medication overdose and continued use of a medication that had been stopped in hospital due to the harm it was causing to the patient’s kidneys. The evidence raises a further concern that the procedure still remains unclear despite internal reviews following the death. I shall be glad to be told of any learning arising from this death and timescales and results of your review. ”

    Source location

    Mr Thompson Elliott · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce and disseminate a visual flow chart guiding staff through medication checks when residents return from hospital without discharge documentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To remind staff, a visual flow chart has been introduced at the care home to provide clear, step-by-step guidance for staff involved in supporting residents returning from hospital where there is no accompanying discharge letter to support changes in medication. A copy of this flow chart, which has been shared and discussed with staff to embed awareness of it, accompanies this letter (enclosure 1). This flowchart is laminated and attached to the medication keys as an immediate prompt to staff. Additionally, there are copies of this flow chart in poster format on the wall of the care home's treatment room and there is a further copy contained within a dedicated discharge file held in the Deputy Manager's office. This dedicated file has been brought in following this case and contains the flow chart prompt and copies of Care UK's relevant up-to-date policies to which I refer below.”

    Source location

    Response from Care UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce hospital-return, discharge and medication-management policies through mandatory read-and-sign confirmation and refresher training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The care home leadership has reinforced Care UK's 'Admissions and Discharge Policy' (enclosure 2) and the 'How to Guide - Supporting a Resident Returning from Hospital' (enclosure 3) as well as the 'Medications Management Policy' (enclosure 4). These documents provide clear guidance to staff as to what to do in circumstances where a resident arrives and/or returns to the care home from hospital and there is insufficient/absent information regarding their discharge and attendant medications. All staff have completed a mandatory "read and sign" process to confirm that they have read and understood these documents, all of which have been discussed with staff as part of further refresher training sessions undertaken.”

    Source location

    Response from Care UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train staff to escalate hospital-return medication queries, obtain same-day clarification and document communications, actions and handovers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Discussion and further refresher training with all relevant staff has emphasized the need to ensure home management is informed immediately of any concerns regarding residents returning from hospital and that checks are undertaken with the hospital. The training has reinforced that if the hospital cannot be reached for an answer, colleagues should check with the GP and failing that contact the 111 service.”

    Source location

    Response from Care UK
    Page 1 · response
    Published 20 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss imminent and new hospital discharges at daily and weekly clinical meetings so required information and follow-up actions are identified.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Home Manager and/or Deputy will ensure that any imminent or new discharges to the care home are discussed at the daily 10@10 meetings and weekly clinical review meetings to ensure staff are aware of the discharges, the relevant information is obtained and any matters requiring follow-up are actioned. In addition, it is also important to note that there is always a member of the management team available (seven days a week) and so at any time the discharge process is taking place, there are senior staff available to help deal with/advise on any issues arising with the discharge.”

    Source location

    Response from Care UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue working with hospital Trusted Assessors to streamline secure, prompt sharing of discharge information and support safe transitions of care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The care home has continued to work closely with the Trusted Assessor team at the hospital which discharged Mr Elliott to try to streamline communication/interaction in relation to discharges. The aim is to ensure all documents are securely and promptly shared including via NHS email if possible to support timely and safe transitions of care from hospital to the care home. This work is ongoing but the care home and its hospital partners share a commitment to best practice to achieve these aims. As noted above, the Home Manager has held meetings with the local hospital's Trusted Assessors to discuss the care home's discharge policies to ensure agreement and buy in to the process.”

    Source location

    Response from Care UK
    Page 3 · response
    Published 20 October 2025

    Open published response
  3. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Peter McCarthy · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Peter McCarthy fell from his wheelchair at home on 25 November 2023, was found the following morning, and was taken to hospital with rib fractures and a subdural hematoma. He deteriorated and died on 30 November 2023 from heart failure and pneumonia. The principal concern was the absence of a protocol governing whether anticoagulant medication should be given to a client after a fall without medical oversight.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a protocol for medication oversight after client falls

    Wider context from the report

    “Following the inquest Care 4 U have put in place steps to ensure staff do not leave clients alone whilst they wait for ambulances. However, I remain concerned that: 1. On her arrival the carer offered Mr McCarthy his daily medications, which included an anticoagulant. He refused to take it. Following the conclusion of the inquest I sought information from Care4U Healthcare as to what, if any, protocol they have to ensure that clients who have fallen are not given anticoagulant medication without medical oversight. I have been told that medication comes in blister packs and the staff would not know if any medication was contra indicated after a fall. To date no protocol has been provided to the Court to deal with this type of situation. ”

    Source location

    Peter McCarthy · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. Sefton, St Helens and Knowsley

    AI-generated summary

    Beryl ELLISON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Beryl Ellison was receiving end-of-life care at Alexandra Care Home and was found deceased there on 28 June 2022. The inquest concluded that her death resulted from underlying poor health in combination with taking an excessive quantity of prescribed medication. Concerns included unsupervised access to syringe medication, prior family reports about medication being left in her room, and the absence of an explanation for the excessive oxycodone concentration found after her death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to supervise syringe medication

    Wider context from the report

    “Mrs Ellison was resident at Alexandra Care Home and was found deceased on 28th June 2022 by staff. Her family expressed concern that she had been left with syringe medication unsupervised by staff and raised concerns about this with the care home both historically and four days prior to her death. A post mortem examination revealed Mrs Ellison to have an excessive concentration of oxycodone in her system which was likely to exceed any acquired tolerance level. The evidence heard at inquest revealed no explanation as to why Mrs Ellison was found to have taken the excessive quantity of oxycodone which contributed to her death. Furthermore, the systems at the care home were stated categorically to be the same as those that were in place prior to Mrs Ellison's death. ”

    Source location

    Beryl ELLISON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct weekly observations of medicine rounds.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Weekly observations of drug rounds are now completed.”

    Source location

    Response from Four Seasons Health Care Group
    Page 1 · response
    Published 9 January 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Write and share a specific medication risk assessment when medication-management risk is identified, retaining it with medication records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Where a risk to medication administration or management is identified for any resident, a specific medication risk assessment will be written and shared with the nursing and care team to ensure awareness of the specific risk and control measures in place. For ease of reference and to ensure that this potential risk is highlighted at each drug round to the member of staff administering medication, a copy of this risk assessment will be held alongside the medication administration records for the individual resident.”

    Source location

    Response from Four Seasons Health Care Group
    Page 4 · response
    Published 9 January 2023

    Open published response
  5. Black Country

    AI-generated summary

    Ms Karen Redding · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ms Karen Redding died after drinking an excess of Oramorph, becoming increasingly drowsy and suffering a fatal overdose. During the inquest, concern arose that care staff handed her the medication without checking the box contents, and that she was not seen by a doctor after disclosing that she had taken too much.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to check oramorph medication contents before handing it over

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Evidence emerged during the inquest that KR was handed the oramorph medication by the care staff upon her request. It appears that there was no check made of the contents of the box. ”

    Source location

    Ms Karen Redding · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and revise medication policies, procedures and working practices to prevent recurrence of medication-related incidents.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the 19 years of Cherish providing care, no incident of this type has ever occurred. Management has reviewed the effectiveness of medication policies, procedures and working practices to ensure such circumstances are not repeated.”

    Source location

    2022-0133-Response-from-Cherish-Home-Care-Ltd_Published
    Page 3 · response
    Published 10 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The existing approach to handing items to service users with capacity, without routinely checking contents, remains appropriate.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We noted your comments in the Report that our management team may wish to consider reviewing the training and guidance to care staff relating to handling items to service users and checking the contents of boxes. With consideration of the circumstances surrounding Ms Redding’s death, we have, as directed, reflected, and reviewed on Cherish’s approach to this issue and the training and guidance provided to staff. We have concluded that the general approach we currently adopt and instruct care workers to take remains appropriate.”

    Source location

    2022-0133-Response-from-Cherish-Home-Care-Ltd_Published
    Page 3 · response
    Published 10 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Medication management was outside the commissioned care responsibilities, so the service user was expected to manage her own medication.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the first instance, I wanted to take the opportunity to confirm some points regarding the care delivered to Ms Redding. Cherish provided care to Ms Redding from 9 November 2020 to 24 March 2021. Ms Redding lived with her partner ████████ - who was her main carer and next of kin that supported Ms Redding in any decision making. Ms Redding was 60 years of age and had full mental capacity and acumen to make her own decisions. Since the start of Ms Redding’s package of care, Cherish was not involved in Ms Redding’s medication and all medication needs were managed and coordinated by Ms Redding herself and ████████.”

    Source location

    2022-0133-Response-from-Cherish-Home-Care-Ltd_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 10 May 2022

    Open published response
  6. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Joan Wright · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Joan Wright, who had poor mobility and was unable to communicate verbally, died at Belmont Residential Home on 16 September 2017; the post-mortem found extensive coronary artery atheroma. The report raised concerns about the incorrect administration and handling of Oramorph, medication management at a care home rated inadequate, and failures to recognise and address safeguarding risks after the medication incident.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Poor management and documentation of medication

    Wider context from the report

    “5. The home in question has been rated as inadequate by CQC and was under regular monitoring via an action plan. It was also being visited regularly by the Local Authority Quality Support Team every 10 days or so. One of the issues previously identified was poor management/documentation of medication. Notwithstanding that, access and unauthorised repeated administration of Oramorph took place; ”

    Source location

    Joan Wright · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to prevent unauthorised access and repeated administration of Oramorph

    Wider context from the report

    “5. The home in question has been rated as inadequate by CQC and was under regular monitoring via an action plan. It was also being visited regularly by the Local Authority Quality Support Team every 10 days or so. One of the issues previously identified was poor management/documentation of medication. Notwithstanding that, access and unauthorised repeated administration of Oramorph took place; ”

    Source location

    Joan Wright · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the Controlled Drugs Regulations establishing tighter controls and mandatory governance arrangements for prescribing, records, custody, monitoring and accountable officers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “You mention the Shipman Inquiry in your report. In response to the Shipman Inquiry's Fourth Report¹, there have been significant changes in the governance arrangements for the use and management of controlled drugs.”

    Source location

    2018-0408-Response-by-Department-of-Health
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 December 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Accelerate rollout of electronic prescribing for controlled drugs and medicines administration.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, as part of the Government's response to the World Health Organisation's patient safety challenge on medicines safety, we are developing a programme of work led by NHS Improvement to improve medicines safety. Work is underway to accelerate the roll-out of electronic prescribing to controlled drugs and medicines administration, and to deploy more clinical pharmacists in primary care and care homes. We have also introduced monitoring of the highest risk prescribing practice linked to hospital admissions.”

    Source location

    2018-0408-Response-by-Department-of-Health
    Page 3 · response
    Published 28 December 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deploy additional clinical pharmacists in primary care and care homes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, as part of the Government's response to the World Health Organisation's patient safety challenge on medicines safety, we are developing a programme of work led by NHS Improvement to improve medicines safety. Work is underway to accelerate the roll-out of electronic prescribing to controlled drugs and medicines administration, and to deploy more clinical pharmacists in primary care and care homes. We have also introduced monitoring of the highest risk prescribing practice linked to hospital admissions.”

    Source location

    2018-0408-Response-by-Department-of-Health
    Page 3 · response
    Published 28 December 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing controlled-drug governance measures are considered sufficient to detect and minimise inappropriate use, although they cannot prevent every incident.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “While no system can ever completely prevent the mismanagement or misuse of controlled drugs, we believe the measures that have been put in place mean that the inappropriate use of opioids and other controlled drugs can be detected more quickly and minimised, so that protracted poor practice is less likely to continue unchecked.”

    Source location

    2018-0408-Response-by-Department-of-Health
    Page 4 · response
    Published 28 December 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Registered providers and managers are responsible for ensuring the proper and safe management of medicines in care homes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is the registered provider and the registered manager’s responsibility to ensure the proper and safe management of medicines and guidance is available to support them to achieve this. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has produced a national guideline on the ‘Safe use and management of controlled drugs’ (NG46)⁶, published in 2016, and a social care guideline (SC1), published in 2014, provides guidance on ‘Managing medicines in care homes’⁷. Furthermore, the CQC has clear guidance on its website on ‘Storing controlled drugs in care homes’⁸.”

    Source location

    2018-0408-Response-by-Department-of-Health
    Page 4 · response
    Published 28 December 2018

    Open published response
  7. Blackpool and the Fylde

    AI-generated summary

    Jean Dorothy Gillespie · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jean Dorothy Gillespie was residing in a care home for respite care when her prescribed Pyridostigmine ran out, with the last dose administered on 25 April 2015. She developed symptoms attributable to myasthenia gravis, was taken to hospital, and died on 8 May 2015. The report raised concerns that care staff did not know about her condition or the urgency of replacing the medication, and that care home records did not document the condition, its symptoms, or the medication's purpose.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of care home records to document conditions, symptoms and medication purposes

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The inquest heard that a senior member of the care staff with responsibility for administering medication to residents and for re-ordering supplies of medication did not know that the deceased suffered from myasthenia gravis, nor was this a condition she had heard of before. 2. When supplies of the necessary medication were about to expire she did seek to re-order supplies. When they did not materialise she did not appreciate the urgency the situation demanded until symptoms became evident. 3. I am concerned that irrespective of whether this is a care home rather than a nursing home that staff with responsibility for administering and / or re-ordering supplies of medication for potentially life threatening conditions are aware of the conditions and what the medication is prescribed for so that staff can then react accordingly. 4. Further, consideration of the care home records made no reference to the name of the condition, the symptoms that can materialise, nor what the prescribed medication was for. A member of staff previously unfamiliar with this patient who may have responsibility for administering her medication would not have been able to familiarise themselves with the necessary knowledge from a perusal of the care home records and I am concerned there is a risk of future deaths were this situation to be replicated. ”

    Source location

    Jean Dorothy Gillespie · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. Manchester West

    AI-generated summary

    Marie Quinn, otherwise known as Marie Pearson Quinn · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Marie Quinn fell at home on 20 May 2015, sustained a fractured right neck of femur, underwent surgery, and died in hospital on 13 July 2015 after becoming unwell. The report identified concerns about sub-optimal deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis and medication management at Richmond House Nursing Home, including inaccurate instructions and unaccounted-for excess medication.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to account for and query excess resident medication

    Wider context from the report

    “2. I have concerns with regard to the following: i. The management of the medication for the residents at Richmond House Nursing Home. ii. Evidence was given at the Inquest that there are occasions where Richmond House Nursing Home are left with excess medication that is prescribed to, or directed to be taken by, a resident in their care. This medication should be accounted for and should therefore be queried as residents may not be given medication in circumstances where they should be. I therefore request that Richmond House Nursing Home, which is governed by HC-One Limited, review their policies and procedures regarding the management of the medication prescribed to their residents. ”

    Source location

    Marie Quinn, otherwise known as Marie Pearson Quinn · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Gateshead and South Tyneside

    AI-generated summary

    EDWIN THOMPSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Edwin Thompson, a 77-year-old residential care home resident with dementia, was found dead in a bathroom on 8 October 2011. The post-mortem identified a previously undiagnosed cardiovascular disease as the natural cause of death. The report identified concerns about protective measures for a vulnerable resident, delayed medical assistance, loss of contact with a resident prone to wandering, response to a final medical crisis, staff training, and record keeping.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unauthorised medication or prescription of ineffective remedies by non-medically qualified care staff

    Wider context from the report

    “There is a need to draft and disseminate to all care staff a clear, simple and concise directive to care home staff to seek medical advice or assistance in respect of residents presenting with pain, particularly of a cardiac nature without delay. Staff with no medical qualification must not seek to speculate as to possible causes of symptoms and should not seek to medicate ( unless otherwise previously prescribed by a Medical Practitioner) or prescribe “remedies” of no or no known worth to anyone in their care. ”

    Source location

    EDWIN THOMPSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Derrick George RIVERS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Derrick George Rivers, who had been admitted to full-time care after becoming frail and falling, was mistakenly given a 150mg dose of Clozapine intended for another resident. He was admitted to hospital with altered consciousness and confusion, initially improved, then deteriorated and died on 11 July 2013; the inquest found that he died from natural causes to which the Clozapine may have contributed. Concerns included inadequate medication policies and administration protocols, insufficient auditing and inspection, and incomplete implementation of recommendations intended to reduce the risk of medication errors.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of the drugs administration policy to meet pharmacy requirements for patient and drug identification

    Wider context from the report

    “6) That the care home’s policy did not meet the pharmacy requirements in terms of patient and drug identification (pod system). ”

    Source location

    Derrick George RIVERS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of care home management to identify carers’ non-compliance with drugs administration protocols

    Wider context from the report

    “3) That the care home owner and/or manager were purportedly unaware of the fact that carers were not following drugs administration protocols. ”

    Source location

    Derrick George RIVERS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026