Recurring concern

Failure to reliably recognise and respond to acute clinical deterioration

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 24 Sep 2013•Latest report 24 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures to recognise, monitor, escalate, obtain clinical review for or respond to acute physical deterioration when the deterioration hazard itself is directly asserted.

Not included

  • Excludes generic communication, staffing, training or senior-oversight failures not directly tied to an identified deterioration episode or control.
  • Excludes deterioration in mental health, and condition-specific systems that do not establish a wider acute-deterioration failure.
Reports
103

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
127

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
169

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care14
NHS England10
Care Quality Commission6
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust6
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence4
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust4
Recipient name withheld3
Royal Sussex County Hospital3
Barts Health NHS Trust2
College of Policing2
Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust2
Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust2
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust2
Medway NHS Foundation Trust2
Metropolitan Police Service2

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Worcestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Jacqueline Frances O'BRIEN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jacqueline Frances O'Brien was treated for injuries from an accidental fall and later developed an intra-abdominal infection. She died in hospital on 4 November 2025 after deteriorating following transfer to a community hospital. The principal concerns were that staff failed to carry out checks or observations for about eight hours and failed to respond to family concerns about her worsening condition, resulting in a missed opportunity for earlier treatment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to carry out checks or observations on a deteriorating patient

    Wider context from the report

    “It was agreed by the consultant who gave evidence at the inquest, and by the Trust's legal representative, that thereafter between 1230hrs and Mrs. O'Brien's departure for Pershore at 2025hrs that evening, there is no evidence of any further checks or observations being carried out. In fact, when Mrs. O'Brien was seen on the PDU by family members that same afternoon, it was clear to them that she was in a great deal of pain and distress. They raised their concerns with staff on the PDU, who assured them that she was alright. No member of staff appears to have acted on those concerns, and ensured that Mrs. O'Brien was checked. Those who transported Mrs. O'Brien to Pershore reported to staff there that she "had been in pain on transfer". On her arrival at Pershore at 2100hrs, it was clear to staff there and to an out of hours GP who was called to examine her, that she was in severe pain and very unwell, with a National Early Warning Score ( NEWS ) of 5. An ambulance was called to transfer her back to Worcester, and the paramedics recorded at 0111hrs that her NEWS score had risen to 10. I am therefore concerned at how staff on the PDU at Worcestershire Royal Hospital failed: (a) for some 8 hours to carry out any checks or observations on a patient who was clearly becoming very unwell; and (b) to follow up concerns raised by Mrs. O'Brien's family about her condition on the afternoon/evening of her discharge. ”

    Source location

    Jacqueline Frances O'BRIEN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete the commissioned case review to identify system improvements and examine its findings for wider learning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “An initial review has been undertaken and discussed in our Patient Safety incident Review Group (PSiRG) on 6th July 2026 and we have commissioned a case review to explore in more detail the events that day and what systems could be improved to aid our staff to care for patients safely and ensure records are accurate in a future scenario similar to this.”

    Source location

    Response from Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 September 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the discharge lounge SOP on patient capacity, deteriorating-patient management, and exclusion criteria for unsuitable patients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• We have identified and confirm that there were no documented observations in the discharge lounge, although the staff recall taking them but only on recording these on paper and not in the electronic patient record. We have reviewed the discharge lounge SOP as it lacked clarity around what we expect our staff and how often observations should be recorded whilst patients are in the discharge lounge.”

    Source location

    Response from Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 September 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require the discharge lounge team to record full observations electronically and use SBAR escalation for deterioration or medical emergencies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• in the event of a deterioration or medical emergency the patients consultant team will be contacted and arrangements made for the patient to be reviewed”

    Source location

    Response from Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 September 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The patient was in the discharge lounge before transfer, not the PDU.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response to your specific concern listed above we would like firstly to clarify that Mrs O’Brien was on the discharge lounge prior to transfer to Pershore, we apologise for any misunderstanding that led you to believe it was PDU. Please find below the actions the trust have taken in relation to your concerns on her care before discharge:”

    Source location

    Response from Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 September 2026

    Open published response
  2. West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Derek Thomas Burt · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Derek Thomas Burt died at home on 15 May 2025 after a spontaneous rupture of an arterio-venous malformation at the back of his right ankle caused severe bleeding. The report raises concerns about communication between the careline service and ambulance services, including failure to pass on key information, delays in escalating the emergency, inadequate recording of information, and the loss of opportunities to provide basic first-aid advice.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to recontact the EMA when a caller reports deterioration

    Wider context from the report

    “In addition, the first careline operator did not call the EMA back when she learned Mr Burt was non responsive and had developed breathing problems. The CSN confirmed to me that if a second call had been made at that point then the call would have been upgraded to category 1. This would have been at approx 22:50. In other words around the same time the EMA was trying to call Mrs Burt back. The clinical review was allocated at 22:55 and the second 999 call was logged at 23:15 so approximately 20-25 mins had elapsed. ”

    Source location

    Derek Thomas Burt · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen CPD and learning programmes for QSF-certified organisations, covering records, operator competence, training, decision-support tools, escalation, and information-sharing with emergency services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Opportunities exist to strengthen guidance and operational procedures in these areas to help reduce the risk of similar issues occurring in the future and these will be addressed through future TEC Quality CPD e-learning programme and through strengthened QSF criteria for all certified TEC Monitoring Auditees to ensure the quality of TEC call monitoring and response.”

    Source location

    Response from Telecare Services Association
    Page 8 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The failure to communicate deterioration was an individual failure to follow established procedures, not a deficiency in those procedures.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Concern 3 Appello Careline Limited accepts that, in this case, certain information indicating deterioration in Mr Burt’s condition was not communicated to the”

    Source location

    Response from Appello Careline Operations Director
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Further procedural change is not considered necessary because established training, audit and supervision processes will continue reinforcing compliance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Concern 3 Appello Careline Limited will continue to reinforce adherence to established procedures through its ongoing training, audit and supervision processes, including the use of call audits and operational review mechanisms to ensure that relevant information is consistently captured and communicated.”

    Source location

    Response from Appello Careline Operations Director
    Page 5 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing procedures, training, auditing and continuous improvement provide a robust framework for managing the identified risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Appello Careline Limited considers that its existing procedures, supported by ongoing training, audit and continuous improvement processes, provide a robust framework for managing the risks identified in this case.”

    Source location

    Response from Appello Careline Operations Director
    Page 4 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The specific case concerns should be addressed by Appello and SECAMB, rather than by the national ambulance membership organisation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “With respect to the matters of concern in relation to the care of Derek Burt, AACE is not in a position to respond; the specific details relate to and should subsequently be addressed by both Appello and SECAMB.”

    Source location

    Response from Association of Ambulance Chief Executives
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Concerns about Apello Careline’s emergency-call guidance, information handling and artificial intelligence trials are outside NHS England’s remit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Concerns 2,3, and 6 relate to the Apello Careline company, and as such are not within NHS England’s remit to comment on. As your Report has also been addressed to the Apello Careline company they will be best placed to respond to these concerns.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Apello Careline is best placed to respond to concerns about its emergency-call guidance, information handling and artificial intelligence trials.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Concerns 2,3, and 6 relate to the Apello Careline company, and as such are not within NHS England’s remit to comment on. As your Report has also been addressed to the Apello Careline company they will be best placed to respond to these concerns.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response
  3. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Edith May Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Edith May Jones had limited mobility and underlying health conditions, including heart failure, and developed a deteriorating sacral pressure ulcer. She was admitted to hospital with an infected stage 4 pressure ulcer, did not improve despite intravenous antibiotics, and died on 17 October 2025; the stated cause was heart failure exacerbated by the infected ulcer. Concerns included poor District Nursing documentation, limited managerial oversight, delayed escalation, shortcomings in the gateway referral triage process, and ineffective GP triage of referrals and family information.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of District Nurses to promptly escalate deteriorating patients

    Wider context from the report

    “3. There was no prompt escalation of her case by the District Nurses when the situation deteriorated; ”

    Source location

    Edith May Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce Team Leader of the Day and Coordinator of the Day roles to provide senior support and clear escalation routes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since then, several developments have strengthened the service's response to deteriorating patients:”

    Source location

    Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use daily SITREP and out-of-hours handover processes to monitor capacity, demand and acuity and escalate urgent staffing pressures.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Improved daily management of capacity, demand and acuity through the SITREP process and Out of Hours (OOH) handover meetings, enabling earlier identification of patients requiring urgent intervention and escalation. Each day is RAG rated as Red, Amber or Green dependent on the allocation of visits and the level of deferred activity. All Red rated days are escalated to the Divisional Nurse and AHP Director for support and action. Red days are also incident reported as a red flag staffing for organisational oversight.”

    Source location

    Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Increase caseload reviews and triage to prioritise patients with complex, frail, end-of-life or changing clinical needs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Increased use of caseload reviews and triage processes to ensure patients with complex needs, frailty, end-of-life care requirements and changing clinical conditions are appropriately prioritised.”

    Source location

    Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
    Page 4 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct deteriorating-patient audits and systematically monitor pathway use, clinical observations and NEWS2 compliance across teams.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Division also carry out a Deteriorating Patient Audit. The result of that audit demonstrates that clinical monitoring standards for deteriorating patients remain consistently high, with April compliance at 93.3% and July at 92.3%. Physiological observation recording has strengthened further, improving from 93.8% in April to 98.5% in July, demonstrating enhanced reliability in core assessment processes. NEWS2 recording compliance has remained at 100% across both months, evidencing sustained adherence to national early-warning requirements. These metrics confirm robust clinical oversight, reliable recognition of deterioration, and continued improvement in the quality and consistency of patient observations.”

    Source location

    Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
    Page 5 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish a District Nursing Improvement Group to lead work on triage, caseload management, documentation, escalation and monthly audited assurance reporting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Divisional Nurse and AHP Director for Integrated Care recently set up the District Nursing Improvement Group providing strategic leadership and governance oversight for strengthening safety, quality and operational reliability across District Nursing. The groups programme of work is centred on improving the triage process to ensure consistent prioritisation and risk-based decision making, enhancing caseload management so workload is balanced, transparent and responsive and raising documentation standards to support accurate clinical records, defensible practice and effective information sharing. A further priority is embedding clearer expectations for recognising”

    Source location

    Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
    Page 6 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response
  4. Bedfordshire and Luton

    AI-generated summary

    Edward James HANDS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Edward James Hands, known as Eddie, died in his cell at HMP Bedford on 16 February 2024 after consuming methadone and developing aspiration pneumonitis. The inquest identified failures in follow-up care, monitoring, escalation, and the implementation of the Under the Influence protocol, with confusion between prison and healthcare staff about their responsibilities.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to recognise and escalate clinical deterioration

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence at the inquest revealed that the (primary) prison healthcare provider (within the prison) and prison staff are working to different policies and protocols in relation to those suspected to be ‘under the influence of illicit substances’; there is confusion and lack of awareness of those working in the prison as to the role and responsibilities and expectations about how to alert and manage a concern that a prisoner may be under the influence. In this instance this confusion resulted in Eddie not being observed; had these checks and monitoring taken place, it would have been clear Eddie was not improving and that a follow up medical assessment was required. This meant his clinical deterioration was not recognised and escalated. It is understood that the NHFT policy is designed to cover the entire Trust and may well, therefore, have relevance beyond Bedford prison. However, it is essential that the policy is clear on what happens when the individual institutions have their own local protocols. Eddie’s inquest has revealed how clarity on steps and paperwork required under the policy is essential amongst frontline staff to ensure the safest possible environment for prison residents at Bedford Prison. ”

    Source location

    Edward James HANDS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Agree and implement a common local protocol, including a flowchart, defining healthcare and prison staff roles, responsibilities, escalation and management of suspected illicit-substance influence.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have worked with the Prison Governor and Head of Safety to agree and implement a common, local protocol for managing those suspected to be under the influence of illicit substances (UTI) at HMP Bedford. I have enclosed a copy of the protocol with this letter for your information.”

    Source location

    Response from Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Facilitate mandatory induction training for healthcare staff on detecting and managing suspected illicit-substance influence.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The healthcare and prison service leadership teams circulated the UTI protocol and an amended UTI recording log to staff late last year. Mandatory training for healthcare staff on UTI detection and management is being facilitated by the Trust’s Resuscitation Lead and is part of our induction programme. An ‘Airways Champion’ has also been identified. The Airways Champion supports our leadership team in maintaining competence in airway management and suction machine use. They will also help deliver future UTI simulation training sessions.”

    Source location

    Response from Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a single agreed UTI protocol standardising responsibilities, observations, escalation routes and handover expectations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following the conclusion of the inquest HMP Bedford and NHFT carried out a joint review of the UTI policies and protocols in place. This review resulted in the removal of any previous conflicting guidance and implementation of a single UTI protocol with standardisation of responsibilities, including observation requirements, escalation routes, and handover expectations. This protocol has been agreed by both parties and is to be followed by both operational and healthcare staff at HMP Bedford.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 23 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide staff guidance on recognising UTI signs, initiating the protocol, completing observations and undertaking follow-up checks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Staff have been given guidance on recognising signs of being UTI, initiating the protocol, completing observations, and ensuring follow up checks are undertaken.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Assure documentation and observations, record improvement needs, and escalate issues concerning timescales or procedures to senior leaders.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Assurance of documentation and observations is completed to ensure compliance of timescales and escalation procedures. Where this identifies areas requiring improvement a record is made and the issue escalated to both prison and healthcare senior leaders to be addressed as appropriate.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 February 2026

    Open published response
  5. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Paolino AMICO · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Paolino Amico, who had metastatic bladder cancer and advanced clinical frailty, was admitted with severe bilateral pneumonia and died in hospital on 12 June 2024. He received multiple overdoses of slow-release morphine following a prescription error, with concerns also raised about medication administration, delayed emergency escalation, oxygen provision after discharge, and the management of morphine reversal and pain relief.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate overnight deterioration and family medication concerns to the on-call doctor

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) The on-call doctor was called approximately one hour after Mr Amico’s NEWS score was found to be 10 and arrived at 07:50, this was not an emergency call. The on-call doctor had not been informed of: a. the deterioration in Mr Amico’s presentation during the night b. that the family had informed nursing staff of their concerns Mr Amico had been given the wrong medication when he was noted to be unresponsive at approximately 03:00 hours, that should have immediately raised concerns about an overdose of MST. ”

    Source location

    Paolino AMICO · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide restorative clinical supervision and professional nurse advocate learning on controlled drugs, communication, challenge and escalation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Restorative clinical supervision took place in June 2024, which was a reflective discussion with special emphasis on how to manage challenging prescribers and how to have an effective professional discussion when in doubt of management plan, and how to escalate higher if still in doubt.”

    Source location

    Response from Princess Alexandra Hospital
    Page 5 · response
    Published 19 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The hospital trust is responsible for providing the response and addressing the reported concerns through its governance arrangements and actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust will be providing their own response to this Report, however, the Hertfordshire & West Essex ICB have advised NHS England of the Trust’s governance arrangements and actions being taken to address the concerns raised. It is understood that the Trust’s Patient Safety Group (PSG) has active oversight of several of the areas highlighted in the Report, particularly medicines safety, recognition of deterioration, and incident learning.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 4 · response
    Published 19 November 2025

    Open published response
  6. Newcastle and North Tyneside

    AI-generated summary

    Thomas Colin Morrell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Thomas Colin Morrell had hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy and was admitted to hospital in October 2024 after initially being treated for abdominal issues before being found to be in heart failure. He underwent heart transplantation, which was complicated by massive bleeding and irreversible failure of the transplanted heart; support was withdrawn and he died on 3 December 2024. Concerns included delayed recognition of heart failure and the absence of a standard operating process for referring HOCM patients, as well as a lack of cardiac imaging between 2021 and 2024 to monitor deterioration.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to recognise the greater role of heart failure in deterioration

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Following Mr Morrell's emergency admission to Scarborough Hospital on 8 October 2024, heart failure (as opposed to abdominal issues) played a greater role in his deterioration than was initially recognised by the treating clinicians. Had this been recognised sooner, Mr Morrell could have been transferred to the Freeman Hospital more quickly. There was not a standard operating process in place for Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy (HOCM) patients covering when to refer patients in such circumstances. ”

    Source location

    Thomas Colin Morrell · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  7. Liverpool and the Wirral

    AI-generated summary

    Gloria SIMON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Gloria Simon moved into a care home for respite care and died there from natural causes on 20 September 2025 after her health deteriorated. Concerns included missed opportunities for timely clinical assistance, a GP misunderstanding the care home setting and oxygen saturation reading, and possible insufficient training of non-clinical staff in seeking help and taking and responding to basic observations.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to obtain timely alternative clinical input when the registered GP is unavailable

    Wider context from the report

    “2. On 17 September 2025 the staff at the care home were sufficiently concerned about the Gloria Simon’s health that they sought assistance from her registered GP, who declined to visit because she was no longer within their area. Whilst efforts were made to register her with a practice local to the care home, staff did not make any alternative arrangements for obtaining clinical input in the meantime. The court heard that staff should have called 111. Depending upon the seriousness of their concerns, another possibility would have been to call 999. In fact, no further attempt was made to seek help until 14:52 on 19 September 2025. The court is concerned that the training of non-clinical staff was insufficient to equip them with knowledge about how to manage a situation such as this effectively and would like to know what measures are being taken to address this. ”

    Source location

    Gloria SIMON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Supervise senior care assistants on obtaining clinical support, including contacting 111 or 999 when residents are unwell and a GP is unavailable.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Supervision of all senior care assistants has been completed by the Registered Manager which includes instruction that when a resident is unwell and a GP cannot be accessed every attempt to obtain clinical support will be made. This would include contacting 111 or in fact 999 following observations.”

    Source location

    Response from Riversdale Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Arrange local GP registration within 24 hours for new out-of-district residents and obtain 111 advice if they become unwell before registration.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Companies’ policy has been revised and all new residents who are out of district with their own GP will have arrangements made within the first 24 hours to be registered with a local GP. This process is in place for both respite and permanent placement. Due to registration taking 48 hours, if a resident becomes unwell then team are to source advice from 111.”

    Source location

    Response from Riversdale Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response
  8. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Pamela SINGH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Pamela Singh died of pneumonia on 29 May 2022 after signs and symptoms had progressed for three days and were not recognised by family and professional care staff until after she went into cardiac arrest. The principal concerns were delayed recognition and response to acute deterioration in a person with a learning disability, and the absence of a specific practice tool to support recognition, escalation and response.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in recognising acute deterioration in people with learning disabilities

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) Delays in recognising, escalating and responding to an acute deterioration is a significant factor in avoidable deaths of people with a Learning Disabilities; ”

    Source location

    Pamela SINGH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in responding to acute deterioration in people with learning disabilities

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) Delays in recognising, escalating and responding to an acute deterioration is a significant factor in avoidable deaths of people with a Learning Disabilities; ”

    Source location

    Pamela SINGH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in escalating acute deterioration in people with learning disabilities

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) Delays in recognising, escalating and responding to an acute deterioration is a significant factor in avoidable deaths of people with a Learning Disabilities; ”

    Source location

    Pamela SINGH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of familiarity with the use of an acute deterioration recognition tool in Wales

    Wider context from the report

    “(6) Neither the GP, Social Worker, or commissioned care provider were familiar with any such tool being used in Wales notwithstanding a recommendation in The Learning Disabilities Mortality Review (LeDeR) Programme Annual Report 2019 to "Adapt (and then adopt) the National Early Warning Score 2 regionally, such as the Restore2TM in Wessex, to ensure it captures baseline and soft signs of acute deterioration in physical health for people with learning disabilities" ”

    Source location

    Pamela SINGH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a specific practice tool for recognising, escalating and responding to potential acute deterioration in people with learning disabilities

    Wider context from the report

    “(5) Family and professional care staff did not have any specific practice tool to help them recognise, escalate and ensure a response to concerns about signs of a potential acute deterioration; ”

    Source location

    Pamela SINGH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Incorporate annual learning disability health checks into the GP Wales core contract for eligible adult patients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “From 1 April 2025, learning disability annual health checks have been incorporated into the GP Wales core contract. Previously, these checks were only offered by some GP practices. Now, all adult patients with a learning disability who are registered with a GP practice are entitled to receive a learning disability check every year. The purpose of these checks is to aid early identification, diagnosis and treatment of health issues, helping to prevent and manage health concerns while also providing education and healthcare advice to individuals.”

    Source location

    Response from the Department for Health and Social Care (Wales)
    Page 2 · response
    Published 25 September 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide additional funding to health boards to embed annual learning disability health checks and support GP practices.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Health boards are responsible for ensuring every adult with a learning disability is offered an annual health check. The Welsh Government is providing health boards with additional funding this year to embed the change and support GP practices. We are also improving data reporting by requesting GP registers of learning disability patients are up to date, eligible individuals are offered a health check, and the number of people taking up this offer is recorded. Working with NHS Performance and Improvement, we are supporting enhancements to ensure high-quality checks are undertaken. This year is likely to be a transitional year while the new process beds in and staff are trained. We will be closely monitoring uptake and impact to ensure the needs of people with learning disabilities are being met.”

    Source location

    Response from the Department for Health and Social Care (Wales)
    Page 2 · response
    Published 25 September 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Support enhancements with NHS Performance and Improvement to ensure high-quality annual learning disability health checks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Health boards are responsible for ensuring every adult with a learning disability is offered an annual health check. The Welsh Government is providing health boards with additional funding this year to embed the change and support GP practices. We are also improving data reporting by requesting GP registers of learning disability patients are up to date, eligible individuals are offered a health check, and the number of people taking up this offer is recorded. Working with NHS Performance and Improvement, we are supporting enhancements to ensure high-quality checks are undertaken. This year is likely to be a transitional year while the new process beds in and staff are trained. We will be closely monitoring uptake and impact to ensure the needs of people with learning disabilities are being met.”

    Source location

    Response from the Department for Health and Social Care (Wales)
    Page 2 · response
    Published 25 September 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Local authorities or commissioning bodies are responsible for ensuring care workers receive relevant training through individual care plans.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is the responsibility of the local authority or commissioning body, when setting care plans, to ensure appropriate and relevant training, such as RESTORE2, is in place for care workers to support individual’s needs.”

    Source location

    Response from the Department for Health and Social Care (Wales)
    Page 1 · response
    Published 25 September 2025

    Open published response
  9. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Emily · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Emily died at Bassetlaw DGH on 6 May 2024 after developing unrecognised dehydration, acute kidney injury, ileus and sub-acute small bowel obstruction following bowel surgery for Crohn’s disease. She experienced vomiting, aspiration pneumonitis and cardiac arrest, with the report identifying concerns about inadequate hydration assessment, fluid-balance recording, recognition of deterioration, clinical assessment and escalation, and response to family concerns. The report also raises concerns about clinical assessment in the Emergency Department before mental health referral or discharge home.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to escalate deteriorating patients for medical assessment

    Wider context from the report

    “2. That nursing assessments, particularly in very vulnerable patients, will not identify a deteriorating patient, thus preventing necessary escalation for medical assessment ”

    Source location

    Emily · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen verbal handovers during shift changes to support identification and escalation of safety concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Verbal handover processes during shift changes have been strengthened.”

    Source location

    Response from Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Launch and embed Trust-wide Safety Huddles at BDGH for real-time identification and escalation of safety concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Safety Huddles have been launched Trust-wide and embedded at BDGH. These evidence-based initiatives support real-time identification and escalation of safety concerns. For example, a recent huddle identified a patient declining all oral intake, prompting immediate clinical review.”

    Source location

    Response from Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 August 2025

    Open published response
  10. Worcestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Vera Fortey · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Vera Fortey suffered an unwitnessed fall at her care home, after which her mobility and condition deteriorated. Her fractured hip was not medically identified for approximately two and a half days, and she later underwent surgery, declined despite treatment, and died in hospital. The principal concerns were inadequate recording of the fall, missed opportunities to obtain medical assessment, insufficient auditing of residents’ records, and inadequate staff familiarity with the care home’s records system.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to recognise post-fall deterioration and seek timely medical assessment

    Wider context from the report

    “3) Before the fall in the early hours of 25.9.24 Mrs. Fortey was able to mobilise independently. After the fall, a number of entries were made in Mrs. Fortey’s Daily Notes, which referred to her: - Being unable to support herself, having bad mobility and requiring a wheelchair ( 1626hrs 25.9.24 ); - Having very bad mobility and requiring a wheelchair ( 1848hrs 26.9.24 ); - Being very confused and agitated, with very bad mobility ( 0713hrs 27.9.24 ); Despite these obvious changes in her condition, no member of staff identified that these changes might have been due to the fall on 25.9.24. Therefore in the 2½ days after the fall, several opportunities were missed to have Mrs. Fortey medically examined, and for her fractured hip to have been identified and treated sooner. A significant reason for these opportunities being missed was the fact that the original fall was not documented in Mrs. Fortey’s file. ”

    Source location

    Vera Fortey · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Developed an action plan addressing unwitnessed falls, medical attention, record keeping, auditing and staff training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To address the specific items raised in the Regulation 28 Report we drew up an action plan that covered:”

    Source location

    Response from The Willows Care Home
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provided fall prevention and management training to staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of the action plan, fall prevention and management training was provided by Acute Training Solutions Limited on 24 July 2025. A copy of the training certificates is contained at Appendix 2. Page 17 of the appendices outlines the learning objectives for the course.”

    Source location

    Response from The Willows Care Home
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 July 2025

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026