Recurring concern

Failure to recognise medication-related pulmonary toxicity

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 30 Sep 2019•Latest report 19 Aug 2025

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of clinical recognition, prescribing safeguards, decision support, alerts, guidance or communication specifically intended to identify and act on pulmonary toxicity or pulmonary fibrosis caused or potentially caused by a medication or therapy.

Not included

  • Excludes pulmonary conditions unrelated to medication or therapy.
  • Excludes general medication-safety, prescribing or adverse-event-reporting failures where pulmonary toxicity is not the identified risk.
  • Excludes failures in treatment after medication-related pulmonary toxicity has been reliably recognised and communicated.
  • Excludes generic training, communication or documentation deficiencies unless they directly impair recognition or communication of medication-related pulmonary toxicity.
Reports
3

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
5

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2019–2025

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
7

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Claypath and University Medical Group1
Egton Medical Information Systems Limited1
Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership1
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency1
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence1
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board1
Park View Group Practice1
Royal Pharmaceutical Society1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Venetia Clarissa Pierce · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Venetia Clarissa Pierce, described as an elderly frail lady with recurrent urinary infections, was prescribed nitrofurantoin prophylactically in February 2024 and died in hospital on 30 December 2024. The inquest recorded nitrofurantoin-induced pneumonitis as the medical cause of death, with frailty contributing. Concerns included the absence of an MHRA safety alert on the surgery’s EMIS system and limited awareness among clinicians of the potential for pulmonary damage and respiratory failure from nitrofurantoin in elderly patients.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of nitrofurantoin safety alert criteria to cover patients without pre-existing pulmonary disease

    Wider context from the report

    “a. The MHRA issued a drug safety alert regarding the risks of pulmonary and hepatic adverse drug reactions in relation to nitrofurantoin in April 2023. However, no MHRA safety alert appeared on the surgery EMIS system when the drug was prescribed to Mrs Pierce. The court heard that the safety alert only arises when patients have a pre-existing pulmonary disease which Mrs Pierce did not have. ”

    Source location

    Venetia Clarissa Pierce · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of the surgery EMIS system to display MHRA nitrofurantoin safety alerts

    Wider context from the report

    “a. The MHRA issued a drug safety alert regarding the risks of pulmonary and hepatic adverse drug reactions in relation to nitrofurantoin in April 2023. However, no MHRA safety alert appeared on the surgery EMIS system when the drug was prescribed to Mrs Pierce. The court heard that the safety alert only arises when patients have a pre-existing pulmonary disease which Mrs Pierce did not have. ”

    Source location

    Venetia Clarissa Pierce · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Limited clinician awareness of nitrofurantoin pulmonary damage and respiratory failure in elderly patients

    Wider context from the report

    “b. Although a “recognised” complication, understanding of the potential for pulmonary damage and respiratory failure from use of nitrofurantoin in the elderly may remain low. The court heard evidence from a respiratory consultant that awareness amongst GPs, hospital clinicians including urologists was limited and that even if Mrs Pierce had been referred to hospital earlier the condition might not have been diagnosed. ”

    Source location

    Venetia Clarissa Pierce · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing EMIS Web functionality is considered sufficient to mitigate the specific MHRA Nitrofurantoin risk; no further software development is required.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In this instance, based on the information provided in the Report, and our subsequent review, we do not believe there are any software developments beyond the existing functionality in the System that are required to mitigate the specific risk raised in the Report.”

    Source location

    Response from EMIS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 August 2025

    Open published response
  2. County Durham and Darlington

    AI-generated summary

    Jane Elizabeth ALLISON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jane Elizabeth ALLISON died in hospital on 20 November 2021 after being admitted with severe type 1 respiratory failure. She had received a 10-day course of nitrofurantoin for a urinary tract infection, and the inquest concluded that she died from the effects of prescribed medication. The principal concern was that BNF guidance did not sufficiently alert clinicians to the risk of sudden pulmonary deterioration or provide adequate monitoring advice in this circumstance.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of nitrofurantoin prescribing guidance to provide advice on monitoring for sudden pulmonary deterioration during short-term treatment in elderly patients

    Wider context from the report

    “In effect, my concern is that the BNF content had not advised to be alerted to the danger of sudden pulmonary deterioration in an elderly patient, and certainly not one who was fit and active, and not in the context of the duration of a prescribing, dispensing and administration period of only 10 days. Effectively, the BNF content did not cover the eventuality of this case in that it was deficient in providing advice as to monitoring and being alert for pulmonary failure. ”

    Source location

    Jane Elizabeth ALLISON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review evidence on nitrofurantoin pulmonary adverse reactions and obtain expert advice on whether product information should be amended.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As you have noted, the product information for nitrofurantoin does list pulmonary and respiratory issues as possible side effects. We have conducted a review of the available evidence concerning nitrofurantoin and pulmonary adverse drug reactions and sought expert advice from the Pharmacovigilance Expert Advisory Group (PEAG) of the Commission on Human Medicines on the”

    Source location

    Response from MHRA
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 March 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Request marketing authorisation holders to strengthen and prominently emphasise respiratory warnings in nitrofurantoin product information for healthcare professionals and patients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In summary, we have considered the available evidence on nitrofurantoin and acute pulmonary reactions and, based on expert advice from the PEAG, will request that Marketing Authorisation Holders (MAHs) strengthen the wording in the UK Summary of Product Information (SmPC) and Patient Information Leaflet (PIL).”

    Source location

    Response from MHRA
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 March 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Communicate nitrofurantoin product-information updates to the BNF so its monograph can be revised as needed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are aware that the BNF, which is not the responsibility of the MHRA, has recently updated the nitrofurantoin monograph. These updates, adding additional information on acute pulmonary reactions, are in line with the current UK SmPC and PIL. The MHRA will communicate any SmPC and PIL updates, to the BNF, so that they can further revise their monograph as needed.”

    Source location

    Response from MHRA
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 March 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish an MHRA Drug Safety Update article informing UK healthcare professionals about nitrofurantoin pulmonary risks, respiratory symptoms, investigation and prompt reporting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The PEAG also agreed that it would be appropriate to communicate to UK healthcare professionals to inform them of these updates and remind them of the potential for pulmonary and chronic adverse drug reactions in association with nitrofurantoin, and that any such symptoms should be investigated and reported promptly. The PEAG considered that an article in the MHRA’s monthly ‘Drug Safety Update’ bulletin may be an appropriate method to communicate these messages, and we will be taking this forward.”

    Source location

    Response from MHRA
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 March 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Alert prescribing clinicians to nitrofurantoin’s serious breathlessness side effects and the need for prompt patient reporting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. An email has been sent to all prescribing clinicians alerting them to the rare but significant and potentially life-threatening side effects of nitrofurantoin causing acute breathlessness and the need to advise patients to promptly report such symptoms.”

    Source location

    Response from Claypath and University Medical Group
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 March 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Write to the Local Medicine Management Team highlighting nitrofurantoin’s life-threatening side effect.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. One of our partners has agreed to write to the Local Medicine Management Team highlighting this life-threatening side effect and expecting possible changes to the local guidelines.”

    Source location

    Response from Claypath and University Medical Group
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 March 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the nitrofurantoin monograph with highlighted information on acute pulmonary reactions, including patient counselling and prompt symptom reporting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have reviewed the BNF content for nitrofurantoin in response to your report and can confirm that we will add additional information regarding acute pulmonary reactions to the nitrofurantoin monograph in the BNF. To increase awareness of this side-effect, we will highlight it specifically in an additional section of the side-effects information. We will also add information on the importance of counselling patients on the possible symptoms of acute pulmonary reactions and the necessity of promptly reporting such symptoms. This will mean that the risk of acute pulmonary reactions will be highlighted in the nitrofurantoin monograph in future.”

    Source location

    2022-0071-Response-from-Royal-Pharmaceutical-Society_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 March 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The BNF is outside the MHRA’s responsibility, so the MHRA will not directly amend its monograph.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are aware that the BNF, which is not the responsibility of the MHRA, has recently updated the nitrofurantoin monograph. These updates, adding additional information on acute pulmonary reactions, are in line with the current UK SmPC and PIL. The MHRA will communicate any SmPC and PIL updates, to the BNF, so that they can further revise their monograph as needed.”

    Source location

    Response from MHRA
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 March 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The BNF is expected to further revise its nitrofurantoin monograph as needed after receiving updated product information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are aware that the BNF, which is not the responsibility of the MHRA, has recently updated the nitrofurantoin monograph. These updates, adding additional information on acute pulmonary reactions, are in line with the current UK SmPC and PIL. The MHRA will communicate any SmPC and PIL updates, to the BNF, so that they can further revise their monograph as needed.”

    Source location

    Response from MHRA
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 March 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Responsibility for BNF content remains with its publishers, so the matter is outside NICE’s authority to comment on or amend.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The BNF is a joint publication of BMJ Group and Pharmaceutical Press, the publishing division of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society. While we make the BNF available on the NICE website, responsibility for the content remains with the publishers and therefore NICE cannot comment on the concerns you have raised.”

    Source location

    2022-0071-Response-from-NICE_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 March 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Royal Pharmaceutical Society is better placed to respond to concerns about the BNF entry for nitrofurantoin.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am aware that your report has also been sent to the chief executive of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society who will be better placed to respond to your concerns.”

    Source location

    2022-0071-Response-from-NICE_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 March 2022

    Open published response
  3. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Graham Earl · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Graham Earl had pulmonary fibrosis diagnosed while receiving Amiodarone therapy and was not referred back to the cardiologist. He later developed influenza, deteriorated, and died at Stepping Hill Hospital on 16 February 2019. The principal concerns were that the link between Amiodarone and pulmonary fibrosis was not recognised promptly, the medication was amended without reference to secondary care, and there was insufficient awareness of escalation procedures for side effects.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of GPs to recognise the link between the therapy and Pulmonary Fibrosis

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The GPs involved did not understand or recognise the known link between the therapy and Pulmonary Fibrosis and did not seek guidance from the prescribing secondary care physician at an early stage. The evidence was that the advice would have been to stop prescribing immediately; ”

    Source location

    Graham Earl · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026