Recurring concern

Unreliable staff access to and understanding of safety-critical guidance

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 3 Dec 2013•Latest report 11 Jan 2023

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of staff-facing arrangements to provide access to safety-critical guidance or learning material and to verify that relevant staff have accessed, considered and understood it, including computer-based material and associated acknowledgement or comprehension checks.

Not included

  • Excludes substantive deficiencies in the guidance itself where access or staff understanding is not the reported unsafe condition.
  • Excludes generic staff training, staffing or communication deficiencies that are not specifically tied to access to or understanding of safety-critical guidance.
  • Excludes failures to implement a safety change after staff have reliably accessed and understood the relevant guidance.
  • Excludes named systems, pathways or hazard-specific guidance where that narrower concern provides the more specific supported boundary.
Reports
13

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
13

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2023

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
10

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Care Quality Commission2
Department of Health and Social Care2
700 Club1
Agd Equipment Limited1
Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust1
Basildon Hospital1
Care First Class (UK) Limited1
Construction Plant-hire Association1
County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust1
DW Fitness First1
East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust1
General Medical Council1
George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust1
Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust1
NHS England1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Warwickshire

    AI-generated summary

    Carol Ann Welch · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Carol Ann Welch became unwell with symptoms initially diagnosed as migraine, returned to the emergency department with changed symptoms, and was discharged without further investigation. She suffered a cardiac arrest on 30 April 2022 and died on 1 May 2022 after an undiagnosed cerebral aneurysm and subsequent spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage. Concerns included failure to investigate possible neurological findings, failure to follow guidance on consultant review after an unexpected return within 72 hours, and uncertainty about how relevant learning and guidance would be embedded, assessed and communicated across the medical team.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of checks that staff have considered and understood safety material

    Wider context from the report

    “(6) Although staff members would have the opportunity of accessing the material, there did not appear to be any checks to ensure that staff members had considered and understood the material provided. ”

    Source location

    Carol Ann Welch · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. Dorset

    AI-generated summary

    Mathew Christopher Moore · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mathew Christopher Moore died on 7 August 2021 in Bournemouth, Dorset, having attached a rope as a ligature. The report records concerns about the combined use of prescribed medication and excess alcohol, including potentially unsafe prescribing, a lack of documented communication of concerns to Mr Moore, and the need for clearer policies, dosage review, follow-up, and information-sharing within the surgery.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unavailability of the policy to all healthcare staff in the surgery

    Wider context from the report

    “2. I have concerns with regard to the following: i. There could be the death of a person in the future due to combined use of ████████ and excess alcohol and I request that consideration is given to creating a policy at the surgery to cover patients who are prescribed ████████, at the same time as consuming alcohol to excess. ii. I would request consideration is given as to the advice to be given in the circumstances where a patient is not being seen face to face, but via another healthcare worker. iii. Further, consideration should be given to the amount and dosage that should be prescribed in these circumstances and whether there should be a documented process to highlight any concerns about the use of ████████ being brought to the patient’s attention as soon as possible. iv. I would request consideration is given that within the policy there is provision for a follow up face to face meeting to review the medication. v. I would request consideration is given to the policy being available to all healthcare staff in the surgery. ”

    Source location

    Mathew Christopher Moore · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Create an electronic-record alert for drugs in the specified prescribing group, warning prescribers about dosage and alcohol-related risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response to Mr Nicholls concerns and suggestions of the 9th August, I can also confirm that we have now created a protocol alert that triggers on the patient electronic record when any drugs in the ████████ prescribing group are issued. This alert warns the prescriber to consider the amount and dosage being prescribed, and highlights the risk of the use of the drug combined with excess alcohol use. The alert also asks them to consider arranging a face to face medication review with the patient. This alert is available to all staff at the Practice who issue medications in the ████████ prescribing group.”

    Source location

    Response from Swanage Medical Practice
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 September 2022

    Open published response
  3. Sunderland

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Alan Hodgson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Alan Hodgson died at Sunderland Royal Hospital on 14 January 2021. The report describes failures to recognise the severity of his condition, delays in acting on and reporting imaging, failures to follow the vascular pathway, inadequate communication and continuity of care, and an insufficient review of the circumstances leading to his death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient dissemination, awareness and continuous training on the Vascular Pathway

    Wider context from the report

    “(6) An insufficiently robust review by The Trust of the circumstance leading to the death of Mr Alan Hodgson and of the lessons to be learnt from it, i.e. an insufficient review of the vascular pathway, including its dissemination, awareness and continuous training to improve the importance of the rapid escalation of care against the background of effective communications and handovers between staff to promote holistic patient care. ”

    Source location

    Mr Alan Hodgson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. Newcastle upon Tyne

    AI-generated summary

    Edward Cockburn · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Edward Cockburn died after falling from an upper-storey window in a sluice room at Sunderland Royal Hospital on 15 March 2020, suffering injuries from which he later died. The report identified failures in enhanced-care assessments and observations, an unsecured sluice-room door, a failed window restrictor fixing, and significantly substandard staffing. It also raised concerns about staff training and the communication of updated window-restrictor fitting guidance.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure staff awareness of the Standard Operating Procedure for Enhanced Care/Observation

    Wider context from the report

    “Staff appeared to be unaware of the Trusts Standard Operating Procedure in relation to Enhanced Care/Observation. Training at that time had not been given to relevant members of staff in connection with the SafeCare system. Whilst training and information had been cascaded there was no procedure in place in relation to any training that could record and thereafter audit the efficacy of that system with particular regard to when the training was delivered and by whom and to whom it was delivered. ”

    Source location

    Edward Cockburn · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop E-learning packages for SafeCare and EICO and make them accessible to relevant staff through the Electronic Staff Record system.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have now agreed a mechanism to address these actions by utilising our existing Electronic Staff Record (ESR) system. We are developing E-learning packages for both SafeCare and EICO which will be uploaded to the ESR and easily accessible to staff. Staff who require this training will have an associated competency added to their learning profile and compliance matrix within ESR. This will allow the creation of reports to capture and monitor/audit completion of this E-learning at an organisational level, as well as a ward/department level.”

    Source location

    2021-0415-Response-from-Sunderland-Royal-Hospital_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 December 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add required SafeCare and EICO competencies to staff learning profiles and compliance matrices within the Electronic Staff Record system.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have now agreed a mechanism to address these actions by utilising our existing Electronic Staff Record (ESR) system. We are developing E-learning packages for both SafeCare and EICO which will be uploaded to the ESR and easily accessible to staff. Staff who require this training will have an associated competency added to their learning profile and compliance matrix within ESR. This will allow the creation of reports to capture and monitor/audit completion of this E-learning at an organisational level, as well as a ward/department level.”

    Source location

    2021-0415-Response-from-Sunderland-Royal-Hospital_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 December 2021

    Open published response
  5. North East Kent

    AI-generated summary

    HARRY RICHFORD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Harry Richford was born at QEQM on 2 November 2017 and died at William Harvey Hospital on 9 November 2017 after being transferred there. The report describes delays in delivery, shortcomings in the caesarean delivery and neonatal resuscitation, and subsequent hypoxia and brain injury. Substantive concerns included locum recruitment, assessment and supervision; clarity about escalation to consultants; neonatal resuscitation training; record keeping and adherence to guidelines; and inaccurate death notifications and reporting.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of staff knowledge of applicable clinical guidelines and policies

    Wider context from the report

    “Concern 10 There appeared to be considerable confusion among members of staff as to which, if any, guidelines and policies affected them. While two senior members of staff, ████████████████ (consultant), said that the East Kent Trust has systems in place to ensure knowledge of and compliance with Trust policies neither of them was able to say whether this was effective. Significant issues remain as to the knowledge of staff as to which guidelines govern their behaviour (this was also a finding of the Health and Safety Investigation Board in 2019). Such confusion or lack of knowledge increases the risk of future deaths. ”

    Source location

    HARRY RICHFORD · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 14 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Trust is responsible for setting out and implementing actions to address the identified maternity-service safety risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am advised that the Trust Board is taking these matters very seriously and has welcomed the national support being provided. I expect the Trust to set out in its response to your report the actions it is taking to address the important safety risks you have outlined.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 October 2022

    Open published response
  6. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Malcolm Marshall Shaw · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Malcolm Marshall Shaw was admitted to Stepping Hill Hospital following a general decline in his condition and later sustained an unobserved fall, resulting in a fractured right femur. He developed bronchopneumonia and died on 20 February 2018; the inquest recorded that his death was contributed to by underlying lung disease. The principal concerns were that the Trust’s original investigation into the fall was fundamentally flawed, that revised investigation training had not yet been introduced, and that frontline staff lacked guidance on promptly capturing evidence about falls.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of guidance for frontline staff on promptly capturing evidence after falls

    Wider context from the report

    “Specifically in relation to cases involving falls, it remains of concern that frontline staff do not appear to have been provided with any guidance as to how to capture the best available evidence as to the circumstances of the fall as soon as reasonably possible after the incident. This is a matter of particular concern bearing in mind the potential benefits such an approach would bring to the Trust’s ongoing efforts to understand the causes of falls on wards with a view to trying to prevent as many of them as possible. ”

    Source location

    Mr Malcolm Marshall Shaw · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Run the Safer Mobility Collaborative, including immediate post-fall assessment, staff statements and patient discussions to confirm safety actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• In June 2018 the Trust launched a Safer Mobility Collaborative aimed at reducing inpatient falls by March 2019. Part of the collaborative included the launch of an immediate assessment of the circumstances of the fall, taking statements from staff and talking with the patient to assess that all actions to ensure patient safety are in place.”

    Source location

    2019-0007-Response-by-Stockport-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 May 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use thrice-weekly Quality Safety Leadership Summits to monitor falls, confirm investigations have started and verify inclusion of immediate statements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• In January 2019, the Trust further enhanced its approaches to monitoring falls via our Quality Safety Leadership Summit, held three times a week. At this meeting, senior nurses are able to ensure that full investigations have started and include immediate statements. The Trust is pleased to report that it continues to be on target to reduce the number of falls within the organisation.”

    Source location

    2019-0007-Response-by-Stockport-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 May 2019

    Open published response
  7. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Catherine Mary GIBBON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Catherine Mary Gibbon suffered a seizure while swimming at a gym on 1 June 2018 and remained face down in the water for around ten minutes. She sustained a hypoxic-ischaemic brain injury following non-fatal drowning and died. Concerns included inadequate pool monitoring and CCTV arrangements, a broken camera, insufficient staff training and emergency equipment, and gaps in first-aid certification systems.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clear guidance and staff understanding of medical conditions relevant to exercise

    Wider context from the report

    “1. When Ms Gibbon joined the gym, she was given a health pledge to read. In this, she agreed to inform a member of staff if she had a medical condition that might interfere with exercise. However, she was not given any assistance in understanding which medical conditions would come in to this category. Even the staff taking her through the health pledge did not have a clear understanding of this. ”

    Source location

    Catherine Mary GIBBON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    James Albert Harris · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    James Albert Harris died in hospital on 3 April 2017 after a fall at his care home, sustaining a fractured neck of femur and subsequently deteriorating with pneumonia, Clostridium difficile infection and underlying health conditions. Concerns included inadequate falls-policy awareness and application, failure to seek medical attention after he reported pain, lack of analgesia, inadequate records of routine checks, and the care home being without a registered manager.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to make the falls protocol clearly available to staff

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Having fallen Mr. Harris complained of pain in his groin. The home’s ‘Protocol for all Falls’ included that if the resident complains of pain in any part of the body following a fall they ought not to be moved and medical attention should be sought. Medical attention was not sought and Mr. Harris was returned to his room. The three carers who gave evidence at the inquest ████████ ████████ and ████████ all gave evidence that they had not seen the document entitled ‘Protocol for all Falls’ prior to Mr. Harris’ fall on the 26th January 2017, although ████████ and ████████ were not found to be credible witnesses, ████████ was credible. Evidence of police investigations identified that the Protocol ought to have been clearly available for staff around the home as a result of issues raised by the CQC prior to this incident. ”

    Source location

    James Albert Harris · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Disseminate the falls protocol to staff and incorporate it into new-staff induction.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3) Protocol for falls – this document has been given to all staff and a signed copy is kept on their personnel file. This has also been made part of the induction protocol for new staff.”

    Source location

    2017-0334-Response-by-Care-First-Class-UK
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 December 2017

    Open published response
  9. Warwickshire

    AI-generated summary

    Mark Richard Seward · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mark Richard Seward died after a pressurised cylinder fractured during workplace testing, ejecting debris that caused a serious head injury. Concerns included unclear definitions of pressure testing and questioned compliance with PUWER and HSE guidance, with evidence that poor practices were replicated elsewhere in the industry.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of managers and staff to access computer-based health and safety material

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) AGD managers and staff had not accessed computer-based material relating to health and safety issues. ”

    Source location

    Mark Richard Seward · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Roll out refresher training and awareness raising so employees know where to find health and safety documents.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The company health and safety documents including the policy, risk assessments and safe systems of work along with relevant HSE Guidance are held electronically on servers and computers. The company has also given the mobile engineers electronic tablets containing these documents for off-site reference. A hard copy of all electronic documents is also held in folders located in the Service Department office. This was already the case at the time of the Inquest and was within knowledge of those employees who gave evidence because they were part of the team directly involved in putting the documentation together. It is not known why this information was not given to the Coroner at the Inquest. Refresher training and awareness raising has been rolled out across all employees to remind them where all health and safety documents can be found.”

    Source location

    SEWARD-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 April 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Health and safety documents were available electronically and in hard copy, contrary to any premise that the company lacked accessible documentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The company health and safety documents including the policy, risk assessments and safe systems of work along with relevant HSE Guidance are held electronically on servers and computers. The company has also given the mobile engineers electronic tablets containing these documents for off-site reference. A hard copy of all electronic documents is also held in folders located in the Service Department office. This was already the case at the time of the Inquest and was within knowledge of those employees who gave evidence because they were part of the team directly involved in putting the documentation together. It is not known why this information was not given to the Coroner at the Inquest. Refresher training and awareness raising has been rolled out across all employees to remind them where all health and safety documents can be found.”

    Source location

    SEWARD-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 April 2016

    Open published response
  10. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Mary Catherine Bloom · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mary Catherine Bloom, who had dementia and reduced oral intake, was admitted with probable left-leg ischaemia and died in hospital on 4 February 2014. Concerns included failures to record her weight, consult haematology, obtain baseline and follow-up blood tests, and make the heparin administration guidance sufficiently visible. There was also no discussion with her next of kin before a DNAR order was placed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient visibility of the heparin administration poster’s direction to seek haematology advice for underweight patients

    Wider context from the report

    “The poster for the administration of heparin include a direction that: An obese/underweight patient who weigh over 131 kilograms and under 40 kilograms should be treated on an individual basis. Please seek haematology advice. This direction is written in very small writing at the bottom of the heparin administration poster. It appears to have been missed by 2 doctors involved in the prescribing of heparin to Mrs Bloom. There is concern that this may have been missed as it was not sufficiently visible on the poster. ”

    Source location

    Mary Catherine Bloom · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026