Recurring concern

Inadequate mental health risk assessment

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 3 Dec 2013•Latest report 1 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes deficiencies in the mental health risk-assessment process, including incomplete assessment, inadequate documentation or formulation, failure to gather relevant information, and reliance on insufficient indicators when assessing patients with mental health concerns.

Not included

  • Excludes failures in communication, handover, escalation, review, or safety planning unless the report explicitly presents them as a component failure of the mental health risk-assessment process.
  • Excludes risk assessments concerning unrelated hazards, settings, or beneficiary groups, such as antenatal growth risk, roadside trees, or general safeguarding.
  • Excludes generic workforce training or staffing deficiencies that are not specifically tied to inadequate mental health risk assessment.
Reports
118

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
135

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
234

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

NHS England20
Department of Health and Social Care19
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust8
North East London NHS Foundation Trust7
North London NHS Foundation Trust7
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust6
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust6
East London NHS Foundation Trust5
Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust5
Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust4
Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust4
NHS Birmingham and Solihull Integrated Care Board4
Care Quality Commission3
Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership3
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust3

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Katharine Emma Corrigan · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Katharine Emma Corrigan, a patient detained under the Mental Health Act, died by suicide after failing to return from unescorted leave on 22 July 2023. The report identifies concerns about failures in the management and recording of Section 17 leave, inadequate risk assessments and care planning, staffing and oversight, and failures concerning access to recognised treatment for a pre-existing hormonal imbalance.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure staff understand Section 17 Leave requirements and conduct required risk assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Policies and protocols on section 17 Leave granted under the Mental Health Act (Section 17 Leave) were not properly understood by all staff and the required risk assessments were not conducted by appropriately qualified and trained staff. ”

    Source location

    Katharine Emma Corrigan · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. Coventry and Warwickshire

    AI-generated summary

    Natalia Violet Cestaro (known as “Tali”) · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Natalia Violet Cestaro, known as “Tali”, was an 18-year-old inpatient who died on 15 November 2023 after ingesting a foreign object, undergoing endoscopic removal, and subsequently developing gastric perforation, sepsis and multi-organ failure. The principal concerns included the proactive assessment of risks from impulsive ingestion, liaison between mental health and acute services, and assurance and auditing of communication processes.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to proactively assess a wider range of swallowable items for patients at persistent risk of impulsive ingestion

    Wider context from the report

    “a) Proactive scope of risk assessment for impulsive ingestion (CWPT) The evidence raised a concern that risk assessments may focus primarily on specific previously ingested items, rather than undertaking a sufficiently proactive assessment of a wider range of swallowable items within the inpatient environment. Where a patient is known to pose a persistent risk of impulsive ingestion, a predominantly reactive approach risks foreseeable hazards not being identified and mitigated in advance. ”

    Source location

    Natalia Violet Cestaro (known as “Tali”) · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct daily electronic environmental audits, address identified hazards, and escalate matters requiring Estates intervention.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We will continue to undertake daily environmental audits across our mental health wards to identify, address and remove potential and foreseeable hazards. These audits are completed electronically, updated in real time and enable immediate escalation of environmental concerns requiring Estates intervention.”

    Source location

    Response from Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a multidisciplinary, formulation-based safety and risk assessment framework that explicitly considers impulsivity and related risk factors.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our safety (risk) assessment, formulation and planning framework has undergone multidisciplinary review to ensure alignment with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Guideline NG225. The framework incorporates a formulation-based approach that considers factors which may predispose individuals to unsafe behaviours, perpetuate risk, or act as protective influences. Impulsivity is specifically considered within this formulation process.”

    Source location

    Response from Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide training supporting formulation-based risk management, professional curiosity, multidisciplinary collaboration, and information triangulation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our training programme supports this formulation-based approach to safety and risk management, with a strong emphasis on professional curiosity, multidisciplinary collaboration and triangulation of information obtained from those important to the individual and those involved in their care. The training encourages staff to consider a broader range of factors that may influence safety and wellbeing and supports a move away from historical documentation and approaches, such as the Skills-based Training on Risk Management (STORM) and Working with Risk (WWR) tools.”

    Source location

    Response from Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor risk-assessment quality through ward management audits and additional Matron-led assurance audits using the AMaT system.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The quality of risk assessments is routinely monitored through our Audit Management and Tracking (AMaT) system. Audits are undertaken by ward management teams, with additional assurance provided through separate Matron-led audits.”

    Source location

    Response from Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response
  3. Carmarthenshire and Pembrokeshire

    AI-generated summary

    Trevor Anthony Evans · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Trevor Anthony Evans was struggling with his mental health and had contact with police, ambulance, mental health professionals and healthcare staff before taking his own life by hanging at home on 27 February 2020. The principal concerns were over-reliance on what he told a mental health nurse, failure to review medical records and insufficient investigation of available background information, resulting in concerns that mental health risk assessments could be incomplete or inadequate.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Over-reliance on referrer-provided information in mental health risk assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “In this case, I found that there was an over reliance on what Trevor told the nurse, a failure to review medical records and a lack of investigation or scrutiny into an abundance of background information that was available. Notwithstanding the fact that I have been told that changes have been made by the Health Board to ensure that those undertaking assessments now look to obtain as much information as possible I also received evidence which indicates that assessors still harbour an attitude that it is the referrer job to provide all the relevant information and then those performing the risk assessment will simply assess the information. For as long as that approach or culture continues I fear that mental health risk assessments in Pembrokeshire may be incomplete, perfunctory and inadequate. There needs to be a shift of onus to a more collaborative approach so that those undertaking the assessment explore what information is available to them and do not simply rely on the details provided by the referrer. It is essential that those undertaking the mental health assessments are aware of the need to obtain as much information as possible in order to complete a full and thorough assessment of the risk and that they are aware of how to and where to obtain the relevant information from. ”

    Source location

    Trevor Anthony Evans · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use comprehensive assessment and referral-support tools to prompt multi-source information gathering, collateral enquiries and documentation of information sources.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. Introduction of referral and assessment support tools”

    Source location

    Response from Hywel Dda University Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue delivering WARRN training across mental health services on multi-source assessment, professional curiosity, collaborative risk management and safety planning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. Workforce development through WARRN”

    Source location

    Response from Hywel Dda University Health Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with police colleagues to strengthen understanding and use of Pembrokeshire police handover processes so relevant information reaches assessing clinicians.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. Review of partnership information-sharing arrangements”

    Source location

    Response from Hywel Dda University Health Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen duty-practitioner expectations so urgent assessments include seeking necessary collateral information beyond analysing information presented.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. Strengthening the duty practitioner role”

    Source location

    Response from Hywel Dda University Health Board
    Page 4 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implemented, immediate and ongoing safety work collectively addresses the identified risk-assessment concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We believe the actions already implemented, the immediate actions undertaken following receipt of this report, and our ongoing participation in national safety and risk improvement work collectively address the issues identified and support the cultural shift towards collaborative, information-seeking, formulation-based assessment practice described by the Coroner.”

    Source location

    Response from Hywel Dda University Health Board
    Page 4 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response
  4. Warwickshire

    AI-generated summary

    Matilda Rose Davis · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Matilda was found deceased at her home shortly after an urgent safeguarding visit concerning her mental health and the welfare of her children. The inquest identified concerns that suicide prevention training was not mandatory for frontline practitioners, that she was not asked directly about suicidal ideation, and that she was not signposted to crisis support services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to directly ask about suicidal ideation when suicidal thoughts are indicated in referral information

    Wider context from the report

    “Evidence heard during the inquest confirmed that suicide prevention training is not mandatory for frontline practitioners and staff within Warwickshire Children’s Services. The social worker and support worker who visited Matilda had not received suicide prevention training, although such training was available within the organisation. In the absence of mandatory suicide prevention training, Matilda was not asked directly about suicidal ideation during the visit, where reference was made to suicidal thoughts within the referral context. It was also noted that she was not signposted to crisis support services at that time. The non-mandatory nature of suicide prevention training may give rise to variability in practice when practitioners are required to explore, record, or respond to indications of possible self harm or suicidal thoughts. ”

    Source location

    Matilda Rose Davis · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver phased, mandatory Tier 2 practitioner training to identified Children and Families staff, with refreshers and ongoing training for new starters.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Tier 2 – Practitioner response (mandatory) This tier is designed for staff working directly with individuals at risk, including social workers, family practitioners, and personal advisors. The focus is on developing applied skills and confidence in:”

    Source location

    Response from Warwickshire County Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 April 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Tier 2 practitioner training will be phased over three years because financial considerations and workforce capacity constrain faster implementation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Tier 2 Delivery Model and Timescale Delivery of Tier 2 training will follow a phased three-year implementation model, reflecting both financial considerations and workforce capacity.”

    Source location

    Response from Warwickshire County Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 April 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Mandatory completion of universal suicide-awareness training across the Council remains subject to further corporate agreement.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Delivery will be through the updated 2024 e-learning programme, ensuring content is aligned with current best practice in suicide prevention, supported by a single, accessible intranet resource hub which signposts to additional resources and pathways for support (including Dear Life). A refreshed and regularly reviewed suicide prevention intranet page will act as the central resource hub, building on the existing WCC Suicide Prevention page and ensuring consistent access to guidance and training materials, as well as signposting resources.”

    Source location

    Response from Warwickshire County Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 April 2026

    Open published response
  5. South Yorkshire (Eastern)

    AI-generated summary

    Delwyn PREECE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Delwyn Preece, a 64-year-old man, died at Rotherham Hospital on 19 August 2025 from a hypoxic brain injury following deliberate self-suspension by ligature while he was an informal patient at an acute mental health hospital. The principal concerns were repeated granting of leave without documented mental state examinations or risk assessments, poor and retrospective record-keeping, and shortcomings in the patient safety investigation arising from unfamiliarity with the medical records system.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to undertake and document mental state examinations and risk assessments before granting ward leave

    Wider context from the report

    “1. There were consistent and repeated incidents (13 incidents in 6 days) where leave from the ward was granted without any documented mental state examination or risk assessment being undertaken prior to the patient being permitted to leave the ward. ”

    Source location

    Delwyn PREECE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Aminata Coulibaly · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Aminata Coulibaly died at home between the evening of 24 June and the morning of 25 June 2022 from acute alcohol toxicity, with respiratory depression as the mechanism; the manner in which the alcohol entered her system could not be determined. The report identifies concerns about safeguarding, information-sharing and recording by Essex Police and the mental health trust, including failures relating to her expressed suicidal thoughts and the handling of the hate crime investigation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to seek clarification of changed welfare circumstances

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Essex Police were aware that Aminata Coulibaly was under the care of the crisis mental health team and that the exacerbation of her mental health crisis was linked to a matter that was being investigated as a Hate Crime. Essex Police did not update the mental health Trust that Aminata Coulibaly sent 2 emails on 22 June 2022 in response to her being informed (incorrectly) that the Hate Crime investigation by Essex Police had been closed: i. to the officer in the case, setting out elements of how she is being treated, elements of the hate crime and that she is not happy with the decisions made by Essex Police and she feels like taking her life. ii. to the Quality Service Team that was forwarded to the Hate Crime police sergeant on 23 June 2022, stating that Aminata Coulibaly wants to contest the decision made by the officer to close the case and that she is facing suicidal thoughts, anxiety and depression. These were not uploaded to Athena or the shared with the mental health Trust. 2. Aminata made a very distressed phone call to the officer in the case on 24 June 2022 and this was not placed on Athena or shared with the mental health Trust. 3. On 26 June 2022 the mental health Trust called Essex Police reporting concerns for Ms Coulibaly’s welfare. The Essex Police contact handler did not record important information reported by the mental health Trust that: a. Aminata had suffered assault and racial abuse by her neighbours b. The mental health Trust had texted Aminata Coulibaly to say that if they did not hear from her by 5pm then they would contact the police for a welfare check. c. Aminata Coulibaly has been having strong thoughts to end her life. 4. On 26 June 2022 a different Essex Police contact handler contacted the mental health Trust to update them on the outcome of their concern for welfare that the police would not attend as it did not meet the criteria. The contact did not ask for clarification when the mental health Trust nurse raised concern when informed that the decision was made that police were not going to attend when he asked, “even though it is life and limb?”. The contact handler did not clarify if there had been any update in the circumstances, these words had not been used by the Trust nurse in the first call. The evidence from the Force Control Room Inspector was that the contact handlers should have recorded relevant information and sought further clarification that this should have been relayed back to her. This would not have made a difference for Aminata Coulibaly as she was probably deceased but is relevant to prevent a future death and ensure that the Inspector has all relevant information when applying THRIVE to assess risk and response. ”

    Source location

    Aminata Coulibaly · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train Contact Management staff in Right Care, Right Person, incident recording, National Decision Model, THRIVE, escalation and supervisory requirements through recruit and continuing-development programmes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To ensure these procedures are understood and consistently delivered by operational officers and staff in our Control Centre, the following has been implemented:”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Police
    Page 5 · response
    Published 1 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop Mental Health Risk Management Briefings to bring relevant agencies together to manage risks involving people experiencing mental ill health.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The Essex Police Mental Health Triage team have developed Mental Health Risk Management Briefings (MHRMB) which can be requested by police or partners. The aim of this meeting is to bring all agencies involved with the subject together, or introduce agencies to the process, that need to have some involvement to manage the risk that the subject poses to themselves or the wider public.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Police
    Page 9 · response
    Published 1 December 2025

    Open published response
  7. West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Joanna Chamberlain · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Joanna Chamberlain took her own life at home on 23 January 2025 after a recent overdose, other self-harm incidents and an assessment that she was at moderate risk. The report raises concerns about the lack of safe, supportive spaces for people needing more support than home treatment teams can provide, and about clinicians seeking and including family or other relevant input when care plans depend on protective factors.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clear guidance and protocols for clinicians to seek and include family or other relevant views in care and safety planning

    Wider context from the report

    “Equally, whilst I recognise the importance and value in clinicians rapidly assessing a patient’s risk of self-harm, using their individual professional judgement, and forming an immediate care and safety plan, there is a potential need for clearer national guidance on, direction to and protocols for clinicians to appropriately seek and include the views and input of family members, or others (e.g. GP), reinforcing the triangle of care, and especially where the delivery or assurance of a care and safety plan depends on them. This appears even more necessary where such individuals themselves are a key protective factor. ”

    Source location

    Joanna Chamberlain · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish national best-practice guidance promoting proactive involvement of trusted others in safety assessment and management.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England published the Staying Safe from Suicide: Best Practice Guidance for Safety Assessment, Formulation and Management on 4 April 2025. It promotes a shift towards a more holistic, person-centred approach rather than relying on risk prediction, which is unreliable because suicidal thoughts can change quickly. Instead, it recommends using a method based on understanding each person’s situation and managing their safety. One of its 10 overarching principles of approach is that of 'involving others: encourage the involvement of trusted others, where possible and as appropriate'. The guidance applies to all mental health practitioners and promotes the proactive engagement of trusted others within legal limits, highlighting that "in the case of immediate risk to life, the duty to share information overrides confidentiality". This guidance therefore clarifies previous national guidance.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Launch nationally available e-learning training complementing the suicide-safety guidance for mental health practitioners.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England has also launched an e-learning session, which is designed to complement our Staying Safe from Suicide Guidance. The Staying Safe from Suicide: Best practice guidance e-learning session is now available for all mental health practitioners across the country. The guidance and the training both cover sections on confidentiality and the law, and refer to the Consensus statement for information sharing and suicide prevention.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share draft personalised-care guidance with Integrated Care Boards on involving families, carers and support networks in care and safety planning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Personalised Care Framework”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 4 · response
    Published 14 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Published suicide safety guidance clarifies national expectations for proactively involving trusted others in safety planning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England published the Staying Safe from Suicide: Best Practice Guidance for Safety Assessment, Formulation and Management on 4 April 2025. It promotes a shift towards a more holistic, person-centred approach rather than relying on risk prediction, which is unreliable because suicidal thoughts can change quickly. Instead, it recommends using a method based on understanding each person’s situation and managing their safety. One of its 10 overarching principles of approach is that of 'involving others: encourage the involvement of trusted others, where possible and as appropriate'. The guidance applies to all mental health practitioners and promotes the proactive engagement of trusted others within legal limits, highlighting that "in the case of immediate risk to life, the duty to share information overrides confidentiality". This guidance therefore clarifies previous national guidance.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 November 2025

    Open published response
  8. City of London

    AI-generated summary

    Tony Montana Duncan · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Tony Montana Duncan had a long-term mental health condition and, during an acute deterioration, told healthcare services that he had suicidal thoughts and planned to jump from a bridge. He was assessed by a psychiatric liaison team and discharged without medication review, admission, documented risk assessment, or follow-up safeguarding, despite information about his suicide plan. On 4 July 2024, he jumped into the River Thames and likely died shortly afterwards; the report identified concerns about the response of mental health services to the risks he presented.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to recognise and assess an identified suicide risk

    Wider context from the report

    “2. When the Deceased attended the hospital, the Accident and Emergency team’s triage notes included express reference to his specific suicide plan and attached the GP’s letter of referral. The Deceased was then assessed by a psychiatric liaison nurse who concluded that his presentation was as a result of psycho-social stressors rather than mental illness; she was not concerned about the risk of suicide because he had no plan or intent; and she referred the Deceased to the homelessness team and discharged him back to the care of his GP. The nurse did not take any steps to review the Deceased’s medication or consider admission, or escalate these matters to a doctor, nor did she involve the Crisis or Home Treatment teams for follow up / immediate safeguarding. Despite there being a recognised risk to self and to others, both of which the Deceased himself said he could not control, there is no evidence of any risk assessment documentation being completed. ”

    Source location

    Tony Montana Duncan · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Participate in the national Culture of Care Programme pilot on personalised approaches to suicide risk.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Training on personalised risk assessment and management was released by NHSE in September 2025, and the AAR recommends that such training should be mandatory for clinicians. The Trust is one of ten mental health organisations taking part in a national pilot through the NHS England and Royal College of Psychiatrists Culture of Care Programme – Personalised Approach to Risk. The pilot aims to enhance how we approach, assess, and manage the risk of suicide. This work aligns with the NICE guidance for Self-harm, which states that risk assessment tools should not be used to predict suicide. Further information can be found here: Culture of Care Programme and here: NCISH | Implementing a personalised approach to risk.”

    Source location

    Response from South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 6 · response
    Published 20 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct multiple daily multidisciplinary clinical safety huddles in the emergency department to review risks and coordinate care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since Mr Duncan’s death the Trust has introduced several new systems to address the challenges raised by patients presenting to ED. The Liaison Psychiatry team carries out multiple clinical safety huddles in ED each day. These are brief, daily, multi-disciplinary team meetings to quickly review patient safety, share urgent information, identify risks (like high-risk behaviour or medication issues), plan care, improve teamwork, and resolve problems. This follows the team handover which facilitates rapid risk review and shared decision making between ED and Liaison Psychiatry teams.”

    Source location

    Response from South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 7 · response
    Published 20 October 2025

    Open published response
  9. Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton

    AI-generated summary

    Abigail Eleanor Ann Jelly · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Abigail Eleanor Ann Jelly, a 34-year-old mother of two experiencing post-natal depression, died on 12 November 2024 after intentionally harming herself, causing fatal blood loss. The report identified concerns about inadequate perinatal mental-health training, limits on urgent specialist visits, insufficient engagement with her parents, and wider failings in professional curiosity, escalation, decision-making and risk assessment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Linear approach to mental health risk assessment and formulation

    Wider context from the report

    “It was accepted that there were cultural issues within the trust services. A report into Abigail’s death concluded that these included ‘a lack of professional curiosity, lack of escalations of deteriorating patients, non-patient centred decision making and a linear approach to risk assessment and formulation.’ I am concerned that there are structural issues with the leadership of the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare Trust that is to the detriment of patients like Abigail, and I am concerned about the risk of future deaths. ”

    Source location

    Abigail Eleanor Ann Jelly · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Roll out a redesigned mental-health risk assessment and management training programme incorporating perinatal risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The “Perinatal Red Flags” is information that is primarily targeted towards non-mental health professionals. It is not mandatory training for Mental Health Registrants, for whom it will have been an integral part of their core education in becoming a qualified mental health practitioner. What we are doing, however, is rolling out a redesigned training programme for assessing and managing all risk in mental health, and perinatal risks will be part of that programme.”

    Source location

    Response from Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 October 2025

    Open published response
  10. Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton

    AI-generated summary

    Naomi Aylott · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Naomi Aylott died on 12 September 2024 after jumping from a railway bridge with the intent to end her own life, following a period of poor mental health and previous suicide attempts. Concerns included that she was not seen face to face by her care co-ordinator, formal risk assessments and care planning were not completed, risk-assessment training and auditing were inadequate, and family involvement during telephone-based care had not been properly considered.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete formal risk assessments in accordance with policy

    Wider context from the report

    “2. I am concerned that within the Andover CMHT the training around risk assessments and the auditing of compliance with risk assessment policy is not adequate. In relation to Naomi I heard evidence that the completion of formal risk assessments was not carried out in accordance with the CMHT policy. I heard evidence that Andover CMHT had undergone risk assessment training at around the time they were involved in Naomi’s care. Despite this no formal risk assessments were completed. In addition I heard that the process for auditing risk assessment compliance had not identified this failure in respect of Naomi’s care. I also heard evidence that the Andover CMHT had requested further training from the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Trust but that this had not taken place. ”

    Source location

    Naomi Aylott · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver bespoke risk-management training sessions to community mental health teams, including Andover.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Pending the roll out of our new risk management training programme, community mental health teams (including Andover) have received bespoke risk management training sessions delivered on a team-by-team basis at their local team base.”

    Source location

    Response from Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare
    Page 3 · response
    Published 20 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a standardised organisation-wide mental-health risk-management training programme.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To ensure that they are as confident as possible in this field, a formal programme of risk management training has recently been developed for staff working in mental health services. This will standardise the offering across the organisation and will act as a refresher for staff. The roll out will commence in quarter 4 of 2025/26 with a ‘train the trainers’ approach, followed by a full programme of training delivery starting in quarter 1 of 2026/27.”

    Source location

    Response from Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare
    Page 3 · response
    Published 20 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Roll out the standardised risk-management training programme using a train-the-trainers approach followed by full staff delivery.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To ensure that they are as confident as possible in this field, a formal programme of risk management training has recently been developed for staff working in mental health services. This will standardise the offering across the organisation and will act as a refresher for staff. The roll out will commence in quarter 4 of 2025/26 with a ‘train the trainers’ approach, followed by a full programme of training delivery starting in quarter 1 of 2026/27.”

    Source location

    Response from Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare
    Page 3 · response
    Published 20 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Standardise community mental health risk-assessment compliance auditing through a revised Quality Assurance Tool.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Routine audit of compliance has also been standardised across our organisation’s community mental health teams with the introduction of a revised Quality Assurance Tool in November 2025, which has been designed to specifically target the quality of risk assessments being completed. This is a Trust-wide approach and is much more sensitive to identifying shortfalls across our Mental Health Services and allowing remedial action to be taken.”

    Source location

    Response from Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare
    Page 3 · response
    Published 20 October 2025

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026