Recurring concern

Unreliable product safety recall and remediation processes

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 5 Nov 2014•Latest report 11 Jan 2023

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in product-safety recall and remediation processes, including identifying affected products and users, preparing adequate recall notices, publicising recalls, reaching end users despite third-party purchase or installation, and providing or directing users to corrective or remedial programmes.

Not included

  • Excludes ordinary product warnings or labelling deficiencies where no recall, withdrawal or remedial-programme process is involved.
  • Excludes the substantive product defect or hazard where the recall and remediation process itself is not deficient.
  • Excludes failures specific to an appliance recall campaign when the assertion does not support the broader product-recall condition; retain appliance-specific recall issues under the existing narrower concern where applicable.
  • Excludes clinical, vehicle, medication or other named recall systems unless the assertion supports the same general product-safety recall and remediation process.
Reports
7

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
9

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2023

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
13

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Beko PLC2
British Standards Institution2
Chartered Trading Standards Institute2
Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy2
Association of British Insurers1
BendPak Inc.1
British Healthcare Trades Association1
British Retail Consortium1
Department for Business, Innovation & Skills1
European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association1
Hotpoint UK Appliances Limited1
Institution of Fire Engineers1
International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers1
Liftmaster Limited1
London Borough of Wandsworth1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. West London

    AI-generated summary

    Ashley Michel Bullard · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ashley Michel Bullard died after a Volvo S80 fell from a vehicle lift while he was working underneath it at Wheel Art Ltd. The lift’s freeplay and the alignment of its pads contributed to the pads moving from a structural part of the car to a non-structural part, causing the car to fall and fatally injure him. Concerns included inadequate maintenance, the use of unsuitable bolts, insufficient warnings and manuals, and risks associated with outer lift points and tolerated freeplay in two-post vehicle lifts.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure replacement of grade 4.8 gear ring bolts in existing lifts

    Wider context from the report

    “5. There was no evidence as to whether all Bendpak XPR9 2-post vehicle lifts with grade 4.8 bolts had been recalled or whether grade 4.8 bolts had been replaced in all existing XPR9 lifts, nor any evidence as to what efforts had made to contact customers that might still have such lifts in operation, in order to replace grade 4.8 bolts in lifts manufactured after 01.01.2014. ”

    Source location

    Ashley Michel Bullard · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. Inner West London

    AI-generated summary

    Mrs Elizabeth Marion Griffin · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mrs Elizabeth Marion Griffin, who was wheelchair bound due to advanced multiple sclerosis, was alone at home in bed when a dishwasher fire started on 14 July 2017. She activated her pendant alarm, but the responder did not recognise the smoke alarm, could not communicate effectively with her, and did not call the fire brigade; Mrs Griffin later died in hospital on 21 August 2017 from smoke inhalation injuries and bronchopneumonia. The concerns included delayed action by the dishwasher manufacturer, lack of appliance-owner registration and contact, and shortcomings in telecare arrangements, including unlinked fire alarms, responder training, communication, and escalation procedures.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in launching appliance repair or withdrawal campaigns

    Wider context from the report

    “1. That it simply took too long for Whirlpool UK to launch the repair/withdrawal campaign. ”

    Source location

    Mrs Elizabeth Marion Griffin · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Improve businesses’ product-recall processes through Office-led work.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Office for Product Safety and Standards is leading work to improve businesses product recall processes. My Department commissioned the British Standards Institution (BSI) to create a new Code of Practice on product recalls (PAS 7100 Code of practice on consumer product safety related recalls and other corrective action). This was launched on 7 March. It guides businesses and regulators through the process of planning for and handling a product safety incident for non-food consumer products. The Code of Practice also sets out for Local Authorities the guidance and advice they should be making available to enable businesses to meet their legal responsibilities and act in the public interest.”

    Source location

    2018-0072-Response-by-Department-for-Business-Energy-Industrial-Strategy
    Page 3 · response
    Published 18 June 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish and implement the PAS 7100 Code of Practice for consumer product-safety recalls and corrective action.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Office for Product Safety and Standards is leading work to improve businesses product recall processes. My Department commissioned the British Standards Institution (BSI) to create a new Code of Practice on product recalls (PAS 7100 Code of practice on consumer product safety related recalls and other corrective action). This was launched on 7 March. It guides businesses and regulators through the process of planning for and handling a product safety incident for non-food consumer products. The Code of Practice also sets out for Local Authorities the guidance and advice they should be making available to enable businesses to meet their legal responsibilities and act in the public interest.”

    Source location

    2018-0072-Response-by-Department-for-Business-Energy-Industrial-Strategy
    Page 3 · response
    Published 18 June 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain lifecycle product-safety policies covering pre-market assessment, post-sale monitoring, incident investigation, risk assessment, hazard reporting and field corrective-action decisions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whirlpool has a comprehensive set of policies, procedures, and guidelines in place for field monitoring, field safety investigations, analysis, risk assessment, and reporting potential safety hazards associated with its products in order to inform an expeditious decision on a field corrective action. These systems have been developed and refined over decades, and Whirlpool keeps those systems under review as part of its commitment to continual improvement.”

    Source location

    2018-0072-Response-by-Whirlpool-UK
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 June 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate senior-leadership oversight through a designated Executive Safety Committee responsible for deciding whether potential product-safety risks require field corrective action.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whirlpool's approach to product safety governance starts with senior leadership oversight, with a specially designated Executive Safety Committee. The membership of Whirlpool's Executive Safety Committee includes members of the Whirlpool senior leadership team from a cross-section of the company. This team is responsible for the decisions regarding the need to undertake field corrective actions for potential product safety risks that have been identified.”

    Source location

    2018-0072-Response-by-Whirlpool-UK
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 June 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Channel reported incidents through a dedicated UK team for consistent initial investigation and escalate safety-related cases for product-safety-engineer review.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “When this initial contact occurs, every effort is made to gather as much information as possible regarding the appliance, the consumer, and the alleged incident. This allows us to both assist the consumer wherever we can, and it also allows us to investigate the matter in more depth.”

    Source location

    2018-0072-Response-by-Whirlpool-UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 June 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Manufacturers are responsible for ensuring product safety and taking corrective action when safety issues are identified.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As you know, the dishwasher that started the fire that caused Mrs Griffin’s death was a model that was subject to a corrective action programme as it had been identified as representing a safety risk. The manufacturer is responsible for ensuring the safety of their product and for taking corrective action when safety issues are identified. Sadly, in this case, Mrs Griffin’s dishwasher was not identified by Whirlpool and had not been repaired or replaced.”

    Source location

    2018-0072-Response-by-Department-for-Business-Energy-Industrial-Strategy
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 June 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Indesit responded promptly to the information available during the DWF Series 3 dishwasher safety campaign.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Coroner raised concerns over the length of timing of the safety campaign for the DWF Series 3 Dishwashers. We welcome the opportunity to provide some context to that safety campaign and Whirlpool's product safety processes.”

    Source location

    2018-0072-Response-by-Whirlpool-UK
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 June 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The matter falls outside the organisation’s authority because it has no powers to intervene.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I would like to take this opportunity to advise you that the Chartered Trading Standards Institute is a private company and professional body for trading standards officers, as such this matter is not something that we are able to get involved with as we have no powers, this would be a matter for trading standards departments that are run by local authorities.”

    Source location

    2018-0072-Response-by-CTSI
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 June 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Responsibility for the matter rests with trading standards departments run by local authorities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I would like to take this opportunity to advise you that the Chartered Trading Standards Institute is a private company and professional body for trading standards officers, as such this matter is not something that we are able to get involved with as we have no powers, this would be a matter for trading standards departments that are run by local authorities.”

    Source location

    2018-0072-Response-by-CTSI
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 June 2018

    Open published response
  3. Bedfordshire and Luton

    AI-generated summary

    BRIAN DAVID BETTERTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    On 20 February 2017, a short-circuiting Electrium Miniature Circuit Breaker caused a small smouldering fire at Brian David Betterton’s home, releasing carbon monoxide. He died in his bedroom from carbon monoxide exposure. The report raised concerns that the product recall did not reach the deceased and was dependent on identifying purchasers, who were often professional electricians not required to keep records or notify suppliers of end users.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of purchaser records for products purchased and fitted by professional electricians

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The Product Recall relates to a product supplied between April 2009 and February 2010. 2. The Product Recall did not come to the attention of the deceased. 3. In the majority of cases the end user of the product will not have purchased or fitted the product. 4. The Product Recall therefore is dependent upon identifying the person who actually purchased the product. 5. The purchaser is likely to be a professional electrician, yet is not required to keep a register of such items that he/she purchased and fitted nor is he/she required to inform the supplier/manufacturer of the details of the end user. 6. As a consequence it seems that the Product Recall was always likely to be ineffective. (It would be interesting to know how many products the manufacturer thought were affected and how many responses they had to the Product Recall Notice). 7. It seems to me that these concerns are not unique to fuse boxes, but that there are many potentially lethal products which are fitted into domestic properties which are purchased by a third party rather than the occupier. ”

    Source location

    BRIAN DAVID BETTERTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of product recalls to reach end users when products are purchased or fitted by third parties

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The Product Recall relates to a product supplied between April 2009 and February 2010. 2. The Product Recall did not come to the attention of the deceased. 3. In the majority of cases the end user of the product will not have purchased or fitted the product. 4. The Product Recall therefore is dependent upon identifying the person who actually purchased the product. 5. The purchaser is likely to be a professional electrician, yet is not required to keep a register of such items that he/she purchased and fitted nor is he/she required to inform the supplier/manufacturer of the details of the end user. 6. As a consequence it seems that the Product Recall was always likely to be ineffective. (It would be interesting to know how many products the manufacturer thought were affected and how many responses they had to the Product Recall Notice). 7. It seems to me that these concerns are not unique to fuse boxes, but that there are many potentially lethal products which are fitted into domestic properties which are purchased by a third party rather than the occupier. ”

    Source location

    BRIAN DAVID BETTERTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to require purchasers to provide suppliers or manufacturers with end-user details

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The Product Recall relates to a product supplied between April 2009 and February 2010. 2. The Product Recall did not come to the attention of the deceased. 3. In the majority of cases the end user of the product will not have purchased or fitted the product. 4. The Product Recall therefore is dependent upon identifying the person who actually purchased the product. 5. The purchaser is likely to be a professional electrician, yet is not required to keep a register of such items that he/she purchased and fitted nor is he/she required to inform the supplier/manufacturer of the details of the end user. 6. As a consequence it seems that the Product Recall was always likely to be ineffective. (It would be interesting to know how many products the manufacturer thought were affected and how many responses they had to the Product Recall Notice). 7. It seems to me that these concerns are not unique to fuse boxes, but that there are many potentially lethal products which are fitted into domestic properties which are purchased by a third party rather than the occupier. ”

    Source location

    BRIAN DAVID BETTERTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish a product recalls and safety working group to identify improvements to recalls and product safety.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I recognise that the public needs to be reassured that the system for consumer product safety is working and that where unsafe electrical goods are identified they are dealt with swiftly and effectively. Product safety is a priority of this Government and we already have comprehensive legislative regulation to ensure products are safe before being placed on the market. In addition, in October 2016 I set up the Working Group on Product Recalls and Safety to bring together product safety experts, the fire service and trading standards professionals to identify where improvements could be made to the system of product recalls and safety.”

    Source location

    2017-0224-Response-by-Department-for-Business-Energy-Industrial-Strategy
    Page 1 · response
    Published 5 October 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Take action to implement recommendations from the Working Group on Product Recalls and Safety.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Working Group published its recommendation on how to improve recalls and reduce fires in white goods on 19 July. The Government will be responding shortly but we have already taken action to implement many of the Working Group’s recommendations. We have supported the development of a new BSI (the British Standards Institution) code of practice on corrective action and recalls which was recently the subject of public consultation. We have also commissioned research to understand how to increase the impact and effectiveness of product safety messages, so that more consumers respond to recalls.”

    Source location

    2017-0224-Response-by-Department-for-Business-Energy-Industrial-Strategy
    Page 1 · response
    Published 5 October 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Support development of a BSI code of practice on corrective action and product recalls.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Working Group published its recommendation on how to improve recalls and reduce fires in white goods on 19 July. The Government will be responding shortly but we have already taken action to implement many of the Working Group’s recommendations. We have supported the development of a new BSI (the British Standards Institution) code of practice on corrective action and recalls which was recently the subject of public consultation. We have also commissioned research to understand how to increase the impact and effectiveness of product safety messages, so that more consumers respond to recalls.”

    Source location

    2017-0224-Response-by-Department-for-Business-Energy-Industrial-Strategy
    Page 1 · response
    Published 5 October 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Commission research into increasing the impact and effectiveness of product safety messages and recall responses.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Working Group published its recommendation on how to improve recalls and reduce fires in white goods on 19 July. The Government will be responding shortly but we have already taken action to implement many of the Working Group’s recommendations. We have supported the development of a new BSI (the British Standards Institution) code of practice on corrective action and recalls which was recently the subject of public consultation. We have also commissioned research to understand how to increase the impact and effectiveness of product safety messages, so that more consumers respond to recalls.”

    Source location

    2017-0224-Response-by-Department-for-Business-Energy-Industrial-Strategy
    Page 1 · response
    Published 5 October 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Upgrade the Government recalls website to provide current recall information and enable direct contact about future appliance recalls.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Government’s recalls website at www.productrecall.campaign.gov.uk has been further upgraded so that consumers can quickly check for the latest recalls and register their appliances to allow them to be contacted directly about any future recalls of their products.”

    Source location

    2017-0224-Response-by-Department-for-Business-Energy-Industrial-Strategy
    Page 1 · response
    Published 5 October 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Respond to the Working Group’s recommendations on improving recalls and reducing white-goods fires.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Working Group published its recommendation on how to improve recalls and reduce fires in white goods on 19 July. The Government will be responding shortly but we have already taken action to implement many of the Working Group’s recommendations. We have supported the development of a new BSI (the British Standards Institution) code of practice on corrective action and recalls which was recently the subject of public consultation. We have also commissioned research to understand how to increase the impact and effectiveness of product safety messages, so that more consumers respond to recalls.”

    Source location

    2017-0224-Response-by-Department-for-Business-Energy-Industrial-Strategy
    Page 1 · response
    Published 5 October 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Building Regulations matters are the responsibility of the Department for Communities and Local Government, which is conducting a review.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “These changes, while aimed at consumers, will also make it easier for tradespeople to check for any safety recalls of products they are installing. I have fed the important points that you raise into the development of the BSI code of practice and I have also asked my officials to share your concerns with colleagues in the Department for Communities and Local”

    Source location

    2017-0224-Response-by-Department-for-Business-Energy-Industrial-Strategy
    Page 1 · response
    Published 5 October 2017

    Open published response
  4. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    John Wilson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John Wilson died in hospital on 9 August 2016 after suffering burns and multiple fractures while escaping a house fire caused by a faulty Beko fridge freezer. The principal concerns were that the product recall may not have reached the Wilsons and that further direct attempts to contact customers with recalled products were not made, despite a further death in 2014 and the increasing fire risk as the products aged.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure recalled-product customers receive effective direct notification

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence of ████████ Quality Manager UK and Ireland, Beko plc was that ████████ were written to on 22nd July 2011 and again on 27th September 2011 to inform them of the product recall. There was no evidence that the letters had been sent or that they had not been delivered as they were sent using standard mail rather than recorded or registered post. The Wilsons did not respond. It was the evidence of the family that they did not receive any such letters and that they were unaware of the product recall pertaining to the fridge/freezer they had purchased, by now almost 6 years previously. They had a few years previously received notice of recall of a Hotpoint product and had responded to that. ████████ told the Inquest that as the Wilsons had not contacted Beko following the recall letters their details were passed to OnCall to carry out a door knocking campaign. Beko had no record of OnCall attending the Wilsons address. However, Beko produced a record of British Gas attending on 21st June 2012, which stated that a letter was left as there was no answer. It came to light during the course of the Inquest that there was a second death in 2014 from a house fire attributed to a recalled model of a Beko fridge/freezer. No further action was taken to make direct face to face contact with ████████ or any other of the customers who had purchased the estimated 80,000 remaining recalled products. I heard evidence of a number of media campaigns and targeting of specific groups through other organisations, such as for example Age Concern. These were however limited in their breadth. ████████ evidence was that the rationale of the door knocking campaign was to make direct contact with the occupants at that particular address, and that is what OnCall and/or British Gas were contracted to do. It was surprising therefore that Beko accepted failure to make contact on just one attempt and that no further attendance at the property was expected or required. There are clearly many reasons why a person may not be at home and I would have anticipated a second or even third attendance, at different times of the day and/or day, before it could be said that a reasonable door knocking campaign had been undertaken. In this particular case the evidence was that because of his poor health Mr Wilson hardly went out and spent most of his day in the downstairs front room of the house. It seems highly likely that on a second visit direct contact would have been made with Mr Wilson. 1. that more could have been done to ensure that the product recall came to the attention of ████████ and that the additional step required to do so was not an onerous one. 2. that no further direct attempts were made either by registered post or recorded delivery or a second door knocking campaign following the second death in 2014 ”

    Source location

    John Wilson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Jonathan David Weatherley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jonathan David Weatherley died from injuries sustained in an incident in which the bonding between carbon-fibre blades and an aluminium fork crown failed after he probably applied his front brakes. Concerns were raised about shortcomings in recall notices issued in October 2015 and March 2016, including the need to identify all known problems and potentially affected products and to alert as wide an audience as possible.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Shortcomings in product recall notices

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) There were shortcomings in the Recall Notices which were issued in October 2015 and in March 2016. ”

    Source location

    Jonathan David Weatherley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. London (East)

    AI-generated summary

    Joseph Allison · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Joseph Allison died after the upper trunnion assembly of his Minivator 2000 stairlift failed, throwing him down the stairs and causing cervical vertebrae and head injuries. He subsequently died from bronchopneumonia. Concerns included inadequate training and equipment for service engineers, the absence of a nationally publicised safety recall, and insufficient communication to the stairlift industry about the risks of unimproved stairlifts.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to undertake a nationally publicised safety recall campaign for end-users

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) No nationally publicised safety recall campaign has been undertaken to alert end-users to the danger, or request that such users contact the manufacturer for access to the remedial programme ”

    Source location

    Joseph Allison · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reiterate to manufacturers the need for written dealer agreements covering recalls and field-safety work, and for using industry channels to raise awareness.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4 The business did raise the matter at one of our meetings (minutes of which are distributed to all relevant members) and we have discussed how to improve notifications and co-operation throughout the supply chain. We will reiterate to manufacturers the need to have written agreement with their dealers setting out what will be expected of them in the event of a recall or the need for field safety work; and that they should make full use of ourselves and the publications read by businesses in the sector to raise awareness.”

    Source location

    2015-0103-Response-by-BHTA
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 March 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct a national newspaper advertising campaign warning end users about the defect and requesting contact for remedial access.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We will be conducting a national advertising campaign in the publications identified to us by external specialists as having the highest readership and best national coverage. This will run between Monday 15th June and Sunday 4th July. Adverts will run on various days in the following publications: The Sun (National), The Scottish Sun, the Daily Mail and the Mail on Sunday.”

    Source location

    2015-0103-Response-by-Handicare
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 March 2015

    Open published response
  7. North London

    AI-generated summary

    Santosh Benjamin Muthiah · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Santosh Benjamin Muthiah died after a fire spread through his home while he and his family were sleeping, with the medical cause recorded as cerebral anoxia due to inhalation of fire fumes. The report raised concerns about the identification and communication of appliance-fire information, risks from recalled and second-hand refrigeration appliances, product safety risk assessments, guidance and notification practices, and the construction and components of refrigeration appliances, including capacitors.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of second-hand market controls for recalled or safety-notice products

    Wider context from the report

    “8. I heard evidence from the LFB witnesses who gave some evidence that defective products on the second hand market pose a continuing risk to consumers. 9. There is no clear system in place to ensure that products subject to a safety notice or recall are not sold, unmodified, on the second hand market. By way of example, the LFB has recently identified several unmodified Beko fridge freezers which are subject to the safety notice, for sale in a second hand retailer. This lack of regulation or market surveillance of the second hand market poses a risk to consumers. ”

    Source location

    Santosh Benjamin Muthiah · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026