Recurring concern

Unreliable hospital switchboard access and handling of urgent clinical requests

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 4 Nov 2014•Latest report 29 Dec 2023

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in hospital switchboard arrangements involving access, call routing, recording, escalation, follow-up or coordination of urgent clinical and specialist-care requests, including delayed contact with tertiary services and requests that may otherwise go unanswered.

Not included

  • Excludes general clinical communication, referral or on-call contact failures where the hospital switchboard is not the deficient process.
  • Excludes downstream clinical assessment, treatment or specialist-care failures after a request has been reliably routed and followed up.
  • Excludes generic telephone outages or public emergency-call failures outside a hospital switchboard context.
  • Excludes failures limited to routine non-urgent administrative calls without a patient-safety or urgent-care consequence.
Reports
3

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
3

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2023

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
5

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1
Care Quality Commission1
Department of Health and Social Care1
NHS England1
Parents of Tommi-Ray Colin Vigrass1
South Warwickshire University NHS Foundation Trust1
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust1
Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Coventry and Warwickshire

    AI-generated summary

    Andrew Douglas Guillaume · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Andrew Douglas Guillaume was admitted to Warwick Hospital on 5 June 2023 with shortness of breath and a cough, and was later assessed as likely having severe aortic stenosis requiring urgent referral. He deteriorated, was admitted to the Cardiothoracic Critical Care unit at UHCW on 19 June 2023, and died on 20 June 2023; concerns included difficulties contacting the UHCW switchboard, lack of awareness of an emergency contact number, and the absence of a completed referral preventing discussion at a multi-disciplinary meeting.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of Medical Consultants and staff to access the UHCW switchboard

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The inability of Medical Consultants and staff to get through to the switchboard at UHCW on two occasions. ”

    Source location

    Andrew Douglas Guillaume · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish a 24-hour, seven-day direct communication escalation process.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have agreed to explore the technological options that may improve this however, in the interim we have agreed an escalation process that now provides a direct line of communication 24 hours, seven days per week.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals Conventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share the confirmed escalation arrangement with other providers across the system.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This arrangement has been confirmed with SWUFT following the tabletop review and we will also share this with the other Providers across the System. We hope this provides assurances, and I would like to assure you that we will continue to explore communication improvements as part of our digital plans.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals Conventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a short-term cross-organisational process for clinical conversations, referrals and escalation safety-netting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition to the work that had been carried out in response to the Serious Incident (SI) Review, the meeting identified work streams/themes which will be progressed by the two organisations. These include both short and longer term work to improve communications between SWFT and UHCW. Although many of these are still a work in progress I will, obviously, be happy to keep you updated.”

    Source location

    Response from South Warwickshire University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop longer-term technological alternatives for accessing clinical teams and making referrals between organisations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition to the work that had been carried out in response to the Serious Incident (SI) Review, the meeting identified work streams/themes which will be progressed by the two organisations. These include both short and longer term work to improve communications between SWFT and UHCW. Although many of these are still a work in progress I will, obviously, be happy to keep you updated.”

    Source location

    Response from South Warwickshire University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The concerns predominantly fall within the relevant NHS trusts’ remit, including UHCW, so they should be addressed to those trusts.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The matters of concern raised in your Report predominantly fall under the remit of the relevant Trusts, South Warwickshire University NHS Foundation Trust (SWFT) and University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust (UHCW). I note that you have addressed your Report to SWFT, but you may also wish to address your concerns to UHCW.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Responsibility for addressing communication about patient-transfer referrals primarily rests with the Trusts involved.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The matters of concern raised are primarily for the Trusts to address, and I note both the South Warwickshire University NHS Foundation Trust (SWFT) and the University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust (UHCW) have addressed your concerns in detail in their responses. Local collaborations and working options are being explored to develop long term technological solution and short-term measures so this does not happen again. Several recommendations and actions have also been completed by the SWFT which address your concerns directly. I also note that NHS England has replied and are sighted on the issues you raised.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 January 2024

    Open published response
  2. Black Country

    AI-generated summary

    Tommi-Ray Colin Vigrass · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Tommi-Ray Colin Vigrass was born prematurely at 28+2 weeks’ gestation and developed respiratory distress requiring ventilator support. Following difficulties with changing and re-inserting his endotracheal tube, he suffered a hypoxic episode and significant brain damage, and died on 13 January 2016. Concerns included the decision-making around extubation and intubation, delayed contact with the tertiary unit, and inadequate handover and preparation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays and problems in contacting the tertiary unit through the switchboard

    Wider context from the report

    “2. In addition, it emerged that there were problems and delays in trying to contact the tertiary unit via the switchboard. ”

    Source location

    Tommi-Ray Colin Vigrass · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish an out-of-hours Regional Cot Locator service to facilitate contact with tertiary neonatal units.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. You may also wish to consider expediting the process to establish a system to contact tertiary units within our area to minimise any delays in contacting the relevant staff for advice.”

    Source location

    2016-0241-Response-by-Walsall-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 8 June 2016

    Open published response
  3. Blackpool and the Fylde

    AI-generated summary

    Mark Bentley Hudson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mark Bentley Hudson was admitted to hospital for chest pain, underwent urgent coronary artery bypass surgery, and later suffered cardiac arrests. During the second arrest, specialist assistance was delayed or may not have been contacted, and an oesophageal intubation went unrecognised; the concern was that procedures for urgent CICU requests via the switchboard were not sufficiently robust.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of Hospital Switchboard procedures to ensure follow-up of urgent specialist care requests

    Wider context from the report

    “Although encouraged by the steps that have been / are being taken internally at the Hospital further to this death, I remain concerned that there is a real risk that when the need arises for urgent provision of specialist care within the CICU department, such requests may go unanswered or be delayed. If CICU staff request such assistance via the Hospital Switchboard personnel at the hospital, I am concerned that the procedures in place are insufficiently robust to the extent that requests may not be followed up appropriately and to the potential detriment of the Patient requiring that urgent help. ”

    Source location

    Mark Bentley Hudson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026