Recurring concern

Unreliable management of patients’ fluid requirements

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 24 Sep 2014•Latest report 7 Apr 2025

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in the patient fluid-management process, including determining and communicating fluid restrictions or requirements, prescribing and recording intravenous fluids, reviewing fluid charts and outcomes, and coordinating fluid decisions across responsible clinical staff.

Not included

  • Excludes failures to provide adequate fluids where the asserted concern is solely omission or insufficiency of fluid provision rather than unreliable management of fluid requirements.
  • Excludes electrolyte, renal or dialysis management concerns unless the report specifically identifies patient fluid requirements or fluid-management decisions as the unsafe condition.
  • Excludes generic clinical documentation, communication or staffing deficiencies unless they directly impair management of a patient’s fluid requirements.
  • Excludes unrelated medication, nutrition or hydration concerns where fluid requirements, restrictions or fluid treatment are not the bounded safety condition.
Reports
11

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
11

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2025

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
16

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Care Quality Commission2
NHS Central East Integrated Care Board2
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust2
Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1
Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust1
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport1
Department of Health and Social Care1
Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine1
General Medical Council1
Hc-One Limited1
Lakeview Care Home1
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust1
Milton Keynes University Hospital1
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence1
NHS Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes Integrated Care Board1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Cambridgeshire and Peterborough

    AI-generated summary

    Christian James Gabriel Hobbs · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Christian James Gabriel Hobbs, a 17-year-old, suffered an acute deterioration at home and was taken to hospital on 26 December 2017, where he developed cardiac arrest and died after treatment was stopped. The inquest recorded multi-organ failure, cardiogenic shock and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. Concerns included the absence of an echocardiogram before his arrest, non-targeted fluid management, delays in obtaining blood gases, team communication, radiology documentation, differential diagnosis, ECG interpretation, record keeping and emergency-department alarm data retention.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to target intravenous fluid management against patient response

    Wider context from the report

    “POINT C - FLUID MANAGEMENT Intravenous fluids were commenced but these were not targeted against response. Christian remained hypotensive and tachycardic despite the fluid administration. This is an area of concern also. ”

    Source location

    Christian James Gabriel Hobbs · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 16 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver training and education on fluid management and maintaining fluid-balance charts.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “C. Fluid Management The Trust acknowledges historical concerns regarding fluid management and the maintenance of fluid balance charts, but significant training and education have since been provided. In Christian’s case, gaining intravenous access was challenging due to hypoperfusion caused by cardiogenic shock, resulting in fluids being administered later than ideal, leaving minimal time to evaluate the response.”

    Source location

    Response from North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 April 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Initial clinical management was appropriate because infection or sepsis was more likely than the much less likely diagnosis of cardiomyopathy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “From your report, the RCEM feels that the initial clinical management in this case was appropriate given the greater likelihood of infection or sepsis being the cause of Christian’s presentation than the much less likely diagnosis of cardiomyopathy. We further feel that the clinical management plan which prioritised the delivery of time critical therapy followed by an assessment to see if the interventions had been effective was appropriate.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal College of Emergency Medicine
    Page 1 · response
    Published 15 April 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing data show fluid management is not recurrent, while ward accreditation and matron audits provide ongoing monitoring and quality improvement.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• From analysis of patient safety data since 2017, fluid management has not emerged as a recurrent theme within North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust (NWAF T). Furthermore, fluid balance monitoring forms part of the Trust’s ward accreditation programme, which reviews wards against a range of national care standards. It is also embedded within the Trust’s core matron audit programme, ensuring ongoing oversight and quality improvement. The Trust continues to hold the responsibility to ensure that it will share any emerging themes or risks to the ICB in the monthly Integrated Quality Report.”

    Source location

    Response from Cambridgeshire and Peterborough ICB
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 April 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Trust remains responsible for sharing emerging fluid-management themes or risks with the ICB through the monthly Integrated Quality Report.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• From analysis of patient safety data since 2017, fluid management has not emerged as a recurrent theme within North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust (NWAF T). Furthermore, fluid balance monitoring forms part of the Trust’s ward accreditation programme, which reviews wards against a range of national care standards. It is also embedded within the Trust’s core matron audit programme, ensuring ongoing oversight and quality improvement. The Trust continues to hold the responsibility to ensure that it will share any emerging themes or risks to the ICB in the monthly Integrated Quality Report.”

    Source location

    Response from Cambridgeshire and Peterborough ICB
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 April 2025

    Open published response
  2. Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

    AI-generated summary

    Paul Byron Holmes · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Paul Byron Holmes sustained fractured ribs and a fractured sternum in a road traffic collision on 4 April 2022, followed by hospitalisation, delirium, dehydration and declining health. He died at home on 29 May 2022 after returning for palliative care. Concerns included inadequate doctor-to-doctor handover and recording of the treatment plan during a hospital transfer, and a prescription error that delayed intravenous fluids.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Errors in writing prescriptions for intravenous fluids

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) An error in the writing out of a prescription for intravenous fluids at the Royal Cornwall meant that the administration of hydrating fluids at Liskeard Community Hospital was delayed. ”

    Source location

    Paul Byron Holmes · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver human-factors and medication-error training through the revised LEAD programme for leaders, supervisors, and managers, with completion monitored electronically.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst training regarding human factors and medication has previously been delivered on an ad hoc basis to all professional groups in the Trust, it is also now part of the revised LEAD programme aimed at all leaders, supervisors, and managers in RCHT. Specific reference to medication errors is made to ensure learning in personal awareness but also that the conditions we create for ourselves (and others) can contribute to slip and lapse errors which can be seen in tasks such as transcription and completing care related tasks.”

    Source location

    Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 28 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Returning prescriptions to the original prescriber cannot safeguard against prescription errors outside normal hours because medical cover is limited.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “CFT recognise that an additional option in such circumstances would be for the receiving ward to return to the original prescriber to rectify any prescription issues. Upon review with ward managers, this course of action is routinely taken when prescription errors are detected in normal operating hours, however this is not a safeguard which would apply in the out-of-hours scenario which impacted Mr Holmes.”

    Source location

    Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 28 June 2024

    Open published response
  3. Milton Keynes

    AI-generated summary

    Alexander Shone BLEWITT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Alexander Shone Blewitt died at Milton Keynes University Hospital on 11 July 2022 after returning to the emergency department with faecal incontinence and abdominal pain, following an earlier visit where he had been referred from an urgent care centre. A possible acute abdomen was confirmed by CT, and he suffered a cardiac arrest before surgery. Concerns included inaccurate communication of important symptoms and treatment information, inadequate clinical recording, and the absence of reliable records of intravenous fluids administered in the emergency department.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to correct and monitor prescribing clinicians' failure to sign off IV fluid prescriptions

    Wider context from the report

    “[5] The Incident Investigation Report which is in part designed to assist with learning from adverse events was of a generally poor standard. There was a failure to consider issues in detail; there was a failure to challenge the statements of clinicians where there were obvious contradictions between statements made and the medical record; there was a failure to put in place measures to correct and monitor prescribing clinicians failure to sign off on IV fluid prescriptions so that the contemporaneous record would be available for clinicians coming after them and they could see whether a patient had satisfactory or unsatisfactory fluid management. The only record in the case was a typed note by a junior doctor to the effect that it was thought Mr Blewitt had received 2 litres of fluid since arrival. ”

    Source location

    Alexander Shone BLEWITT · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use quality-improvement methods to improve monitoring, review, antibiotics, fluid management, escalation and antimicrobial stewardship for sepsis.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Sepsis QI Group will use quality improvement methodologies to provide assurance on current performance and to drive further improvement in areas contained within the relevant NICE quality statements, including:”

    Source location

    Response from Milton Keynes University Hospitals
    Page 8 · response
    Published 23 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Write to registered Emergency Department staff highlighting the case, referral-note review, electronic prescribing, fluid documentation, short-infusion orders and timely sepsis treatment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Chief Nurse and I will be writing to all registered staff in the ED to highlight the key elements of Mr Blewitt’s case, and to remind them of the issues referenced in this letter:”

    Source location

    Response from Milton Keynes University Hospitals
    Page 8 · response
    Published 23 June 2023

    Open published response
  4. Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

    AI-generated summary

    Coco Bradford · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Coco Bradford, a 6-year-old girl with autism, developed diarrhoea and vomiting, was diagnosed with haemolytic uraemic syndrome, deteriorated despite treatment and died in Bristol on 31 July 2017. The substantive concerns relate to the size and review of intravenous fluid boluses, when to escalate intensive care, and how clinicians should weigh antibiotic treatment when bacterial gastroenteritis and possible sepsis coexist because antibiotics may worsen haemolytic uraemic syndrome.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide for careful reassessment after each IV fluid bolus

    Wider context from the report

    “1) In April 2009, NICE published CG 84 on Diarrhoea and Vomiting caused by gastroenteritis in Under 5s and management. Paragraph 1.3.3 deals with IV fluid management for patients presenting with shock. The guidance suggests rehydration with rapid IV infusion at 20mls/kg. The guidance is now a little dated and it is at odds with the Resuscitation Council UK Guidelines issued in 2021 which provide that for children and infants presenting with shock, fluid should be given in boluses of 10mls/kg – there is an emphasis on smaller boluses with careful re-assessment after each bolus to enable early identification of signs and symptoms of fluid overload. This was particularly relevant in Coco’s treatment where there was concern she may develop HUS with associated compromise of kidney function. As there appears now to be a move towards smaller boluses of fluid with more frequent review, it may be that you will also feel it appropriate to reconsider when to escalate care to colleagues in intensive care i.e. whether it should still be after two boluses or after a particular total amount of fluid. ”

    Source location

    Coco Bradford · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Blackpool and the Fylde

    AI-generated summary

    Douglas OWENS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Douglas Robert Owens developed acute cardiac failure, hypotension, aspiration pneumonia and multi-organ failure after cataract surgery, treatment for raised intraocular pressure, ongoing eye pain and painful urinary retention. He died in intensive care on 7 July 2018. Concerns included arrangements for urgent ophthalmic transfer, specialist assessment, monitoring and review of deterioration, fluid documentation, and recording medication doses.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete prescription and fluid balance charts for prescribed fluids

    Wider context from the report

    “(5)That the evidence disclosed the fact that, whilst fluids had been prescribed, no prescription chart or fluid balance chart had been completed. Unless action is taken to ensure the completion of applicable documentation, the lives of patients may be put at risk. ”

    Source location

    Douglas OWENS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct regular Emergency Department spot audits and huddles to verify NEWS2 recording, prompt escalation and completion of fluid charts.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the interim, the Head of the Emergency Department and the Matron will ensure senior clinical staff will undertake regular spot audits / huddles, to ensure all patients in the ED have their NEWS2 score recorded correctly, that any changes in score are acted upon promptly and that fluid charts are completed correctly and acted upon promptly. The ED complete a Consistency in Care Audit daily, where 40 patients’ notes (approximately 20% of all patients daily) are reviewed in real time and this includes a review of the NEWS 2 and fluid balance. This is used to monitor the compliance and manage any inconsistencies in care at the time. Additionally the ED undertakes an intentional round, where all patients who have been in the department for longer than 4 hours, are reviewed by the EPIC (Emergency Physician in Charge) to ensure that appropriate plans of care are in place.”

    Source location

    2020-0210-Response-from-Blackpool-Teaching-Hospitals_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 December 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete daily real-time Consistency in Care Audits reviewing NEWS2 and fluid-balance compliance and manage identified inconsistencies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the interim, the Head of the Emergency Department and the Matron will ensure senior clinical staff will undertake regular spot audits / huddles, to ensure all patients in the ED have their NEWS2 score recorded correctly, that any changes in score are acted upon promptly and that fluid charts are completed correctly and acted upon promptly. The ED complete a Consistency in Care Audit daily, where 40 patients’ notes (approximately 20% of all patients daily) are reviewed in real time and this includes a review of the NEWS 2 and fluid balance. This is used to monitor the compliance and manage any inconsistencies in care at the time. Additionally the ED undertakes an intentional round, where all patients who have been in the department for longer than 4 hours, are reviewed by the EPIC (Emergency Physician in Charge) to ensure that appropriate plans of care are in place.”

    Source location

    2020-0210-Response-from-Blackpool-Teaching-Hospitals_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 December 2020

    Open published response
  6. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Mary Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mary Jones had an accidental unwitnessed fall, was treated surgically and transferred for rehabilitation, and died on 3 March 2019 after developing acute pneumonia alongside congestive heart failure and acute kidney injury. Concerns included an out-of-hours transfer and admission, delayed falls-risk assessment, poor fluid-chart documentation, loss of records during an IT merger, absent or untraceable nutrition-related referrals, and no clear clinical review of fluid-chart outcomes.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to clinically review fluid chart outcomes

    Wider context from the report

    “6. There was no evidence of clear clinical review of the outcome of the fluid charts. ”

    Source location

    Mary Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  7. Black Country

    AI-generated summary

    Mrs Margaret Melia · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mrs Margaret Melia was admitted to Dovetail Court Care Home in October 2018, later developed declining food and fluid intake, was admitted to hospital with dehydration and a lower respiratory tract infection, and died on 7 November 2018 while receiving end-of-life palliative care. The inquest identified an inadequate discharge and pre-assessment process between Lakeview Care Home and Dovetail Care Home concerning the requirement for subcutaneous fluids.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate discharge and pre-assessment process for subcutaneous fluid requirements

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Evidence emerged during the inquest that there was an inadequate discharge and pre-assessment process between Lakeview Care Home and Dovetail Care Home over the requirement of subcutaneous fluids. ”

    Source location

    Mrs Margaret Melia · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review organisational pre-admission and admission policies and practices.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We reviewed our policies and practices as an organisation in relation to our pre-admission and admission processes.”

    Source location

    2019-0320-Response-by-HC-One
    Page 1 · response
    Published 6 November 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the current admission process checklist.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We reviewed the current Admission process checklist.”

    Source location

    2019-0320-Response-by-HC-One
    Page 1 · response
    Published 6 November 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Include guidance requiring further information when pre-admission assessment occurred more than five days before admission, including medication and healthcare review updates.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “On reviewing our practices, we identified that if a delay occurred between the pre-admission assessment conducted, there needed to be clearer guidance set out for colleagues within our Admission, Transfer and Discharge Procedure (Appendix 1). We have now included practice that in the eventuality the pre-assessment was completed more than five days prior to admission to the home, further information should be sought from the hospital ward/care home/social worker as soon as possible. This will include the update of any medication changes or outcome of any recent healthcare professional reviews of the person during this period, to avoid any misunderstanding that could result in harm.”

    Source location

    2019-0320-Response-by-HC-One
    Page 1 · response
    Published 6 November 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Cascade the revised admission practice across homes through the Homes’ Bulletin.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The changes to practice have been cascaded across the organisation via our Homes’ Bulletin, which is sent to our homes.”

    Source location

    2019-0320-Response-by-HC-One
    Page 1 · response
    Published 6 November 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the admission process checklist across all homes to reflect the revised practice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our Admission process checklist (Appendix 2), which is available within all our homes to ensure all aspects of the organisation’s pre-admission and admission processes are completed, has been updated to reflect this improvement in practice.”

    Source location

    2019-0320-Response-by-HC-One
    Page 1 · response
    Published 6 November 2019

    Open published response
  8. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Michael William Flynn · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Michael William Flynn underwent elective hip replacement surgery and required a blood transfusion. He subsequently experienced inadequate Early Warning Score monitoring, failures to follow escalation procedures, incomplete fluid-balance monitoring, and a lack of timely clinical review before suffering cardiac arrest and dying on 17 July 2018.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to reference fluid balance charts when prescribing further fluids

    Wider context from the report

    “10. A fluid balance chart was requested and fluids prescribed. It was not completed fully and in particular the necessary calculations to understand Mr Flynn's fluid position were not made. The trust policy was not followed regarding completion. The doctor who saw Mr Flynn on the morning of 16th July 2018 prescribed further fluids without reference to the fluid charts. ”

    Source location

    Michael William Flynn · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Distributed a learning bulletin on monitoring and completing fluid balance charts.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Medical Education Manager has advised that fluid balance management is included in the AIMS training that is provided to junior doctors commencing at the Trust and the Patient Safety Team have drafted and distributed a ‘Time out for Learning’ bulletin focusing on the importance of monitoring and completing fluid balance charts.”

    Source location

    2019-0008-Response-by-Tameside-and-Glossop-Care-NHS-Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 23 May 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Intravenous fluids were clinically appropriate based on clinical assessment and blood parameters, despite concerns they were prescribed without reference to the fluid balance chart.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “With regards to your concerns that fluids were prescribed for Mr. Flynn without reference to the fluid balance chart, I understand from ████████ that following the ward round conducted on the morning of 16 July 2018, and based on the clinical assessment and blood parameters noted at that time, it was clinically appropriate for fluids to continue intravenously, and to be re-prescribed. I understand from ████████ that once an improvement in Mr. Flynn's renal function was noted on the afternoon of 16 July 2018, the correct decision was taken to discontinue the intravenous fluids.”

    Source location

    2019-0008-Response-by-Tameside-and-Glossop-Care-NHS-Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 23 May 2019

    Open published response
  9. Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    MR. ANTHONY GEERTS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr. Anthony Geerts sustained a fractured neck of femur, underwent surgery and was transferred for rehabilitation before being moved to a nursing home. He later returned to hospital with hospital-acquired pneumonia and a possible urinary tract infection, and died on 21 November 2014. The concerns included inadequate rehabilitation, incomplete records and monitoring, poor communication and discharge planning, and failures in managing his continence, fluid restriction and possible chest infection; the inquest concluded that neglect at Princess Royal Hospital contributed to his death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to document and adhere to fluid restrictions

    Wider context from the report

    “Mr. GEERTS went to Princess Royal Hospital to Twineham Ward (the Ward which specialise in Rehabilitation patients coming from The Royal Sussex County Hospital in Brighton). Mr. GEERTS came with a fractured neck of femur which had been timeously operated. He was determined to return home to his wife who depended on him. He lived in Brighton and Hove and was disappointed to be going to Haywards Heath for rehabilitation as he knew how difficult it would be for his family to visit so regularly. In Brighton he had received physiotherapy and been regularly reviewed. In Haywards Heath he was effectively abandoned from the 6th. His notes give no clue as to how he was cared for. His physiotherapy notes end abruptly with no plan. I was told nurses on this rehabilitation ward had been asked to look after him as (a) There was insufficient physiotherapy staff to do so and (b) Without any or any effective consultation, the decision had been made that he was to be discharged to highgrove Nursing Home as soon as possible after the 6th. Neither Mr. GEERTS nor his family were involved in this decision. Mr. GEERTS had suffered long term mental health issues. These were ignored during his stay at Princess Royal Hospital. His anxieties were not addressed in any meaningful way. He was given no assistance after the 6th. Having been told he was to be transferred for further rehabilitation, Mr. GEERTS remained very anxious about the impending move and about the lack of communication and particularly the lack of physio. For reasons unexplained satisfactorily to this day, he was moved out of Twineham Ward late on the 10th, Bailey Ward was unaware of his needs. He was incontinent of urine. On the 11th he was transferred to the discharge ward from where he contacted his daughter 3 times. He arrived in a poorly state at Highgrove in the mid afternoon. This resulted in him being unable to participate fully in any of the Highgrove activities, nor could he settle in. He was back at The Royal Sussex County Hospital on the 16th with Hospital Acquired Pneumonia and ? urinary tract infection. No more physiotherapy was possible and in spite of ongoing treatment he deteriorated to his death on the 21st. Specifically at Princess Royal Hospital: • Notes not completed. • No nursing notes and no NEWS for 10th or 11th • Fluid chart not completed. Fluid restriction not properly documented. Fluid restriction effectively disregarded. • No plan for physiotherapy • No rehabilitation on Rehabilitation Ward from 6th -10th. Exercise on the 10th not properly documented. • No proper notes of Rationale for transfer to Bailey Ward on 10th/11th. Transfer procedure not followed. Transfer not documented. • No referral of lack of urinary continence. Therefore no plan regarding this. • Failed Trial without catheter on 3rd November 2014. • Bowel monitoring chart not complete • Discharge planning non-existent or inadequate • Communication with patient and family virtually non-existent • No senior review from 4th November 2014; possibility of chest infection not followed up. • Should have had a blood test as requested on 11th November 2014. Did not and therefore unnecessary extra 48 hours on fluid restriction. • Discharge lounge information incorrect. ”

    Source location

    MR. ANTHONY GEERTS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce integrated documentation for all clinical staff treating patients on Twineham ward.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “b) introduction of integrated documentation for use by all the clinical staff treating each patient on the ward”

    Source location

    2015-0240-Response-by-Brighton-and-Sussex-University-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 June 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and deliver a Twineham ward training package on accurate documentation and the consequences of poor documentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “c) joint development of a training package for all the staff based on Twineham ward, by the senior physiotherapy and nursing staff, to assist with accurate and detailed documentation. This includes a specific focus on the potential consequences of poor documentation”

    Source location

    2015-0240-Response-by-Brighton-and-Sussex-University-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 June 2015

    Open published response
  10. Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Mrs. Evelyn KENNEDY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mrs. Evelyn KENNEDY was an 89-year-old woman who died in hospital on 29 October 2014 after admission following recurrent falls. The inquest concluded that she died of hospital-acquired pneumonia and that her death was probably accelerated by a short time because of the effects of her five-day admission to the Acute Medical Unit. Concerns included incomplete handover and poor personal care, missing identification and risk bands, inadequate monitoring and documentation, missed medication and nutritional support, and failures to escalate clinical deterioration.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record fluid intake and output

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Once again my concerns involve the Acute Medical Unit (AMU). (2) Mrs. KENNEDY was transferred from AMU in a chair, not a trolley. (3) Handover was incomplete and unhelpful. (4) She arrived unkempt. (5) She had porridge leaking from her mouth; it took 20 mouth sponges to give her adequate mouth care. (6) She felt cold and said she was cold. (7) She had been incontinent of faeces and had not been cleaned for some time. (8) She had no name wrist band. (9) In spite of known allergies she had no allergy wrist band. (10) In spite of falling regularly she had no falls risk wrist band. (11) She still had an IV cannula in place; this should have been removed after 72 hours. (12) Her daily catheter care bundle had not been completed for 3 days. (13) She had no fluid charts for 16th, 17th, 18th, 19th or 20th. (14) Care plans were not completed for 17th, 18th, 19th or 20th. (15) Repositioning charts were incomplete or poor for 16th, 17th, 18th and 19th. (16) The handling assessment was not completed for 16th, 18th, 19th or 20th. (17) No food chart was completed for her entire time in AMU. (18) She had pressure damage to her hips and bottom. (19) No daily oral assessment was completed for her entire time on AMU. (20) She was not weighed. (21) The malnutrition tool was not completed. (22) Her bowel movements were not recorded. (24) NEWS scores of 4 to 9 had not been escalated to doctors nor filled in on her drug chart. PLUS (25) No personal care over the weekend of 18th and 19th. (26) No senior review over that weekend. (27) Not written up for her Sertraline, therefore not given (28) Not written up for any food supplements until 21st October. (29) She should have been specialled, but wasn’t. Once again AMU has been found to be chaotic and not fit for purpose. ”

    Source location

    Mrs. Evelyn KENNEDY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor documentation more closely and provide nurses with real-time feedback.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Changes, introduced mainly before the inquest into Mrs Kennedy’s sad death as part of the ongoing programme of improvements, include:”

    Source location

    2015-0178-Response-by-Brighton-and-Sussex-University-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 May 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and condense Acute Medical Unit documentation into multidisciplinary paperwork that directs care and reduces duplication.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Extensive and complex work is also being undertaken to”

    Source location

    2015-0178-Response-by-Brighton-and-Sussex-University-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 7 May 2015

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026