Recurring concern

Failure to provide required medication promptly when clinically needed

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 4 Sep 2013•Latest report 17 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in the medication-provision process that delay or prevent clinically required medication from being prescribed, processed, dispensed or administered when needed, including delayed usual medication after admission and delayed urgent therapeutic medication.

Not included

  • Excludes long-term medication review, medication reconciliation, dosage verification and medication administration concerns when timely provision of required medication is not the shared unsafe condition.
  • Excludes failures limited to medication continuity across care transitions where the issue is maintaining uninterrupted access rather than promptly initiating or providing medication when clinically needed.
  • Excludes medication shortages, prescribing inappropriateness or monitoring failures that do not directly cause delayed or absent provision of clinically required medication.
  • Excludes generic staffing, communication, documentation or electronic-system deficiencies unless they directly result in delayed or absent provision of the required medication.
Reports
32

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
34

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
51

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust3
Department of Health and Social Care2
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust2
Royal Cornwall Hospital2
Royal Free Hospital2
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust2
Aneurin Bevan University LHB1
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB1
Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1
Coastal Homecare – Hove Branch1
Community Disability Nurse1
Droylsden Road Family Practice1
Dr Simon Chapple1
General Pharmaceutical Council1
Hc-One Limited1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Suffolk

    AI-generated summary

    Jake Harvey READ · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jake Harvey READ was declared deceased at home on 5 May 2025 after sustaining self-inflicted knife injuries. He had attended an emergency department two days earlier seeking mental health support but left before planned Diazepam was prescribed. The principal concerns were the absence of national guidance or timelines for administering medication during mental health agitation or crisis, and the lack of direct access to the medication for a qualified non-medical prescriber, which contributed to a delay in prescribing.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of direct access to required Mental Health medication for Mental Health Liaison Team Non-Medical Prescribers in Emergency Departments

    Wider context from the report

    “My second concern is that at the time of Jake's attendance on 3rd May 2025, one of the Mental Health Liaison Team staff who spoke to Jake at 17:30 was a qualified Non-Medical Prescriber, who could have prescribed the Diazepam to Jake herself. However, at that time, even though a Mental Health Liaison Team Non-Medical Prescriber had assessed Jake required an immediate dose of Diazepam, this clinician had no direct access to the required drug. Therefore, at that time, the Non-Medical Prescriber had to request an Emergency Department clinician to prescribe it for them. In Jake's case this caused the 2 hours and 44-minute delay between clinical observations being completed and drug prescription being made. Evidence was heard that the East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Trust and the Norfolk and Suffolk Foundation Trust have changed the system at the Ipswich Hospital, and now the Mental Health Liaison Team Non-Medical Prescribers are able to both prescribe and access prescription medications within the Emergency Department, without the need to request an Emergency Department clinician to prescribe it for them. When asked, the witness providing this evidence could not say whether the same provision was available in hospitals other than those covered by the relevant trusts. As such, it is not known if direct access to Mental Health medication by Mental Health clinicians working in an Emergency Department is just a local arrangement, or if it is replicated in other jurisdictions? ”

    Source location

    Jake Harvey READ · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Responsibility for relevant clinical guidance, NHS service delivery and oversight sits with NHS England.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The report raises concerns about the availability of guidance on the administration of medication to patients in a state of agitation or crisis, particularly in relation to timelines; and the ability of non-medical prescribers to both prescribe and access prescription medicines in emergency departments for patients presenting in such circumstances. Responsibility for these matters, including relevant clinical guidance, service delivery and oversight of NHS services, sits with NHS England. NHS England is also responsible for coordinating the regional response where appropriate and is therefore best placed to provide a detailed response to the concerns identified in your report.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response
  2. West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    John Malcolm FISHER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John Malcolm Fisher was admitted to hospital on 22 April 2025 with persistent focal seizures that developed into status epilepticus, and he died on 4 May 2025 after the seizures could not be controlled. The report raises concerns about inaccurate or incomplete medication information during transfers between community services and the omission of sodium valproate from the care agency’s medication record, resulting in six days without that medication.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Risk of discontinued or essential seizure-control medication being incorrectly administered

    Wider context from the report

    “Overall, after hearing evidence over two days regarding the administration of Mr Fisher's AED medication, I remain concerned that patients in the community are at risk of either being given medication that has been discontinued by a GP or not being given essential medication to control seizures. ”

    Source location

    John Malcolm FISHER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the MAR chart SOP with guidance on discontinued medicines remaining in patients’ homes and mandatory GP second checks for discrepancies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The SOP is being updated to include explicit guidance on the management of recently discontinued medications that remain physically present in the home, including a mandatory second check with the GP where discrepancies arise.”

    Source location

    Response from Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen escalation pathways by referring complex medicines-reconciliation issues to senior clinicians and SCFT pharmacy support.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Clear escalation pathways have been strengthened, including referral to senior clinicians and SCFT pharmacy support for complex medicines reconciliation.”

    Source location

    Response from Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver staff briefings and training aligned with the revised MAR chart SOP after approval.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The SOP is being updated to include explicit guidance on the management of recently discontinued medications that remain physically present in the home, including a mandatory second check with the GP where discrepancies arise.”

    Source location

    Response from Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide staff with Plexus shared-care-record access for real-time GP medication summaries.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Since October 2025, SCFT staff have access to shared care records via the Plexus system (which links digital care records across Sussex GP’s, hospital and community healthcare services as well as local authorities), enabling real-time access to GP medication summaries and reducing reliance on emailed or static information.”

    Source location

    Response from Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 26 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Embed pharmacy support within the UCR and General Virtual Ward model for complex or unclear medication regimes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Pharmacy support is now embedded within the UCR/General Virtual Ward model, providing timely expert advice where medication regimes are complex or unclear.”

    Source location

    Response from Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 26 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise and implement UCR referral documentation to require receiving agencies to reconcile medicines with prescribers and pharmacies and clarify that UCR MAR charts are for SCFT staff only.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• UCR referral documentation is being revised to clearly reinforce current agreements that receiving care agencies must undertake their own medicines reconciliation directly with the prescriber and community pharmacy.”

    Source location

    Response from Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 26 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen referral-pathway expectations that medicines reconciliation is confirmed when care responsibility transfers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• SCFT has strengthened expectations within referral pathways that medicines reconciliation must be confirmed at transitions of care, particularly where responsibility for medicines administration is transferring.”

    Source location

    Response from Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 26 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require staff to cross-check medicines against prescribing records, administration records, and referral documentation during handover.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The following changes have now been implemented:”

    Source location

    Response from Coastal Homecare
    Page 3 · response
    Published 26 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Integrate GP Connect into the digital platform and current practice to verify medicines and identify recent changes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• At the time Mr Fisher was receiving support from our service, GP Connect access was not available to our digital platform. Since October 2025, we have fully integrated GP Connect to our digital platform, and into current practice as an additional safeguard to support safer medication management and continuity of care. Subject to appropriate consent arrangements and patient opt-out rights, authorised staff are now able to review GP medication summaries to verify prescribed medicines and identify recent medication changes during referral, assessment, and handover processes. This has strengthened our ability to cross-check medication information and identify discrepancies at an early stage.”

    Source location

    Response from Coastal Homecare
    Page 3 · response
    Published 26 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Record each person’s dispensing pharmacy and require escalation to relevant healthcare professionals when medication discrepancies or uncertainties arise.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We recognise, however, that some medication changes initiated within hospital settings, Urgent Community Response services, or other secondary care pathways may not always be immediately reflected within GP Connect records. Our revised procedures therefore also require liaison with relevant healthcare professionals, including pharmacists, and specialist teams, where appropriate, to support safe and accurate medication management.”

    Source location

    Response from Coastal Homecare
    Page 3 · response
    Published 26 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require all staff to complete additional Epilepsy Awareness training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• All staff are now required to complete additional Epilepsy Awareness training as part of our ongoing commitment to strengthening knowledge, understanding, and safe practice across the service. Additionally, representatives of the organisation have attended the Local Authority’s Medication Adults: Epilepsy Awareness, Seizure Management and Buccal Midazolam training to further enhance our medication management procedures though continued learning.”

    Source location

    Response from Coastal Homecare
    Page 3 · response
    Published 26 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Attend Local Authority training on epilepsy awareness, seizure management, and buccal midazolam.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• All staff are now required to complete additional Epilepsy Awareness training as part of our ongoing commitment to strengthening knowledge, understanding, and safe practice across the service. Additionally, representatives of the organisation have attended the Local Authority’s Medication Adults: Epilepsy Awareness, Seizure Management and Buccal Midazolam training to further enhance our medication management procedures though continued learning.”

    Source location

    Response from Coastal Homecare
    Page 3 · response
    Published 26 March 2026

    Open published response
  3. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Elise Kay Louise Sebastian · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Elise Kay Louise Sebastian tied a fatal ligature in her room on Longview Ward on 17 April 2021 and died two days later in hospital. The principal concerns included inadequate and falsified observations, insufficiently trained and staffed ward personnel, poor communication about ligaturing and self-harm, medication-recording errors, failures involving Oxevision, and other care and record-keeping deficiencies.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to enter and administer re-prescribed medication

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Elise’s medication changes whilst in mental health hospital were not correctly entered onto the medication chart: a. Elise asked for changes to her medication and then reported that these changes were not therapeutic. It was agreed with her consultant that her previous regime would be implemented. The medication was crossed out and removed from the prescription chart. Sertraline 200mg was re-prescribed by the consultant but not entered onto the medication chart and not administered. b. Nursing staff did not query the sudden cessation of medication for treating mental health with no replacement or explanation given. Elise suffered a significant deterioration in her mental health during this time, the frequency and severity of ligatures increased, and Elise had to be placed under section 3 Mental Health Act. c. There was no pharmacist scrutiny just prior to the Bank Holiday and the medication error was only noted when questioned by Elise’s family when she went on home leave. ”

    Source location

    Elise Kay Louise Sebastian · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement electronic prescribing and medicines administration safeguards against omitted medicines during prescription-chart changes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has since intruded an electronic prescribing and medicines administration (ePMA) system. This new system provides safeguards around prescribing. ePMA will help prevent inadvertent omission of medicines which could occur when a paper drug chart reached completion and has to be rewritten.”

    Source location

    2026-0078 - Response from Essex University Partnership Trust
    Page 6 · response
    Published 13 February 2026

    Open published response
  4. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Paolino AMICO · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Paolino Amico, who had metastatic bladder cancer and advanced clinical frailty, was admitted with severe bilateral pneumonia and died in hospital on 12 June 2024. He received multiple overdoses of slow-release morphine following a prescription error, with concerns also raised about medication administration, delayed emergency escalation, oxygen provision after discharge, and the management of morphine reversal and pain relief.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to administer prescribed medication

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Mr Amico did not receive his prescribed medications during his second admissions when he was readmitted to hospital on 9 June. a. On 9 June a doctor in Accident & Emergency had reviewed Mr Amico’s prescribed medications and increased liquid oral morphine sulphate 10 mg in 5mL Solution 4 hourly as required with 2.5 -5 mg max 6 doses at 22:57 hours with slow released morphine sulphate (MST) continued 2 times daily. Trust staff did not administer any morphine to Mr Amico although he and his family were raising concerns about his high level of pain. b. The family was informed incorrectly that medications had not been prescribed. On the morning of 10 June, the family were given permission by a nurse to dispense from Mr Amico’s own supply of medications that he had brought to the hospital due to his level of pain. This was not accurately recorded in Mr Amico’s record. Mr Amico took his prescribed morning dose of MST. c. On 10 June the nurse in Accident & Emergency did not escalate to the nurse in charge or a senior doctor that she could not locate the doctor allocated to Mr Amico and instead approached a foundation year 1 doctor to prescribe pain relief for Mr Amico. The nurse informed the doctor who was junior and very busy that the frequency of the morphine needed to be increased for Mr Amico. The doctor did not escalate the matter and did not review Mr Amico before prescribing a controlled drug. d. Neither the nurse nor the doctor sufficiently scrutinised the medication prescribed on 9 June or on the Trust system that would have shown the correct medications. This led to a prescription error being made with MST being increased from 2 times daily to 4 times daily. Mr Amico was not referred for pain management. e. Mr Amico then moved to a ward. Multiple nurses were involved in checking and administering a controlled drug morphine sulphate slow release (MST) on 5 separate occasions between 10 and 11 June 2024 and did not raise concerns about the potential for a prescription error or note that Mr Amico had already received 1 dose of MST that morning. ”

    Source location

    Paolino AMICO · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Education and training alone would not sufficiently mitigate recurrence; systems improvements and mechanisms are also required.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The NICE medicines optimisation guidance NG 5 (2015) referenced above recommends that organisations support healthcare professionals through training and education to ensure safe prescribing, dispensing and administration. In this specific case, education and training alone would not prevent these types of safety system issues and would not be sufficient to mitigate the risk of reoccurrence. Systems improvements and mechanisms will need to be implemented to ensure lessons are learnt and that the current organisational and systems factors and processes highlighted in this case are addressed, to ensure the safe and effective checking and administration of medications. This has been substantiated by safety research and incident analysis.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 4 · response
    Published 19 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The hospital trust is responsible for providing the response and addressing the reported concerns through its governance arrangements and actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust will be providing their own response to this Report, however, the Hertfordshire & West Essex ICB have advised NHS England of the Trust’s governance arrangements and actions being taken to address the concerns raised. It is understood that the Trust’s Patient Safety Group (PSG) has active oversight of several of the areas highlighted in the Report, particularly medicines safety, recognition of deterioration, and incident learning.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 4 · response
    Published 19 November 2025

    Open published response
  5. Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

    AI-generated summary

    Tracey Oldfield · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Tracey Oldfield underwent an elective fistula revision procedure on 17 October 2024 and was admitted after developing low oxygen saturations and low blood sugars. She became drowsy and unresponsive after receiving opiate pain relief that was contraindicated in end-stage renal failure, while her CPAP device was unavailable and there was no senior medical review. She suffered a cardiac arrest, developed a hypoxic brain injury, and died on 24 October 2024. A continuing concern was the timely prescription of patients’ usual medication after unexpected admission, including appropriate pain relief.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure timely prescription of usual medication for late and unexpected admissions

    Wider context from the report

    “One point that did not appear to have been fully resolved, however, centred on the need for patients who are admitted late and unexpectedly (of which the PSII recorded there are over 1,000 annually) to have their usual medication prescribed in timely fashion. On the facts of this case, Tracey was prescribed insulin when the family informed clinical staff she had a diagnosis of diabetes. Her pain relief was not prescribed at the same time, however, and as she became more uncomfortable after the nerve block used intra-operatively wore off, this resulted in her being prescribed opiates (inappropriately) rather than her usual Gabapentin. There was debate at the inquest as to who would be best placed to prepare the prescription and when. Matron ████████ thought it could be done by an anaesthetist who would be reviewing the patient pre-operatively in any event. ████████ (Head of Patient Safety) felt it could be better done by a junior doctor when a patient was admitted and clerked in. On the facts of this case, Tracey was not seen by a junior doctor (other than to have an insulin prescription) and was not formally clerked in. ”

    Source location

    Tracey Oldfield · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish a multidisciplinary clinical group to advise on strengthened governance for timely, accurate prescribing after unexpected day-case admissions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. A multidisciplinary group of relevant clinicians has been established to advise strengthening existing governance related to safe, accurate and timely prescribing of a patient’s regular medications following unexpected hospital admission following Day Case Surgery. It will report to Clinical Effectiveness Group on 25th March 2026 for action plan sign off prior to implementation by 27th May 2026.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Cornwall Hospital
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Submit the prescribing governance action plan to the Clinical Effectiveness Group for sign-off before implementation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. A multidisciplinary group of relevant clinicians has been established to advise strengthening existing governance related to safe, accurate and timely prescribing of a patient’s regular medications following unexpected hospital admission following Day Case Surgery. It will report to Clinical Effectiveness Group on 25th March 2026 for action plan sign off prior to implementation by 27th May 2026.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Cornwall Hospital
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Identify systems that alert relevant staff when day-surgery patients are unexpectedly admitted, including their location, admission reason and responsible consultant.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “i. Identify the systems used which alert all day surgery patients with an unplanned inpatient admission due to unexpected change in clinical condition including location, reason for admission and responsible consultant. ii. Ensure all current patient data platforms triangulate and provide accurate information on this patient subset to the site co-ordination office, responsible senior and resident doctors. Influence the planning and implementation of the new integrated clinical care platform, eCare to further strengthen tracking these patients. iii. Ensure a responsible consultant is identified and aware of the patient admission at the time of admission. This consultant can either be the operating clinician, or the relevant specialty on-call consultant if the admission occurs out of hours. iv.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Cornwall Hospital
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ensure patient-data platforms triangulate accurate information about unexpected day-surgery admissions for the site-coordination office and responsible doctors.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “i. Identify the systems used which alert all day surgery patients with an unplanned inpatient admission due to unexpected change in clinical condition including location, reason for admission and responsible consultant. ii. Ensure all current patient data platforms triangulate and provide accurate information on this patient subset to the site co-ordination office, responsible senior and resident doctors. Influence the planning and implementation of the new integrated clinical care platform, eCare to further strengthen tracking these patients. iii. Ensure a responsible consultant is identified and aware of the patient admission at the time of admission. This consultant can either be the operating clinician, or the relevant specialty on-call consultant if the admission occurs out of hours. iv.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Cornwall Hospital
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ensure a responsible consultant is identified and aware of each unexpected day-surgery admission at admission.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “i. Identify the systems used which alert all day surgery patients with an unplanned inpatient admission due to unexpected change in clinical condition including location, reason for admission and responsible consultant. ii. Ensure all current patient data platforms triangulate and provide accurate information on this patient subset to the site co-ordination office, responsible senior and resident doctors. Influence the planning and implementation of the new integrated clinical care platform, eCare to further strengthen tracking these patients. iii. Ensure a responsible consultant is identified and aware of the patient admission at the time of admission. This consultant can either be the operating clinician, or the relevant specialty on-call consultant if the admission occurs out of hours. iv.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Cornwall Hospital
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ensure medical and nursing staff follow pharmacy prescribing policies, including medicines reconciliation focused on high-risk medicines.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “v. Ensure medical and nursing staff adhere to existing pharmacy prescribing policies including medicines reconciliation with a focus on ‘high risk medications’ such as insulin, opioids, anticoagulants, psychotropics and immunosuppressants.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Cornwall Hospital
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share the patient-safety review and PFD findings with care-group leadership and clinical-governance teams for dissemination to day-surgery services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. Immediate Response pending implementation of the above workstreams: The findings of the PSR2 and PFD report and response will be shared with Care group leadership and clinical governance teams at Patient Safety Incident Review Oversight Group (PSIROG), with a request to cascade to all clinical specialty groups and teams providing day surgery services to review and strengthen current practice to ensure patients unexpectedly admitted following day surgery under go full clerking by a resident doctor with review of regular medications with appropriate senior oversight.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Cornwall Hospital
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit postoperative prescribing for all inpatients admitted after day-case surgery against the five workstream recommendations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. Following implementation, we will audit postoperative prescribing of all patients admitted as inpatients following day case surgery against each of the five workstream recommendations. This audit will be commissioned and monitored by the Clinical Effectiveness Group with an expected completion date in September 2026. Any learning and further work identified will be reviewed by the group 25th November 2026.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Cornwall Hospital
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review learning and further work identified through the postoperative prescribing audit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. Following implementation, we will audit postoperative prescribing of all patients admitted as inpatients following day case surgery against each of the five workstream recommendations. This audit will be commissioned and monitored by the Clinical Effectiveness Group with an expected completion date in September 2026. Any learning and further work identified will be reviewed by the group 25th November 2026.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Cornwall Hospital
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 November 2025

    Open published response
  6. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Robert Tom Duke SIMPSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Robert Tom Duke SIMPSON underwent a hemicolectomy for colonic cancer on 4 June 2024, developed hospital-acquired pneumonia and an anastomotic leak, and was discharged home on 28 June while awaiting drainage. He deteriorated after discharge, was admitted as an emergency on 1 July, and died on 9 July 2024 after further treatment and two peri-arrests. Concerns included the provision of medication that did not belong to him, missed antibiotic doses because the drug was out of stock, and a lack of evidence about how these medication failures occurred or were managed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure availability and escalation of necessary prescribed medication

    Wider context from the report

    “1. It was accepted by the Trust that the deceased had been provided and discharged with medication (gabapentin) that did not belong to him and had missed two doses of antibiotics (fidaxomin) due to the drug being out of stock, which had not been communicated to or escalated to treating clinicians. 2. In evidence the Trust were unable to confirm whether the issues set out in 1. above sat solely with the nursing team or also involved pharmacy. 3. Whilst evidence was given in relation to the discharge nurse having undertaken reflection and a focus group being set up to explore improvements with discharge and planning there was no evidence as to how the wrong medication was provided to the deceased and whether this was a discharge only issue or also an issue with allocation and distribution of medication by pharmacy or by ward staff. 4. There was no evidence to explain how the deceased missed two doses of antibiotics due to the drug being out of stock, why treating clinicians were not informed or why an alternative antibiotic was not administered in its place. The Trust were unable to talk to what, if any, systems were in place to ensure that patients were not left without necessary medication. 5. I am concerned that there may still be a risk to life of patients within the trust if they are provided with the wrong medication or miss necessary doses of prescribed medication. ”

    Source location

    Robert Tom Duke SIMPSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Circulate a Trust patient-safety notice reinforcing procedures for obtaining and escalating time-critical medicines, using safety huddles, meetings, newsletters, and governance channels.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “These medicines omissions have been retrospectively reported on the Trust RADAR incidents system and immediate actions have been taken to address the procedural failings with the individual responsible nurses. The patient safety incident and learning have been shared across surgical and medical inpatient clinical teams. To strengthen awareness, a Trust patient safety notice will be circulated to reinforce the process for obtaining time-critical medicines both in and outside of normal working hours, to reduce the risk of missed administrations across the organisation. The notice will be shared in department Safety Huddles, Ward team meetings, Newsletters, Clinical Assurance and Care Quality meetings.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 14 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen induction and Medicines Management training on missed doses, time-critical medicines, escalation, and staff accountability for medicines administration.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Induction training materials for healthcare professionals involved in medicines administration will be strengthened to emphasise the management of missed doses of time-critical medicines, including the requirement to escalate to the medical team where a dose is likely to be missed or has been omitted. The Trust Medicines Management Moodle training package is also under review, so will strengthen any sections on missed doses/time critical medicines for all clinical substantive professionals.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 14 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Fidaxomicin was available throughout admission; missed doses resulted from nursing failures to record and communicate its location, not pharmacy supply failure.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Fidaxomicin was available either on the ward, in main pharmacy or within the emergency drug cupboard at Solihull Hospital throughout Mr Simpson’s admission and accessed as per the medicines code. On the 16 June 2024, the drug was in the bedside secure locker however nursing handovers had failed to communicate and/or document on PICS noting, where the medication was being securely stored and the RNs were not routinely checking the bedside lockers before administrations. In the event a registered nurse cannot locate a drug dose, then the emergency drug cupboard should be utilised. Fidaxomicin has low usage as it is a restricted antibiotic used as a second line treatment for clostridium difficile or on the recommendation of a microbiologist. Fidaxomicin is a high-cost medication (£1,600 for a box) and is therefore not recommended as a stock drug on any location across UHB clinical areas.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    UHB Pharmacy could not have prevented the missed doses because they occurred outside normal hours and Fidaxomicin was available through emergency drug cupboards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There are no actions UHB Pharmacy could have taken to prevent either of the missed doses as the incidents occurred out of normal working hours, and the drug was available in the emergency drug cupboard and dispensed directly to the ward. The expected standard for any omission of prescribed medication is that the omission is immediately escalated to the nurse in charge of the shift as per policy and procedure (medicine code).”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 August 2025

    Open published response
  7. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Abu RAHMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Abu Rahman, aged 88, suffered a traumatic fall causing a fractured hip and underwent hemi-arthroplasty before deteriorating with pneumonia on a background of end stage renal failure. Concerns included delays in obtaining Naloxone when supplies ran out and limited awareness of opioid toxicity or accumulation in patients with kidney impairment or failure.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure timely availability of Naloxone

    Wider context from the report

    “Firstly, I heard evidence from the family that nursing staff were frequently unable to administer Naloxone as it had run out. They had to obtain more Naloxone from the pharmacy, which led to delays for “hours and hours” on multiple occasions. Secondly, I heard evidence concerning a lack of awareness or appreciation concerning the risk of opioid toxicity / accumulation in patients with kidney impairment/failure, even where the “correct” dose may have been given. I am concerned that if there is no proper or properly implemented system for obtaining medication in a timely manner, and limited awareness of the matters canvassed above, then this gives rise to a risk of future deaths. ”

    Source location

    Abu RAHMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver two weeks of safety-huddle sessions on accessing and replenishing Naloxone, including out-of-hours arrangements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Clarity on the process of accessing Naloxone, including out of hours, should stock need replenishing will be shared at daily huddles for two weeks. In addition, pharmacy will be increasing the stock level on 8 North ward to reduce the likelihood of it not being immediately available. Stock levels have been increased from 2 boxes to 3 boxes which under expected usage levels provides a sufficient supply for more than 24 hours.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Free Hospital
    Page 2 · response
    Published 1 April 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Increase ward 8 North Naloxone stock from two to three boxes and audit stocking consistency.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Clarity on the process of accessing Naloxone, including out of hours, should stock need replenishing will be shared at daily huddles for two weeks. In addition, pharmacy will be increasing the stock level on 8 North ward to reduce the likelihood of it not being immediately available. Stock levels have been increased from 2 boxes to 3 boxes which under expected usage levels provides a sufficient supply for more than 24 hours.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Free Hospital
    Page 2 · response
    Published 1 April 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Access to Naloxone on ward 8 North was not disrupted; unusually high usage caused the delay in administration.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Access to Naloxone during Dr Rahman’s time on 8 North was not reported to be disrupted and his medication chart records that it was administered to him between 24 minutes and 1 hour following the prescription being made, despite the significant quantity that was used. It was concluded that this was a highly unusual circumstance, in which Dr Rahman was receiving ongoing infusions, requiring an unusually large quantity of Naloxone, as a result impacting the time to administer.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Free Hospital
    Page 2 · response
    Published 1 April 2025

    Open published response
  8. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Billie Diane WICKS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Billie Wicks, aged 16, was brought to hospital with an asthma attack and was discharged without adequate repeat observations or senior clinical review. The report states that her asthma was not diagnosed or treated and that she died from infective exacerbation of asthma. Concerns included understaffing and inadequate observations, delayed antibiotic treatment, lack of awareness of adult-onset asthma, and the limitations of safety-netting advice after her parents had already sought hospital care.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to administer the first antibiotic dose in the emergency department

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The registrar who saw Billie the night before her death prescribed an antibiotic, but he was not in the habit of giving the first dose in the department and he did not on this occasion. This meant that Billie’s infection was not tackled as quickly as it could have been. This seems to indicate a training and potentially a guideline need. ”

    Source location

    Billie Diane WICKS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide mandatory induction and continuing teaching on paediatrics, deterioration, escalation, TTA medication use and individualized safety-netting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• All new doctors starting in the Emergency Department, now receive a mandatory teaching session at induction focusing on paediatrics and paediatric deterioration and escalation with regular sessions timetabled ongoing to maintain this education.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Free Hospitals
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Progress plans for dedicated emergency-department pharmacy provision through the business-case approval process.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The addition of an ED pharmacist would support reliable stocking of medications, provide access to critical medications out of hours, education throughout the department and provide continuous and vital expertise. The lack of pharmacy resource within the Emergency Department is noted to be an area of concern. It is recognised and is continually monitored, risk mitigations have been identified, and actions are currently being driven to try to resolve this in the form of a business case. The business case is currently progressing through an approval process with a comprehensive action plan in place whilst this gap remains.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Free Hospitals
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ensure sufficient adult TTA medication stock and assign medication-stock responsibilities in job planning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This pharmacy resource has also been explored in greater detail in the Patient Safety Incident Investigation (PSII) and appropriate actions have been added to monitor progress of the business case previously referred to. An additional action to ensure there is sufficient supply of medication in the adult TTA stock cupboard in the Emergency Department and to include medication stock responsibilities in job planning has been agreed to further support the ED team in this area, this is being led by the Divisional Clinical Director for this area.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Free Hospitals
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Earlier antibiotics were unlikely to have altered Billie’s outcome because the infection was likely viral, although earlier treatment may benefit similar patients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “After a thorough review by the multidisciplinary team (MDT) panel, it was determined that antibiotics were unlikely to have altered the outcome, as the infection was likely to be viral in nature. The panel agreed that while initiating antibiotics at an earlier stage was unlikely to have altered the outcome for Billie, it may well alter the course of other patients in similar circumstances.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Free Hospitals
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    No national guidance or clear rationale supports requiring clinicians to administer the first antibiotic dose absent suspected allergy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Antibiotic administration It is good practice for the prescribing and administration of medicines to be performed by different practitioners [8]. There is current guidance on the management of sepsis. This would suggest that for sepsis without shock, antibiotics should be administered within three hours [9]. It is unclear whether Billie had sepsis. Guidance for the time to administer the first dose of antibiotics in people with infection without sepsis are less prescriptive. RCEM notes that Billie was discharged after about three and a half hours. It is assumed that she was given antibiotics at discharge, to self-administer. Antibiotics are only part of the management for an exacerbation of asthma thought to be secondary to a bacterial”

    Source location

    Response from Royal College of Emergency Medicine
    Page 1 · response
    Published 17 March 2025

    Open published response
  9. Lancashire and Blackburn with Darwen

    AI-generated summary

    Ava Grace HODGKINSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ava Grace HODGKINSON died in cardiac arrest at Ormskirk District General Hospital on 14 December 2022, following overwhelming sepsis caused by Group A Streptococcus infection. A delay in receiving antibiotics occurred because the prescribed strength was unavailable and the pharmacy could not issue a different strength that would have provided the same dose without an amended prescription.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Restrictions preventing pharmacists from issuing equivalent medication strengths to provide the same dose

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) In evidence at the inquest it was explained that the Ava had seen her GP who had prescribed amoxicillin with a dose of 250mg/5ml. The pharmacy did not have this strength in stock but did have amoxicillin 125mg/5ml in stock but could not issue this as restrictions currently in place prevent a pharmacist issuing any different strength of medication without an amended prescription, even where the medication can be provided to enable the same dose to be administered (here Ava's parents could have been instructed to provide 10ml enabling the same dose of antibiotics to be provided). This led to a delay in Ava receiving antibiotics. Evidence from the Department of Health and Social Care included that this issue was being actively considered but it was explained the issue was complex and any change was likely to need public consultation and ministerial support. It was also explained that it was not possible to provide any timeframe for any appropriate steps to be taken to consider changing the restrictions preventing pharmacists from issuing medication where they can provide the same dosage of the same medication in a different denomination. ”

    Source location

    Ava Grace HODGKINSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Explore new flexibilities allowing pharmacists, in appropriate circumstances, to supply alternative doses or formulations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Nevertheless, I am committed to my officials exploring new flexibilities. There has been a recent programme of engagement, since December 2024, as part of which my officials have discussed possibilities with stakeholders such as GP representatives, pharmacy bodies and patient groups. The stakeholder feedback has been sufficiently positive that the Government is minded, subject to the normal machinery of Government clearance processes, to proceed to a formal, public consultation.”

    Source location

    Response from DHSC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct and publish a public consultation on proposed medication-supply flexibilities, subject to governmental clearances and Northern Ireland involvement.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Nevertheless, I am committed to my officials exploring new flexibilities. There has been a recent programme of engagement, since December 2024, as part of which my officials have discussed possibilities with stakeholders such as GP representatives, pharmacy bodies and patient groups. The stakeholder feedback has been sufficiently positive that the Government is minded, subject to the normal machinery of Government clearance processes, to proceed to a formal, public consultation.”

    Source location

    Response from DHSC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 January 2025

    Open published response
  10. West Yorkshire Eastern

    AI-generated summary

    David Joseph Crompton · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    David Joseph Crompton, who had epilepsy, was left without his prescribed Tegretol for approximately 10 days in April 2024 and again in December 2024. His falls in both periods occurred when he was without the medication, and the inquest recorded a fall downstairs on 13 December 2024, with causes of death including hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and cervical spine injury. The principal concerns were delays in supplying essential anti-epileptic medication, reliance on family members to seek alternative supplies, and the absence of clear systems for managing medication shortages.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to obtain and supply prescribed anti-epileptic medication promptly

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) It is important that when anti-epileptic medication is prescribed by a GP that this is obtained and supplied promptly by the dispensing pharmacy. It is a matter of concern that for relatively lengthy periods on two occasions Mr Crompton was left without this important medication. ”

    Source location

    David Joseph Crompton · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inspect the pharmacy’s systems for managing out-of-stock medicines and supply issues.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The particular pharmacy has been inspected by our Inspection Team, who looked for evidence that the pharmacy was meeting our Standards for Registered Pharmacies. The purpose of these standards is to create and maintain the right environment in pharmacies to protect and improve people’s health and wellbeing. The inspection included looking for evidence about the systems in place to manage medicines which were out of stock at the pharmacy and where there were supply issues at the wholesalers. This was to ensure practices in the pharmacy relating to stock management were appropriate.”

    Source location

    Response from General Pharmaceutical Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The pharmacy’s staged process sought medication supplies, and referral to other pharmacies followed unsuccessful attempts to obtain the prescribed brand.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “(2) The evidence given by family members at the inquest was that when the pharmacy was unable to supply the prescribed Tegretol medication, it was left to them to contact other pharmacies to see if they could obtain it, rather than for the pharmacy to search for supplies.”

    Source location

    Response from Midway Pharmacy
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    National medication shortages prevented the pharmacy from obtaining the prescribed Tegretol medication and require a national resolution.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The process of managing owings is staged to ensure we obtain patients’ medications in a prompt and timely manner. On this occasion, only a single supplier (AAH Pharmaceuticals) had the medication in stock, and other Midway pharmacies could not obtain supplies. There was a clinical risk of changing the brand of medication supplied due to the condition being treated, and Mr Crompton was referred to other pharmacies that may have had the medication in stock.”

    Source location

    Response from Midway Pharmacy
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 January 2025

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026