Recurring concern

Unreliable documentation of mental health assessments

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 2 Nov 2018•Latest report 27 May 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures to complete, accurately record or retain templates, proformas and equivalent records documenting mental health assessments, mental-health presentations or associated welfare findings when the record is required for safe care, handover, review or escalation.

Not included

  • Excludes general clinical-record deficiencies where the missing information is not part of a mental health assessment or associated welfare assessment record.
  • Excludes failures to perform or clinically conduct a mental health assessment when documentation is not the deficient control.
  • Excludes care plans, risk assessments and treatment records when they are not the documentation of a mental health assessment or associated welfare finding.
  • Excludes generic staff training, communication or policy deficiencies unless they directly cause incomplete documentation of a mental health assessment.
Reports
9

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
10

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2018–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
13

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care2
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust2
NHS England2
Care Quality Commission1
Cygnet Health Care Limited1
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust1
Greater Manchester Integrated Care Partnership1
gtd healthcare1
Lincolnshire Police1
Manchester Royal Infirmary1
Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust1
Mitie1
National Police Chiefs’ Council1
Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust1
Recipient name withheld1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Abbigail Louise SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Abbigail Louise Smith was found at Braintree Recreation Ground on 15 February 2022 and was pronounced deceased shortly after midnight on 16 February 2022 from compression of the neck by ligature. The report describes concerns about failures in mental-health care, communication, staff training, risk assessment and discharge planning, including her discharge to supported living without an adequate plan to mitigate a known risk of self-harm.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inclusion of inaccurate patient information in AMHP assessment documentation

    Wider context from the report

    “5. Abbi deteriorated significantly at the end of January 2022 and February 2022 requiring police to take Abbi to a place of safety due to her presentation and level of self-harm and suicidality that required a Mental Health Act assessment. Professional concerns were raised about inaccurate clinical information contained in the documentation from the Approved Mental Health Act Professional (AMHP) that were about another patient. Abbi made a video about the contents of this letter that reinforced her view that professionals did not care about her. Abbi received an apology about the inaccuracies in this AMHP assessment shortly before her death. ”

    Source location

    Abbigail Louise SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The AMHP service falls outside the Trust’s remit because it is provided by Essex County Council.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Please note that the AMHP service is not provided by EPUT, this is provided by Essex County Council (ECC) who would be best placed to respond to this concern.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 13 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Essex County Council, which provides the AMHP service, is best placed to respond to concerns about that service.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Please note that the AMHP service is not provided by EPUT, this is provided by Essex County Council (ECC) who would be best placed to respond to this concern.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 13 August 2026

    Open published response
  2. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Abigail Louise SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Abigail Louise Smith was found at Braintree Recreation Ground on 15 February 2022 after unsuccessfully trying to suspend herself, and was pronounced dead at 00:08 on 16 February 2022 from compression of the neck. The report describes concerns about failures in mental-health care, including inaccurate records and diagnosis information, inadequate adjustments for autism and learning difficulties, medication-management problems, and discharge from detention without an effective plan to mitigate a known and immediate risk of suicide.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to accurately record changes in mental health diagnosis in discharge summaries

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Abbi spent most of her adult life detained and over 18 months in a specialist Tier 4 mental hospital having been transferred there by her local mental health trust. The Tier 4 specialist team agreed that Abbi did not have a personality disorder. This was a significant change for Abbi and was not accurately set out in the discharge summary. ”

    Source location

    Abigail Louise SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  3. Manchester West

    AI-generated summary

    Michaela FINCH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Michaela FINCH died on 2 August 2025 following combined drug toxicity after a period of acute mental health deterioration, alcohol misuse and an earlier non-fatal overdose. The report raises concerns that possible co-occurring mental health and addiction needs were not fully recognised, that family concerns were not effectively communicated to the assessing clinician, and that risk assessment, diagnosis, discharge and follow-up may have been inadequate. It also identifies possible funding limitations affecting access to escalated community-based care.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to document and identify co-occurring mental health and alcohol dependency disorders

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The deceased had a well established diagnosis of mixed anxiety and depressive disorder and profound alcohol dependency syndrome - in evidence, it was established that there was no recent documented mental health diagnosis, and that it was possible that the deceased ought to have been considered as suffering from “co-occurring disorder” (formerly ‘dual diagnosis’) and so eligible for a more active treatment and care escalation pathway, including a care co-ordinator. ”

    Source location

    Michaela FINCH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate an internal Co-Occurring Conditions group to develop a Trust-wide strategy, service offer and staff training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “████████ is working with senior leads and has established an internal Co-Occurring Conditions group to take forward the work required to equip our staff with the skills they need to work with people with co-occurring needs. This includes the development of a trust wide strategy that will inform the service offer and staff training.”

    Source location

    2026-0064 - Response from Greater Manchester Mental Health
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and update the Trust Co-Occurring Conditions Policy for publication.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust is currently reviewing and updating the Trust Co-Occurring Conditions Policy with a planned publication date of May 2026.”

    Source location

    2026-0064 - Response from Greater Manchester Mental Health
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver co-occurring-conditions training using the Dual Diagnosis Capability Framework, experts by experience and initial Wigan-focused workforce development, then share learning across the Trust.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust provides essential skills training for practitioners supporting people with co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders. A further Band 7 practitioner is currently being recruited to enhance the existing offer. This training will cover core capabilities for supporting people with co-occurring conditions based on the Dual Diagnosis Capability Framework 2019 and will include experts by experience on each of the courses. Given the emerging needs in the Wigan borough this workforce development programme will initially focus here, and any learning will be shared across the Trust.”

    Source location

    2026-0064 - Response from Greater Manchester Mental Health
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and provide formulation training for clinical staff across the Community and Acute Care Groups.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition to this training the Trust has commissioned it’s Psychological Therapies Training Centre to develop and provide formulation training to clinical staff across the Community and Acute Care Groups. This training will support staff to work collaboratively with patients to understand the whole person, identify their difficulties, which are often multi-faceted, what makes them worse and what might help and how this can guide treatment and support decision making.”

    Source location

    2026-0064 - Response from Greater Manchester Mental Health
    Page 3 · response
    Published 11 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Embed revised pathways with enhanced outreach, improved crisis interfaces and stronger support for co-occurring conditions during the third and fourth quarters of 2026/27.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Q3-Q4 2026/27: Embedding of revised pathways, including enhanced outreach, improved crisis interface and strengthened support for co-occurring conditions”

    Source location

    2026-0064 - Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 11 February 2026

    Open published response
  4. South London

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Paul Timothy Dunne · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Paul Dunne was brought to A&E after a paracetamol overdose and was considered at high risk of suicide, but did not receive continuous 1:1 observation. He absconded several times and was found dead after suspending himself in a nearby children's playground. Concerns included failures in risk assessment, observation, communication, documentation and escalation, as well as separate clinical-record systems used by mental health and A&E staff.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to document mental health assessments when no recording location is available

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Individual mental health professionals appeared to have gaps in knowledge and judgment. The director who was spokesperson for the Mental Health Trust did not appear to appreciate the seriousness of these deficits. • A mental health liaison nurse, who now is manager of these nurses, did not recognize the patient as high risk, despite his having been persuaded to attend A&E by the police against his will, having just expressed suicidal ideation, made a previous attempt, with alcohol intoxication and absconsion, as at the time he denied suicidality. Even in retrospect in court she did not acknowledge her misjudgement. She also asserted incorrectly that a patient who has mental capacity cannot be assessed under the Mental Health Act. • A mental health nurse of 9 years standing in the Home Treatment Team who acknowledged the risk to the patient’s life could hardly be higher, failed to document his assessment, as he could not find anywhere to write it before going on his break. No staff acknowledged that he had informed them of the risk. He assumed the patient would get 1:1 monitoring, but did not direct anyone to the need. When asked what he would have done if he had known there were no staff to conduct 1:1 monitoring, he said that he could perhaps hang around for a bit longer. ”

    Source location

    Mr Paul Timothy Dunne · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide funding to ensure NHS Trusts have electronic patient records implemented.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England is committed to improving the maturity and quality of Electronic Patient Records (EPRs) across all NHS Trusts. NHS England has provided funding to ensure all NHS Trusts have an EPR implemented. It is, however, up to individual NHS Trusts to effectively procure and implement their chosen EPR system, and to agree and progress any convergence of EPR systems within their local systems.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Investigating or acting against individual healthcare professionals falls outside the regulator’s authority.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. We recognise the distress and concern these events have caused and acknowledge the importance of accountability where there are apparent shortfalls in professional conduct or decision-making. However, it is important to clarify that the Care Quality Commission’s regulatory remit, as established under the Health and Social Care Act (2008) and the associated Regulated Activities Regulations (2014), is focused on assessing and holding providers rather than individual staff accountable for meeting fundamental standards of care. While we do not have the authority to investigate or act against individual healthcare professionals, we expect providers to ensure that their staff are competent, appropriately trained, and supported to deliver safe and effective care.”

    Source location

    Response from Care Quality Commission
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 February 2025

    Open published response
  5. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Leslie Andrew Swindells · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Leslie Andrew Swindells had a complex mental health background and, after his mental health deteriorated, was found unresponsive at home with self-inflicted puncture wounds to the neck. The concerns included assessment by a practitioner with limited mental-health training, lack of appropriate triage and escalation, failure to recognise and mitigate risk, telephone-based assessment, inadequate documentation, and unclear supervision arrangements.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Poor documentation of mental health assessment content

    Wider context from the report

    “7. The documentation of the practitioner was poor and did not reflect the content of the conversation which had been recorded and was available to the inquest. ”

    Source location

    Leslie Andrew Swindells · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide paper copies of clinical templates for use when electronic templates are inaccessible.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We recognise the concerns that you have raised into the documentation concerning Mr Swindells' appointment with the Assistant Practitioner. We have outlined at Section Two above the changes which were introduced to the standard templates utilised by Assistant Practitioners in their mental health and depression reviews. In addition to this, to ensure that accurate contemporaneous records are kept of all appointments with patients, clinicians have also been provided with hard copies of the templates to be used if they are unable to access the clinical system templates due to IT issues.”

    Source location

    Response from GTD Healthcare
    Page 8 · response
    Published 17 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Concerns about care and documentation should be addressed by the provider, rather than NHS England or the CQC.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Upon review, many concerns fall within the remit of the provider and their responsibility as an employer to meet the fundamental standards set out in Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.”

    Source location

    Response from DHSC
    Page 1 · response
    Published 17 October 2024

    Open published response
  6. West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Miles Ethan Hurley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Miles Ethan Hurley died at 5.58am on 10 July 2022 after intentionally driving his father’s car towards an HGV lorry while experiencing a psychotic episode. The report identified concerns about inadequate communication and documentation between police officers, the Liaison Diversion Service and mental health services, including the handling of family information and mental health assessments while he was intoxicated. It also identified gaps in guidance, availability and procedures for mental health assessment, appropriate adult support and ongoing care in custody.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide formal written LDS mental health assessments to police

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Lack of effective documentation and communication between the Liaison Diversion Service (LDS) and the police within the custody suite. a. The use of word of mouth rather than formal written documentation of a mental health assessment compromised the Police’s comprehension of the complexity and nuances of Mile’s mental health difficulties to assist in determining the most appropriate care. b. The lack of a documented recommended mental health ‘plan’ by the LDS to be followed whilst an individual remains in custody. c. A lack of nationally agreed guidelines as to when it would be appropriate to undertake a formal mental health assessment when an individual is known to be intoxicated when first detained. I heard evidence that it is not possible to rely on the findings of a formal mental health assessment if undertaken when an individual is intoxicated. Yet, The LDS mental health practitioner was tasked to do so in those circumstances resulting in a ‘qualified’ assessment the significance of which was not recognised prior to Miles’s release from custody. c. A lack of guidelines to support a LDS practitioner as to when it is appropriate to undertake a formal mental health assessment if an individual is intoxicated rather than feeling obliged to do so because of their availability. I heard evidence that the LDS mental health practitioner worked from 08:00-20:00 and would not have been available after those hours hence the request for an earlier mental health assessment. d. A lack of a 24 hour LDS service within custody despite mental health issues being prevalent throughout the day and night for individuals in custody. d. A lack of effective guidelines to assist the police on decision making as to whether an individual needs a further mental health assessment and/or an Appropriate Adult. The on call social worker (having spoken to Miles’s father), contacted the police to raise concerns about Miles’s mental health and the need to have a mental health assessment and an Appropriate Adult present. This was deemed not necessary by the interviewing officer. There appears to be a conflict in that the police accept they are not qualified to formally assess mental health issues but on the other hand they relied on their assessment that Miles did not need a further mental health assessment or for an appropriate adult to be present. e. Difficulty in being able to obtain collateral information to assist in a mental health assessment from other Mental Health Services. Evidence was heard that members of Miles’s family contacted the Mental Health helpline with their concerns whilst Miles was in custody but were not afforded the opportunity to share these concerns with the LDS practitioner which would not have been a breach of confidentiality. ”

    Source location

    Miles Ethan Hurley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 5 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of formal documentation procedures for LDS and police custody care

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Memorandum of Understanding between Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Sussex Police and Mitie The MOU does not adequately address the practical issues facing an LDS and the police services to ensure appropriate management of mental health assessment and ongoing care whilst an individual is in Custody. There is an absence of local or national ‘Standard Operating Procedures’ or guidelines as to when to obtain a mental health assessment if an individual is intoxicated, a lack of formal documentation procedures, or steps to be taken to encourage further sharing of available information between the LDS service and the police (the LDS practitioner was not fully informed of Miles’s presentation at arrest, was not informed of the concerns raised by the family regarding Miles’s acute deterioration in his mental health and had no access to police records to be better informed). Nor are there any appropriate templates available with regard to liaison between LDS and the police to ensure consistency and accuracy of available evidence. ”

    Source location

    Miles Ethan Hurley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 7 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a standard template and guidance with NPCC and CPS for transferring relevant Liaison and Diversion assessment information to police.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “‘NHS England to provide clear guidance to practitioners on what information should be uploaded to police custody logs to ensure consistency and relevance for decision-makers (e.g. custody welfare, bail, police and court outcomes). To be achieved in collaboration with the CPS and local police services.’”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Record custody risks and concerns discussed with Liaison and Diversion staff on the detainee’s risk assessment and care plan.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “LDS Nurses will proactively triage detainees listed on the Custody White Board between 08:00hrs and 20:00hrs. This is a virtual white board accessed via NICHE which LDS nurses can independently access at any time. It contains details of all detainees in each Custody Centre. A Professional Discussion will be held between the LDS Nurse and Principal Sergeants to identify assessments that may need to be prioritised.”

    Source location

    Response from Sussex Police
    Page 4 · response
    Published 29 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add a standard template for written information shared with police colleagues to the Custody Pathway SOP.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In direct response to your concerns raised during the inquest into Mr Hurley’s death regarding the lack of guidelines to support a Liaison and Diversion practitioner as to when it is appropriate to undertake a formal mental health assessment if an individual is intoxicated rather than feeling obliged to do so because of their availability, MPFT are currently reviewing the Custody Pathway SOP. It has been agreed with the Senior Leadership Team in MPFT Health and Justice Services that written guidelines, regarding assessment of individuals who are intoxicated, are needed for MPFT staff. MPFT Custody Team Leaders are meeting on the 9th October 2024 to review the SOP to add:”

    Source location

    Response from Midlands Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain documented, verbally delivered and CCTV-recorded custody handovers, with live risk updates, shared access, audit trails, staff training and peer review.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “At the point of handover, the Principal Sergeant will refer to a handover document (a copy of which is supplied at Appendix 1) from which they will brief the oncoming team verbally. All members of the current duty team and the oncoming team will be present. They are each given a copy of the handover document which they can refer to during the briefing. The briefing is delivered by the Principal Custody Sergeant in person and is recorded on CCTV which is accessible at any time.”

    Source location

    Response from Sussex Police
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete and regularly review detainee risk assessments and care plans, recording changing physical or mental health information and responding to identified risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A Custody Officer (Sergeant or Detention Officer) will complete an Initial Risk Assessment of the detainee on arrival and a Pre-Release Risk Assessment on their release from Custody. In every case a Care Plan is created to mitigate identified risk(s).”

    Source location

    Response from Sussex Police
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the Custody Pathway Standard Operating Procedure for Sussex Liaison and Diversion services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since assuming responsibility for Liaison and Diversion services in Sussex MPFT has introduced a Custody Pathway - Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The SOP was written by Operational Managers/clinicians experienced in the delivery of Liaison and Diversion services in Police custody and was implemented in June 2024.”

    Source location

    Response from Midlands Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 July 2024

    Open published response
  7. West London

    AI-generated summary

    Tom Sweeting · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Tom Sweeting experienced a sudden deterioration in his mental health in August 2021 and was assessed by liaison psychiatry after reporting suicidal thoughts. On 20 August 2021, he was found suspended by a ligature at home after locking himself in the garage, and resuscitation attempts were unsuccessful. Concerns included incomplete clinical assessment documentation, failures in discharge communication and treatment-plan communication, delegation of family collateral information gathering to a junior trainee, and a lack of evidence that new training and procedures had been effectively audited.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete the mental health assessment template

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Tom was assessed in relation to his mental ill health presentation by the Consultant liaison psychiatrist, but the Trust template was not completed, which was not in compliance with the Trust policy and criticised in the Trust serious incident report. There is a concerning mismatch of what more junior colleagues are expected to do and be trained in, compared with Senior practitioners demonstrated work practises. ”

    Source location

    Tom Sweeting · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. Lincolnshire

    AI-generated summary

    Levi Craig Don Pettit · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Levi Craig Don Pettit was reported to police as having suicidal ideations on 8 December 2019. Four days later, he died by suicide; concerns included the handling of the police response, including the failure to complete or make required referrals and uncertainty about relevant policy and training.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete a mental welfare proforma report

    Wider context from the report

    “(II) PC ████████ admitted he used his discretion in dealing with the deceased and did not make a PNN ,complete a mental welfare proforma report, or reported the incident to any other officer on the night ”

    Source location

    Levi Craig Don Pettit · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Officers need not understand the mental-health proforma data workflow because it does not affect care; existing training and administrator checks suffice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I would not expect DS ████████ to know what happens to the mental health proforma once completed. Officers are trained (see below) to understand that the mental health proforma provides a statistical return that is used by the Home Office and other stakeholders to understand the local data for mental health policing. It is not a referral mechanism. We do have an administrator who checks against our incidents to ensure that mental health proforma have been completed when required. Understanding the mechanics of the workflow of this statistical submission would not contribute to officers’ work “on the ground”.”

    Source location

    2021-0231-Response-from-Lincolnshire-Police_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 July 2021

    Open published response
  9. Manchester West

    AI-generated summary

    Karl Qolf Jamil Englemak Cassimjee · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Karl Qolf Jamil Englemak Cassimjee, who had a history of presumed paranoid schizophrenia and psychosis, was found dead on 5 February 2018 after becoming missing and being last seen behaving irrationally and bizarrely. The medical cause of death was hypothermia, and the inquest concluded accidental death. Concerns included an inadequate Mental Health Act assessment, insufficient risk assessment and safety planning, failures to obtain relevant collateral information, and mental health operational systems identified for revision not having been implemented.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete Mental Health Act assessment forms in the required format with the required practitioner information

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Brief circumstances of matter of concern a. A Mental Health Act assessment had been completed without a collateral history being obtained (including Clatterbridge Hospital); b. The assessment completed by the Specialist Registrar was entered on the form ‘Amongst systems’ in the incorrect format with no South Practitioner; c. The assessment, as recorded by the Registrar was accepted to be sub-optimal; d. The risk assessment has no clear formulation of risk and no evidence of collaborative safety planning with the deceased (that is to say, clear evidence that the advice was to means to take in the event of a deterioration in his condition from discharge to being seen by the Mental Health Home Treatment Team. e. It is unclear from patient records as to what information the deceased and/or the British Transport Police (who were tasked with the responsibility of considering the feedback to the response about contact with the MHTT or what action to be taken in the event of a deterioration in the interim). f. A Mental Health Nurse recorded a substantial and detailed history given to her by the deceased setting out the full extent of his florid delusions and paranoid thoughts that to have been fully and adequately properly evaluated by the Specialty Registrar, to the extent that the nurse expressed extreme surprise that the Registrar had not shown the required concern, and Mental Health Act detention where being no means within the operational procedures in place for the nurses concerns to be taken into account. ”

    Source location

    Karl Qolf Jamil Englemak Cassimjee · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026