Recurring concern

Delays in ambulance attendance

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 24 Feb 2014•Latest report 23 Mar 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes recurring failures, resource constraints, dispatch problems and other dedicated ambulance-service response failures that result in delayed attendance to patients or emergency calls.

Not included

  • Excludes delays occurring after ambulance arrival, including hospital handover and crew-release delays.
  • Excludes delays in other emergency services, such as police, fire and rescue, or specialist clinical on-call attendance.
  • Excludes generic staffing, capacity or information-sharing deficiencies unless the reports explicitly tie them to delayed ambulance attendance.
Reports
118

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
129

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
460

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care53
NHS England25
Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust22
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB9
North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust8
Association of Ambulance Chief Executives7
East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust7
East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust6
Welsh Government6
Conwy County Borough Council4
Denbighshire County Council4
Flintshire County Council4
Gwynedd Council4
Isle of Anglesey County Council4
NHS West Yorkshire Integrated Care Board4

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Northamptonshire

    AI-generated summary

    Harry Peter DUNN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Harry Peter Dunn died shortly after arriving at hospital following a head-on collision between his motorcycle and a car on 27 August 2019. The report raised concerns about the unavailability and delayed response of ambulance resources, including delays caused by lengthy hospital handovers, and the continuing risk of future deaths from these delays.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain sufficient emergency ambulance resources to meet response standards

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) When the 999 call was made shortly following the accident no resources were available within either the operating area of the relevant ambulance trust, East Midlands Ambulance Service Trust (“EMAS”) or within the neighbouring South Central Ambulance Service Trust. The only available emergency medical resource was that run by the Air Ambulance Service Charity which was an advanced medical team based out of Coventry Airport, some c.30 miles away with an estimated arrival time of 57 minutes. (2) The Inquest heard that EMAS was unable to meet mean response standards at the time of the 999 call. They had entered a sustained period where demand was outstripping the resources they had available. This was worsened by the fact that what resources they did have were being delayed at hospitals due to lengthy hospital handovers at the Accident and Emergency departments. (3) Although EMAS reported a slight improvement in the issue of resourcing following the adoption of the newer NHS Pathways triage process the delay in paramedics attending Category 2 calls has not been resolved to within target ranges. This is because EMAS’s resources cannot be fully utilised as a result of the delays in ambulances clearing Accident and Emergency departments. (4) I am concerned that these continuing delays for ambulances at hospital handovers reflects a risk of deaths into the future. ”

    Source location

    Harry Peter DUNN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain the increased ambulance capacity delivered during 2023/24.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the shorter-term, a range of action is being taken by the NHS this year to improve performance including maintaining the increase in ambulance capacity (hours on the road) delivered in 2023/24, where NHSE reported a circa 6% increase year-on-year for December 2023. There is a focus on reducing ambulance handover delays to support patient flow and on increasing direct referrals into community services to reduce conveyance rates to acute hospitals.”

    Source location

    Response-from-DHSC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue regular regional review meetings with EMAS on support needed to improve response times and care quality.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHSE has advised my officials that the regional team for the Midlands will continue to have regular review meetings with EMAS including on the support needed to improve response times performance and the quality of care for patients. It is recognised that operational productivity has fallen since the pandemic, and while there was improvement during 2023/24, further improvement is required. The NHS’s operational target for 2024-25 is for Category 2 response times to improve to an average of 30 minutes across the year.”

    Source location

    Response-from-DHSC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 August 2024

    Open published response
  2. Gwent

    AI-generated summary

    Marjorie Joyce Michael · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Marjorie Joyce Michael fell at a residential home and lay on the floor for over 14 hours while waiting for an ambulance. She was taken to hospital on 4 September 2023 and died on 6 September 2023; the inquest recorded hypostatic pneumonia following the fall and long lie, with her death contributed to by the delayed ambulance response. The report raises concerns about continuing delays in ambulance responses, including delays in releasing emergency ambulances from acute hospitals.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in ambulance responses to potentially life-threatening emergencies

    Wider context from the report

    “Despite ongoing attempts by Welsh Ambulance Service and Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, the delays in responding to emergency calls are not improving. Witness evidence confirmed the many initiatives undertaken by these services to improve ambulance response times but these continue to be undermined by the delay in releasing emergency ambulances from acute hospitals to attend emergency calls. Witness evidence also confirmed that despite these initiatives there was no appreciable reduction in the length waiting times for Amber 1 and Amber 2 responses; which are categorised as potentially life-threatening emergencies. ”

    Source location

    Marjorie Joyce Michael · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to release emergency ambulances from acute hospitals promptly

    Wider context from the report

    “Despite ongoing attempts by Welsh Ambulance Service and Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, the delays in responding to emergency calls are not improving. Witness evidence confirmed the many initiatives undertaken by these services to improve ambulance response times but these continue to be undermined by the delay in releasing emergency ambulances from acute hospitals to attend emergency calls. Witness evidence also confirmed that despite these initiatives there was no appreciable reduction in the length waiting times for Amber 1 and Amber 2 responses; which are categorised as potentially life-threatening emergencies. ”

    Source location

    Marjorie Joyce Michael · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Set in-year aspirations for local health boards to reduce ambulance handovers exceeding one hour by 30% by December 2024.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I remain concerned about the levels of ambulance patient handover delays reported across Wales, and LHBs must improve the timeliness of handover to release ambulance crews to respond to other patients in the community.”

    Source location

    Response from Welsh Government
    Page 2 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish and fund the Six Goals programme to support improvements in ambulance handover, patient flow and urgent and emergency care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We established the six goals programme to enable LHBs to deliver on the objectives set out in our strategy, and have allocated an additional £50m in support over the past two years. The annual six goals allocation has increased to £27m in 2024/2025.”

    Source location

    Response from Welsh Government
    Page 3 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Escalate ABUHB to enhanced monitoring and oversee agreed improvement requirements through enhanced monitoring, escalation and performance meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Escalation of ABUHB to enhanced monitoring (Level 3)”

    Source location

    Response from Welsh Government
    Page 4 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide capital funding decisions on WAST vehicle-replacement business justification cases.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In terms of procuring ambulance vehicles, WAST submitted a Strategic Outline Programme (SOP) in 2016 that was endorsed by Welsh Cabinet Secretaries for its Vehicle Replacement Programme. The endorsement of the SOP allows WAST to submit Business Justification Cases (BJCs) setting out its vehicle replacement requirements on an annual basis. I will then make a decision on the BJC. Capital funding over the last three years is as follows:-”

    Source location

    Response from Welsh Government
    Page 5 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide funding for WAST workforce expansion and targeted investment in ambulance clinical triage resources and technology.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition to core funding, we provided £3m to the WAST in 2022/2023 to enable recruitment of 100 new staff. Since December 2021, there has been a 4.6% increase in WAST’s emergency medical services workforce in the ABUHB area.”

    Source location

    Response from Welsh Government
    Page 5 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide additional funding to support urgent and emergency care improvements and local programme delivery in Gwent.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have provided an additional £6 million in six goals programme funding over the last two years to drive improvements in urgent and emergency care in Gwent, and the ABUHB will receive a further £2.7m this year. This funding has been used to develop new services and recruit key clinical leadership to oversee the ABUHB’s local programme plan.”

    Source location

    Response from Welsh Government
    Page 3 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide £14 million capital investment to support expansion of the Grange University Hospital emergency department.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Finally, following consideration of a business case submitted by ABUHB earlier this year, we have also provided £14m capital investment to support the expansion of the emergency department at the Grange University Hospital site. Improvements are expected to be completed by Spring 2025 and will double the current wait capacity (38) to provide 75 seats in total. There will also be an area dedicated to support the e-triage tool referenced above, with the existing waiting area repurposed to provide a rapid assessment area, both of which will help with timeliness of access – providing the right care and treatment more efficiently.”

    Source location

    Response from Welsh Government
    Page 4 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue monitoring ambulance handover performance and the reduction of delays exceeding one hour.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst in escalation, ABUHB is held to account by Welsh Government through normal performance management arrangements such as IQPD and JET meetings. Further oversight is also in place through enhanced monitoring touchpoint meetings chaired by either the Deputy Chief Executive of NHS Wales or the Welsh Government Director of Operations for NHS Wales, as well as quarterly escalation meetings with LHB leads and chaired by the Chief Executive of NHS Wales. This includes a focus on progress made by LHBs on delivering the in-year aspiration to reduce ambulance patient handover delays over an hour in length by 30% by the end of December.”

    Source location

    Response from Welsh Government
    Page 4 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Local health boards are responsible for planning and delivering ambulance-related health services locally.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the report you ask for an update on details of action taken or proposed by the Welsh Government to improve ambulance responsiveness and prevent future deaths in the Gwent area. Whilst I have a role to set expectations in terms of a strategic direction for health and care services in Wales, and to hold the NHS to account, local health boards (LHBs) remain responsible for planning and delivering these services at a local level to meet the needs of the communities they serve.”

    Source location

    Response from Welsh Government
    Page 1 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The NHS Joint Commissioning Committee is responsible for determining funding allocated to the ambulance service.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The new NHS Joint Commissioning Committee (NHS JCC) was established on 1 April 2024 and has responsibility for planning and securing emergency ambulance services for the people of Wales. It is for the committee to consider all relevant factors in determining the quantum of funding allocated to WAST for delivery of emergency ambulance services. I will hold the chair of the NHS JCC to account for effective commissioning of emergency ambulance services and achievement of the Ministerial priorities I have set of all organisations from 2024/2025 onwards.”

    Source location

    Response from Welsh Government
    Page 5 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    WAST and ABUHB are responsible for delivering services on the ground and should provide specific details of their actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “You may wish to write to both organisations directly for further details on specific actions they are taking to improve ambulance responsiveness and prevent future deaths linked to delayed ambulance response, as they are responsible for delivery of services on the ground. I have provided a summary of the actions undertaken by ABUHB and WAST for information below, as reported to us by both organisations through ongoing monitoring arrangements undertaken by Welsh Government officials and the NHS Executive.”

    Source location

    Response from Welsh Government
    Page 5 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response
  3. Buckinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Fern Elisabeth Foster · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Fern Elisabeth Foster died by suicide on 8 July 2020 after consuming a substance she had procured with the intention of ending her life. The report identified concerns about the absence of independent advocacy and physical professional support when Fern received news concerning the intended adoption of her child, and about ambulance response times and access to antidote medication in suspected poisoning cases.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of ambulance triage and prioritisation to provide sufficient time for emergency treatment

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The process for triaging and prioritising ambulance attendance to an incident involving the suspected ingestion of ████████ (intentionally or otherwise) does not provide sufficient opportunity for travel, attendance, conveyance to hospital for emergency treatment and/or provision of antidote treatment at scene, which may provide the only likely means of prevention of death where sufficient quantity has been ingested. ”

    Source location

    Fern Elisabeth Foster · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issue overdose-management communications requiring timely clinical assessment or automatic ambulance-response upgrading.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England issued communications to ambulance services and NHS 111 providers in 2019 and 2021 in respect of managing overdose cases, and in November 2023 an updated version was issued instructing that any case reaching a Category 3 response should have further clinical assessment within a set timeframe, or else be automatically upgraded to a Category 2 response. Further details are set out below.”

    Source location

    2024-0311 Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and deploy the Dx0124 disposition code to identify overdose and suicide-attempt cases for priority clinical assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To support NHS England’s 2019 communication and enable services to identify these Category 3 cases to clinicians for priority assessment, NHS Pathways developed a specific disposition code ‘Dx0124 Emergency Ambulance Response for Risk of Suicide (Category 3)’ in April 2019. This code facilitates improved visibility of overdose or suicide attempt cases within the ambulance dispatch queue. These actions, to develop and deploy this disposition code, were ratified by the former NHS Pathways National Clinical Governance Group (NCGG) in February 2019 (this group has been superseded by NCAG). This was also approved by NHS England’s ECPAG on 3rd July 2019. It was deployed to all service users as part of Release 18 in October 2019.”

    Source location

    2024-0311 Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish the national operational procedure for ambulance services managing Category 3 overdose and suicidal-ideation calls.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In April 2021, NHS England and Improvement, in conjunction with the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives (AACE), published a new operational procedure for all ambulance services in England entitled, “Category 3/ 999 Overdose and Suicidal Ideation Calls; Initial Assessment of Lethality/Toxicity Principles Document”. This document followed a detailed review that had been undertaken to consider agreed ambulance control room processes, to ensure that suicidal patients receive the correct clinical response. This review had also been the catalyst for NHS England contacting all ambulance and NHS 111 services in early 2019 as described above. In this 2021 document, NHS England set out that, where an overdose is declared, a further clinical intervention should take place within 30 minutes and/or the case will be automatically upgraded if this does not occur within 40 minutes.”

    Source location

    2024-0311 Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the overdose and suicidal-ideation operational procedure to ensure it remains fit for purpose.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In October 2023, a review of this document was completed by ECPAG and the National Ambulance Service Medical”

    Source location

    2024-0311 Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update JRCALC overdose and poisoning guidance to cover sodium nitrate/nitrite poisoning, TOXBASE and NPIS advice, oxygen administration, and rapid conveyance to hospital.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are currently reviewing and updating our overdose and poisoning JRCALC guidance for paramedics, and we will be including sodium nitrate/nitrite poisoning as an example of a chemical that can be ingested. The guidance will recommend that paramedics consult the National Poisons Information Service (NPIS) database (TOXBASE) and where necessary use the NPIS 24-hour, seven-day telephone advice line for details of the effects of specific substances and advice around possible toxic doses. Where a potentially or immediately life threatening substance has been taken, rapid conveyance to hospital will be recommended.”

    Source location

    Response from AACE
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The current overdose triage process, including urgent clinical assessment and escalation, is considered most suitable.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Director’s Group (NASMeD, Association of Ambulance Chief Executives) to ensure it remains fit for purpose. The view from the Ambulance Response Programme Implementation Group at NHS England, supported by NASMeD, was that cases involving suicidal ideation (including overdoses) are often multi-factorial and therefore too complex for Health Advisors to apply a definitive disposition without assessment by a clinician. Instead, they require an urgent remote clinical risk assessment in the absence of priority airway, breathing or circulatory symptoms during triage. This means that for those cases which do not automatically result in a Category 1 or 2 emergency ambulance response, an urgent remote clinical assessment will take place, pending which the case will be dealt with as a Category 3 emergency ambulance response.”

    Source location

    2024-0311 Response from NHS England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ambulance attendance triage and prioritisation are outside AACE and NASMeD’s remit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The process for triaging and prioritising ambulance attendance is not within the remit of AACE or NASMeD. The categorisation of 999 calls is overseen at a national level through the NHS England clinical coding group which reports to Emergency Call Priority Advisory Group (ECPAG). The algorithms for NHS”

    Source location

    Response from AACE
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 June 2024

    Open published response
  4. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Bernard Compton · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Bernard Compton developed symptoms of a myocardial infarction, but delays in ambulance response, ECG interpretation, triage, blood-result review and clinical assessment meant that the optimum window for intervention had passed. He later suffered a left ventricular rupture and died on 19 October 2023. The concerns included inadequate oversight of patients and urgent results, unclear systems for repeating and acting on tests, and demand-related delays in ambulance and emergency care.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unavailability of timely ambulance response capacity during periods of demand

    Wider context from the report

    “Demand on NWAS meant that even though they knew he had been diagnosed as being in the throes of a MI they could not get an ambulance to him in less than 45 minutes due to demand on their services. ”

    Source location

    Bernard Compton · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Increase ambulance capacity through the Urgent and Emergency Care recovery plan.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There was significant demand on both NWAS and Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust in the Autumn of last year, with the Emergency Department (ED) at Tameside under significant pressure and all areas of the ED full. Health systems remain in recovery following the COVID-19 pandemic and pressures arising from it and the societal response. NHS England’s recovery plans include a focus on Urgent and Emergency Care, with one of the plan’s nine workstreams including increasing ambulance capacity. Since October 2023, Tameside’s ED has increased its capacity as part of a planned rebuild of the unit. My regional colleagues have approached the Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board (ICB) for further information regarding your concerns, as the local commissioner of the Trust.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 7 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Concerns outside NHS England’s national policy or programme remit are not addressed in this response.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “My response to you focuses on those concerns raised in your Report that come under the remit of NHS England’s national policy or programme work. It would be more appropriate for the North West Ambulance Service (NWAS) NHS Trust and Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust to respond to some of the concerns raised, and you may wish to revert to those Trusts for further information.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NWAS, Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, and the ICB should provide information on concerns assigned to them.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “My response to you focuses on those concerns raised in your Report that come under the remit of NHS England’s national policy or programme work. It would be more appropriate for the North West Ambulance Service (NWAS) NHS Trust and Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust to respond to some of the concerns raised, and you may wish to revert to those Trusts for further information.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 June 2024

    Open published response
  5. Gwent

    AI-generated summary

    Sylvia Eileen Evans · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sylvia Eileen Evans sustained an accidental leg wound at home on 5 September 2023, causing severe haemorrhage, and died at home the following day. She called for an ambulance at 22:56, but the call ended abruptly before the nature of her injuries was conveyed. An ambulance arrived at 07:45, almost 8 hours and 49 minutes after the call was registered, and the report identifies hospital handover delay as contributing in part to the delay.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in ambulance response to life-threatening emergencies

    Wider context from the report

    “The correct procedure was adopted by the Welsh Ambulance Service and Sylvia was categorised as requiring an Amber 1 response. The inquest heard that Amber 1 is the second highest category, reserved for people who are likely to be suffering from a life-threatening emergency. An ambulance eventually arrived at 07:45 on 06/09/2023. This was almost 8 hours and 49 minutes after the call was registered. Sylvia had died by the time the ambulance arrived. The reason for the delay was explored at the inquest and in part determined to be due to hospital handover delay. ”

    Source location

    Sylvia Eileen Evans · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Bobilya Mulonge · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mrs Mulonge became unconscious after developing laboured breathing on 24 November 2022 and was found in cardiac arrest when an ambulance arrived 72 minutes after the call. She died later that day from congestive cardiac failure against a background of hypertensive heart disease, chronic kidney disease and type II diabetes mellitus; the principal concern was that delays in ambulance response times had not been resolved within target ranges because ambulances could not be cleared from Accident and Emergency departments.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in paramedics attending Category 2 calls

    Wider context from the report

    “Despite a number of measures being undertaken by the North West Ambulance Service, the delay in paramedics attending Category 2 calls has not been resolved to within target ranges. This is because resources available in the North West Ambulance Service cannot be fully utilised as a result of the delays in ambulances clearing Accident and Emergency departments. ”

    Source location

    Bobilya Mulonge · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide £200 million of additional funding to expand ambulance capacity and improve response times.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Your report highlights that NWAS were under high demand at the time of the incident. Ambulance services received £200 million of additional funding in 2023/24 to expand capacity and improve response times.”

    Source location

    2024-0250 Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 May 2024

    Open published response
  7. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Michael Clarke · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Michael Clarke, who had multiple underlying health conditions including end stage renal failure, developed suspected urosepsis after a cystoscopy and died in hospital on 30 July 2023. The report raised concerns about delays in category 3 ambulance responses, the categorisation of a call where sepsis was suspected, and the absence of specific sepsis trigger questions on the ambulance pathway.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in category 3 ambulance responses

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The inquest was told that due to significant demand the wait time for an ambulance in category 3 was in excess of 4 hours rather than the target 1 hour. The inquest was told that this was not unusual and was still an ongoing issue. The evidence was that this was not unique to NWAS but the general picture in England. The inquest was told that there had been improvements in category 1 and 2 response times but to achieve this category 3 calls continued to have these significant delays. ”

    Source location

    Michael Clarke · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish the Delivery Plan for recovering urgent and emergency care services, including actions to improve ambulance response times and capacity.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Your first concern is centred on the significant demand and waiting times for a Category 3 ambulance which was more than four hours rather than the one-hour target. NHS England recognises the significant pressure on ambulance services since the Covid-19 pandemic, which has seen longer response times across all categories than before the pandemic, as well as issues associated with handing over ambulance patients in a timely way at some NHS Trusts. NHS England has prioritised improving ambulance performance during 2023/24, supported by the Delivery plan for recovering urgent and emergency care services, which was published in January 2023.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England and NHS GMIC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain ambulance capacity increases achieved during 2023/24 to support improved response times.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The plan outlined key actions to recover and improve urgent and emergency care services, including improving ambulance response times, increasing ambulance capacity through growing the workforce (for example, increasing clinical capacity in control rooms), alongside broader system actions to improving flow through hospitals and reducing handover delays, speeding up discharges from hospitals and expanding new services in the community, all of which should help ambulance crews to get back on the road to the next waiting patient more rapidly.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England and NHS GMIC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue developing alternative referral pathways, including urgent community response, to provide timely and appropriate care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst ambulance response times have not returned to pre-pandemic levels, there were improvements in ambulance response times nationally during 2023/24. The 2023/24 year-end Category 3 Mean time to respond was 2 hours 4 minutes 14 seconds which is 31 minutes 4 seconds quicker than 2022/23 and the 2023/24 year-end Category 2 Mean was 36 minutes 23 seconds which is 13 minutes 37 seconds quicker than 2022/23. For 2024/25, the Delivery Plan continues to focus on the improvement of ambulance response times, with ambulance services expected to maintain the increases in capacity achieved throughout 2023/24, alongside the continued development of alternative referral pathways (e.g. urgent community response) to ensure that patients receive timely and high-quality care.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England and NHS GMIC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor achievement of all Ambulance Response Programme standards through the North West Ambulance Improvement Plan and regional urgent-care governance arrangements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We acknowledge this is still not achieving the national standards which is why for 2024/25 achieving all ARP standards, not just the NHS England UEC recovery plan of category 2 mean, is part of the North West Ambulance Improvement Plan being monitored by the North West Ambulance and 111 commissioning team and UEC ICB leads at the Strategic Partnership and Transformation Board which includes NHS England UEC Regional representation.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England and NHS GMIC
    Page 7 · response
    Published 14 May 2024

    Open published response
  8. South Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    Sophie HINDMARSH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sophie HINDMARSH had complex needs and required full-time care. After her father called 999 because she was vomiting brown liquid, felt hot to the touch and had a leaking feeding tube, the ambulance arrived 4 hours and 46 minutes after the call; concerns centred on delays in ambulance response and hospital handovers that reduced available ambulance resources.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide ambulance responses within the required 40 minutes

    Wider context from the report

    “The ambulance service was called at 0245 on 21 July 2022 and the call was coded as a Category 2 at 0251 call requiring a response within 40 minutes. The ambulance finally arrived at 0731 on 21 July 2022, 4 hours and 46 minutes after the call. There was a significant delay in offloading patients at hospitals which tied up ambulance resource on that day and meant they were unable to respond to emergency calls. ”

    Source location

    Sophie HINDMARSH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide £200 million in additional funding to ambulance trusts to expand capacity and improve response times.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Your report highlights that YAS were under high demand at the time of the incident. To support ambulance services, ambulance trusts received £200 million of additional funding in 2023/24 to expand capacity and improve response times. In addition, to improve patient flow and bed capacity within hospitals £1 billion of dedicated funding was provided to increase staffed core hospital beds by 5,000 compared to 2022/23 plans.”

    Source location

    Response from DHSC
    Page 1 · response
    Published 9 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement quality-improvement initiatives with acute trusts to reduce ambulance handover delays.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The correlation between handover delays at Emergency Departments and overall ambulance response times is widely acknowledged. Handover times vary amongst our acute trusts in the region. We seek to ensure the root causes are understood.”

    Source location

    Response from West Yorkshire ICB
    Page 3 · response
    Published 9 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Agree and use a Joint Escalation Action Plan defining organisational actions to improve ambulance handover during system pressures.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “YAS and Sheffield Teaching Hospitals (including other South Yorkshire Hospitals) have agreed a new Joint Escalation Action Plan (JEAP), for when system pressures increase. This plan provides specific actions that organisations must employ to support the improvement of ambulance handover.”

    Source location

    Response from West Yorkshire ICB
    Page 3 · response
    Published 9 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce and enact a Duty to Rescue protocol enabling senior clinical decisions on rapid handover and ambulance release during significant operational pressure.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Implementation of Duty to Rescue protocol - this protocol was introduced ahead of the winter period (2023/24) and is now enacted at times of significant operational pressure. On occasions when there are high number of ambulances waiting to handover patients, the protocol allows for senior clinical decision makers from YAS and our hospitals to agree to the rapid handover and timely release of an ambulance crew to attend to a specific 999 call, or one who has been awaiting conveyance and is deteriorating. The introduction of this protocol has been welcomed by all parties and allows for clinical risks to be better managed in the system.”

    Source location

    Response from West Yorkshire ICB
    Page 3 · response
    Published 9 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and improve alternative care pathways, including Urgent Community Response and direct Same Day Emergency Care access, to avoid appropriate hospital conveyance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Alternatives to Accident and Emergency (A&E) Departments – more alternative pathways of care are available for use by YAS Ambulance crews or staff within the Emergency Operations Centre (EOC) to safely and appropriately avoid conveyance to hospital.”

    Source location

    Response from West Yorkshire ICB
    Page 3 · response
    Published 9 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish the Delivery plan for recovering urgent and emergency care services to improve ambulance and urgent-care performance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England recognises the significant pressure on ambulance services since the Covid-19 pandemic, which has seen longer response times across all categories than before the pandemic, as well as issues associated with handing over ambulance patients in a timely way at some NHS Trusts. NHS England prioritised improving ambulance performance during 2023/24, supported by the Delivery plan for recovering urgent and emergency care services, published in January 2023.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 9 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Specific actions to improve ambulance response and hospital handover times will be provided directly by NHS England and the Integrated Care Board.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Your report raised concerns about ambulance response times by Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust (YAS) and hospital handover delays. You have appropriately shared your report and concerns with West Yorkshire Integrated Care Board and NHS England (NHSE). Departmental officials have made enquiries with NHSE and West Yorkshire Integrated Care Board who I understand will be writing to you directly on the specific actions being taken locally to improve ambulance response and handover times.”

    Source location

    Response from DHSC
    Page 1 · response
    Published 9 May 2024

    Open published response
  9. Wiltshire and Swindon

    AI-generated summary

    Richard Carpenter · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Richard Carpenter underwent major cardiac surgery on 19 November 2021 and was discharged home on 28 November. After developing increasing left-sided pain late on 30 November, he became unresponsive and died at home at 05:00 on 1 December 2021, following a postoperative bleed. The principal concern was that delays in Category 2 ambulance responses, linked in part to hospital bed shortages and delayed discharges, could increase the risk of otherwise preventable deaths, although no causal link was found between the delay and Richard’s death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to consistently meet ambulance response targets

    Wider context from the report

    “The reason I am submitting this Regulation 28 Report is that I heard evidence when I put the question to ████████ as to whether or not the Trust is hitting its targets in relation to ambulance response, and I was told that the Trust was not meeting those targets consistently in a way comparing to pre-pandemic times. When I drilled down further as to where problems lay, again the issue of patients in hospitals taking up beds arose in circumstances whereby the patient was physically fit for discharge but they were not able to be discharged due to the lack of appropriate care packages in the community. This issue has arisen in other Regulation 28 Reports that I have written to you recently and I am concerned as regards the lack of availability of sufficient free beds in hospital due to bed blocking is still causing significant disruption to ambulance services trying to transfer patients to hospital. Although on this occasion I did not find a causal link between the delay and Richard’s death, I am concerned that delays in ambulances attending patients in the community are likely to increase the risk of death in Cat 2 instances especially that would otherwise be preventable had the patient been got to hospital in a timely fashion. ”

    Source location

    Richard Carpenter · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide £200 million in additional funding to ambulance trusts to expand capacity and improve response times.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Your report highlights that SWAST were responding to high demand. To support ambulance services, ambulance trusts received £200 million of additional funding in 2023/24 to expand capacity and improve response times. In addition, to improve patient flow and bed capacity”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    SWAST is best placed to determine and implement local action with NHS partners to reduce handover delays and improve ambulance response times.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “You have appropriately shared your report and concerns with SWAST, who are best placed to respond on the specific action they are taking locally with NHS system partners to reduce handover delays and improve ambulance response times.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 April 2024

    Open published response
  10. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Jade Marie GRIFFITHS-JONES · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jade Marie Griffiths-Jones died in hospital on 4 June 2023 after suffering a cardiac arrest caused by coronary artery disease and sustaining severe hypoxic brain injury. An ambulance was not available to attend her earlier chest-pain call within target times, with concerns about ambulance response delays linked to increased demand and hospital handover delays.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to meet target ambulance response times

    Wider context from the report

    “1. During the inquest evidence was given on behalf of West Midlands Ambulance Service from ████████, Learning Response Lead, that at the time of Jade's initial call reporting centralised chest pain at 13:33 on the 31st May 2023 the Trust was experiencing increased volume of calls and significant hospital delays and therefore could not resource the category 2 disposition within national target times (mean average of 18 minutes, 90th centile of 40 minutes). The call was still unresourced when she was reported to be in cardiac arrest during a further call at 15:01 (the 4th call). The Trust's Gold Dashboard that was captured closest to the clock start time for the first call (captured at 13:00:32) identified that there were delays in the mean and 90th percentile response times for Category 1, 2, 3 calls. There was 3 available ambulance resource within the sector at that point in time with 54 Category 2 and 43 Category 3 cases awaiting resource allocation, and 16 cases yet to be prioritised. There were regional hospital delays of up to 218 minutes. 2. For the 2 hours before Jade's call the Birmingham sector had been experiencing a 2 hour spike in demand. However, the real problem affecting resourcing was pandemic crews being stuck at hospitals awaiting handover. In 2023 to 2024 West Midlands Ambulance Service lost approximately 250,000 response hours due to delays at hospitals. 3. West Midlands Ambulance Service have taken a broad range of measures in recent years to tackle increasing response times including measures to reduce call demand through public education, to avert calls away from ambulance services and hospitals via clinical validation, to improve patient flow through intelligent conveying and to increase the number of resources in operation. Aside from seeking funding to recruit further paramedics and increase ambulance numbers alongside continued monitoring and learning there is nothing West Midlands Ambulance Service can identify that they can do to improve the situation further. 4. West Midlands Ambulance Service continue to fail to meet target response times and have been made the subject of a regulation 12 notice on this topic by the CQC. 5. The evidence of West Midlands Ambulance Service is that if hospital handover delays didn’t exist they would be likely to be meeting their response targets as they did before hospital delays became chronic. In the circumstances it is my conclusion that the availability of ambulance crews is continuing to be compromised by delays at hospitals resulting in delays in response times which creates a risk to the life. ”

    Source location

    Jade Marie GRIFFITHS-JONES · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Coordinate system-wide urgent and emergency care responses through the Delivery and Improvement Board and System Co-ordination Centre, with escalation and safety oversight.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “For this reason, oversight is via a UEC Delivery and Improvement Board which is chaired by the ICB Chief Delivery Officer with senior representation from all system partners. This Board provides integrated system leadership to set and deliver the Urgent and Emergency Care Strategy, with a focus on equity of access and system efficiency.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Birmingham and Solihull
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review urgent treatment centre provision against local population needs and national guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “BSOL has six UTCs across the footprint; these can be accessed either by walking-in or via direction from NHS 111. They provide an alternative pathway away from ED for those patients who require swift medical attention with urgent but non-life-threatening conditions. The UTCs can also offer clinical telephone advice to ambulance crews on the scene and can accept conveyances when and where agreed. On average, 714 patients have been treated daily within UTCs over the last 12 months. A full review of UTC provision was instigated in May 2024 to ensure it meets the needs of both our local population and new national guidance published in October 2023.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Birmingham and Solihull
    Page 4 · response
    Published 29 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide the “Call before you convey” service to divert suitable older patients from hospital attendance into urgent community or wider community services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “‘Call before you convey’ is a direct service available to WMAS colleagues whilst with the patient in their own home, offering diversion pathways to use where appropriate, other than hospital attendance. This service is primarily aimed to support patients over the age of 75 years, offering diversion into the UCR or wider community services. Since the commencement of this service in December 2023 there have been an average of just over 65 calls per week equating to nearly 10 patients per day.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Birmingham and Solihull
    Page 5 · response
    Published 29 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Engage weekly with Integrated Care Boards through assurance and planning rounds to reduce emergency department crowding, improve acute front-door services, and release ambulance capacity.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Improving ambulance handover delays is the responsibility of all providers, commissioning bodies (Integrated Care Boards (ICBs)) and regulators. This year (2024/25) NHS England, through regular assurance and planning rounds, are engaging with ICBs on a weekly basis until assurance has been given that everyone is working to reduce emergency department crowding, improve acute front door services and release the ambulance service/s within their commissioned frameworks for 2024/25. In addition, throughout 2024/25 further work will be done to enhance and drive further efficiencies in acute patient flow, avoidable attendance for the frail and elderly emphasising same day care and care closer to home as a priority and this will aim to further improve the quality and standard of care across the emergency unscheduled care pathway.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide £200 million in additional funding to expand ambulance capacity and improve response times.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Your report highlights that WMAS were under high demand at the time of the incident. A primary aim of the Delivery plan is to boost ambulance capacity. Ambulance services received £200 million of additional funding in 2023/24 to expand capacity and improve response times.”

    Source location

    Response from DHSC
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide £1 billion in dedicated funding to increase staffed core hospital beds by 5,000 against 2022/23 plans.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I recognise that ambulance trusts work within a health and care system and issues such as delayed patient handovers to hospitals can impact on capacity and response times. To improve patient flow and bed capacity within hospitals £1 billion of dedicated funding was provided to increase staffed core hospital beds by 5,000 compared to 2022/23 plans. £1.6 billion of funding was also made available over two years to support the NHS and local authorities to ensure timely and effective discharge from hospital, helping to free up beds and reduce long waits for admission from A&E.”

    Source location

    Response from DHSC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Make £1.6 billion available over two years to support timely hospital discharge and reduce admission delays.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I recognise that ambulance trusts work within a health and care system and issues such as delayed patient handovers to hospitals can impact on capacity and response times. To improve patient flow and bed capacity within hospitals £1 billion of dedicated funding was provided to increase staffed core hospital beds by 5,000 compared to 2022/23 plans. £1.6 billion of funding was also made available over two years to support the NHS and local authorities to ensure timely and effective discharge from hospital, helping to free up beds and reduce long waits for admission from A&E.”

    Source location

    Response from DHSC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ambulance service commissioning is undertaken by Black Country ICB on behalf of West Midlands ICBs, with BSOL as an associate commissioner.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “WMAS is not directly commissioned by BSOL, but by the Black Country ICB on behalf of the West Midlands ICBs, with BSOL as associate commissioners. As such BSOL contributes to discussion on performance and quality via established routes with Black Country colleagues. Operationally, however, WMAS colleagues are very integrated into BSOL provision and daily oversight rhythm. This not only includes the paramedic crews themselves, but presence of a senior co-ordinating role, the Hospital Ambulance Liaison Officer (HALO), and until recently provision within UHB with Ambulance Decision Areas (as below). The overall objective of the HALO service is to facilitate the handover of patients presenting at ED by ambulance, in a clinically safe, effective and efficient manner, thus enabling crews to turnaround ambulances in readiness to respond to other emergency calls.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Birmingham and Solihull
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NHS England and the Birmingham Integrated Care Board are best placed to address local ambulance response and hospital handover delays.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Your report raised concerns about ambulance response times at the West Midlands Ambulance Service (WMAS) University NHS Foundation Trust, and the hospital handover delays that they experience. You have appropriately shared your report and concerns with NHS England and Birmingham Integrated Care Board who are best placed to respond on the specific action being taken locally to improve ambulance response and handover times. You also shared your report with the Care Quality Commission who I note inspected WMAS in February 2024 and, while rating the trust good overall, raised the need to improve response times.”

    Source location

    Response from DHSC
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 April 2024

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026