Recurring concern

Unreliable Community First Responder coverage and call-out

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 15 Jan 2016•Latest report 24 Jan 2019

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in arrangements dedicated to Community First Responder coverage and call-out, including rostering, availability, mobilisation, dispatch and communication controls where these leave required first-responder assistance unavailable or delayed.

Not included

  • Excludes generic ambulance or emergency-service capacity and dispatch failures unless Community First Responders are the identified response function.
  • Excludes general volunteer-management, mobile-network or communication deficiencies unless they directly make Community First Responder coverage or call-out unreliable.
  • Excludes failures in clinical treatment or later emergency response after an appropriate Community First Responder call-out has occurred.
  • Excludes unrelated first-aid training or staffing concerns where Community First Responder coverage or mobilisation is not the shared unsafe condition.
Reports
2

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
4

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2016–2019

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
4

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust1
NHS Wales Joint Commissioning Committee1
Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust1
Welsh Government1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Lincolnshire

    AI-generated summary

    Olive JOHNSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Olive JOHNSON died within 24 hours of admission to Pilgrim Hospital on 11 May 2018. The concerns raised relate to the absence of a first responder, emergency response times, how response delays were recorded after regrading, and whether EMAS had sufficient conveying resources to meet its targets.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to call out first responders

    Wider context from the report

    “a) Why were no first responder's called out in relation to the deceased? ”

    Source location

    Olive JOHNSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The available Community First Responder could not attend because excessive travel distance fell outside the role’s intended community coverage.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “a) Why were no First Responders called out in relation to the deceased?”

    Source location

    2019-0031-Response-by-East-Midlands-Ambulance-Service-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 24 May 2019

    Open published response
  2. North West Wales

    AI-generated summary

    Jasmine Ruby Lapsley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    On 19 August 2016, six-year-old Jasmine Lapsley choked on a grape while on holiday in Morfa Nefyn and died at 23.58 hours despite resuscitation efforts. The report identified concerns about gaps in overnight air support, the lack of a reliable Community First Responder rota and communication system, the need for sufficient local responders, and resource planning during seasonal population increases in rural and remote areas.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of an effective rota system for consistent Community First Responder cover

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) There is no effective rota system for Community First Responders to ensure consistent cover these local volunteers who provide essential support for patients in remote and/or rural locations in North West Wales. The method of communicating Community First Responders to attend is mobile telephone although this is by mobile telephone although this is fraught with difficulties in remote and/or rural areas where network coverage can be patchy at best and frequently non existent. WAST should review the systems in place for rostering and contacting Community First Responders to ensure more consistent cover and more reliable communication. ”

    Source location

    Jasmine Ruby Lapsley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient planning for recruitment and retention of local Community First Responders

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) Given the difficulties in ambulances arriving at many rural and/or remote areas in North West Wales it is essential that there are sufficient local Community First Responders to arrive promptly at the casualty and provide essential treatment preserving life until an ambulance arrives. WAST should review the planning for the recruitment and retention of Community First Responders. ”

    Source location

    Jasmine Ruby Lapsley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unreliable communication for contacting Community First Responders in remote and/or rural areas

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) There is no effective rota system for Community First Responders to ensure consistent cover these local volunteers who provide essential support for patients in remote and/or rural locations in North West Wales. The method of communicating Community First Responders to attend is mobile telephone although this is by mobile telephone although this is fraught with difficulties in remote and/or rural areas where network coverage can be patchy at best and frequently non existent. WAST should review the systems in place for rostering and contacting Community First Responders to ensure more consistent cover and more reliable communication. ”

    Source location

    Jasmine Ruby Lapsley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Coordinate with Community First Responders on available resources and volunteer-service arrangements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2.4 Current dialogue with CFRs around how best to coordinate use of available resources / identifying list, recognising that this is a volunteer service.”

    Source location

    2016-0022-Response-by-Welsh-Ambulance-Services-NHS-Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 15 January 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen leadership arrangements for Community First Responder recruitment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2.1 WAST to review and strengthen the leadership arrangements for CFR recruitment.”

    Source location

    2016-0022-Response-by-Welsh-Ambulance-Services-NHS-Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 15 January 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Run a Community First Responder recruitment campaign and provide adequate training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3.2 CFR recruitment campaign and ensure adequate training by the end of spring in readiness for the summer months. Lead: Director of Operations; Assistant Director Operations Evidence: Evidence of a clear plan and additional volunteers Completion: June 2016”

    Source location

    2016-0022-Response-by-Welsh-Ambulance-Services-NHS-Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 15 January 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Pilot and roll out hand-held devices to improve communication with Community First Responders.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2.2 Pilot hand-held devices to improve WAST's ability to communicate with CFRs.”

    Source location

    2016-0022-Response-by-Welsh-Ambulance-Services-NHS-Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 15 January 2016

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026