Recurring concern

Failure to review relevant clinical records before care decisions

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 23 Aug 2013•Latest report 8 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures to consult, check, cross-reference or review relevant existing clinical records as part of clinical assessment, prescribing, treatment, admission, transfer, escalation or other care decisions, including review of the correct record set and routine review requirements.

Not included

  • Excludes failures to retrieve or make records available when the records were not accessible in the first place; those belong to access or record-availability concerns.
  • Excludes deficiencies in the completeness, accuracy or maintenance of the records themselves unless the asserted unsafe condition is also failure to review them.
  • Excludes generic failures to communicate or hand over clinical information where no record-review failure is identified.
  • Excludes non-clinical record reviews, such as administrative, inspection or mortuary monitoring records.
Reports
54

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
59

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
70

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care11
Barts Health NHS Trust5
Care Quality Commission5
HM Prison and Probation Service4
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust3
NHS England3
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust3
East London NHS Foundation Trust2
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust2
HM Prison Service2
Lancashire & South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust2
Sheffield Health Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust2
Association of Ambulance Chief Executives1
Beeston Health Centre1
Berkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. South Yorkshire (West)

    AI-generated summary

    Barbara Joan COPE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Barbara Joan COPE, a 75-year-old woman, presented to Rotherham Hospital with decreased conscious levels, slurred speech and reduced oral intake, and was later found to have a high paracetamol level. The result was not reviewed or acted upon for approximately 19 hours, delaying time-critical treatment. The principal concerns were failures in communicating and following up abnormal results, reviewing investigations during clinical deterioration, and clearly assigning responsibility for ongoing care.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to review and act on clinical records and recent investigation results

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Even when the patient clinically deteriorated overnight and required two separate clinical reviews, the blood results were not reviewed and/or acted upon. If clinical records and recent investigations results are not reviewed then appropriate medical management will be delayed or will not occur. ”

    Source location

    Barbara Joan COPE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Flag all abnormal results within MEDITECH.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Over the years, the Trust has undertaken a programme of quality improvement work, led by the Deputy Medical Director and Chief Clinical Information Officer to strengthen our responsiveness to abnormal results. This has included ensuring that all abnormal results are flagged within MEDITECH (our electronic patient record). In addition, a Standard Operating Procedure setting out the required actions for managing investigation results was introduced and communicated Trust wide.”

    Source location

    Response from Rotherham District General Hospitals
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce and communicate a Trust-wide standard operating procedure for managing investigation results.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Over the years, the Trust has undertaken a programme of quality improvement work, led by the Deputy Medical Director and Chief Clinical Information Officer to strengthen our responsiveness to abnormal results. This has included ensuring that all abnormal results are flagged within MEDITECH (our electronic patient record). In addition, a Standard Operating Procedure setting out the required actions for managing investigation results was introduced and communicated Trust wide.”

    Source location

    Response from Rotherham District General Hospitals
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and update the standard operating procedure for critically abnormal pathology results in clinical areas.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since Mrs Cope’s death we have reviewed and updated the Standard Operating Procedure for the Management of Critically Abnormal Pathology Results in Clinical Areas and I attach a copy of the same for your reference.”

    Source location

    Response from Rotherham District General Hospitals
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct an additional 50-result audit of documentation and appropriate action for time-critical results.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “An audit has been conducted by Pathology to check that the documentation for time critical results telephoned to clinical areas complies with the Standard Operating Procedure with a finding that results audited had been communicated in a timely manner. An additional audit of 50 results is currently underway focusing on whether time critical results have been documented and acted on appropriately. The result of this audit is expected by the end of August 2026.”

    Source location

    Response from Rotherham District General Hospitals
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a Power BI module to monitor acknowledgement of results.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, the Trust has developed a Power BI module to monitor acknowledgement of results which continues to show an improvement in clinicians’ responsiveness to the management of test results.”

    Source location

    Response from Rotherham District General Hospitals
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Launch an Urgent and Emergency Care Centre pilot using the alertive bleep system to flag critical blood results.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I was concerned to hear that Mrs Cope deteriorated overnight, requiring two separate clinical reviews and despite this, her blood results were not reviewed. The Trust has a clear handover process in place whereby medical staff working in hours, handover tasks for follow up to the out of hours team at the face-to-face handover meetings. In addition to this, we will imminently launch a pilot within our Urgent and Emergency Care Centre of the use of the ‘alertive bleep’ system which flags critical blood results on the bleep system.”

    Source location

    Response from Rotherham District General Hospitals
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Include learning from the incident in the Quality Newsletter, focusing on acting upon time-critical blood results.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Deputy Chief Nurse in conjunction with colleagues from the learning from deaths programme, clinical effectiveness team and the quality governance team will include the learning from this incident in the Quality Newsletter focusing on the importance of acting upon time critical blood results.”

    Source location

    Response from Rotherham District General Hospitals
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing face-to-face handover arrangements require follow-up tasks to be transferred to the out-of-hours team.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I was concerned to hear that Mrs Cope deteriorated overnight, requiring two separate clinical reviews and despite this, her blood results were not reviewed. The Trust has a clear handover process in place whereby medical staff working in hours, handover tasks for follow up to the out of hours team at the face-to-face handover meetings. In addition to this, we will imminently launch a pilot within our Urgent and Emergency Care Centre of the use of the ‘alertive bleep’ system which flags critical blood results on the bleep system.”

    Source location

    Response from Rotherham District General Hospitals
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response
  2. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Abbigail Louise SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Abbigail Louise Smith was found at Braintree Recreation Ground on 15 February 2022 and was pronounced deceased shortly after midnight on 16 February 2022 from compression of the neck by ligature. The report describes concerns about failures in mental-health care, communication, staff training, risk assessment and discharge planning, including her discharge to supported living without an adequate plan to mitigate a known risk of self-harm.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to review patient history and query inconsistencies in medical records

    Wider context from the report

    “6. There were issues in communication and sharing of information. Evidence was that some EPUT staff did not appreciate Abbi’s history and did not read the medical records or query inconsistencies. Not all clinical contacts were appropriately recorded. ”

    Source location

    Abbigail Louise SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce review of patient history and information gathering from consenting families through supervision and governance meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A task and finish group was established as part of the Trust PSII Review Action Plan in respect of the vital importance of records review. In response to this concern, staff have been reminded again to review relevant patient history and gather information from family (where there is consent to do so). As per the evidence presented in court such reminders form part of structured supervision meetings as well as service governance meetings.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 13 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use ward-specific electronic dashboards and daily printed information to identify and address gaps in records, risk assessments, and care plans.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Management Teams and staff also have access to an electronic Trust dashboard which is specific to each ward and provides a full oversight of relevant ward information about their current patients (including records, risk assessments and care plans), this supported the identification of any record gaps that can then be promptly addressed. These are printed on a daily basis for staff.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Trust
    Page 9 · response
    Published 13 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide greater pharmacy input to inpatient MDTs and medication-history reviews through pharmacist participation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There is now an Electronic Patient Medication System in place where clinicians are able to see the patient’s previous medical history in respect of previous hospital attendances and past medication reviews. There is now greater pharmacy input in place for Inpatient Services, with pharmacists now sitting in on MDT’s and supporting medication history reviews.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Trust
    Page 8 · response
    Published 13 August 2026

    Open published response
  3. Carmarthenshire and Pembrokeshire

    AI-generated summary

    Trevor Anthony Evans · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Trevor Anthony Evans was struggling with his mental health and had contact with police, ambulance, mental health professionals and healthcare staff before taking his own life by hanging at home on 27 February 2020. The principal concerns were over-reliance on what he told a mental health nurse, failure to review medical records and insufficient investigation of available background information, resulting in concerns that mental health risk assessments could be incomplete or inadequate.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to review medical records during mental health risk assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “In this case, I found that there was an over reliance on what Trevor told the nurse, a failure to review medical records and a lack of investigation or scrutiny into an abundance of background information that was available. Notwithstanding the fact that I have been told that changes have been made by the Health Board to ensure that those undertaking assessments now look to obtain as much information as possible I also received evidence which indicates that assessors still harbour an attitude that it is the referrer job to provide all the relevant information and then those performing the risk assessment will simply assess the information. For as long as that approach or culture continues I fear that mental health risk assessments in Pembrokeshire may be incomplete, perfunctory and inadequate. There needs to be a shift of onus to a more collaborative approach so that those undertaking the assessment explore what information is available to them and do not simply rely on the details provided by the referrer. It is essential that those undertaking the mental health assessments are aware of the need to obtain as much information as possible in order to complete a full and thorough assessment of the risk and that they are aware of how to and where to obtain the relevant information from. ”

    Source location

    Trevor Anthony Evans · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use comprehensive assessment and referral-support tools to prompt multi-source information gathering, collateral enquiries and documentation of information sources.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. Introduction of referral and assessment support tools”

    Source location

    Response from Hywel Dda University Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issue a professional practice reminder requiring relevant practitioners to review electronic patient records before assessments and consider historical risks and safeguarding concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. Reinforcement of expectations regarding historical information review”

    Source location

    Response from Hywel Dda University Health Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss historical-record review and collateral-information requirements in Adult Mental Health Services operational team meetings to reinforce consistent practice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. Team discussions and practice reinforcement”

    Source location

    Response from Hywel Dda University Health Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implemented, immediate and ongoing safety work collectively addresses the identified risk-assessment concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We believe the actions already implemented, the immediate actions undertaken following receipt of this report, and our ongoing participation in national safety and risk improvement work collectively address the issues identified and support the cultural shift towards collaborative, information-seeking, formulation-based assessment practice described by the Coroner.”

    Source location

    Response from Hywel Dda University Health Board
    Page 4 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response
  4. West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Amy Clare CHAPMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Amy Clare Chapman, who was experiencing a mental health crisis and assessed as at high risk of suicide, was admitted to the Haven Unit at Millview Hospital on 23 March 2025. On 27 March, she was permitted to leave the unit twice without adequate checking of her records, family contact, or documentation, and later jumped from a bridge, dying from her injuries. The principal concerns included insufficient risk assessment and planning for trips out, failures to read and record notes, inadequate family involvement, uncertainty over care and safety plans, and gaps in training, alerts, checklists, and auditing.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of nurses to read notes before significant decisions

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Nurses not reading notes before taking significant decisions is a very serious concern, as is not then completing records of the decisions taken. ”

    Source location

    Amy Clare CHAPMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Peter Asher CAMPBELL · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Peter Asher Campbell collapsed in his prison cell at Pentonville after smoking a drug and died five days later. The principal concerns were the failure to prevent drugs entering the prison and shortcomings in the prison drug service’s response, including inadequate engagement, harm-minimisation advice, staff training, supervision and auditing.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to review medical records before recovery-worker interactions

    Wider context from the report

    “For Phoenix and PPG Mr Campbell collapsed in prison on 18 September 2024 as he had done before following the use of ████████, and the prison and healthcare staff responded to this as an emergency code blue. The ambulance service was called and he was immediately conveyed to hospital where he was resuscitated. The jury found a failure by the prison drug service to provide a meaningful interaction with Mr Campbell between the collapse on 18 September 2024 and the fatal collapse on 3 October 2024. This was partly because a visit was not arranged promptly, a systemic issue that since seems to have been addressed. However, I also heard evidence that, when the Phoenix recovery worker did go to see Mr Campbell on 1 October 2024 in an attempt to promote harm minimisation: • She did not read any part of his medical records before she saw him, and she did not know whether she was meant to do so. She was. • She spoke to him through the hatch in the cell door, with his cellmate present. This was her normal practice, but she was not able to say why. It should not have been. • She did not have any meaningful discussion with him about his drug use, either the use that led to his collapse on 18 September 2024 or his use generally. She should have. • She gave him various pieces of harm minimisation guidance in keeping with her training, including the advice to avoid using drugs whilst alone. This advice was later confirmed as within policy by the Phoenix head of service. However, it does not seem to take account of the fact that smoking a drug in a small cell with a cellmate puts the cellmate at risk. • Mr Campbell told her that he was not under the influence at the time. The recovery worker was not wholly convinced, but she did not return later that day or the following day to see if better engagement was possible. She should have. • She did not know whether her interaction with Mr Campbell was in accordance with her training. I was told that it was not. She had not received further training or changed her practice since his death. • The drug recovery worker was the last healthcare worker to see Mr Campbell before his fatal collapse from drugs and did so just two days before that occurred. However, the gaps in her care of Mr Campbell were not identified by the investigation following his death by Phoenix and PPG (or by the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman). • She had not changed her practice since Mr Campbell’s death, but any gaps in her care of other prisoners had also not been identified in the following year and a half, either by routine supervision or by audit. I heard that audits are undertaken of the medical records only. Therefore, the first time that Phoenix and PPG recognised a drug recovery worker’s failures to follow their procedures over at least a year and a half, was at the inquest. ”

    Source location

    Peter Asher CAMPBELL · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind all Recovery Workers to check SystmOne records before visiting people accessing services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our process was, and remains, that wherever possible staff check SystmOne records before supporting people accessing services. There are occasions where records cannot be viewed by way of example where prison officers ask a Recovery Worker to review another person or if they require urgent support. In other words, there are circumstances where, because of the urgency of a request, it is not possible to consult the records.”

    Source location

    Response from Phoenix Futures
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 April 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce SystmOne-record checking through team meetings, six-month communications and supervision.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As soon as the above concern was raised by the Learned Coroner, we immediately reminded all Recovery Workers to check SystmOne before visiting people accessing services to ensure they are aware of any recent incidents or changes in care needs. This reminder will be reinforced during upcoming team meetings and will continue to be communicated every six months and, supported through supervision as per our protocol.”

    Source location

    Response from Phoenix Futures
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 April 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Responsibility for Phoenix Futures’ service and employees rests with Phoenix Futures, which is expected to respond separately.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Likewise, the points raised under the heading for Phoenix and PPG mainly relate to Phoenix Futures and the steps taken by one of their employees. Whilst we work closely with Phoenix as one of our subcontractors at Pentonville and work together to improve services and continue our strong working partnership, we do not propose to comment on their service or individual employees. We understand that Phoenix will be responding to the points raised separately.”

    Source location

    Response from Practice Plus Group (1)
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 April 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Records cannot always be reviewed before consultations when requests are urgent or staff are redirected to support another person.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our process was, and remains, that wherever possible staff check SystmOne records before supporting people accessing services. There are occasions where records cannot be viewed by way of example where prison officers ask a Recovery Worker to review another person or if they require urgent support. In other words, there are circumstances where, because of the urgency of a request, it is not possible to consult the records.”

    Source location

    Response from Phoenix Futures
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 April 2026

    Open published response
  6. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Urmila Patel · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Urmila Patel, aged 78, was admitted to hospital with suspected sepsis and later fell in a ward toilet on 29 June 2025. She subsequently deteriorated and died in hospital on 7 July 2025 after a CT scan identified a significant subdural haematoma. The concerns included inadequate falls-risk assessment, mobility care planning, supervision, assessment for intracranial bleeding, timely CT referral, and review of her warfarin after the fall.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to review preceding clinical records for relevant falls information

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The failure of nurses on the ward to instigate an adequate falls risk assessment of Mrs Patel. 2. The failure of nursing staff on the ward to produce a meaningful care-plan for Mrs Patel’s mobility. 3. The failure of Trust staff to note a fall on 23rd June 2025 and reassess risk of falls. 4. The failure of nursing staff on the ward to monitor and supervise Mrs Patel on the afternoon of 29th June 2025. 5. The failure of Trust staff to adequately assess the likelihood of a traumatic intra-cranial bleed following the fall on 29th June 2025. 6. The failure of the duty doctor to act decisively and refer Mrs Patel for an urgent CT Head scan on 29th June 2025. 7. The failure of the duty doctor to review Mrs Patel’s warfarin prescription after the fall. 8. The failure of ward staff on the ward round on 30th June 2025 to read the clinical records from the previous day to alert them to Mrs Patel’s fall on 29th June 2025. ”

    Source location

    Urmila Patel · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require ward rounds and multidisciplinary reviews to consider events from the preceding 24–72 hours, including weekends.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Ward teams have been reminded that ward rounds and multidisciplinary reviews must include active consideration of events from the preceding 24–72 hours, including weekends.”

    Source location

    Response from Barts Health NHS Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 3 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NHS England, which oversees the issues raised, is responsible for responding directly to the Prevention of Future Deaths report.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Given the concerns you have raised I feel it is important that you receive a response directly from NHS England as it has oversight for the issues you raise. Therefore, my officials have contacted NHS England who have agreed to respond to you directly about the Prevention of Future Death report concerning Mrs Patel.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 March 2026

    Open published response
  7. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Urielle Mayila Kuyenga · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Urielle Mayila Kuyenga, a four-year-old girl with sickle-cell disease, died in hospital on 4 December 2023 from sepsis resulting from bacterial pneumonia. The report identifies failures to ensure administration of prescribed prophylactic penicillin and failures by doctors to identify her sickle-cell diagnosis during three presentations for respiratory infection as contributory factors.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of clinicians to identify Sickle Cell Disease from available clinical records

    Wider context from the report

    “2. In the weeks prior to her death Urielle’s mother presented her daughter to three separate GPs about a respiratory infection. On each of these three attendances the attending clinician was ignorant of Urielle’s Sickle Cell diagnosis. The reasons for these lapses were, firstly Urielle’s mother did not inform the doctor of the fact and, second, that the doctors did not adequately read the clinical records available to them. ”

    Source location

    Urielle Mayila Kuyenga · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require clinicians to review relevant previous patient encounters and expand the requirement to all patients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In our letter dated 30 October 2025, we confirmed the various locations in which a patient’s records may be located. We also confirmed that since this tragic incident we had introduced a new requirement that clinicians, when reviewing a child or vulnerable adult, conduct a review of the individual’s records.”

    Source location

    Response from Partnership of East London Co-operatives Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share organisational learning with staff about reviewing all relevant previous patient encounters, including regular dissemination to new and existing employees.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. Learning Communication to Staff- Organisational learning has been shared regarding the importance of reviewing all relevant previous patient encounters as part of review of the patient. This learning will continue to be shared at regular intervals so as to ensure that new starters are aware and current employees are reminded.”

    Source location

    Response from Partnership of East London Co-operatives Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Include the requirement to review all relevant prior patient encounters in relevant clinical staff contracts.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. Inclusion in Clinical Staff Contracts- In our letter of 30 October 2025, we confirmed that there was an expectation of clinicians to act within GMC Professional Standards and Good Practice which requires that clinicians must ‘adequately assess’ the patient. We have now included the requirement to all relevant prior patient encounters a part of staff contracts.”

    Source location

    Response from Partnership of East London Co-operatives Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a clinical-record alert for children presenting with sickle cell disease, triggered by disclosure or clinician identification from summary care records with consent.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. Clinical System Alert for Discharge Decisions- We are currently working with Adastra to implement an alert within clinical records for all children presenting to the service with a diagnosis of sickle cell disease.”

    Source location

    Response from Partnership of East London Co-operatives Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add clear pop-up alerts and warnings identifying sickle cell disease in each clinical record.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• We have added clear alerts and warnings in each clinical record. This ensures that their diagnosis of Sickle Cell Disease is visible to all staff as a pop-up box, and does not rely solely on the problem list being reviewed. Completed.”

    Source location

    Response from Maylands Healthcare Surgery
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement and jointly publish Jess’s Rule to encourage structured clinical re-evaluation after three unresolved or worsening consultations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To further improve the safety of patients, we have implemented a new initiative in September 2025 called “Jess’s Rule: Three Strikes and Rethink”. This has been published jointly with the Royal College of General Practitioners and NHSE. Under Jess’s Rule, clinicians in general practice are encouraged to take a structured approach to critically re-evaluate symptoms, diagnoses and patient concerns if after three consultations the patient’s condition remains unexpectedly unresolved, their symptoms are escalating and/or they have no clear diagnosis. We know this practice is commonplace in many settings, and GPs, and others use their clinical discretion every day to find the underlying cause of unclear cases.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response
  8. Liverpool and the Wirral

    AI-generated summary

    Gloria SIMON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Gloria Simon moved into a care home for respite on 9 September 2025 and died there from natural causes on 20 September after her condition deteriorated. Concerns included missed opportunities to obtain timely clinical input, the GP’s failure to undertake a face-to-face assessment after misreading oxygen saturation results, and insufficient attention to her medical history and care-home setting.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to obtain and consider relevant previous medical history

    Wider context from the report

    “2. In its typed ‘Request for Care’ form, the care home noted that Gloria Simon's oxygen saturations were 84% and described them (correctly) as ‘very low’. The time when the observations were taken was not stated. Despite a clerical assistant at the GP practice having not done correctly that the reading was 84%, the GP misread the papers as saying 94% and described the oxygen saturations as ‘low’. The GP told the court that he would have been assisted by knowing the patient's previous medical history and would have acted differently had he known it. However, the records indicate that this information had been supplied by the care home, had been flagged by another GP who made a record on the practice's system, and was available to him. There was no evidence before the court to suggest that the GP had: (a) requested sight of the previous medical history, or made any enquiry about it when (or before) he spoke to a member of staff at the care home; or (b) asked when the observations had been taken or recommended that any further observations should be taken; or (c) asked about whether those observing or caring for the Deceased had any clinical qualifications (having assumed, incorrectly, that she was in a nursing home setting). The court considers that this elderly vulnerable patient should have had a face-to-face clinical assessment but did not because of insufficient attention to detail and/or clinical curiosity on the part of the GP. The court would like to understand how the practice can ensure that this is not something that will recur. ”

    Source location

    Gloria SIMON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ensure clinicians assess whether available clinical information is sufficient without delaying appropriate patient assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is noted on the request for care form that several of the parameters were missing. We will reiterate the importance of a full set of observation from staff to care homes, but accept that this may lie outside of the competence of some care home staff. We expect all Marine Lake clinicians to ensure they are comfortable with the clinical information available but not at the detriment of delaying appropriate assessment of the patient.”

    Source location

    Response from Marine Lake Medical Practice
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response
  9. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Steven Roy Davidson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Steven Roy Davidson died while in prison after a history of self-harm during a previous prison stay. The report identifies concerns that healthcare staff at HMP Chelmsford could not sufficiently navigate or search System One records, or did not sufficiently understand the importance of previous self-harm information when assessing his mental health and risk.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to search clinicians’ records from previous prison stays during Reception Health Screens or mental health needs reviews

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Health Care Staff at HMP Chelmsford say that they are: (i) not able to navigate the System One records sufficiently well to find information about previous incidents of self- harm in prison; and/ or (ii) not sufficiently aware of the importance of searching the records made by clinicians during previous prison stays when conducting Reception Health Screens and/ or reviews of a prisoner’s mental health needs. (iii) May not be sufficiently trained to understand and utilise System One records to find previous history, including incidents of self- harm in custody. ”

    Source location

    Steven Roy Davidson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver structured SystmOne training through induction, refresher training, and equivalent training for long-term agency staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “SystmOne is the NHS electronic patient record system used in prison and custodial healthcare settings across the country. NHS North of England Commissioning Support (NECS) provides training and technical support for users of SystmOne, including system navigation, search functions and information retrieval. HCRG has amended its training provision so that all new staff will now receive structured SystmOne training as part of their induction, provided by NECS and recorded in the mandatory training schedule. This will include guidance on locating clinical information that may be stored in different parts of the system (see further below). Refresher training will also be provided to existing staff within three months and recorded in their personal training record.”

    Source location

    Response from HCRG Care Group
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce through clinical governance that practitioners consider risk-related history, including information beyond the default summary record view.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All Practitioners conducting clinical assessments should, as part of good practice, review relevant patient history when undertaking reception screenings, mental health reviews or risk assessments. In this case, it appears that practitioners focused primarily on Mr Davidson's current presentation rather than reviewing earlier records in depth. HCRG will reinforce through clinical governance that risk-related history should be considered when assessing patients, and that in some cases this may involve searching beyond the default summary record view.”

    Source location

    Response from HCRG Care Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Expand monthly clinical-note audits to check access to relevant historic information during risk assessments and report findings through governance and quality monitoring.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To ensure that records are being reviewed appropriately, the existing monthly audit of clinical notes will now include specific checks as to whether practitioners have accessed relevant historic information when assessing risk. Findings from the audit will feed into governance meetings and quality and performance monitoring available to NHS England commissioners.”

    Source location

    Response from HCRG Care Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Embed SystmOne training into governance and supervision processes to support consistent and safe use of the platform.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “HCRG’s Performance and Quality teams are embedding SystmOne training into existing governance and supervision processes to ensure consistent and safe use of the platform. Staff may also contact the Performance and Quality Lead if further clarification is needed, either directly or via their line manager.”

    Source location

    Response from HCRG Care Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 October 2025

    Open published response
  10. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Julie Sheila Beasley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Julie Sheila Beasley was found deceased at home on 16 March 2023 and died from multiple drug misuse involving a fatal amount of morphine and concomitant prescribed medications. She had deteriorating mental health, increasing suicidal thoughts and plans, and repeatedly requested mental health assessment and a medication review. The report identifies failures to complete required assessments and medication review, inadequate communication and record keeping, and insufficient exploration of information she sought to share about her risks.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to review records and identify the need for urgent mental health assessment

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) Mrs Beasley was conveyed to hospital having taken an overdose of medication and was reviewed by the Trust mental health liaison team. Review of the mental health Trust medical records would have shown that Mrs Beasley had an SBAR review rather than a V4 mental health assessment. This should have alerted staff to the fact that an urgent assessment was required when Mrs Beasley attended mental health liaison following an overdose of her medication. This did not happen. ”

    Source location

    Julie Sheila Beasley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require full biopsychosocial mental health assessments, with documented rationale for omissions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Response: The Trust has continued to review our assessment processes to ensure that the appropriate reviews are undertaken in a timely manner and are supported through the MDT approach which then supports a joined up approach to patient assessments. Staff in the Mental Health Crisis team are required to undertake a mental health assessment for all patients, which is monitored and audited via supervision meetings and compliance reviews.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct monthly evidence-based assessment quality audits and provide feedback on findings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Monitoring of the quality of assessments, noting the concerns above has been enhanced with monthly assessment quality audits. The audits are evidence based (NICE Guidance) and undertaken by each lead reviewing 10 cases each month. The lead will feedback to staff the themes they have found, good practice and areas for improvement, as a means of ‘spot checking’ the assessments that are being carried out. In addition to the team monthly audits, an EPUT wide audit carried out in April 2025 for urgent care, showed overall for the 5 teams, sections regarding Patient Details, Consent & Capacity, Carers, Referral Details and Assessment attained results at 91% or above regarding compliance.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue reviewing urgent-care learning, deadlines and impact through monthly quality and safety meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This event was led by the Director of Quality and Safety and Operational Associate Director on the 19th August 2024 with a focus on assessment and family involvement. A follow up Urgent care away day took place on 1st May 2025 to review all learning, data and incident reporting across 2023- 2024 for urgent care to ensure joined up thematic learning and review. The scrutiny of deadlines and impact continues to be reviewed at the monthly Urgent care Quality and safety meetings.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 June 2025

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026