Recurring concern
Unreliable fire-safety protection for telecare clients
First reported 24 Jan 2014•Latest report 21 Feb 2022
What this concern includes
Includes failures in telecare arrangements that affect fire safety for clients, including inconsistent treatment of watch-only and wider-support clients, failure to identify or communicate fire-safety needs, and failure to offer or arrange relevant Fire Home Safety Checks or equivalent protective measures.
Not included
- Excludes generic telecare availability, funding or operator-information failures that do not concern fire safety.
- Excludes general fire-safety deficiencies affecting people with no telecare connection.
- Excludes physical fire-detection, evacuation or emergency-response failures where the telecare-related fire-safety arrangement is not deficient.
- Excludes neutral differences between telecare service categories where no inconsistent fire-safety protection is asserted.
- Reports
- 3
- Individual concerns
- 9
- Date range
- 2014–2022
- Stated actions
- 2
Distinct published reports
A report can raise multiple concerns
First to latest report issue date
Described in published responses
Reports over time
Reports over time
Reports about this concern issued each year.
* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.
Most frequent recipients
Most frequent recipients
Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.
Concerns and responses across reports
Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.
-
Concerns raised1
Failure to link telecare to smoke alarms or AFSS
This report raised 10 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Responses linked to these concernsEach statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
Respondent positions A position is what a respondent says about the concern when they do not describe a specific action.1
-
Position
Matters of Concern 2, 3 and 4 are not issues for the landlord to address.
Stated by Sovereign Network Homes
-
Concerns raised6
Failure to make linked fire alarms a contractual requirement for telecare clients
Artificially differentiated fire-safety treatment of watch-only and wider telecare clients
Unlinked household fire alarms in telecare users' homes
Failure to identify and replace unlinked fire alarms in a timely and auditable manner
Lack of working relationships with local fire brigades to facilitate client home fire-risk assessments
Failure to train staff to recognise and escalate linked and unlinked fire-alarm sounds
This report raised 7 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Responses linked to these concernsEach statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
No linked response statementsNo respondent-stated action or position is linked to these concerns in the published data.
-
Concerns raised2
Lack of interim protection for Telecare package users pending interlink installation
Failure to inform Telecare users about the free Fire Home Safety Check service
This report raised 3 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Responses linked to these concernsEach statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
Actions described in response An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.2
-
Action
Establish a six-month full-time Council post to accelerate installation of linked smoke detectors for Telecare clients.
Stated by Conwy County Borough Council -
Action
Install linked smoke detectors for Telecare clients identified as lacking them, using the accelerated installation programme.
Stated by Conwy County Borough Council
Data last updated 7 September 2026