Recurring concern
Unreliable disclosure of confidential medical information to police for safety purposes
- Reports that mention this concern
- 2
- Times this concern has been raised
- 2
- Stated actions linked to this concern
- 2
What this concern includes
Includes failures in healthcare and police-facing arrangements for determining, authorising, communicating or carrying out disclosure of relevant confidential medical information to police for safety purposes, including disclosure concerning victims at risk and missing people, and failures of professional guidance or cross-agency understanding that directly impair those disclosures.
What is not included
- Excludes ordinary patient confidentiality, consent or information-governance concerns where no safety-related disclosure to police is involved.
- Excludes generic communication, training or information-sharing deficiencies that do not concern disclosure of confidential medical information to police for a safety purpose.
- Excludes disclosure to families, courts, coroners, social services or other recipients unless the assertion also concerns the same police-facing medical-information disclosure process.
- Excludes failures to act after relevant information has been lawfully and promptly disclosed to police.
- Excludes clinical assessment, treatment, missing-person search or victim-protection failures where the police disclosure process itself is not deficient.
Trends
Reports over time
Reports mentioning this concern, over time
Reports about this concern issued each year.
* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.
Most frequent recipients
Most frequent recipients
Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.
Reports and published responses 2 reports
See individual reports that have raised this concern, and the actions taken in response
-
Concerns raised1
Lack of cross-agency awareness and training on requesting and sharing confidential medical information about missing persons
This report raised 4 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
No linked response statementsNo respondent-stated action or position is linked to these concerns in the published data.
-
Concerns raised1
Insufficient clarity and knowledge of professional and legal duties to disclose confidential information about victims at risk
This report raised 4 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked response
- Royal College of General Practitioners
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.2
-
Royal College of General Practitioners
Publish a Safeguarding Adults at Risk of Harm Toolkit for general practitioners, including information, responsibilities and an explanatory film.
-
Royal College of General Practitioners
Publish guidelines on managing domestic abuse in general practice.
Actions and positions describe what organisations say in published responses. Implementation is not independently verified.
Data last updated 7 September 2026