Recurring concern
Failure to reliably recognise and treat hypovolaemia
First reported 13 Apr 2017•Latest report 13 Dec 2024
What this concern includes
Includes failures in the dedicated clinical process for recognising, assessing, escalating or treating hypovolaemia, including inadequate staff knowledge of early signs, delayed diagnosis, insufficient resuscitation and related training or guidance deficiencies.
Not included
- Excludes generic bleeding, shock or deterioration concerns where hypovolaemia is not the material unsafe condition.
- Excludes failures involving anticoagulation, haemorrhage or blood loss where no hypovolaemia recognition or treatment deficiency is identified.
- Excludes failures occurring after hypovolaemia has been reliably recognised and appropriately treated.
- Excludes generic training, staffing, communication or documentation deficiencies unless they directly impair recognition or treatment of hypovolaemia.
- Reports
- 3
- Individual concerns
- 4
- Date range
- 2017–2024
- Stated actions
- 6
Distinct published reports
A report can raise multiple concerns
First to latest report issue date
Described in published responses
Reports over time
Reports over time
Reports about this concern issued each year.
* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.
Most frequent recipients
Most frequent recipients
Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.
Concerns and responses across reports
Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.
-
Concerns raised1
Failure to recognise covert bleeding causing hypovolaemia
This report raised 15 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Responses linked to these concernsEach statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
Actions described in response An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.5
-
Action
Provide guidance on preventing and managing postpartum haemorrhage, including clinical assessment, monitoring, escalation and multidisciplinary response.
Stated by Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists -
Action
Provide guidance on maternal collapse, including early-warning observation, systematic cause identification, ongoing assessment and concealed-haemorrhage diagnosis.
Stated by Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists -
Action
Implement the OBS UK obstetric bleeding care bundle covering risk assessment, quantitative blood-loss measurement, escalation, and rapid clotting tests.
Stated by Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
-
Action
Implement the national MEWS observation package and escalation policy, including trigger-team referral and mandatory maternity-inpatient use.
Stated by Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust -
Action
Embed deterioration recognition, concealed-bleeding assessment and escalation training in PROMPT, induction, local teaching, drills and written staff communications.
Stated by Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
-
Concerns raised1
Insufficient training on the risks of hypovolaemia in anticoagulated patients
This report raised 2 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Responses linked to these concernsEach statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
Actions described in response An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.1
-
Action
Amend the INR point-of-care-testing SOP and training video to cover anticoagulant-related bleeding complications and prompt observations after clinical deterioration.
Stated by Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
-
Concerns raised2
Failure to provide adequate and timely resuscitation for hypovolaemia
Lack of knowledge and recognition of early signs of hypovolaemia
This report raised 12 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Responses linked to these concernsEach statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
No linked response statementsNo respondent-stated action or position is linked to these concerns in the published data.
Data last updated 7 September 2026