Recurring concern

Failure to reliably provide antenatal GBS screening

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 7 May 2015•Latest report 30 Jun 2016

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of arrangements to establish, offer or routinely provide antenatal GBS screening to pregnant women during the relevant late-pregnancy period, including absence of a national programme and repeated failure to offer screening through NHS maternity care.

Not included

  • Excludes intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis failures where screening provision is not the asserted unsafe condition.
  • Excludes diagnosis or treatment of established maternal or neonatal infection after screening or risk identification.
  • Excludes generic antenatal-care, maternity staffing or clinical-guidance deficiencies that do not specifically concern provision of antenatal GBS screening.
  • Excludes screening for infections other than group B Streptococcus.
Reports
2

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
2

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2015–2016

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
5

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care2
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence2
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists2
Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health2
Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    baby Dominic Smith · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Baby Dominic Smith was born on 2 June 2015 after a prolonged labour and died at approximately 18 hours of life following a collapse. The report describes pneumonia as the cause of death and identifies concerns including failure to recognise possible rupture of membranes and infection risk, inadequate maternal and neonatal observations, failure to escalate deterioration, delayed antibiotic treatment, and communication and record-keeping problems.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to routinely offer antenatal GBS screening to pregnant women during the final weeks of pregnancy

    Wider context from the report

    “Department of Health, NIHCE and the Royal Colleges: 1. I previously completed a PFD 13 month ago in relation to a neonatal GBS death. At that time I raised the following concerns: - That antenatal screening for GBS was not being routinely offered by the NHS to all pregnant women during the final weeks of pregnancy, - That prophylaxis intrapartum antibiotics were not routinely offered to all women who test positive for GBS (or have done so in the past) & - That given the seriousness of the illness, in the absence of a national screening and prophylactic treatment programme, babies were potentially being put at risk of harm/death. During the course of the inquest into Baby Smith’s death the evidence suggested that no further action has been taken in this regard, despite the responses received in relation to the last PFD action. I therefore raise the issues again as a concern. ”

    Source location

    baby Dominic Smith · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Routine antenatal GBS screening is not recommended because evidence of mortality benefit is lacking and screening may cause maternal, neonatal and antimicrobial harms.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The UK National Screening Committee does not recommend routine screening of all pregnant women for GBS carriage. We note that the National Screening Committee is due to review this recommendation again in 2015/16.”

    Source location

    2016-0240-Response-by-RCPCH
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 June 2016

    Open published response
  2. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Baby Olsberg · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Baby Olsberg was born on 23 December 2013 and developed worsening symptoms in the hours after birth. Despite medical treatment and transfer to tertiary care, he suffered three cardiac arrests and died on 24 December 2013; blood cultures confirmed GBS infection. The concerns identified were the lack of routine antenatal GBS screening and routine prophylactic intrapartum antibiotics, and the resulting potential risk of serious harm or death to babies.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to routinely offer antenatal GBS screening to all pregnant women during the final weeks of pregnancy

    Wider context from the report

    “1. That antenatal screening for GBS is not routinely offered by the NHS, to all pregnant women, during the final weeks of pregnancy. ”

    Source location

    Baby Olsberg · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review evidence and consult stakeholders to assess whether the antenatal GBS guideline requires updating.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We most recently reviewed the evidence in 2014, and after consulting with stakeholders, we decided that there was not enough new evidence to justify updating the guideline.”

    Source location

    2015-0177-Response-by-N.I.C.E
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 May 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Encourage further research into GBS screening during pregnancy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As you are aware, our guideline does not recommend routine screening for GBS. This is because there was insufficient evidence to support a positive recommendation. However, we have encouraged more research to be carried out in this area and we will keep our recommendations under review, pending new evidence emerging. Our consideration of the evidence informing this recommendation is available in the full guideline which is available on our website: www.nice.org.uk/cg62. Screening for GBS is discussed in section 10.9.”

    Source location

    2015-0177-Response-by-N.I.C.E
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 May 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Keep recommendations on antenatal GBS screening under review pending new evidence.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As you are aware, our guideline does not recommend routine screening for GBS. This is because there was insufficient evidence to support a positive recommendation. However, we have encouraged more research to be carried out in this area and we will keep our recommendations under review, pending new evidence emerging. Our consideration of the evidence informing this recommendation is available in the full guideline which is available on our website: www.nice.org.uk/cg62. Screening for GBS is discussed in section 10.9.”

    Source location

    2015-0177-Response-by-N.I.C.E
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 May 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Encourage research into the clinical and cost effectiveness of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis guided by routine antenatal GBS screening.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “You may also be interested in our clinical guideline on Antibiotics for early-onset neonatal infection (CG149, 2012). The guideline provides a framework outlining risk factors and clinical indicators that may be used to direct antibiotic management decisions. Once again, we have encouraged further research into the clinical and cost effectiveness of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis targeting group B streptococcus and guided by routine antenatal screening. Further information is available on our website at: www.nice.org.uk/CG149.”

    Source location

    2015-0177-Response-by-N.I.C.E
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 May 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish and maintain guidance on preventing early-onset neonatal Group B streptococcal disease.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The 2nd edition of the RCOG Green top guideline number 36, Prevention of Early-onset Neonatal Group B Streptococcal Disease was published on 1st July 2012. It gives guidance based on the recommendations of the National Screening Committee.”

    Source location

    2015-0177-Response-by-Royal-College-of-Obstetricians-and-Gynaecologists
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 May 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Routine GBS screening was not recommended because evidence was insufficient, and later review found insufficient new evidence to update the guideline.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As you are aware, our guideline does not recommend routine screening for GBS. This is because there was insufficient evidence to support a positive recommendation. However, we have encouraged more research to be carried out in this area and we will keep our recommendations under review, pending new evidence emerging. Our consideration of the evidence informing this recommendation is available in the full guideline which is available on our website: www.nice.org.uk/cg62. Screening for GBS is discussed in section 10.9.”

    Source location

    2015-0177-Response-by-N.I.C.E
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 May 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Local clinicians and organisations are responsible for deciding the best approach to care, using evidence and guidance provided.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I should point out that our role is to provide the evidence for decisions to be made by local clinicians and organisations on the best approach to care by providing guidance on treatments and other forms of practice. In developing the recommendations in our clinical guideline on antenatal care (CG62, 2008), we referred to the evidence-based recommendations of the UK National Screening Committee (NSC), which is part of Public Health England.”

    Source location

    2015-0177-Response-by-N.I.C.E
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 May 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Routine antenatal GBS screening is not recommended because evidence of benefit is insufficient and screening may cause harms and require substantial changes and funding.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Point 4.1 in the RCOG guidelines states that Routine bacteriological screening of all pregnant women for antenatal GBS carriage is not recommended. Until it is clear that antenatal screening for GBS carriage does more good than harm and that the benefits are cost-effective, the National Screening Committee does not recommend routine screening in the UK. Initiating national swab-based screening for antenatal GBS carriage would have a substantial impact on the provision of antenatal care within the UK. Major organisational changes and new funding would be required to ensure an equitable and quality-assured service.”

    Source location

    2015-0177-Response-by-Royal-College-of-Obstetricians-and-Gynaecologists
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 May 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Universal antenatal GBS screening is not considered necessary because evidence does not show its benefits outweigh its harms.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “evidence for programmes against a set of internationally recognised criteria. In the case of GBS carriage in pregnancy, the current evidence does not support universal screening.”

    Source location

    2015-0177-Response-by-Department-of-Health
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 May 2015

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026